The American Spectator

Kinley Ardal| 7.8.09 @ 8:54AM

I had no idea of Mr. Koontz's novels before reading this article. I will make a trip to Borders today to pick some of his work up! Thank you for the heads-up. ^^ It is indeed difficult to find fiction works with a solid moral bedrock to them in this era.

mteachjw| 7.8.09 @ 9:05AM

For those (conservatives) who like "spy thrillers" try Vince Flynn and Brad Thor. Some of them are somewhat far-fetched but they are fast and fun reads. Flynn's read like "24" before they tried to become "inclusive" by hiring uber liberal actors and doing PSA's for global climate change. Thor was in homeland security for a while and some of his insights are interesting.

Tim| 7.8.09 @ 9:06AM

Thanks. The reason I've never actually purchased a Koontz book was I figured he was a King clone with similar ridiculous worldviews. This article changes that.

Mary| 7.8.09 @ 9:25AM

I have read everything this man has written, including his most recent novel, Relentless. He's in the top five of my most favorite authors. Try him, you might be pleasantly surprised.

Danny| 7.8.09 @ 9:55AM

Try 'Watchers'. One of, if not his first mainstream novel.

Good book with a great plot and ending. Very suspensefull.

Joe T| 7.8.09 @ 10:51AM

I have enjoyed Mr. Koontz's writing for years as they never fail to entertain.

Mike F| 7.8.09 @ 2:50PM

How Odd .. a writing who leans to the right.

D Jones| 7.8.09 @ 5:36PM

Thank you for doing a great job of exposing a new audience to the wonderful writings of Dean Koontz. I've been a fan for over 20 years now and have "Relentless" sitting here in my office while I finish reading "Lord of the Rings" again. I am also looking forward to the wrap-up of the "Frankenstein" series due later this month.

While an unabashed fan of Koontz, I am also a fan of Stephen King and do have to disagree with you on a couple points: I think you give Koontz too much credit and King too little. There is no mistaking that Koontz is a fantastic writer...most of the time. He does have his forgettable novels ("The Face" and "Your Heart Belongs to Me" come to mind) and a few that are chores to read (I had to start "False Memory" 3 times before I could finally plow through it). And while King's writing is a bit on the vulgar side at times, he does portray the light and power of God every now and then, most notably in "The Stand" and "Desperation."

Overall, I would say that King is the better writer, but Koontz will almost always leave you feeling good at the end of the book.

Greg| 12.4.11 @ 10:18PM

I could not disagree more that King is the better writer.

King is often so stereo-typical in his portrayal of the world. Granted, he is a phenomenal writer, but he is just so shallow with some of his characters. Even the heroic characters in the stand seem to be personas that are so often used by other writers. I do love how King uses the language of his characters to describe them, so that even the narrative adopts his characters voice.

In that way, Koontz is nearly the polar opposite. His narratives are perfect descriptions of thoughts and actions without adopting the character's voice at all. His narratives feel like illustrations from an omnipotent observer who can delve into the minds of the actors without being soiled by them. The "forgettable" book, "The Face", is a great example of this omnipotent narrative in the idealistic villain of the book, who goes around poisoning lawns for the sake of chaos. Koontz describes the villains motives in that same sense without adopting them temporarily as King does.

King just repels me with the leftism that bleeds out of every page. He just never catches the tragic while rising from it like Koontz does. King seems to unwittingly fall victim to the tragic. Koontz just talks to me, I guess.

Blake Gabel| 7.8.09 @ 5:59PM

I've read everthing he's written (and under 3 names). Love his work. King started losing it years ago.

Rob R| 7.8.09 @ 6:26PM

A big "thanks!" to D Jones for the heads up on the "Frankenstein" finale. Been looking for that one for a while.

"One Door Away From Heaven" is one of the best novels I've ever read. Period.

Jessica| 7.8.09 @ 7:13PM

I too never read Koontz, but I'll give him a try, although I'm very scared of scary stuff, so it might not work out for me.

But this was a MOST informative article, and I thank you for that.

I have a recommendation too - hubby discovered Daniel Silva's Gabriel Allon books and they are very good. We have listened to 3 so far on audio, and we are both thoroughly enjoying them. Allon is an Israeli secret agent and also a world class art restorer. The books are well written, and for anyone who enjoys audio books, amazingly well read by all the readers we've heard. They are very cosmopolitan in their settings and all the characters are well drawn. Even the really bad guys have depth. I'm a wee bit peeved that Silva often makes ultra-conservative Catholics the bad guys, but that is my only quibble and it is a quibble.

Maybe we'll try Koontz next, if anyone can mention a good one of his on audio that would be great.

Nicky Billou| 7.8.09 @ 9:53PM

Fantastic! I had no idea Dean Koontz was a conservative! I will go and gobble up his books!

I am a big fan of Brad Thor, Vince Flynn, and WEB Griffin. These gentlemen are fantastic storytellers, proud patriots, and darn good writers.

I would welcome recommendations of other right-wing novelists.

Nicky

Jeff Vowell| 7.9.09 @ 11:47AM

My friend, Shelton Robinson, introduced me to Mr. Koontz, but I merely passed that along to my wife, who is a voracious reader. She instantly fell in love with his books (though she does prefer 'later' Koontz to 'earlier' Koontz). She finally brought me around to reading one (Velocity), and I was thereafter hooked. Now my oldest son is a budding 'addict' too.

Note to Kinley Ardal and Jessica: Besides some of the titles already mentioned here, check out Mr. Murder, Intensity, Tick Tock, Fear Nothing, Seize the Night, By the Light of the Moon (just to name a few).

wanda keith| 7.9.09 @ 12:02PM

Thank you so much for reminding me how much I have enjoyed Koontz in the past. I never made the Conservative Connection until you brought it up. Maybe that is why I did enjoy his books so much. I will definitely pick up Relentless.

reader| 7.9.09 @ 3:21PM

the odd thomas series is as readable as it gets.

Greg| 12.4.11 @ 9:56PM

Dean Koontz has been my favorite author for quite some time. The first book that I read of his was "Strange Highways" and that cemented me as a Koontz reader from then on. As I have read many of his books, I have found it impossible to miss the Conservatism and Libertarianism within his writing. I have never looked his leanings up until recently, but so often I just felt akin to him as I've read his stuff. His protagonists are moral and commendable, non-super heroes. Even Odd Thomas, gifted as he is, exudes the tragic vision overcome by his high moral disposition. Every once in a while, Dean Koontz will use a phrase or explain an idea that is just too much of the tragic vision for Koontz not to hold it himself. I find that that people who do not hold the tragic vision just can't explain it beyond the superficial and are often surprised by the reality of it.

Andy| 12.31.11 @ 12:22AM

Stephen King gave me purpose in life; he made me want to be a writer, and so far I've had two books and numerous stories and articles published. He has his flaws, but he has produced masterpieces like The Shining and Pet Sematary. Dean Koontz...has not.

I have read six Koontz books over the years, each time trying to figure him out so I could enjoy what everybody else was so crazy about. Every book was awful.

There's a sentence from one of his books that I memorized, to help me explain why his clunky, repetitive, two-dimensional books are so unreadable. Here it is:

"Astonished at her vehemency, he reassimilated the assumptions he'd made upon entering."

That is not good writing. That is CLUNKY writing. Dean Koontz's primary contribution is that any amateur writer who's done some reading and devoted some time to getting better can pick up any of his books and realize that people this bad are getting published, so they must have some kind of a shot.

Also:

- Every single one of his books is set in California. Sure Stephen King likes Maine, but he's set many in other places (CO, NH, CA, FL, TX, NV, PA, OH, NY).

- His constant reuse of the stock "ice-cold psychopath" who is supposed to be extra terrifying because he just has ABSOLUTELY NO EMOTIONS!

- His titles almost never have anything to do with the plot of his books. You know what Carrie, Firestarter, Misery, etc. are about, at least once you read the dust jacket. ("Watchers," "Whispers," etc.)

And if he's a right-wing conservative then I'm glad I got the untalented vibe from him long ago. Give me a Stephen King or a John Irving any day of the week. In fact, Irving's Cider House Rules is one of the all-time greats, about a time you regressives look back on fondly, when women died in seedy back-alley abortions because the self-appointed guardians of our morality decided to make it nearly impossible to get a safe, sterile one. Dr. Larch in Cider House is one of literature's greatest heroes.