8.11.09 @ 6:01AM
Ben Stein has many friends and admirers. The New York Times does not. A special Reader Mail.
EXPELLING THE LIBERAL MEDIA
Re: Ben Stein's
Expelled From the New York Times:
Ben Stein's column about his "demise" at the NYT was a
delight to read as it was well-crafted, thoughtful, and in his
person as in I could hear him saying the words to his keyboard.
Please pass along my best wishes and tell him that I will
continue to read his thoughts any time and anywhere.
-- John Wilson
Chicago, Illinois
Loved your article from Ben Stein. Wrote the editor at the NY Times. They will lose some of their one hundred subscribers they have left, the thinking ones. I asked the NY Times editor how he liked running a propaganda rag. There was once some integrity in the media, with a desire to report the news, instead of being bought and paid for hacks who sail the American people down the river. Shame on them.
Thanks for the article from Mr. Stein.
-- Jeff Belinski
Having read Ben Stein's piece on his treatment by the minions at
the New York Times, I am reminded of the old saying,
"When one lays down with dogs, one should not be surprised to
wake up with fleas." In this
case, nasty fleas with a taste for Shaq memorabilia on the cheap.
I pray for Ben to be delivered from the itching and hurt dealt
him by the fleas.
-- Reid Bogie
Waterbury, Connecticut
Fuhgeddaboudit -- it's their loss and soon no one will care what
that bunch of intellectually dishonest snobs thinks anyway. The
sad story is the loss of any semblance of interest in discovering
truths that conflict with liberal ideology by the Times.
I'm sure Mr. Stein will go on to better things.
-- Allen Churchill
Mandeville, Louisiana
I love this guy. We need more written by him, not less. Treatment
by Times was going to happen eventually -- Darwinists
are very vindictive. I pray for them as well.
-- Mike Abel
Auburn, Indiana
Dear Mr. Stein… As I refuse to have the NYT in my house,
I was unaware of this contretemps. Congratulations on your
emancipation.
-- H. Jensen
You have always been in my opinion a very honest, intelligent person with great insights and perspectives; the New York Times is becoming the opposite in some of their departments.
I would say this will change when they have to get new balanced
management to financially save the paper.
-- John Lee
I have enjoyed your work; all of it: writing; TV; Academy Award acting, etc. I am surprised that you would be upset in getting fired by the NYT. That you were there is unusual. You don't need certification from the NYT for me to follow your writings and other work.
Wit and balloon puncturing are not products that the obsolete NYT publishes, especially if you are outside the NYT Canon. You have a brand that out-ranks the NYT certification. Keep selling and producing the Ben Stein brand.
I get the following papers delivered in the morning:
NYT, WSJ, FT and of course my
favorite, the New York Post. I spend the least time with
the NYT. Not just because it slants the news and pushes
an agenda, (we are all subject to that) but, also because it does
not include news that does not fit the NYT story line.
Editing important news out is fatal to a news organization. It is
the Internet that I rely on for information. How you can find a
way to profit from the wide audience of Internet readers is your
challenge. The NYT is of no help there. How about a
humorous movie?
Good luck
-- Jim Needham
I have had the good fortune to meet you. We chatted at a dinner in Philadelphia hosted by a Morgan Stanley private equity conference three or four years ago. Because there was an attractive 30-something sitting between us, you may not remember this unattractive 50-something. We mostly discussed your Nixon days (big history fan, here) and you told me you were at the White House when he made his good-bye speech to the staff. What a historical moment.
Anyhoo, I just read your article which got my blood pressure to
spike like it always does when the mainstream media reveal
themselves. Ditto the posted comments. Good luck in your next
adventure.
-- Kent
Please lose no sleep over the Times; I will read you
wherever I can find your essays. I just subscribed to
TAS for your weekly columns. You so mind-melded into my
consciousness with your piece on Get a Dog; Ferris
Bueller's Day Off is one of my favorites; I am not
embarrassed to say that I am a 56-y/o male physician. Thanks for
your work and presence.
-- John VanderWoude, MD, FACS
Ben Stein is simply right and thank you for giving him a forum. I
have read nothing of the NY Times in years with the
exception of him and so now, I need not even open one for that.
And the Times wonders why it is hemorrhaging readership?
Maybe it's because they do nothing and provide nothing whatsoever
of value to the nation anymore. The day they file Chapter 11 will
be a great day for the free media. I truly hope for all its
pathetic liberal editors that day comes soon! Then, maybe they'll
see what government care is really all about, unemployment lines,
welfare lines, foreclosure lines.... Yes, a good dose of reality
for the Times and its publisher is coming. Meanwhile,
those of us that admire and respect Ben Stein will still be
watching for him in other places!
-- Louis Deaux
Too bad the NYT is so biased and extremest. They just
got rid of a truly entertaining and independent
thinker. Just one more reason to no longer read
their paper. Mr. Stein will continue on and thrive and I will
enjoy his writings and musings in other venues. As for the
NYT continuing......who knows!!!
-- Michaeleen Toler
Welcome to the ever-expanding list of those who dare publicly
oppose the anointed one. The control freak in charge of this
country will do anything to quell dissent, including his snitch
website. Do you think the union representing the Times,
along with the ownership of the Times didn't have
anything to do with your release? Please, neither of us is so
naïve as to believe that. Political dissent is a right afforded
only to the left. We are seeing an interesting reawakening across
America as an informed public is starting to wake up to the
stench of Cap and Trade and Obamacare. It really is
about control after all. "Community organizers" are actively
suppressing open debate, town hall meetings are organized to
exclude opposition points of view, and American citizens who dare
exercise their First Amendment rights are labeled "traitors" by
the Speaker. Be happy you just lost a small gig, I expect in the
future it will be far more egregious than this. Welcome back to
the fold, Ben, we missed you.
-- Greg Mercurio
Vacaville, California
I love Ben Stein and so do my friends. I will read anything he writes anywhere, anytime, anyhow. I'm glad I can read him on your website. Thanks.
Gosh, I wish a rich conservative would just buy the NYT
and end all the misery.
-- Nancy Cohen
You know from previous letters I love you and your sometimes
somewhat overly sensitive nature. I tend to identify with you in
so many ways although I am not Jewish and decidedly not an
intellectual or genius as you definitely are. But Ben, have you
forgotten the old saying when you lie down with pigs you are
going to get mud all over you. Your exit from the fabled but alas
now decadent NYT was predestined as soon as you joined
it. Your kind cannot long be countenanced at the "Old Grey
Lady"as William Kristol found out more quickly than you did.
Years ago when I worked for the old GM (the good GM) we were
provided with the NYT and the WSJ daily with
the rationale that one could not be informed or educated if one
did not read these publications. Still true for the WSJ
despite the inevitable changes, but the NYT is now
nothing more than a propaganda sheet for all liberal causes no
matter how questionable -- and worse -- it is usually
dishonest.
-- Jack Wheatley
Royal Oak, Michigan
I've always enjoyed reading Ben Stein and have had much
admiration for his principled stand on many topics. But he seems
to have lost track of his principles when he let the
Times kill his article critical of Obama. He should have
left then and there. He obviously didn't stay for economic
reasons. Apparently the adulation of the Times was too
intoxicating to leave. Not firing the Times when it
dictated what he could write was Mr. Stein's real conflict of
interest, and he only has himself to blame for this debacle. The
other "Steyn" (Mark Steyn) dropped the Times like a bad
habit when that paper altered one of his articles. I still enjoy
Mr. Stein immensely. But let's hope that now that he has left the
dark side he's got his senses back.
-- Robert G. Dailey
I have enjoyed and respected Ben Stein's endeavors from Ferris Bueller to Win Ben Stein's Money to his columns.
And I believe his account of his shabby treatment at the hands of the NYT after having the chutzpah to write critical words about Obama from a mildly right of center perspective (what a shocker that Pinch's minions would have reacted to him like that--who'd a thunk it, huh?).
BUT... if one wants to be taken seriously as a columnist, then
one shouldn't do commercials for cheesy "free" credit report
outfits, sorry "free credit score" outfits. It certainly is Ben
Stein's right to make money legally however he wishes. But this
isn't the same as doing silly commercials that leverage the
Ferris Bueller persona: it was a mistake. Not a legal or
ethical mistake, but a mistake in judgment nonetheless. I hope
Mr. Stein does some introspection on this so he can return to the
land of columnists who deserve to be taken seriously since he
long ago earned that right.
-- Anthony C. Deutsch
I always thought the main problem with Intelligent Design was the notion of an Intelligent Designer.
As for the New York Times…I can't remember if I said it
here before, but I know I said it somewhere: If they go out of
business tomorrow, I'll just do somebody else's crossword
puzzle.
-- Robert Nowall
Cape Coral, Florida
Please tell Ben Stein that he is fantastic and we love him!!
He is a great American!
-- Greg Allison
Jackson, Tennessee
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
By George Will
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
Home |About |Contributors |Advertise |Donate |Privacy Policy |Contact
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.
Copyright 2012, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.