The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

Another Perspective

GOP Not Alone in Hypocrisy

"He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first," Jesus said when confronted by an angry mob intent on executing a woman caught in the act of adultery.

Democrats should take that advice when it comes to Mark Sanford. The party isn't crucifying the Republican South Carolina governor for being an adulterer, but for being an adulterer and a social conservative. In other words, for being a hypocrite.

From a public relations standpoint, that's an effective approach. Democrats will get plenty of mileage out of snickering over the righteous Republicans who can't keep their pants zipped. And they were eager for any opportunity to take down Sanford, who was becoming increasingly popular as a conservative mainstay and could have proven a decent threat to Obama in 2012.

There's only one problem -- Democrats have built their political house on politicians who make a habit of saying one thing and doing another, so their indignation at Sanford's hypocrisy rings hallow. In fact, it's downright hypocritical.

Recall that Bill Clinton was the president who signed the Defense of Marriage Act into law in 1996. The act defined marriage in federal law as the union of one man and one woman, which is the traditional Judeo-Christian understanding. Less than two years later, news broke that Clinton had violated his own marriage vows (not for the first time, or the last) with a White House intern.

Admittedly, Clinton was reluctant to sign the law, and did so more out of political necessity than principle. But if consistency between a politician's lifestyle and actions is the goal, how can Democrats square Clinton's support for the most sweeping federal marriage-protection law ever passed with his disdain for his own marriage vows?

More recently, John Edwards has assumed the Democratic Party's hypocrisy mantle. The former North Carolina senator, renowned for his fight against poverty, often uses a "two Americas" refrain to draw a contrast between the haves and the have-nots. His personal lifestyle, however, doesn't match his rhetoric.

Edwards owns a multi-million dollar, 28,200-square-foot home in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. During his second bid for the Democrats' nomination for president, it was revealed that he enjoys $400 haircuts.

Now, federal investigators are probing whether Edwards skirted the law by diverting campaign funds to pay his mistress hefty sums for her videography work, which might have included more than campaign publicity material.

Using the same standard that Democrats have applied to Sanford, is it reasonable to view Edwards as a champion for the underprivileged while he maintains such an opulent lifestyle?

Or take Al Gore as another example. The Democrats' go-to-guy for all things eco-friendly is known for leaving the lights on. He doesn't say no to some private air travel, either. But he's in good company, since America's first green president enjoys polluting the skies as well (and on Earth Day, no less).

The point of highlighting these Democratic dalliances is not to dismiss Sanford's sins. He should be forgiven, but actions have consequences, especially when a public figure is involved. If for no other reason than to devote time to rebuilding his marriage and family, Sanford should resign from office.

But if Democrats are intent on lambasting Sanford because his talk didn't match his walk, they should acknowledge the same behavior among their own. Anything else would be, for lack of a better word, hypocritical.

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Bill Clinton, Mark Sanford, John Edwards

David N. Bass is an investigative reporter and associate editor with the John Locke Foundation.

Comments

Sandi| 7.6.09 @ 6:46AM

Well said Mr Bass ITA with your Sanford comments!! You are only the second journalist covering this scandal whose writing makes sense. I think he does love his wife I just think he lost sight of that for a while. They should get the book "Not just friends" by Shirley P Glass & Jean Coppock Staeheli. MS "love story" is a text book case straight out of the pages of the book!!

Alice Moore| 7.6.09 @ 7:14AM

You forgot to mention the Obama's rhetoric of sacrifice, "giving up your piece of the pie", "having skin in the game", etc. They order $100 a pound Japanese beef, have pizzas flown in from Chicago, and have $1 million dollar date nights. They certainly are not willing to spread THEIR wealth.

Of course there are the Democrats who extol the virtues of public education; while making sure their own offspring are in the most exclusive private schools.

Darin| 7.6.09 @ 7:19AM

Hypocrisy is possible only where standards exist. Liberals have no standards - their viewpoints are all subjective and based on emotion and feeling, thus subject to frequent change. Hence, liberals can't be accused of hypocrisy.

Jay| 7.6.09 @ 7:25AM

Adulterous behavior and pedophilia are not a stumbling block for democrat politicians. They are members of the "big tent party." They ambrace everything and so stand for no principles.

It is absoulutely correct to demand, for example, that the governeor of South carolina resign in shame. He is a member of a party that tells us it stands for morality, truth and justice. If that be true, how can he not resign? He is a democrat.

Bill Clinton stood for nothing but Bill Clinton. He committed all manner of immorality and even a tad of criminality. But that is expected of democrats, nothing to be ashamed of.

true religion jeans| 7.6.09 @ 8:43AM

I must say this is a great article i enjoyed reading it keep the good work.

Roy| 7.6.09 @ 9:11AM

"that is expected of democrats, nothing to be ashamed of. "

Actually, on balance, when it comes right down to it, it is.

John Navratil| 7.6.09 @ 9:52AM

Darin, you are spot on!

If one has no standards, one has nothing to live up to. Falling short of standards isn't hypocrisy, it's failure. Not striving to reach the standard is hypocrisy.

A person of no standards has absolutely no business criticizing the failures of those who do.

Tony in Central PA| 7.6.09 @ 10:57AM

More applause for Darin. I wanted to say the same thing, but he did a much better job than I could have.

Mattled| 7.6.09 @ 11:07AM

Darin,

We should end the comments at your post. Well said.

My uber-liberal in-laws just left after a weekend at our house.

I asked them to please recycle their bottles and papers. Nah, we don't recycle. Too much effort (?).
They have Al Bore's DVD and buy carbon credits. I guess the carbon credits justifies their lavish overseas vacations, their huge house WAY out of town away from all grocery stores in a lily-white rural enclave and gas-guzzling v-8 SUV.

They don't know how to properly turn off our lights---when I tried to show them, they just waved me off. So they leave the lights on in three rooms.

I told my spouse I have nothing in common with them. I was told it was because of MY politics.

No---I think it's more like their hypocrisy, ignorance, laziness and loathing (of me).

I really, sincerely don't know bigger hypocrites and it gets worse each time.

KyMouse| 7.6.09 @ 6:26PM

Seems to me that a lot of people misunderstand hypocrisy. Boomers who eagerly indulged in "free love" during the '60s and '70s have been reluctant to tell their kids (or grandkids) to save sex for marriage. They're afraid that the kids will call them hypocrites, but I think that label applies only if one is still doing what one says is wrong. If you know that your previous behavior was wrong and stopped doing it, you aren't a hypocrite for telling your kids not to do it.

Take a reformed thief as an example: He used to steal things, but finally repented and stopped stealing. Now, as a father with youngsters to raise, he says stealing is wrong. That isn't hypocrisy-- in fact, he would be a bad father if he DIDN'T tell them that stealing is wrong.

ED Hardy Caps| 7.24.09 @ 3:43AM

i like

cheap handbags| 7.26.09 @ 6:36PM

We only sell the top grade replica cheap handbags, some of them are genuine leather handbags, yet the price is far lower than the authentic designers want you to pay. We lead you to a genuine pool of bags : collections in wide range: handbags, shoulder bags, clutches, tote bags, purses and wallets, the hottest brands you can find like replica  Louis Vuitton handbags, Replica marc jacobs handags, Replica Prada handbags, Coach,Replica Chloe handbags,Burberry, Dior,replica  Chanel handbags, Chloe,Replica gucci handbags, Dolce & Gabbana,Replica Balenciaga handbags . Crafted to the highest standard, from the finest materials in the industry, we guarantee the toppest  Replica Hermes handbags   at low price you'll find anywhere.

george| 7.29.09 @ 2:52AM

a href="http://www.louisvuittonlive.com/categories/311-1.html">Louis Vuitton Damier Azur handbags , commonly referred to as

ouis Vuitton Damier Azur, or sometimes shortened to

Louis Vuitton Damier Canvas handbags has become one of the most

Louis Vuitton Damier Canvas luxury brands.

louis vuitton outlet storelove

luis vuitton outleti like

lv outletsgood

louis vuitton onlinenice

dropshippngwatch| 9.2.09 @ 8:39AM

Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
Sales Replica Watches
Fake Watches
Fake Watch
Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
replica Rolex watches
Replica Rolex Watches
Replica A.Lange&Sohne; Watches
Replica Alain Silberstein Watches
Replica Audemars Piguet Watches
Replica B.R.M Watches
Replica Baume & Mercier Watches
Replica Bell&Ross; Watches
http://www.dropshippingwatch.com

Starrfish| 9.3.09 @ 12:18PM

When one is espousing a holier than thou attitude and then gets caught in Argentina, it is actually funny. That is why we get such a kick out of people like Larry Craig, the guy with the teenage pages, the senator in Vegas, Sanford, and all the other homo reps in Washington. Falling from non-existent grace is entertaining and hypocritical. The difference with Clinton is that he was in no way vomiting his Christian values all over the nation, that is the difference.

Wedding Dresses| 9.10.09 @ 2:49AM

Very good article written byWedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
ah

Leave a Comment

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

In Sum, IPCC Discredited

Paul Chesser

* * * *

That Dangerous Radical . . . Marvin Olasky?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Forget the Committees

Greg Scandlen

* * * *

Reid Disses David Broder

Philip Klein

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT