By The Prowler on 7.13.09 @ 6:09AM
The reason Obama supports investigation of "Bush war crimes."
Also: Obama's unanswered Michigan questions.
RED MEAT
Despite reports to the contrary over the weekend, Attorney
General Eric Holder's review of a possible
criminal investigation into use of enhanced interrogation
techniques is taking place with the approval, and even the
encouragement, of the White House.
On Sunday, several news outlets, speaking to unnamed sources in
the Administration, said that Holder was considering the criminal
prosecution despite concerns or "against the wishes" of President
Barack Obama, who wanted to leave the issue in
the past.
But Capitol Hill Democratic aides and several White House aides
who deal with outside political organizations say that's not the
case. While the public stance of Obama and his senior aides may
be reticence on the enhanced interrogation investigation, "they
know the issue is one reason [Obama] has the support from groups
like MoveOn, and this is the kind of thing that politically will
keep them engaged on other issues," says one White House staffer.
"We can't afford to flip on every campaign promise or issue, and
there is already a sense out there, what with our decision on
terrorist detention, that we're hedging a bit more than these
supporters like."
Another concurred, saying that while Obama and Holder would
doubtless take political heat from many Republicans and other
segments of the public, there was hesitancy to further agitate
Obama's friends on the left at a time when they needed that
political coalition on a range of issues, including healthcare
reform and climate change legislation.
"Better to keep our team happy and willing to fight and have the
other side distracted," says a House Democrat aide. "If Holder
moves ahead, it doesn't particularly hurt us, but it may
indirectly help us: while the other guys get all riled about it,
we can just push ahead with other things and leave them in the
dust."
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
It would seem David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel have greater faith
in Barack Obama's varied teleprompters than in their man in an
unstructured setting.
Several weeks ago, it was announced that tomorrow the president
would attend a town hall in Warren, Michigan, a Macomb County
suburb of Detroit. Yesterday, however, the White House announced
that Obama would not take questions from a community angry over
his stimulus plans and auto bailout and where unemployment is
higher than the national average of about 10 percent. Instead
Obama will make a prepared speech, expected to focus, White House
sources said, on education and job retraining programs.
The decision was made, according to Democrat sources in Michigan,
after party officials determined that Republicans, as well as
auto workers, were planning on seeking admission to the event, to
ask questions of the President on the economy, taxes, auto and
bank bailouts, and the scandal-ridden Democrat House member,
John Conyers.
"There were also rumors that Republicans were going to hold their
own town hall nearby to answer the questions Obama did not," says
a state Democrat party consultant. "It may be a circus no matter
what, but this gives the White House a little more control than
they might have had."
The White House, according to sources, is mulling to have
selected attendees to the speech ask questions specific to the
President's remarks, but as it now stands, they would rather
control the message than give the citizens of Michigan the
answers they feel he owes them.