By Brett Joshpe on 9.11.09 @ 6:07AM
On Monday Judge Richard Goldstone is expected to release his
report on Israel's recent Gaza incursion. It's not expected to be
anything but extremely critical.
Richard Goldstone's much anticipated fact-finding report on
Operation Cast Lead is scheduled to be released prior to the
start of the UN Human Rights Council's next session on September
14. The report is likely to direct disproportionate criticism at
Israel and its military for its conduct during the Operation.
After all, the Goldstone Commission's original mission was "to
investigate all violations of international human rights law and
international humanitarian law by the occupying power, Israel,
against the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip,
due to the current aggression." One of the members of the
Goldstone Commission, Christine Chinkin, even signed a letter
earlier this year condemning Israel for committing war crimes.
Knowing that the Commission had already reached it conclusion,
Israel refused to participate in the investigation.
The Human Rights Council is the successor to the UN Human Rights
Commission, which sponsored the infamously anti-Semitic Durban
Conference in 2001. So far, the Council seems determined to carry
on tradition with its biased and unjustified focus on Israel.
It is only part of a full-fledged assault on Israel since it
responded to Hamas rocket attacks last December with Operation
Cast Lead. Groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights
Watch have been publishing reports accusing Israel of committing
war crimes and crimes against humanity and urging the
International Criminal Court (ICC) to exercise jurisdiction. The
Arab League commissioned an "Independent Fact Finding Committee,"
headed by John Dugard, accusing Israel of the same and imploring
the ICC to prosecute Israelis. Dugard is also working with
organizations to petition South African courts to prosecute
Israelis.
Israel has attempted to refute many of the misleading and
inaccurate claims with its own report, reminding the public that
Hamas -- whose charter states "there is no solution to the
Palestinian problem except Jihad" -- launched nearly 3,000
rockets and mortar shells at Israel in 2008 alone, and that it
stored weapons in schools, mosques, U.N. facilities, and homes,
while using medical facilities and ambulances for military
purposes during Operation Cast Lead. Israel also provides
extensive evidence that Hamas used "human shields," whereas
Amnesty and the Arab League concluded there was no evidence of
such tactics. (Please go to YouTube and type in "Fathi Hamad" to
draw your own conclusion.)
Israel also details how it used extreme care to avoid civilian
casualties, employing a comprehensive warning system that
included distributing millions of leaflet warnings in Gaza and
systematically checking and cross-checking targets to avoid
striking civilians. And the IDF refused to strike Shifa hospital,
where Hamas established its main headquarters, because of the
risk of civilian collateral damage.
Israel is still in the process of conducting its own
investigations into allegations of wrongdoing, examining
approximately 100 complaints, including 13 criminal
investigations. The investigations are then subject to review by
the Military Advocate General (MAG), who is independent from the
IDF command hierarchy, and then subject to further review by the
Attorney General and then the Supreme Court of Israel. If there
is sufficient evidence for an indictment, then the MAG Corps will
proceed with prosecutions in the Military Courts. For anyone who
thinks that the process is rigged or that Israel cultivates a
"culture of impunity," consider that from 2002 through 2008,
1,467 criminal investigations were opened into alleged soldier
misconduct, 140 indictments issued, and 103 defendants convicted.
Despite propaganda from critics, Israel's internal integrity is
well respected internationally. In fact, the National Court of
Spain recently rejected universal jurisdiction over previous
incidents in Gaza because Israel is investigating the matters
itself, and its system is sufficiently independent and impartial.
The ICC and South Africa's National Prosecuting Authority should
follow their lead and remove themselves from the political fight.
Don't expect the Goldstone Report to reach the same conclusion.
topics:
Israel, United Nations, Gaza