Dim Democrats and the “choice” Wyden plan.
Are all Democrats stupid or do you just have to be stupid to be a Democrat? I haven’t figured that out yet.
The latest manifestation of the understanding-challenged comes with a New York Times op-ed last week by Oregon Democratic Senator Ron Wyden entitled: “Health Reform’s Missing Ingredient.” The missing ingredient, Wyden declares, is “choice.”
“My guiding principle is, and always has been that consumers do better when there is a choice and competition,” said the Senator, quoting no less an authority than President Barack Obama. Then quoting himself, he went on: “Empowering Americans to choose from a broad selection of health plans would turn the tables. Those insurers that charged affordable rates and provided good coverage would attract more customers.”
Well, isn’t that something? Newt Gingrich and the Republicans have been saying that for a decade, but let’s take up the challenge. Why not free up the insurance market from burdensome state and federal regulations and let the companies sell whatever kinds of plan they want. Consumers could make their own choices and healthcare would be no more a “crisis” than cars or television sets.
It isn’t so hard to imagine. Right here in New York I picked up a flyer in the supermarket the other day that offered the following health insurance policy:
• $5,000 per accident.
• $60,000 lifetime coverage for any of the following illness: cancer, cardiovascular, respiratory, blood and lymphoid, digestive, endocrine, musculoskelatal, nervous, skin, eyes, ears and nose diseases, etc,.
• 70 percent coverage, $100 deductible.
Not bad, eh? The cost — $37.95 a month or $455 a year. The only catch is you have to buy it for your dog. If you’re a human being, you have to pay at least $5,000 a year to buy basic protection.
Why? Because, like almost every other state, New York has regulated insurance to death. When you buy health insurance in New York, you can’t just buy a simple policy. You have to accept coverage for mental health, psychiatry, psychologists, chiropractors, alcoholism, drug abuse, midwives, podiatrists, infertility clinics, occupational therapists, speech therapists, social workers and on and on. Other states mandate everything from massage therapists to acupuncturists to hair transplants. According to the Council on Affordable Health Insurance, there are close to 2,000 state mandates, which raise the price of insurance anywhere from 20 to 50 percent. And it’s not consumers who are demanding this kind of coverage. It’s the providers who lobby the legislatures to be included so they can get paid.
The result is insurance everywhere is overpriced. But that’s just the beginning. As I outlined at length last week, the reason we have a “healthcare crisis” is precisely because so many people have managed to get out from under these state mandates while others remain stuck in them.
A long time ago, the Fortune 500 and their labor unions learned they could circumvent state regulations by setting up “self-insurance” pools for employees. Instead of buying insurance from insurance companies, the companies form their own pools and self-insure. All this is protected by the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), which trumps state regulation. (States were granted regulation of the insurance industry by the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945, which has stifled competition and turned each state into a cartelized fiefdom.) Then, thanks to the IRS, these benefit plans are also tax-free. As a result, corporations and their employees loaded up on first-dollar, no-deductible coverage. Benefits were even extended to retirees so that — as we just learned recently — every Cadillac comes loaded with $3,000 in healthcare costs.
It was a great deal for those it benefited. In Patient Power, the best book I’ve ever read on the subject, John Goodman and Robert Musgrave speculated that it is precisely these “gold-plated” benefit plans that have driven up the costs of medical care, since the system is flooded with people spending other people’s money.
The downside falls on those who are left out. If you aren’t employed in a big company or the government, or if you’re self-employed or work for a start-up or a company like Wal-Mart that’s skimping every penny, or if you lose your job with the big company, then you’re out of luck. Instead, you have to look for insurance in “the market,” which consists of people like yourself plus those who are too sick to work or have been kicked out of their ERISA plans for running up too many bills. (ERISA plans are allowed to do this because they’re not “insurance” but only “benefits.”) Meanwhile, your state insurance commission, in classic stat-sponsored-monopoly fashion, has kept competitors out of the market at the behest of other competitors so your choices are limited. All you can buy is those Christmas-tree-laden mandated policies approved by the state legislation. You’ll probably pay $5,000-10,000 a year for coverage that is costing an ERISA employee less than $1,000.
The “health insurance crisis,” then, only exists for people outside ERISA’s charmed circle. (Call up the ERISA Industry Committee — 202-789-1400 — if you don’t believe any of this.) It’s a phenomenon called “rent-seeking” where people use the government to institutionalize advantages at the expense of everybody else.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online
Michael L. Hauschild| 9.21.09 @ 11:34AM
Tucker's take on energy independence is strong, clear and rational. His opening line of this piece, however, is straight from the Quinnish handbook of sanctimonious disdain. May I remind those here that we are living through the horror of the "elections have results" theory of political circumstance due to the fact, not only did the Democrats have a winning strategy, the Republicans had a losing manifest of poor candidates, failure to focus on issues that resonated with the entire electorate, and a "my way or the highway" demeanor. Well gang, the road to 2010 is going to be long and bumpy and you are no longer driving but riding in the back seat.
Stan Redmond| 9.21.09 @ 1:08PM
Having met Wyden on several occasions here in Oregon I can firmly say the man is incredibly ignorant. BUT NOT TO BE OUTDONE, the liberals of Oregon found an equally ignorant man to join Wyden named "Jeff Merkely." These two combined are more stupid than seperate. Wyden's solution to everything is more government spending and programs and he wraps all liberal policies in the most bizaar ways. For example, when gasoline was $4 a gallon, Wyden's solution was to pump more Oregon grown food crops in to ethanol and build windmills for what he calls "filling stations" without gasoline. When it came to the abysmal job situation in Oregon Wyden's response was (paraphrase) that employers aren't hiring because health care costs are so high and our dependency on foreign oil is hampering energy costs so we must pass health care reform, cap and tax, and build more windmills. And don't get me started on his environmental policies. He's willing to bankrupt the entire nation for the sake of a few salmon. He's truly dillusional. He was kept in check by Gordon Smith but unfortunately his ignorance has exploded since Merkely joined him.
hardius| 9.21.09 @ 7:06PM
I also live in Oregon and find that your opinion of our Senators agrees with mine. Unfortunately in Washington D.C. they are the norm.
David T.| 9.21.09 @ 1:41PM
I agree, Mr. Hausfeld, that Mr. Tucker unfairly impugned Democrats in his opening line. He should have said, "Are the overwhelming majority of Democrats stupid or do you just have to be barely sentient to be a Democrat?" That would have been much more fair.
Michael L. Hauschild| 9.21.09 @ 2:02PM
DT,
"Are the overwhelming majority of Beltway Cockroaches stupid or do you just have to be barely sentient to be a Beltway Cockroach?"
Elections do not terminate cockroaches, term limits terminate cockroaches.
Real American| 9.21.09 @ 5:06PM
My guess is that Wyden is just stupid, though maybe he's lying or believes his own spin. My money is that he's stupid. If you recall, he famously couldn't find Bosnia on a map during the 1990s. Of course, the MSM let him off the hook.
Michael Tomlinson| 9.21.09 @ 7:33PM
Are all Democrats stupid or do you just have to be stupid to be a Democrat? Both are correct.
Kurt| 9.21.09 @ 10:58PM
It would be nice if it was stupidity or ignorance driving this policy of the Democrats & Republicans; but it's not, and that is what I fear. These folks are smart and determined to get control. Indeed, it has worked well and continues to work well. If I wasn't on to them we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Richard Baker| 9.22.09 @ 11:25AM
Remember, Wyden is NOT the sharpest knife in the drawer. As was said about Frank Burns on "MASH", "your (aptitude) scores say that if you hadn't been a Doctor that you would have been pastry chef." Such is Wyden.
Pingback| 9.22.09 @ 1:31PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : Lost in the Senate [spectator.org] o links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
scott| 9.24.09 @ 11:36AM
So you are saying that every ERISA plan is a great plan that people are happy with???? Many of them are very good, but some of them ARE NOT. All that Wyden is saying is if you have a CRAPPY ERISA plan (and I have had them) that you could take what you company is spending and go purchase something else. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT IDEA???
Mark| 10.13.09 @ 11:15AM
Well, wasn't it kind of stupid of the Republicans to have done nothing at all to address the problem while they controlled Congress?