By George Neumayr on 7.17.09 @ 6:08AM
"Yeah," he supports gay marriage, foreshadowing Obama's eventual
position.
After conservative Republicans bloodied his nose in 1994, Bill
Clinton had to fake up an interest in "traditional values." Out
of this phoniness came his hasty signing of the Defense of
Marriage Act. A defensive Clinton told the press during his 1996
reelection campaign: "I remain opposed to same-sex marriage. I
believe marriage is an institution for the union of a man and a
woman. This has been my long-standing position, and it is not
being reviewed or reconsidered."
No longer needing to sustain this sham, Clinton has now
unburdened himself of his true thoughts about gay marriage:
"I personally support people doing what they want to do…I think
it's wrong for someone to stop someone else from doing that."
"Yeah," Clinton says he supports it, which delights gay activists
who note that he joins the ranks of other "high-profile"
Democratic proponents of it, such as Senators Chuck Schumer and
Chris Dodd.
The Democratic Party's official and obviously brittle and
insincere opposition to gay marriage crumbles by the week. "We'll
get there," Teresa Heinz Kerry promised gay activists in San
Francisco back in 2004, and time has proven her right, as more
and more Dems, judging that the political and cultural coast for
gay marriage is now clear, don't even bother to defend that
gnarled platform plank.
Clinton's "frank" throat-clearing about an "evolving" position on
gay marriage can provide talking-points to other prominent Dems
eager to reverse their nominal opposition. Clinton has cited, as
the cause of his new enlightenment, the edifying learning
experience of watching his homosexual friends take care of tots;
this apparently sounds better to him than having to admit that he
was fibbing opposition all along.
Turning hot water up gradually without the frogs jumping out is
tricky, but Obama seems to think that he can also pull it off. It
won't be long before his support for "robust civil unions," an
inching euphemism towards gay marriage he likes, gives way to a
"frank" Clinton-style reappraisal and endorsement of gay marriage
in all 50 states.
The American people, after all, can be cajoled out of their "worn
arguments and old attitudes," he implied at the White House's
"LGBT" reception in late June.
"Welcome to your White House," Obama burbled, adding an oblique
promise of support for every item on the LGBT agenda, including
gay marriage: "We've been in office six months now. I suspect
that by the time this administration is over, I think you guys
will have pretty good feelings about the Obama administration."
By the end of Obama's probable second term, his justices will
almost certainly have uncorked some bogus constitutional right to
gay marriage discovered within the penumbras of Lawrence v.
Texas. At which point, Obama, drawing upon the faux-pained
honesty he has perfected, can regurgitate what he wrote in his
memoirs: that he was once on "the wrong side of history" but has
now happily come into the light.
The construction of his position on gay marriage in The
Audacity of Hope is comically passive, salted with several
I'm-eager-to-be-wrong-here qualifiers: "In years hence I may be
seen as someone who was on the wrong side of history" and
"I was reminded that it is my obligation not only as an elected
official in a pluralistic society, but also as a Christian, to
remain open to the possibility that my unwillingness to support
gay marriage is misguided."
It is hard to describe what's happening on this rapidly-moving
front as a "culture war," since that implies two sides are
fighting. Are there even two sides to make a war at this point?
It appears, with a few conservative exceptions here and there,
that only one side is fighting -- the left; the PC oafs in the
Republican Party could not care less.
Perhaps 2010 prospects may rouse a momentary interest in
exploiting the issue politically, but morally and culturally they
just don't care. Gay activists noted with some satisfaction that
Bill Clinton actually arrived at his position later than a
Republican eminence, Dick Cheney.
topics:
Democratic Party, Gay Marriage