The American Spectator

Charles| 8.3.09 @ 7:59AM

Your Country, Israel, is a Theocracy of Judaism. What do the holy texts say? Let's read them.

"If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death" Leviticus 20:12-14

I see no merit in your argument.

Paul| 8.3.09 @ 8:54AM

If there was another terrorist attack on New York
how much support would you give to the people who preach hatred against America?

Galen| 8.3.09 @ 9:08AM

A little learning is a dangerous thing...there would have to be a trial of the individuals. Shooting up the cafe by a free lancer would be a sin.

Joe| 8.3.09 @ 9:28AM

Well said Jay. We on the right could easily do the same and with more examples. However, we choose not to stoop that low.

VIRUS MISSING IN USA| 8.3.09 @ 12:37PM

April 22, 2009 -- Updated 0050 GMT (0850 HKT)
Share this on:
Mixx

Twitter

Digg

delicious

reddit

MySpace

StumbleUpon

Army: 3 vials of virus samples missing from Maryland facilityStory Highlights
Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis samples missing from Army facility

Virus sickens horses, can be spread to humans through mosquitoes

Investigators say vials may have been in freezer that was destroyed

So far, investigators have found no evidence of criminal activity

Next Article in U.S. »

From Larry Shaughnessy
CNN Pentagon Producer

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Missing vials of a potentially dangerous virus have prompted an Army investigation into the disappearance from a lab in Maryland.

Fort Detrick is the home of the Army's top biological research facility.

The Army's Criminal Investigation Command agents have been visiting Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland, to investigate the disappearance of the vials. Christopher Grey, spokesman for the command, said this latest investigation has found "no evidence of criminal activity."

The vials contained samples of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis, a virus that sickens horses and can be spread to humans by mosquitoes. In 97 percent of cases, humans with the virus suffer flu-like symptoms, but it can be deadly in about 1 out of 100 cases, according to Caree Vander Linden, a spokeswoman for the Army's Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. There is an effective vaccine for the disease and there hasn't been an outbreak in the United States since 1971.

The vials had been at the research institute's facility at Fort Detrick, home of the Army's top biological research facility, for more than a decade. The three missing vials were among thousands of vials that were under the control of a senior scientist who retired in 2004. When another Fort Detrick scientist recently inventoried the retired scientist's biological samples, he discovered that the three vials of the virus were missing. The original scientist's records about his vials dated back to the days of paper-and-pen inventories.

During the investigation, the retired scientist and another former Fort Detrick researcher cooperated with investigating agents and, according to Vander Linden, they came back to the facility to help look for the vials

Ses sting Catholic priest| 8.3.09 @ 12:52PM

Sting that caught priest started in Kansas City
BY ROBERT PATRICK, The Southern News Services
Monday, August 3, 2009 4:17 AM CDT
ST. LOUIS -- The FBI pedophile sting that snared a Catholic priest and two other men here marked just the second time nationally that a tough federal sex trafficking charge was used to target demand for child prostitutes, officials said Friday.

The first, “Operation Guardian Angel,” began in March when Independence, Mo., and Kansas City police, FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents posted Craigslist ads advertising young girls.

Officials eventually arrested and charged seven, including a car dealership finance manager from Mississippi who allegedly intended to pay $60 for sex with a 15-year-old girl. During the e-mail conversations leading up to his visit, prosecutors said the man asked, “Is she willing or do you have to hold her down?”

Another suspect was a Navy recruiter accused of using his government computer and cell phone to arrange sex for $60 with an 11-year-old girl.

Both allegedly paid $20 extra to forgo a condom.

Don Ledford, spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in western Missouri, would not say how many people had responded, but he said the ads and ensuing e-mail and phone conversations left no doubt that underage girls were being offered.

The sex trafficking charge is normally used to pursue pimps and carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in prison, with higher minimums applying to those seeking sex with younger girls.

In St. Louis, a similar operation led to charges Thursday against the Rev. James P. Grady, pastor of St. Raphael the Archangel Church in south St. Louis. It also nabbed a man who works for a landscaping company and another who works for a bank. All posted bail.

History of a people| 8.3.09 @ 12:54PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jewish History, Jewish Religion
The Weight of Three Thousand Years
Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Notes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Book Review:

When the Roman historian Tacitus pointed out 19 centuries ago that the Jews are unique among the peoples of the world in their intense hatred and contempt for all peoples but their own, he was only repeating what many other scholars had discovered before him. For the next 1,900 years other investigators came to similar conclusions, either from a study of the Jews' religious writings or from a study of the Jews' behavior toward non-Jews.

Notable among these was the reformer, Martin Luther, who in 1543 wrote in "Von den Juden und Ihren Lugen":

"Does not their Talmud say, and do not their rabbis write, that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob, as they do with their usury, from a heathen is a divine service. For they hold that they cannot be too hard on us nor sin against us, because they are of the noble blood and circumcised saints; we, however, are cursed goyim. And they are the masters of the world, and we are their servants, yea, their cattle...

"Should someone think that I am saying too much, I am not saying too much, but much too little. For I see in their writings how they curse us goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and their prayers."

The Jews responded to Luther like they responded to all the others. They put him down as just another "hater," blinded by religious bigotry. And today that's still the Jews' standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about them except the most fawning praise.

Rabbi from Hell| 8.3.09 @ 1:01PM

Lubavitch Manis Friedman the Nazi rabbi from HELL:

Chabad rabbi: Jews should kill Arab men, women and children during war
By Nathaniel Popper, The Forward

Like the best Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis, Manis Friedman has won the hearts of many unaffiliated Jews with his charismatic talks about love and God; it was Friedman who helped lead Bob Dylan into a relationship with Chabad.

“But Friedman, who today travels the country as a Chabad speaker, showed a less warm and cuddly side when he was asked how he thinks Jews should treat their Arab neighbors.”

“The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle),” Friedman wrote in response to the question posed by Moment Magazine for its “Ask the Rabbis” feature.

Friedman argued that if Israel followed this wisdom, there would be “no civilian casualties, no children in the line of fire, no false sense of righteousness, in fact, no war.”

“I don’t believe in Western morality,” he wrote. “Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention.”

Friedman’s use of phrasing that might seem more familiar coming from an Islamic extremist has generated a swift backlash. The editor of Moment, Nadine Epstein, said that since the piece was printed in the current issue they “have received many letters and e-mails in response to Rabbi Friedman’s comments – and almost none of them have been positive.”

Friedman quickly went into damage control. He released a statement to the Forward, through a Chabad spokesman, saying that his answer in Moment was “misleading” and that he does believe that “any neighbor of the Jewish people should be treated, as the Torah commands us, with respect and compassion.”

But Friedman’s words have generated a debate about whether there is a darker side to the cheery face that the Chabad-Lubavitch movement shows to the world in its friendly outreach to unaffiliated Jews. Mordecai Specktor, editor of the Jewish community newspaper in Friedman’s hometown, St. Paul. Minnesota, said: “The public face of Lubavitch is educational programs and promoting Yiddishkeit. But I do often hear this hard line that Friedman expresses here.”

“He sets things out in pretty stark terms, but I think this is what Lubavitchers believe, more or less,” said Specktor, who is also the publisher of the American Jewish World.

“They are not about loving the Arabs or a two-state solution or any of that stuff. They are fundamentalists. They are our fundamentalists.”

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League and a regular critic of Arab extremists, said that in the , “We are not immune to having these views. There are people in our community who have these bigoted, racist views.”

But, Foxman warned, Friedman’s views are not reflective of the Chabad rabbis he knows. “I am not shocked that there would be a rabbi who would have these views,” Foxman said, “but I am shocked that Moment would give up all editorial discretion and good sense to publish this as representative of Chabad.”

A few days after anger about the comment surfaced, Chabad headquarters released a statement saying that, “we vehemently disagree with any sentiment suggesting that Judaism allows for the wanton destruction of civilian life, even when at war.”

The statement added: “In keeping with Jewish law, it is the unequivocal position of Chabad-Lubavitch that all human life is G-d given, precious, and must be treated with respect, dignity and compassion.”

In Moment, Friedman’s comment is listed as the Chabad response to the question “How Should Jews Treat Their Arab Neighbors?” after a number of answers from rabbis representing other Jewish streams, most of which state a conciliatory attitude toward Arabs.

Epstein said that Friedman was “brave” for stating his views so clearly.

“The American Jewish community doesn’t have the chance to hear opinions like this,” Epstein said, “not because they are rare, but because we don’t often ask Chabad and other similar groups what they think.”

The Chabad movement is generally known for its hawkish policies toward the Palestinians; the Chabad Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, rejected peace accords with the Palestinians. Rabbi Moshe Feller, the top Chabad rabbi in Minnesota, said that the rebbe taught that it is not a mitzvah to kill, but that Jews do have an obligation to act in self-defense.

“Jews as a whole, they try to save the lives of others,” Feller told the Forward, “but if it’s to save our lives, then we have to do what we have to do. It’s a last resort.”

Friedman is not a fringe rabbi within the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. He was the English translator for the Chabad Rebbe, and at the rebbe’s urging, he founded Beis Chana, a network of camps and schools for Jewish women. Friedman is also a popular speaker and writer on issues of love and relationships. His first book, “Doesn’t Anyone Blush Anymore?” was promoted with a quote from Bob Dylan, who Friedman brought to meet the rebbe.

On his blog and Facebook page, Friedman’s emphasis is on his sympathetic, caring side. It was this reputation that made the comment in Moment so surprising to Steve Hunegs, director of the Jewish Community Relations Council: Minnesota and the Dakotas.

“Rabbi Friedman is a best-selling author who addresses some of the most sensitive issues of the time,” Hunegs said. “I intend to call him and talk to him about this.”

But Shmarya Rosenberg, a blogger and critic of Chabad who lives a few blocks from Friedman in Minnesota, says that the comment in Moment is not an aberration from his experiences with Friedman and many other Chabad rabbis.

“What he’s saying is the standard normal view of a Chabadnik,” Rosenberg said. “They just don’t say it in public.”

For his part, Friedman was quick to modify the statement that he wrote in Moment. He told the Forward that the line about killing women and children should have been in quotes; he said it is a line from the Torah, though he declined to specify from which part. Friedman also said that he was not advocating for Israel to actually kill women and children. Instead, he said, he believed that Israel should publicly say that it is willing to do these things in order to scare Palestinians and prevent war.

“If we took this policy, no one would be killed – because there would be no war,” Friedman said. “The same is true of the United States.”

Friedman did acknowledge, however, that in self-defense, the behavior he talked about would be permissible.

“If your children are threatened, you do whatever it takes – and you don’t have to apologize,” he said.

Friedman argued that he is different from Arab terrorists who have used similar language about killing Jewish civilians.

“When they say it, it’s genocide, not self-defense,” Friedman said. “With them, it’s a religious belief – they need to rid the area of us. We’re not saying that.”

Feller, the Chabad leader in Minnesota, said that the way Friedman had chosen to express himself was “radical.”

“I love him,” Feller said. “I brought him out here – he’s magnificent. He’s brought thousands back to Torah mitzvah. But he shoots from the hip sometimes.”

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1091469.html

First they’ll kill the Arabs and their cattle, then they’ll come after the rest of us ‘gentiles’ and our animals, too – unless we stop them first!

Crimes against the people| 8.3.09 @ 1:09PM

President, Murderer, Lecturer, AuthorIt’s NO Mystery to Canadians! »American severely wounded by Israeli troops
Posted by terres on March 24, 2009

American man severely wounded by Israeli troops
Israel must take full responsibility for the shooting of our son. —Mike Anderson, Victim’s Father
From Guardian UK
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/8418011

By DIAA HADID - Monday March 23, 2009

American Peace Activist Tristan Anderson, 38, from Oakland, Calif., was severely wounded after he was hit in the forehead and face by a tear gas canister fired at him by Israeli troops in the town of Naalin, in the West Bank, March 13, 2009. Photo AP. Image may be subject to copyright.

Associated Press Writer JERUSALEM (AP). The parents of an American man severely wounded by Israeli troops during a West Bank protest have asked Israeli police to launch an investigation, their lawyer said Monday. Tristan Anderson, 38, from Oakland, Calif., was struck in the head by a tear gas canister fired by members of Israel’s paramilitary border police in the Palestinian village of Naalin on March 13.

Anderson had joined a protest against Israel’s separation barrier, which cuts off Naalin from 300 acres of olive groves. In the past year, four Palestinians were killed in Naalin by Israeli troops quelling weekly stone-throwing protests against the barrier, according to Israeli human rights group B’tselem.

The couple’s lawyer, Michael Sfard, said he asked Israel’s police to launch an investigation.

The Andersons, of Grass Valley, Calif., held back tears Monday as they described their son’s critical condition. “We don’t know if he’ll recover, and if he does, we don’t know what abilities he will ever regain,” his mother, Nancy, told reporters.

His father, Mike, said Israel must “take full responsibility for the shooting of our son.”

Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said Anderson’s injury was “an extremely regrettable result of rioting.”

The incident is under investigation, the Israeli military has said, though it is not clear if police will investigate separately.

Rachel Corrie

Rachel Corrie lies on the ground fatally injured by the Israeli military bulldozer driver. Rachel’s fellow activists have dug her a little out of the sand and are trying to keep her neck straight due to spinal injury. Picture taken at 4:47PM on 16 March 2003, Rafah, Occupied Gaza. Photo by Joseph Smith. (ISM Handout)

Rachel Aliene Corrie (April 10, 1979 – March 16, 2003) was an American member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) who traveled to the Gaza Strip during the Second Intifada. She was killed when an Israeli soldier drove his bulldozer over her as she protested against the destruction of Palestinian homes by the Israeli Occupation Forces in the Gaza Strip.

Israeli Occupation Forces murdered Rachel Corrie, but they couldn’t kill her spirit.

Tom Hurndall
Tom Hurndall a student and a British peace activist was shot in the head the 11 April 2003 as he tried to help a Palestinian woman and her children flee Israeli gunfire. Tom Hurndall was shot as he moved towards the family in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. He was wearing a fluorescent orange vest, and witnesses say that there had been no exchange of fire between the Israeli army and Palestinian gunmen that day. —Near

Tom Hurndall was in a coma for nine months after being shot in the head by an Israeli sniper on April 11, 2003. He died January 13, 2004. Source

James Miller

James Miller, a British cameraman, was shot dead by Israeli soldiers. Photo source: Mona Baker

James Henry Dominic Miller (18 December 1968 – 2 May 2003) was a British (Welshman) cameraman, producer, director and recipient of numerous awards, including five Emmy Awards. He was murdered by a single shot fired by a an Israeli military sniper on 2 May 2003 while filming a documentary in Rafah. The soldier who shot him was identified as Captain Hib al-Heib.

… Tristan Anderson ‘hanging by a thread’

The Israeli military has said there was heavy stone-throwing and troops fired tear gas during the demonstration, though protesters said the stone-throwing was sporadic. Anderson did not throw any stones and was struck after he had returned to the village, witnesses said.

Rights activists say Israeli troops often use excessive force in dispersing West Bank protests, and fire tear gas canisters directly as protesters, using them as a weapon, rather than a means to disperse crowds.

The Israeli military says stone-throwing poses a threat to troops, and several officers have been injured by rocks. The military said troops used permitted means of riot dispersal, such as tear gas, rubber-coated steel pellets and stun grenades.

About 450 people have been injured, 12 of them seriously, in a year of Naalin protests, organizers say.

Israel says the barrier prevents Palestinian attackers infiltrating into Israel. Palestinians say it’s a land grab because it juts into the West Bank.

This entry was posted on March 24, 2009 at 4:26 am and is filed under International Solidarity Movement, Israeli military snipers, James Miller, Rachel Corrie, Tom Hurndall. Tagged: Israeli troops, Naalin, Occupied Palestine, Tristan Anderson, west bank. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “American severely wounded by Israeli troops”

Herspirit said
June 14, 2009 at 12:05 am
[Unintelligent remark. Edited. TERRES]

American man severely wounded| 8.3.09 @ 1:26PM

American man severely wounded by Israeli troops
Israel must take full responsibility for the shooting of our son. —Mike Anderson, Victim’s Father
From Guardian UK
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/8418011

By DIAA HADID - Monday March 23, 2009

Nazi Rabbi from hell| 8.3.09 @ 1:35PM

Nazi rabbi from HELL
Posted by terres on June 10, 2009

submitted by a reader

Chabad rabbi: Jews should kill Arab men, women and children during war
[And if there was no war, hell we could create one!]

How could he say that and get away with it? Unless he is convinced that the majority of us, “we the people,” believe Arabs are terrorists and the jews are our “saviors.”

But judging by the people’s recent awakening, and their responses to both the bombing of USS Liberty by Israeli forces and the controlled demolition of WTC towers on 9/11 by the jewish mafia and other supporters of Israel, the rabbi has scored a number of own goals.

Chabad-Lubavitch rabbi has also grossly miscalculated the average ‘gentile’ (goyim) appreciation of the seriousness of the traditional jewish plot which, as reiterated put by the rabbi, “to fight a moral war [sic] is the jewish way.”

Based on what is said in Torah, which the evil rabbi repeats, we know the jews won’t stop their killing orgy until they have killed not only every Arab men, women and children (and cattle), but every gentile (goyim), like you and I, and our families (and animals), too, in the US, Europe, Asia and elsewhere … They have built a massive stockpile of nuclear bombs (warheads and very many “suitcase bombs” that are currently unaccounted for), which would be used to blow most of our cities to smithereens.

Below are some of the comments made by Chabad-Lubavitch Manis Friedman the Nazi rabbi from HELL:

Chabad rabbi: Jews should kill Arab men, women and children during war
By Nathaniel Popper, The Forward

Like the best Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis, Manis Friedman has won the hearts of many unaffiliated Jews with his charismatic talks about love and God; it was Friedman who helped lead Bob Dylan into a relationship with Chabad.

“But Friedman, who today travels the country as a Chabad speaker, showed a less warm and cuddly side when he was asked how he thinks Jews should treat their Arab neighbors.”

“The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle),” Friedman wrote in response to the question posed by Moment Magazine for its “Ask the Rabbis” feature.

Friedman argued that if Israel followed this wisdom, there would be “no civilian casualties, no children in the line of fire, no false sense of righteousness, in fact, no war.”

“I don’t believe in Western morality,” he wrote. “Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention.”

Friedman’s use of phrasing that might seem more familiar coming from an Islamic extremist has generated a swift backlash. The editor of Moment, Nadine Epstein, said that since the piece was printed in the current issue they “have received many letters and e-mails in response to Rabbi Friedman’s comments – and almost none of them have been positive.”

Friedman quickly went into damage control. He released a statement to the Forward, through a Chabad spokesman, saying that his answer in Moment was “misleading” and that he does believe that “any neighbor of the Jewish people should be treated, as the Torah commands us, with respect and compassion.”

But Friedman’s words have generated a debate about whether there is a darker side to the cheery face that the Chabad-Lubavitch movement shows to the world in its friendly outreach to unaffiliated Jews. Mordecai Specktor, editor of the Jewish community newspaper in Friedman’s hometown, St. Paul. Minnesota, said: “The public face of Lubavitch is educational programs and promoting Yiddishkeit. But I do often hear this hard line that Friedman expresses here.”

“He sets things out in pretty stark terms, but I think this is what Lubavitchers believe, more or less,” said Specktor, who is also the publisher of the American Jewish World.

“They are not about loving the Arabs or a two-state solution or any of that stuff. They are fundamentalists. They are our fundamentalists.”

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League and a regular critic of Arab extremists, said that in the , “We are not immune to having these views. There are people in our community who have these bigoted, racist views.”

But, Foxman warned, Friedman’s views are not reflective of the Chabad rabbis he knows. “I am not shocked that there would be a rabbi who would have these views,” Foxman said, “but I am shocked that Moment would give up all editorial discretion and good sense to publish this as representative of Chabad.”

A few days after anger about the comment surfaced, Chabad headquarters released a statement saying that, “we vehemently disagree with any sentiment suggesting that Judaism allows for the wanton destruction of civilian life, even when at war.”

The statement added: “In keeping with Jewish law, it is the unequivocal position of

Coup against America| 8.3.09 @ 1:43PM

skip to main | skip to sidebar Monday, January 19, 2009
The Zionist Plan and US Military Intelligence.

According to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (LATEST EVIDENCE ON THE VERACITY OF THIS REMARKABLE DOCUMENT), the Zionist plan is to:

Destroy all financial stability.

Increase economic depressions to the extent of bringing a general world bankruptcy.

Stop the wheels of industry.

Make bonds, stocks and paper money worthless.

Accumulate all the gold of the world in the hands of a certain few people thus withdrawing tremendous capital from circulation.

At a given hour close all the exchanges, withdraw all credits and cause general panic."

In 1850, The Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu was written by the Jew Jacob Venedey.

In 1864, the Jew Maurice Joly (Joseph Levy) wrote The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published around 1897, the year of the first Zionist Congress.

The Protocols appear to have some similarities to those two earlier books, which may themselves be based on an earlier text.

16.45 % of the passages in Joly's Dialogues are the same as the Protocols.

(http://mailstar.net/toolkit.html)

The Protocols was published by Professor Sergius Nilus.

Nilus stated that he got the Protocols from dissident Jews who knew about a plot to destroy existing societies and create a world government.

A declassified US Military Intelligence document (The Power And Aims Of International Jewry.) from 1919 suggests the Protocols Of Zion were taken very seriously by US intelligence.

According to the document:

"Some of the important events which have occurred since 1897 have fulfilled in a striking manner the predictions and aims expressed in the Protocols themselves...

"The coming of a world war is predicted which the Jews are to secretly promote.

"The creation of the chaos of Bolshevism is described as to be worked out by Jews all over the world as a step towards Jewish world dominion."

Northcliffe, who died in mysterious circumstances.

In May 1920 Lord Northcliffe published an article about the Protocols in The Times.

The article was entitled The Jewish Peril.

In 1921 Northcliffe became ill.

He complained he was being poisoned

In 1921, the Times changed its mind and produced a series of articles suggesting the Protocols was a forgery.

On 14 August 1922 Lord Northcliffe died, aged 57.

The cause of death stated was 'ulcerative endocarditis..

The John JACOB Astor took over the Times in 1922.

The Times became pro-Zionist.

Jesus said to certain Jews: "If God was your Father, you would love me... You are of (your) father the devil..."(John 8:39)

~~

Posted by Anon at 7:16 PM
Labels: Protocols
0 comments:
Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) Blog Archive
▼ 2009 (497)
▼ August (6)
China and Israel in Nigeria.
'Strange' events have struck each of these countri...
Lisbon, Ireland...
THE PENTAGON'S FRIEND - PRABOWO?
Young student writes about his love life.
Show Some Guts
► July (89)
NASTY 'CHINESE EMPIRE'?
UK's Gary McKinnon has lost his appeal; time to bo...
'DISINFORMATION' ON MANCHESTER UNITED AND THE JAKA...
THE RUSSIAN-GERMAN ALLIANCE?
INDONESIA'S 'MASTERS OF TERROR' ARE SPLIT?
Manchester United, graft wars and the Udayana Mili...
PLOTS IN JAKARTA
Sex Scandals
Kingpin
Gladio-style terror in Istanbul, New York, Jakarta...
JAKARTA HOTEL BOMBS: WESTERN MEDIA STORY COLLAPSES...
Who are the real spooks?
Bad Boys
SARKOZY VERSUS OBAMA ON IRAN?
Alleged child sex slavery in Saudi Arabia
Sex in Iran
Illuminati, Music Industry and WHY MICHAEL JACKSON...
Same Old Game
Noreen and Johnny Gosch.
Kopassus, Cilacap and the Jakarta hotel bombs.
In Britain, the Health Service is as badly managed...
CIA BOMBS IN THE PHILIPPINES?
Bashir blames the CIA.
INDONESIA BURNING
ANTHONY BLUNT
THE USE OF PATSIES IN THE JAKARTA HOTEL BOMBINGS?
The New Face
THE USA, ISRAEL AND THE JAKARTA HOTEL BOMBS
Controlled
HOW DANGEROUS ARE MOSLEMS?
There appears to be more than one Mohammad Ajmal A...
USA SEEKS CONTROL OF INDONESIA?
Eight Years Old
ECONOMIC HITMAN IN INDONESIA
Did Crown Prince Rudolph really die at Mayerling?
NOORDIN TOP WORKS FOR THE SECURITY SERVICES?
GENERAL PRABOWO LINKED TO JAKARTA HOTEL BOMBS?
Experts want new 9 11 investigation
JAKARTA HOTEL BOMBS, THE MILITARY AND THE CIA
Mystery
The Daily Mail asks: Did MI5 kill the UK Governmen...
Did Tsar Nicholas II of Russia escape to England?
The Classic American Liberal.
Why Advertising Is Failing On The Internet
►

)
►

In 1921 Northcliffe | 8.3.09 @ 1:48PM

In 1921 Northcliffe became ill.

He complained he was being poisoned

In 1921, the Times changed its mind and produced a series of articles suggesting the Protocols was a forgery.

On 14 August 1922 Lord Northcliffe died, aged 57.

The cause of death stated was 'ulcerative endocarditis..

The John JACOB Astor took over the Times in 1922.

The Times became pro-Zionist.

Jesus said to certain Jews: "If God was your Father, you would love me... You are of (your) father the devil..."(John 8:39)

China &Israel; in Nigeria| 8.3.09 @ 2:00PM

In 2006, we learnt that China had secured four oil drilling licences from Nigeria.

"In exchange China will invest $4bn (£2.25bn) in oil and infrastructure projects in Nigeria.

"China will buy a controlling stake in Nigeria's 110,000 barrel-a-day Kaduna oil refinery and build a railroad system and power stations."

(BBC NEWS Business China and Nigeria agree oil deal)

Nigeria has become an important source of oil and petroleum for China's rapidly growing economy and Nigeria is looking to China for help in achieving high economic growth; China has provided extensive economic, military and political support.[3][4]

Two countries that may not be entirely happy with Nigeria are the USA and Israel.

As early as the 1970s, Nigeria was supplying more than 50% of Israel’s crude oil in exchange for military hardware. (Cached)

Several top officers in the Nigerian army have had links to Israeli businessmen and security agents. (Cached)

In 2008, in Nigeria, members of the National Assembly expressed concerned about the alleged invitation of Mossad to train Nigeria's security services under a secret security pact.
_________________________________

Where does Israel get this Military hard wear? from America free, they are out dated so they sell what they got free to stupid Goyims the Blacks they consider Dogs. It breaks my heart that people can't learn.

The Israeli get they oil FREE, for their old Weapons. The oil they get free, in exchange for their old guns, and then stir up trouble between the christians & the Moslems, and the old weapons they got free from America they give to the Africans they use it to kill each other.

I would laugh only it's not funny. The USA is speaking up to Africa, but they don't mean them anygood.

Alkali Ike| 8.3.09 @ 2:04PM

According to the previous moonbat posts, John JACOB Astor was a Jew! I guess Dwight DAVID Eisenhower and ABRAHAM Lincoln must be, too. Hmmm. . . and the Pope's name is Ratzenberger-- sounds Jewish to me! In fact, everyone is a Jew except the poster. Could it be Charles, again?

Learning is the answer| 8.3.09 @ 2:05PM

Old Texan you are living in a fools dream world, who is having a laugh. Play both side of a war, or both side of every situation and come out laughing, with loads of money.

The only thing that is a Jewish God is Molec, and it's not the same god as yours if you are a Goyim look up what the words mean and stop being a dam fool.

KyMouse| 8.3.09 @ 2:31PM

I've been asking this when these anti-Jewish screeds are posted, but none of the posters has ever had the guts to reply:

Would you Jew-haters please just cut to the chase and say what you would LOVE to see done to Jewish people -- you know, to carry out Hitler's "final solution"? All you ever do is try to lure us over to your side, but you should tell us your bottom line. So come on -- what's YOUR "final solution"?

Then slink on back to Hell, which is where you came from, and where you will be for eternity.

Covert US JewOperation in Iran| 8.3.09 @ 2:42PM

Best of the Web The CIA and the Iranian experiment: From Mossadegh to Ahmadinejad

Thierry Meyssan
VoltaireNet
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:54 UTC

The news of alleged election fraud has spread through Tehran like wildfire, pitching ayatollah Rafsanjani's supporters against ayatollah Khamenei's in street confrontations. This chaotic situation is secretly stirred by the CIA which has been spreading confusion by flooding Iranians with contradicting SMS messages. Thierry Meyssan recounts this psychological warfare experiment.

© Voltaire Net

In March 2000, the Secretary of State Madeleine Albright admitted that the Eisenhower administration organized a regime change in 1953 in Iran and that this historical event explained the current hostility of Iranians towards the United States. Last week, during the speech he addressed to Muslims in Cairo, President Obama officially recognized that « in the midst of the cold war the United States played a role in the toppling of a democratically elected Iranian government » [1].

At the time, Iran was controlled by a puppet monarchy headed by the Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. He had been placed on the throne by the British who forced his father, the pro-Nazi Cossack officer Reza Pahlavi to resign. However, the Shah had to deal with a nationalist Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh. Mossadegh, with the help of ayatollah Abou al-Qassem Kachani, nationalized the oil resources [2]. Furious, the British persuaded the United States that the Iranian dissent needed to be stopped before the country became communist. The CIA then put together Operation Ajax to overthrow Mossadegh with the help of the Shah, and to replace him with Nazi general Fazlollah Zahedi who until then was detained by the British. Zahedi is responsible for having instituted the cruelest terror regime of the time, while the Shah would cover his exactions while parading for Western 'people' magazines.

Operation Ajax was lead by archeologist Donald Wilber, historian Kermit Roosevelt (grandson of president Theodore Roosevelt) and general Norman Schwartzkopf Sr. (whose son with the same name lead Operation Desert Storm). This operation remains a textbook example of subversion. The CIA came up with a scenario that gave the impression of a popular revolt when in reality it was a covert operation. The highpoint of the show was a demonstration in Tehran with 8 000 actors paid by the Agency to provide credible pictures to Western media [3].

Is History repeating itself? Washington renounced to a military attack on Iran and has dissuaded Israel to take such an initiative. In order to « change the regime », the Obama administration prefers to play the game of covert actions - less dangerous but with a more unpredictable outcome. After the Iranian presidential elections, huge demonstrations in the streets of Tehran are pitching supporters of president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and supreme leader Ali Khamenei on one side, to supporters of defeated candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi and former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani on the other. The demonstrations are a sign of a profound division in the Iranian society between a nationalist proletariat and a bourgeoisie upset at being held back from economic globalization [4]. With its covert actions, Washington is trying to weigh on the events to topple the re-elected president.

Once again, Iran is an experimental field for innovative subversive methods. CIA is relying in 2009 on a new weapon: control of cell phones. Since the democratization of mobile phones, Anglo-Saxon secret services have increased their interception capability. While wired phones' tapping requires the installation of branch circuits - and therefore local agents, tapping of mobile phones can be done remotely using the Echelon network. However, this system cannot intercept Skype mobile phones communications, which explains the success of Skype telephones in conflict areas [5]. The National Security Agency (NSA) therefore lobbied world Internet Service Providers to require their cooperation. Those who accepted have received huge retribution [6].

In countries under their occupation - Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan - , the Anglo-Saxons intercept all telephone communication, whether mobile or wired. The goal is not to obtain full transcripts of any given conversation, but to identify « social networks ». In other words, telephones are surveillance bugs which make it possible to know who anyone is in touch with. Firstly, the hope is to identify resistance networks.

Secondly, telephones make it possible to locate identified targets and «neutralize» them. This is why in February 2008, the Afghan rebels ordered various operators to stop their activity daily, from 5PM to 3AM, in order to prevent the Anglo-Saxons to follow their whereabouts. The relay antennas of those that refused to comply where destroyed [7].

On the contrary, with the exception of a telephone exchange which was accidentally hit, Israeli forces made sure not to hit telephone exchanges in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead from December 2008 to January 2009. This is a complete change in strategy. Since the Gulf War, the most prevalent strategy was colonel John A. Warden's « five circles theory »: the bombing of telephone infrastructures was considered a strategic objective to both confuse populations and to cut communication lines between commanding centers and fighters. Now the opposite applies: telecommunication infrastructures must be protected. During the bombings in Gaza, the operator Jawwal [8] offered additional talk time to its users - officially to help them but de facto serving Israel's interests. Going one step further, Anglo-Saxons and Israeli secrets services developed psychological warfare methods based on an extensive use of mobile phones. In July 2008, after the exchange of prisoners and remains between Israel and Hezbollah, robots placed tens of thousands of calls to Lebanese mobile phones. A voice speaking in Arabic was warning against participating in any resistance activity and belittled Hezbollah. The Lebanese minister of telecommunications, Jibran Bassil [9], files a complaint to the UN against this blatant violation of the country's sovereignty [10]. Following the same approach, tens of thousands of Lebanese and Syrians received an automatic phone call in October 2008 to offer them 10 million dollars for any information leading to the location and freeing of Israeli prisoners. People interested in collaborating were invited to call a number in the UK [11].

This method has now been used in Iran to bluff the population, to spread shocking news and to channel the resulting anger.

First, SMS were sent during the night of the counting of the votes, according to which the Guardian Council of the Constitution (equivalent to a constitutional court) had informed Mir-Hossein Mousavi of his victory. After that, the announcing of the official results - the re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with 64 % of cast votes - seemed like a huge fraud. However, three days earlier, M. Mousavi and his friends were considering a massive victory of M. Ahmadinejad as certain and were trying to explain it by unbalanced campaigns. Indeed the ex president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani was detailing his grievances in an open letter. The US polling institutes in Iran were predicting a 20 points lead for M. Ahmadinejad over M. Mousavi [12]. M. Mousavi victory never seemed possible, even if it is probable that some fraud accentuated the margin between the two candidates.

Secondly, Iranian citizens were selected or volunteered on the Internet to chat on Facebook or to subscribe to Twitter feeds. They received information - true or false - (still via SMS) about the evolution of the political crisis and the ongoing demonstrations. These anonymous news posts were spreading news of gun fights and numerous deaths which to this day have not been confirmed. Because of an unfortunate calendar overlap, Twitter was supposed to suspend its service for a night to allow for some maintenance of its systems. The US State Department intervened to ask them to postpone it [13]. According to the New York Times, these operations contributed to spread defiance in the population [14].

Paranoid Jewish people| 8.3.09 @ 2:48PM

No one hates Jewish people it's all in the mind due to guilt. Its called being paranoid, due you absolute evil spoken of in the Bible.

Spies & Assassins in Israel| 8.3.09 @ 2:55PM

Share |

Last update - 20:14 21/06/2009

Mossad chief kept on for another year to monitor Iran

By News Agencies

Tags: Israel News, Mossad

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday extended the tenure of Mossad chief Meir Dagan for an eighth year, a testament to the spymaster's perceived success in waging shadow wars against Iran and its allies.

Dagan, a former commando and retired general, took over Mossad in 2002 with what security sources described as a mandate to monitor and sabotage the Iranian nuclear program ahead of any decision by Israel to launch full-scale preemptive strikes.

The Mossad has also been credited with spotting an alleged Syrian nuclear reactor which Israel bombed in 2007, and with assassinating Islamist guerrillas such as Imad Moughniyah of Lebanon's Hezbollah militia, who was slain in Damascus in 2008.
Advertisement

"This is an excellent man who, at the head of an excellent team, has improved the country's capabilities," an aide to Netanyahu quoted him as telling the Israeli cabinet in its weekly session.

The son of Holocaust refugees, Dagan, 64, has spearheaded assessments that a nuclear-armed Iran would present a mortal threat to Israel. Iran - which denies seeking the bomb - could produce its first such warhead by 2014, Dagan said last week.

He also played down prospects of the current civil upheaval over Iran's disputed June 12 election leading to a change in government, but said Tehran could be persuaded to curb sensitive nuclear technologies if U.S.-led sanctions are intensified.

Failing that, Israel, which is widely assumed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal, has hinted at a military option, though many analysts think Iranian sites are too dispersed and fortified for its air force to take on alone.

That leaves covert action as a stop-gap countermeasure, something Israeli officials privately confirm is under way.

Western media reports have spoken of Mossad involvement in sabotage at Iranian nuclear facilities and sneak attacks on Iranian scientists and military personnel. Iranian media have reported the disruption of some suspected Israeli spy cells.

Mossad's purview is "human intelligence" - recruited agents with first-hand information about, and access to, enemy plans. Security sources say this has lent Dagan authority among Israeli decision-makers reluctant to design their Iran strategy around satellite pictures or electronic eavesdropping transcripts.

Mossad's headquarters, north of Tel Aviv, has almost doubled in size since 2002 - an indication of Dagan's budgetary clout.

"If there is one service that has brought us close to knowing what's really going on in Iran, it's Mossad," said a recently retired government official, who formerly had a top post in a rival Israeli spy agency.

Israel's military top brass and civilian defense chiefs generally serve for four years, with a traditional one-year extension. Dagan's tenure was extended twice before. He is now due to step down in 2010

The stories yet to be told| 8.3.09 @ 3:10PM

Revisionist History: beyond the gatekeepers

Hoffman

The Courage to Speak Truth to Power

Now in its third printing

A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit

The most comprehensive decryption of Orthodox Judaism published in English
Massive, Textbook-size Hardcover. 1102 pages. 1 map. 164 illustrations. $45 plus shipping

Judaism is not a normal adversary, it is an exceptional recrudescence of the guile and cunning synthesized from the accumulated intelligence of the eternal pagan psychodrama on which it is based....One of the most refractory intellectual and practical difficulties that scholars of integrity face in the post-modernist era is deciding how to apply to Judaism the same critical scrutiny to which Christianity and Islam are subjected, without being defamed as a "hater." —Michael Hoffman

Two ways to obtain your copy of this banned book:

Print out our order form, mail it in, and pay by check or money order
This method of payment helps us the most because we do not have to pay a fee to the credit card companies or to Paypal when you pay by check or money order (we do not sell, trade, loan, give away or otherwise divulge or disclose the identities of our customers)

Order online with your VISA or Mastercard at our secure, convenient store
We offer this service for your convenience
_________________________________________________________________________________________

Distributors wanted
Wholesale rates on multiple copies for resale or distribution
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Why Hoffman wrote it and what he is trying to accomplish with his new book:
Read this hate-free, life-affirming essay, Judaism Discovered: A Desideratum

Dr. Henry Makow's endsorsement
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Don't curse the darkness - Light the candle of Truth
Citizen-journalist Michael Hoffman's
News Bureau
Online deconstruction of the establishment's reality distortion field

Our News Bureau is temporarily located here

Please Help
Your donations are Vital to the continuation of our website
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Judaic Front-Group Secretly Promotes Neo-Nazism

The holocaust about which the West is mostly in denial
The effect of Israeli mass murder in Gaza six months later

Top "Holocaust"-hoaxer exposed
Simon Wiesenthal: Liar Extraordinaire

The Myth that fat from Judaics was made into soap

Calling Israelis "Nazis" may become a crime in Britain

Israeli troops give war crimes testimony

Israeli war criminal: General Yoav Gallant

Letter from a Supporter
_______________________________________________________________________________________

"If a Jew kills a gentile, the Jew is to go free."
--Babylonian Talmud: Sanhedrin 57a

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Talmudic justice, Israeli style: Ze'ev Braude shot two Palestinians and got out of jail free
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Fifth century Orthodox Church discovered in Connecticut?

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Abortion
"...I had thought that at the time Roe (v. Wade) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of...." New York Times Magazine, July 12, 2009

War criminals who are professors at Tel Aviv University

Their favorite name for Jesus Christ
The Bastard Epithet in Talmudic Judaism

Ray| 8.3.09 @ 3:27PM

It looks like we know who's responsible for the slaughter of the innocents in this case. That would be the very person who's been posting anti-Semitic rants in a effort to justify the murder of Jewish gays. BTW, isn't there something in the Koran about killing Jews wherever they are found?

Hardius| 8.3.09 @ 3:42PM

Even God waits until people are dead before he judges them.

Devil rituals| 8.3.09 @ 3:52PM

CHAPTER 1

HUMAN SACRIFICE
A SEMITIC TRADITION

IT is incontestable that the ancient "Semites" manifested a peculiar leaning towards the practice of bloody sacrifices to their gods.

Typical is the Jewish story of Abraham offering to slay with a knife his first-born, Isaac, as an offering to Yahweh who had commanded him so to do. More typical still is the Semitic idea that his god would require such a murder to be done.

In Excavations at Gezer, R. A. S. Macalister tells us that the bodies of sacrificed young children were
found in all semitic strata; this work describes the remains of these victims of which pictures are given.

Isaiah charges the Jews with "enflaming themselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clifts of the rocks" (lvii, 5). There are many other Old Testament references to the practice of sacrificing children to Moloch.

Says the Rev. J. Kitto in the Cyclopaedia of Biblical Literature 1895, "their altars smoked with human
blood from the time of Abraham to the fall of the Kingdoms of Judah and Israel."

G. A. Dorsey writes in Civilization (Hamish Hamilton): "Historically their temple at Jerusalem, like a Hindu or Aztec temple, was a shambles--one sacrifice after another."

The Jewish Encyclopedia (1904, Vol. VIII, p. 653) says: "The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that in the last days of the kingdom human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh as King or Counsellor of the Nation and that the Prophets disapproved of it ...."

Jesus Himself speaking to the Pharisees (St. John, viii, 44) charges them with being hereditary murderers, which term can have no other meaning than ritual murderers. "Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do; he was a murderer from the beginning." This is in the Book on which "witnesses" are sworn when they give evidence against "anti-semites" who expose the murder of Christian children by Jews!

John8 verse44| 8.3.09 @ 3:55PM

John 8 Verse 44. Explains a lot, even Jesus found the idea disgusting.

dcd| 8.3.09 @ 4:41PM

This blog is getting ridiculous. Advertising, gibberish, antisemitism, poetry, copied articles, etc. This space is for comment and debate. If the admins don't start excercing a bit more prudence the whole comments section will be a lost cause.

Federale| 8.3.09 @ 5:51PM

The left exists only as an exploiter of tragedy. Whether it is the pain and suffering of the poor, the sad perversity of homosexuality, generational angst, race, etc. There is no situation or problem not exploited by the radical left for their benefit. Just look at how they ignore the execution of women and homosexuals in Iran, but then condemn for their own benefit the murder of homosexuals and women in the west.

Crimes & Genocide is evil| 8.3.09 @ 6:40PM

Today 50 Palestinians was evicted from their homes they have kived in for 56 years by looter, and mass murders. Why don't you write about that you bunch of criminals.

What about the 1400 people killed women and children December to January2009. Should we forget them because it the Jewish Ritual murders way.

When did two Homosexual Jews became so valuable? In Christianity it's an abomination.

Jewish Ritual Murders| 8.3.09 @ 6:42PM

Book of cabbalistic theosophy. The passage runs:

"Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the lawful method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the High God."

Dr. Bischoff may be right. I venture no opinion.

Nevertheless, the Jewish Laws do tell us something; without any direct sanctioning of Ritual Murder, they show us without any possibility of doubt, that the Jew is normally at war spiritually with the rest of mankind, and upon this argument I base my statement that Jewish Laws show ample foundation for the scientific investigator to take the view that there is nothing improbable in the reality of Jewish Ritual Murder I am not going to take the same line as other anti-Jewish investigators have done about this matter; I am not going to quote any Mosaic Laws nor any Talmudic tenets. I am simply going to quote the great explorer and orientalist, Sir Richard Burton, a Briton who made it his business to Study the Talmud closely and recorded his conclusions on the relations it revealed as existing between Jew and Gentile. I quote now from his The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, edited by W. H. Wilkins, and published by Messrs. Hutchinson in 1898.

Page 73. "The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish belief is that the Ger, or stranger, in fact all those who do not belong to their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than the fauna of the field." I have long known this to be the Key of International Politics; and it shows that what would be Murder to an Aryan is only Slaughter to a Talmudic Jew.

Page 81. "The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the Lord, viz: (1) that of
the Paschal holocaust; (2) that of circumcision." (The Paschal holocaust is the Easter sacrifice.)

I suppose every nation has the God it deserves and admires. What sort of a people is this whose God Ends the blood obtained from mutilations of human genital organs as "pleasing"?

Sir Richard Burton comments:

Page 115. "Obviously such cruel and vindictive teaching as that recounted in the previous chapter must bear fruit in crime and atrocities."

The Jewish Schulchan Aruch, which codified the teachings of the Talmud, goes much further in sanctioning shameful practices against the Gentile; I do not quote it because my object is not to excite retaliation, but to mark down the Jews as having been
responsible, either collectively or individually, for ritual murders. I want the Gentile to take steps to
remove the Jews from our midst by expulsion to a National Home of their own, and by legal means.

Love thy Neighbours| 8.3.09 @ 6:47PM

I have noticed the hatred of Muslim, Semetic people. No Jew would complain if there was a 1000, comments by Jews to kill Semetic Arabs. These Nazi criminals are heartless beasts.

Love thy neighbours, that is what Christianity is about.

Hold on to reality| 8.3.09 @ 6:51PM

Hardius| 8.3.09 @ 3:42PM
Even God waits until people are dead before he judges them.
_________________________________

Hello Dead people don't know nothing. God do not judge Dead people Jews Judge people who are alive, and Mass murder Palestinians, and plot murders, for money. Plot wars to Bankrupt Nations.

TheTruthNothing; but the truth| 8.3.09 @ 6:56PM

Time all the truth was out about this Devil people was made public, once and for all and leave them nothing to hide behind.

elle| 8.3.09 @ 7:29PM

The American Spectator is becoming hostage to Jew hating cretins. Perhaps the website administrator should review the posts and consider appropriate action.

History can not hide| 8.3.09 @ 8:11PM

CHAPTER VI

COULDN'T HAPPEN NOW?

THIS argument, "It couldn't happen now," seems quite good enough for a lot of people when it is applied to the matter of Jewish Ritual Murder. It is, perhaps, comforting to the democratic mind to think that "Progress" ensures that such an evil practice, even if it occurred in unenlightened days, could not have survived to-day. I wish I could see any comfort in this argument, but I don't. There are no facts to support it.

That the Aryan peoples have progressed I do-not deny; but I do not think there is any evidence to show any like progress among some of the other races.

Compare the following two happenings, noting the dates:

A.D. 117. From the account of Dio Cassius in 78th Book of his history Chapter 32:

"Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also its Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 40,000 were slain."

A.D. 1936. From Daily Mail, 17th September (describing the horrors of the Red Revolution in Spain):

"Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by shooting, hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive. Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of God, had their religious medals with the figure of the Virgin, nailed into the sockets of their eyes.

"La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo, who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered.

"Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being buried alive as they fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen writhing above the ground."

I cannot see much difference in outlook between the Jewish devils responsible for both these massacres, even though there are 15 centuries between them!

In view of that, why boggle at the idea of Jewish Ritual Murder still surviving?

Why make such a fuss when Jews are charged with the practice of Ritual Murder? Other Asiatics are known to have practised it until 1850, and, if left to themselves, would doubtless have maintained the custom.

In India, from 10,000 to 50,000 murders were perpetrated every year by a religious body known as the Thugs. They were mostly people of Mahommedan extraction, but a number of Hindus were also involved. They used to worship Kali, the Hindu goddess of destruction. Their custom was to club together, generally as travellers, when they would slowly gain the confidence of some innocent person, and at a given signal, would strangle him in a prescribed manner, which they regarded as a religious duty; then they would rob him if he had anything to be robbed of, and bury the body with such skill as to leave no trace. The Thugs actually received the protection of some of the native princes and chiefs who were thoroughly frightened of their power as a secret religious sect. How this reminds us of the attitude of the influential men in this country who adopt the same view of Masonry and Jewry!

Then the British Government decided the thing must stop. After many years of investigation, Sir W. H. Sleeman stamped out the Thug sect, and no Thuggee murders are on record since 1850. He found that Thuggee was hereditary among male members of a family, and he achieved his object by confining in segregation for life all male members of Thug families.

Now my point is that Thuggee happened; and happened in the 19th century until the British put an end to it under Sleeman. It was a long time before the British administration learned of the existence of Thuggee, so carefully was it concealed; another analogy with Jewish Ritual Murder!

"It couldn't happen now." Why not?

And on 13th September, 1937, a telegram was sent to The Times from Delhi reporting the sacrifice of a 17-year-old youth to propitiate the rain-god, in Sirmoor State. The youth was led through the village of Gunpur by a crowd of people headed by a priest and the village headman, and beheaded on a special altar to the accompaniment of devotional songs. The head was found by the police at the foot of the deity in the village temple.

As Aryan rule over India relaxes, Thuggee and other human sacrifices will re-appear.

"It couldn't happen now." Why not, again?

Here is an extract from Magick by the "Master Therion", published in 1929 by the Lecram Press, 26 Rue d'Hautpool, Paris, pp. 94-5:

". . . it was the theory of the ancient magicians that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal, and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape.... For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable

A footnote on p. 95 says "(4) It appears from the Magical Records of Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 e.v. and 1928 e.v."

This footnote refers to the last sentence in the paragraph quoted above.

"It couldn't happen now." Why not, in the Devil's name?

Sir Richard Burton show us that the disappearance of children at Passover was talked of in Rome and in the other towns of Italy throughout the early part of the 19th century when efficient policing was unknown, as also throughout the century at Smyrna and other places in the Levant and in Turkey.

It couldn't happen now? But the Jewish method of cattle slaughter happens now and is specially exempted from the objects of the Slaughter of Animals Act, 1933, which Act orders that all cattle for Gentile food must be stunned with a mechanically-operated instrument before the throat is cut. The Jewish method is cutting the throat from ear to ear without any previous stunning. It has been condemned by a Government Commission held in 1904 as failing in rapidity, freedom from unnecessary pain and instantaneous loss of sensibility. Yet it "happens now" and is protected in this our England, by an English Law, and remains unattacked by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

Why couldn't it happen now?

To this day, we learn from Jewish sources (B'nai B'rith Messenger, California, 3rd April, 1936) that the Samaritans, an unorthodox Jewish sect who keep Passover by solar computation, indulge in bloody sacrifices of animals on that feast-day; an account is given of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in the 20th century, and these word, are used:

"I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is withdrawn from the neck of the lamb of sacrifice."

Here is a paragraph from a periodical which shall be unnamed, of 1936, showing that the urge to the "Mysteries" is not dead:

"The sophisticated Pharisee of the 20th century unceasingly gives thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves as victimised by that person whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint praise. Riddles are irksome. The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise?"

Alongside this clotted nonsense was a picture of a ritual murder, with the victim crucified, below it, a portrait of the author, an obvious Jew.

I take it that- "it would happen now" if this Jew had his way!

Satans Children| 8.3.09 @ 8:23PM

CHAPTER VII

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE EXPULSION OF 1290

THE first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I do not deny the possibility of some of them in which details are lacking, being "trumped-up" ones, where death may have been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.
1144- Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

In J. C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder of St. William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935) says: "Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." How these modern enquiries arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

John Foxe's Arts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this Ritual Murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

1160- Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. Recorded in Monumenta Germania Historica, Vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.

1181- Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause 'miracles.' Authority: Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.

1192- Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in Jewish Encyclopedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.

1232- Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in Hyamson's History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, membrane 8, 26.6. 1232.

1235- Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, "They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks." Further authority Huillard Breolles Grande Chronique, III, 86. Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23.

1244- London. A child's body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul's. Authority: Social England, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.

1255- Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed.

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows:

"The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation."

At a recent visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in 1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: "That he (St. Hugh) was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age." The Chancellor on the same occasion said: "It was quite obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well."

These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for their statements; it couldn't have happened, they say. Why not?

Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been, ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn's Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when it said of this case "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Lincoln, for which 18 are hanged"? There are no 'ifs' and 'buts' here! Or does Copinus's confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, "For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice."

No one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaised Gentiles unite in denying the fact of Ritual Murder.

Strack, in his The Jew and Human Sacrifice, written in defence of the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress's Tale (Canterbury Tales) of Chaucer and is referred to in Marlowe's Jew of Malta. Hyamson's History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to "Little St. Hugh of Lincoln," showing the importance of the Ritual Murder issue in the Jewish mind today.

The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh: Henry III, 39, m. 2,7.10 1255; 39, m. 2,14.10.1255; 40, m. 20, 24.ii.. 1255; 40,m.13,13.3.1256; 42, m. 6; 19.6.1258. And the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40,m.20,26.11.1255; 40,m.19,9.12.1255; 40,27.3.1256; and 40,m.5, 20.8.1256.

1257. London. A child sacrificed. Authority: Cluverius. Epitome Historia, p. 541. Details lacking.

1276. London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276.

1279. Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged." Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. I5; H. Desportes, Le Mystere du Sang.

1290. Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June, 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.

The reader will see (p. 20) that it was a similar ritual case which was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel professing Jews from that country in 1492.

The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by Ritual Murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the Kings of England, against whose moral character no one else has dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. From the Jewish Chronicle Supplement, April, 1936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln case in the reign of Henry III):

"Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I, the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century writers of history began to examine the old records in a new sceptical temper, some may be found venturing on such unkind surmises as that the alleged crucifictions of Christian children only seemed to happen when kings were short of money." The foul accusation against men of upright character is repeated by the Jew Hyamson (History of the Jews in England, 1928 edition, p. 21), writes: "it has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed replenishing."

To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of Lincoln were Jewish Ritual Murders is to accuse certain English Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators, known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St. William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the Sheriff would take no action himself.

Whom do you believe the Jews or the English?

"It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial and so frequent." So says Social England concerning Ritual Murders in England Vol. I, p. 407, I893, edited by H. D. Traill.

A significant fact is that Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the last century.

Ritual killings in Europe| 8.3.09 @ 8:29PM

CHAPTER VII

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE EXPULSION OF 1290

THE first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I do not deny the possibility of some of them in which details are lacking, being "trumped-up" ones, where death may have been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.
1144- Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

In J. C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder of St. William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935) says: "Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." How these modern enquiries arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

John Foxe's Arts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this Ritual Murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

1160- Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. Recorded in Monumenta Germania Historica, Vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.

1181- Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause 'miracles.' Authority: Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.

1192- Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in Jewish Encyclopedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.

1232- Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in Hyamson's History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, membrane 8, 26.6. 1232.

1235- Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, "They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks." Further authority Huillard Breolles Grande Chronique, III, 86. Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23.

1244- London. A child's body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul's. Authority: Social England, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.

1255- Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed.

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows:

"The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation."

At a recent visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in 1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: "That he (St. Hugh) was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age." The Chancellor on the same occasion said: "It was quite obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well."

These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for their statements; it couldn't have happened, they say. Why not?

Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been, ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn's Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when it said of this case "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Lincoln, for which 18 are hanged"? There are no 'ifs' and 'buts' here! Or does Copinus's confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, "For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice."

No one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaised Gentiles unite in denying the fact of Ritual Murder.

Strack, in his The Jew and Human Sacrifice, written in defence of the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress's Tale (Canterbury Tales) of Chaucer and is referred to in Marlowe's Jew of Malta. Hyamson's History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to "Little St. Hugh of Lincoln," showing the importance of the Ritual Murder issue in the Jewish mind today.

The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh: Henry III, 39, m. 2,7.10 1255; 39, m. 2,14.10.1255; 40, m. 20, 24.ii.. 1255; 40,m.13,13.3.1256; 42, m. 6; 19.6.1258. And the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40,m.20,26.11.1255; 40,m.19,9.12.1255; 40,27.3.1256; and 40,m.5, 20.8.1256.

1257. London. A child sacrificed. Authority: Cluverius. Epitome Historia, p. 541. Details lacking.

1276. London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276.

1279. Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged." Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. I5; H. Desportes, Le Mystere du Sang.

1290. Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June, 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.

The reader will see (p. 20) that it was a similar ritual case which was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel professing Jews from that country in 1492.

The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by Ritual Murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the Kings of England, against whose moral character no one else has dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. From the Jewish Chronicle Supplement, April, 1936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln case in the reign of Henry III):

"Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I, the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century writers of history began to examine the old records in a new sceptical temper, some may be found venturing on such unkind surmises as that the alleged crucifictions of Christian children only seemed to happen when kings were short of money." The foul accusation against men of upright character is repeated by the Jew Hyamson (History of the Jews in England, 1928 edition, p. 21), writes: "it has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed replenishing."

To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of Lincoln were Jewish Ritual Murders is to accuse certain English Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators, known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St. William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the Sheriff would take no action himself.

Whom do you believe the Jews or the English?

"It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial and so frequent." So says Social England concerning Ritual Murders in England Vol. I, p. 407, I893, edited by H. D. Traill.

A significant fact is that Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the last century.

CHAPTER VII

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE EXPULSION OF 1290

THE first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I do not deny the possibility of some of them in which details are lacking, being "trumped-up" ones, where death may have been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.
1144- Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

In J. C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder of St. William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935) says: "Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." How these modern enquiries arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

John Foxe's Arts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this Ritual Murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

1160- Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. Recorded in Monumenta Germania Historica, Vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.

1181- Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause 'miracles.' Authority: Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.

1192- Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in Jewish Encyclopedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.

1232- Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in Hyamson's History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, membrane 8, 26.6. 1232.

1235- Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, "They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks." Further authority Huillard Breolles Grande Chronique, III, 86. Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23.

1244- London. A child's body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul's. Authority: Social England, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.

1255- Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed.

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows:

"The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation."

At a recent visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in 1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: "That he (St. Hugh) was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age." The Chancellor on the same occasion said: "It was quite obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well."

These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for their statements; it couldn't have happened, they say. Why not?

Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been, ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn's Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when it said of this case "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Lincoln, for which 18 are hanged"? There are no 'ifs' and 'buts' here! Or does Copinus's confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, "For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice."

No one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaised Gentiles unite in denying the fact of Ritual Murder.

Strack, in his The Jew and Human Sacrifice, written in defence of the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress's Tale (Canterbury Tales) of Chaucer and is referred to in Marlowe's Jew of Malta. Hyamson's History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to "Little St. Hugh of Lincoln," showing the importance of the Ritual Murder issue in the Jewish mind today.

The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh: Henry III, 39, m. 2,7.10 1255; 39, m. 2,14.10.1255; 40, m. 20, 24.ii.. 1255; 40,m.13,13.3.1256; 42, m. 6; 19.6.1258. And the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40,m.20,26.11.1255; 40,m.19,9.12.1255; 40,27.3.1256; and 40,m.5, 20.8.1256.

1257. London. A child sacrificed. Authority: Cluverius. Epitome Historia, p. 541. Details lacking.

1276. London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276.

1279. Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged." Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. I5; H. Desportes, Le Mystere du Sang.

1290. Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June, 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.

The reader will see (p. 20) that it was a similar ritual case which was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel professing Jews from that country in 1492.

The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by Ritual Murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the Kings of England, against whose moral character no one else has dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. From the Jewish Chronicle Supplement, April, 1936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln case in the reign of Henry III):

"Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I, the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century writers of history began to examine the old records in a new sceptical temper, some may be found venturing on such unkind surmises as that the alleged crucifictions of Christian children only seemed to happen when kings were short of money." The foul accusation against men of upright character is repeated by the Jew Hyamson (History of the Jews in England, 1928 edition, p. 21), writes: "it has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed replenishing."

To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of Lincoln were Jewish Ritual Murders is to accuse certain English Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators, known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St. William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the Sheriff would take no action himself.

Whom do you believe the Jews or the English?

"It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial and so frequent." So says Social England concerning Ritual Murders in England Vol. I, p. 407, I893, edited by H. D. Traill.

A significant fact is that Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the last century.

Palestinian murders| 8.3.09 @ 8:33PM

Palestinians are suffering crimes of past events in Europe. And Europe and America tolorate the crimes because they don't want to have to put up with these crimes in europe again, commited by the Jews.

But the Arab world is stuck with it, and is lost as to what to do about them.

Dan| 8.3.09 @ 9:15PM

You guys have too much free time on your hands.

Hate is in the mind of the Jew| 8.3.09 @ 9:40PM

elle| 8.3.09 @ 7:29PM
The American Spectator is becoming hostage to Jew hating cretins. Perhaps the website administrator should review the posts and consider appropriate action.
_____________________________-

When did History become hating anybody, if we spoke about Slavery in Europe would you say it was hating Black people, Jewish Idiot.

Where did any body but your self express hate?

Jewish History should not be covered up unless you have something to be ashamed of.

If you have given up Ritual killings say so or if you intend to stop the massacre of innocent children in Gaza say so.

Stop hiding behing the Holocaust while you commit the same crimes yourselves. What is wrong with honesty.

Why do you think Jews was thrown out of Europe? Why did Christ condemn the Jews as children of Satan the Devil, are you saying the bible is not true, if so why did Jewish people write something for the Gentiles you as Jews knew was a lie.

You see I am not one of your original Goyims, or the beast you claim Gentiles are. You cannot answer the questions, you would rather hide under the ADL, why on earth does the Jews try to cover up their past? all it does is cause more people to be curious about you. It's like a theif that don't wish to be caught. Anyone with any sense can see that.

So if anyone spoke of hate it was you and you alone. History is not about hate it's about getting to what is facts from fiction. When you dabate the facts you can produce your evidence, if it's every ones word against you the facts is over whelming.

KyMouse| 8.3.09 @ 9:50PM

I'm sure they won't pay any attention to this, but it would be a good idea for the Jew-haters here to ponder the fact that one day, they will have to give an account of themselves to Jesus, the King of the Jews (John 19:19).

As the Jewish prophet Isaiah pointed out, the Messiah loved His Jewish people so much, He paid for the sins of all of them who will put their faith in Him (and the same offer was later made to gentiles): "He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities, the chastisement for our peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray, each of us unto his own way; and the Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all." -- Isaiah 53: 5-7

The Book of Revelation points out that the New Jerusalem will have "12 gates, and 12 angels at the gates, and names written on them, which are the names of the 12 tribes of the children of Israel" as well as the names of the 12 apostles of Jesus (Rev. 21: 12, 14). Therefore, Jewish and gentile believers in Jesus will be together for all eternity. I'm looking forward to that. You undoubtedly are not.

You've made your choice. We won't miss you.

I have read theTora&the; BIBLE| 8.3.09 @ 10:00PM

If Jesus was King of the Jews, and the Jews plot to Kill the King, who do you think have something to fear. Having said that I do not trust what the Jews wrote as facts. Jesus said they were liars, I trust his word more.

Jesus chucked them out of the Temple for Gambling to make money and selling things, they were also warned about Ritual killings of children as sacrifice to Molec. I sugest you read your Bible, or you must be Jewish and read the Talmud or TORA.

The media mind control?| 8.3.09 @ 10:18PM

Dan| 8.3.09 @ 9:15PM
You guys have too much free time on your hands.
_________________________________
Nothing wrong with having time to read, and look at the facts. Dan sometimes that is what we need, so we can make decisions based on what is researched.

Americans are being lead to the slaughter, in wars based on lies, like the Iraq war. If I can save one life, it's worth it.

It's comming to a head| 8.3.09 @ 10:26PM

Homosexual perverts don't go forth and multiply.

Read between the lines as you may, because it explains why some people want to reduce the population because they have never been a Nation, because homosexual perverts do not produce children. So it's easy to kill other peoples children.

We can all change| 8.3.09 @ 11:02PM

I would hate my gran children wasting their lives fighting for a worthless cause killing people for no reason because some corrupt American government who has no interest in the people of America, fighting in the desert of the ME for no realistic purpose. For a people who do not have any respect for humanity or for that matter humanity it's self.

I have read more hatred of Arabs on this site of a people Americans don't know or likely to ever know or understand.

I have seen more deaths in my life than I ever want to see again, and the truth is I am sick of it.

Its all about greed for a small group of Oil companies, and arms dealers, and people who want what is not theirs to have, thou shalt not steal for the Bible Bashers, who claim to be christian, they are no more christian than a dead dog in the gutter in the countries they rape and steal from. And no better than the Jews in their ritual killings and their Homosexuality, and child molesting, no more than the Catholic Priest who rape young boys, we live in a sick society the sooner we get of our high horse and take a good look at who we are and what we do and what we say about each other the better we will be, think and stop being a bunch of Racial idiots, and Religious idiots.

Stop complaining about Muslims, if America stayed the hell out of their country, they would stay out of yours. Change the attitude in Palestine, they are people too, stop staring usless wars, lets try to live in peace. People can't take anymore of this violence, violence breeds violence. GOD DAM IT STOP.

KyMouse| 8.3.09 @ 11:45PM

Do you realize how absurd it is to say, "I do not trust what the Jews wrote as facts. Jesus said they were liars, I trust his word more"?

You have no source for the words of Jesus except for the Brit Hadashah, the New Testament, which was written by Jews! Matthew's name really was Mattityahu; John was Yochanan. Paul was Sha'ul. James was Ya'akov. Peter was Kefa. Jews all! And so was Jesus -- His name was Y'shua, and He too was Jewish. If you hate Jews, you hate Him as well.

Benjamin Disraeli (1801-1881), the renowned prime minister of Britain, was a Jewish believer in Jesus. It was he who wrote,

"When Omnipotence deigned to be incarnate, the Infallible Word did not select a Roman, but a Jewish frame. The prophets were not Romans but Jews; she who was blessed above all women, I never heard she was a Roman maiden...The first preachers of the gospel were Jews and none else. No one has ever been permitted to write under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit , except a Jew. For nearly a century no one believed in the good tidings except Jews...And when the time was ripe to diffuse the truth among the nations, it was not a senator of Rome or a philosopher of Athens who was personally appointed by our Lord for that office, but a Jew of Tarsus...Jesus of Nazareth, the Incarnate Son of God, is the eternal glory of the Jewish race."

All of your lies and your hatred can't change that, or wipe out His love for His Jewish people. You are following in Hitler's footsteps; and like him, your life will end in despair, impotent rage and self-destruction. And you'll have no one to blame but yourselves.

DWIGHT| 8.4.09 @ 3:04AM

It was immediately assumed without a modicum of evidence -- the killer shouted no slogans, left no pamphlets -- that this indiscriminate act was an act of discrimination.

WHO THE FUCK DO YOU THINK IT IS DUMBASS? YOU HAVNT SPENT LONG IN ISRAEL, HAVE YOU? LUCKY BOY.

BUT YOU WRITE ENGLISH SO HORRIBLY I CAN BELIEVE YOU GREW UP THERE.

Contenting himself with the pronouncement that "the dreadful murder that was committed yesterday in Tel Aviv against teenagers and young people is a murder that a cultured and enlightened people cannot accept."

YOU HAVE AN ACTUAL PROBLEM WITH THAT? DROP YOUR SHITTY INTERNET RAG... YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT STATEMENT?

Shooting up an opera or a ballet may be a crime against culture and enlightenment, not this.

OHHHH, CAUSE IT WAS A GAY CLUB. WHAT DO YOU THINK OPERA AND BALLET IS, FAG? A GAYCLUB FOR OLD FAGS WITH BEARDS.

YOURE GAY, DONT BE SO ASHAMED, GO WITH IT. CALL ME.

Jay D. Homnick| 8.4.09 @ 3:07AM

Your place or mine?

KyMouse| 8.5.09 @ 7:54AM

Dwight, if you truly believe that opera and ballet "is [sic] a gayclub for old fags with beards," there is little that any of us can do to help you. However, I do pity you for never having appreciated the majesty of opera or the athletic beauty of ballet. A few English classes would do you a world of good as well.

Perhaps you are so irritable because you keep getting carpet burns on your knuckles?

KyMouse| 8.5.09 @ 7:45PM

"Devil rituals" and the other Jew-haters here won't read this, but I'll say it anyway: John 8:44 MUST be read in context. Jesus is NOT saying that all Jews are the children of the devil; He was speaking at that particular time to a group of Jews who were deliberately trying to trap Him, and who refused to consider His claims about Himself in light of the Tenach (the Old Testament).

To anyone with an ounce of sense, it is clear that Jesus did NOT consider His Jewish followers, and there were many of them, to be children of Satan. He dearly loved Kefa (Peter), Mattityahu (Matthew), Yochanan (John), Y'hudah (Jude), Ya'akov (James), Sha'ul (Paul), and countless other Jews who put their faith in him.

And He gave His life on the cross to pay for the sins of all Jewish people who will put their faith in him (the fulfillment of the account of the "bronze serpent raised in the wilderness," in Numbers 21:9 and John 3:14-15). That same offer was made to gentiles (Acts 10:45).

By the way, there is a small but growing number of "Jews for Jesus" in our own day. In the past 100 years or so, they have included British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli, composer Felix Mendelssohn (who wrote the music to "Hark, the Herald Angels Sing," and planetary astronomer William Herschel.

As I said, however, nothing will get through to the Jew-haters here, who truly ARE the children of their father, Satan.

Paul| 8.9.09 @ 12:38AM

You spelled Timothy McVeigh's name incorrectly.

Plus, it is a form of enlightenment to not only not criminalize homosexuality, but to even have places where same-sexualists can meet and flirt, etc. Just glance around the Middle East and try to find another country as enlightened in this regard and see why this is doubtless a step in the right cultural direction.

jiner| 8.10.09 @ 4:39AM

Air Jordans
cheap dunk shoes
Chanel Handbags
Coach Handbag
LV Handbags
Air Force 1
Air Max Shoes
Dunk SB Shoes
Supra Shoes
UGG Classic Cardy
Discount UGG Boot

dropshippngwatch| 9.2.09 @ 9:37PM

Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
Sales Replica Watches
Fake Watches
Fake Watch
Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
replica Rolex watches
Replica Franck Muller Watches
Replica Graham Watches
Replica Gucci Watches
Replica Guess Watches
Replica Harry Winston Watches
Replica Hermes Watches
Replica Hublot Watches
Replica Hugo Boss Watches
Replica IWC Watches
Replica Jacob & Co Watches
Replica Jaeger-LECoultre Watches
http://www.dropshippingwatch.com