The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Last Call
Print Email
Text Size

Last Call

To the Santa Barbara Station

Fifty years ago today Soviet bully Nikita Khrushchev arrived in the U.S. for a ten-day stay.

RIDING OVER THEM ON MY WAY TO CHURCH that September Sunday in 1959, I looked down at the railroad tracks beneath my bike’s tires, mindful that just a few miles down those tracks Nikita Khrushchev would soon be stopping at the Santa Barbara station, on his way from L.A. to San Francisco and soon to ride over this very same spot. Earlier that year my parents had taken my sister and me to the Airport Drive-In to see The Journey, starring Deborah Kerr and Yul Brynner, about Budapest in 1956. I knew it was Khrushchev who ordered the Soviet troops to open fire in Hungary. Brynner played an honorable Russian in that movie (how could he not be honorable, having met Deborah Kerr?). He was free to visit any time. But I didn’t want Khrushchev anywhere near my home.

Not everyone agreed. According to my hometown News-Press, some 2,000-2,500 locals greeted him during his 13-minute layover, which saw him leave the train for some smiles and waves, “appearing more as a whistle-stopping Harry Truman than the boss of world Communism,” as the paper put it. Later he would thank the town’s mayor for being so cordial, in contrast to L.A. Mayor Norris Poulson, who nearly caused an international crisis the previous night with his thunderous denunciation of Khrushchev. Those were the days.

Many of them are captured by veteran journalist Peter Carlson in his excellent recreation of Khrushchev’s ten-day visit to America, K Blows Top (Public Affairs). Anyone who remembers those times knows they occurred only yesterday-50 long years ago. From that perspective it’s easy to laugh the visit off as a “Cold War comic interlude,” as Carlson does in his subtitle. At the same time Carlson, in that knowing anti-anti-Communist way of his former employers at the Washington Post, is also too apt to dismiss anger at Khrushchev’s visit as the product of disgruntled East Europeans or Republican pols like Paulson playing for votes. For all the thoroughness of his research, he seems rather unmoved by the brutality of Communist rule and Russian history.

Perhaps I was expecting too much from someone whose serious interest in the Khrushchev visit began when he still worked for People magazine. Thus it’s only fitting that the worst putdown of Khrushchev in the book comes from a blonde bombshell. Despite playing nice with him during the Hollywood phase of his trip-at a big studio lunch, which Bing Crosby and Ronald Reagan declined to attend-Marilyn Monroe would later tell her maid, “He was fat and ugly and had warts on his face and he growled.” Incidentally, until I read Carlson’s book I didn’t know Khrushchev was barely five feet tall.

Several Americans distinguished themselves during this trip, first and foremost President Eisenhower, who was cool and businesslike throughout and both firm and cordial in the limited contact the two men did have. Ike’s discomfort was forever captured in the photo of him squeezed between Khrushchev and Mrs. K. in the back seat of the presidential limousine for the ride into D.C. from Andrews. One suspects he was happy the U-2 shootdown the following year kept him from having to make a return visit to the USSR.

Henry Cabot Lodge, U.S. Ambassador to the UN and later Richard Nixon’s running mate in 1960, went beyond the call of duty as Khrushchev’s escort in New York and across America. Yet for reasons best known to the Boston Brahmin or moderate Republican in him, he felt compelled to address the standard Soviet critique of rapacious capitalism. At a banquet at the Waldorf-Astoria, Lodge told Mr. K. and the 2,000 in attendance that what some call “monopoly capitalism” is actually “economic humanism.” “We live in a welfare state which seeks to put a floor beneath which no one sinks,” he proudly noted.

Others there were less defensive. After Khrushchev delivered his remarks, someone asked him about the unavailability of U.S. media in the USSR. Mr. K did not like the tenor of the question. “Answer the question,” a heckler shouted. Harry Schwartz would report in the New York Times, “No one who was there will soon forget an angry, red-faced Khrushchev waving his fist in the air at the audience.” That’s how I remember him.

About the Author

Wlady Pleszczynski is editorial director of The American Spectator and the editor of AmSpec Online.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (12) |

Marc Jeric| 9.15.09 @ 4:44PM

I remember a later visit to the US by that butcher of Ukraine. He wanted to visit the Disneyland one lunch hour; the 405 freeway was loaded with people going to or coming back from theit lunches. Khrushchev accused the American government of ordering the citizens to get to the freeway in order to impress him falsely of American prosperity. Imagine - that a##hole in charge of the world's destiny!

Richard Baker| 9.15.09 @ 5:00PM

Kruschchev, despite all his PR, was a servant of Josef Stalin and completed the murder of many on order from the Kremlin. I remember the hue and cry about Disneyland and I'm glad he didn't get to go.

Alan Brooks| 9.16.09 @ 8:32PM

Krushchev's only lasting contribution, as far as I know, was his secret speech of '56--
the year Stalin posthumously relinquished power.

Paul Crowley| 9.17.09 @ 12:47PM

"I knew it was Khrushchev who ordered the Soviet troops to open fire in Hungary." [Wlady Pleszczynski].

Such a "well informed" teenager (if even that old in '59).

Khrushchev was the Soviet Premier between 1958 and 1964.

A rather overly-serious, possibly moody, kid, as well:
“RIDING OVER THEM ON MY WAY TO CHURCH that September Sunday in 1959, I looked down at the railroad tracks beneath my bike's tires, mindful that just a few miles down those tracks Nikita Khrushchev would soon be stopping at the Santa Barbara station, on his way from L.A. to San Francisco and soon to ride over this very same spot.”

So much for the term “Spectator” in the title The American Spectator.
Political essayists looking upon events at a distance of 40-60 years, but certainly not disinterestedly.

More Orwell-dubbed “Prol-Feed” manure from The American Spectator for 65-years-old, and under, underclass Americans.

Paul Crowley| 9.17.09 @ 12:54PM

"his secret speech of '56--the year Stalin posthumously relinquished power." [Alan Brooks| 9.16.09 @ 8:32PM]

Stalin died in 1953.

It's not true that Stalin 'held on to power,' posthumously, from 1953-1956.

More Articles by Wlady Pleszczynski

More Articles From Last Call

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/15/to-the-santa-barbara-station

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT