- Home
- About Us
- Contributors
- Departments
- Topics
- Back Issues
- Weekly Archives
- AmSpecBlog
- Subscribe
- Newsletter
- Advertise
- Donate
- Contact Us
- Daily Digest
- Templeton Essays
The Terror Spectator
Obama Professes Toughness
George Burns used to tell the story of John Barrymore flagging a taxi in Manhattan. The cabbie says, "Mister Barrymore, it is an honor to have you as a passenger. Tell me, vot brings you to town?"
"I am here to perform Shakespeare's King Lear on Broadway."
"Oy, King Lear, a vonderful play. I have seen it performed many times in the Yiddish theater by Leo Adler and other great actors. Vot do you tink, Mister Barrymore, will it go in English?"
This story helped me understand the disconnect between Obama and his critics on Iran. They say he has not been sufficiently firm. His tone has been conciliatory, lukewarm, vacillating. He has not stood up for the downtrodden. He has not remonstrated on behalf of the demonstrators. His response to these charges? He dismisses them: on the contrary, he has been rock-solid. So which is it, who is right? The answer is simple. He is being stern and unyielding, except there is no one to translate his remarks into English.
His native language is the one which he uses in extremis. It is simple human nature in time of stress to retreat into one's comfort zone. For Barack Obama, the patois he retreats into is Professorish.
PRACTITIONERS OF THIS JARGON speak more in gums than in tongues. They don't tackle subjects, they skirt them. They don't address issues, they only leave a zip code. They don't confront matters, preferring to concentrate on background. They chew things over too thoroughly to spit out something solid. No machismo charisma for them, real men eat cliché.
Our inability to provide the translation is what will ultimately prove the undoing of Obama. His plan to approach the Muslim "world" with a new directness has instantly disintegrated in the face of the first episode of As The Muslim World Turns. Once a few guys named Mahmoud split up into opposing camps, the Obama bluster turns into fluster. His visit as a Cairo proctor failed to effect an adjustment. Now all he can do is play King-Tut-tut with graveness of demeanor.
Now he has ramped up his tone somewhat, the press (who are there to cover him) say, even "dramatically" according to AP. They quote his declaration of being outraged and appalled. This narrowly misses the classic "shocked and appalled," which has generated more comedy skits than wiener schnitzel. Well, it is a relief to hear our President voice his outrage, even in a tone of voice generally reserved for telling the waitress at the diner "I'll have the pancakes." I guess it is hard to be El Lobo in the same breath as El Globo.
Which is not to say measured tones do not convey anything. For example, the President assured the folks in the Iranian street they are on the right side of history, provided they are aiming for the right goals for the right reasons at the right time in the right way. Beware the IDs of marchers, some soothsayer must have told him, right before the Senators knifed him in the back. You say equilibrium, I say equivocation, we're both on the same page.
What does this bode? If the pen is mightier than the sword, perhaps this is the beginning of unilateral disarmament. No more nuclear stockpile of words which explode into the microphone or onto the page. No more machine-gun delivery of high-powered rhetoric. No more going for the jugular. No more hitting below the belt. No more striking while the iron is hot.
It is time for a new world order, says Russia, and she may well be right. The next leader who can issue an order will get to run the show. Just as nature abhors a vacuum cleaner, it loves a pressure cleaner. The world is so constructed that being toothless is ultimately being truthless. A little more of this Professorish and the A students will all be asleep while the manipulators cheat off their test papers.
Another Burns story, then, about Barrymore. He and Katharine Hepburn were teamed up in a movie and their relationship quickly degenerated into a nasty feud. At the end of the production, Miss Hepburn shouted at Barrymore: "I will never again act with you in a film." To which the great Thespian replied: "You never have." If Barack Obama claims he has shown leadership on Iran, we know just how to reply.
Comments
Leave a Comment
Sean| 6.24.09 @ 6:51AM
I'd like to comment on your article. Tell me when you've said something.
Tuco| 6.24.09 @ 7:16AM
Sean,
You don't want to comment on the fact that we have a pantywaist running the country?
There's a promising future for you today's MSM...
Siegfried X| 6.24.09 @ 7:24AM
The President was very clear: no war with Iran. You neo-cons lost this battle, just like you lost the last election in the US.
Obama: "I've been very clear, ultimately, this is up to the Iranian people to decide who their leadership is going to be and the structure of their government"
CraigZ| 6.24.09 @ 7:37AM
Tuco says that we have a "pantywaist" running the country. It is far worse. We have a pussy. I do not say this to offend, but to communicate. As long as there has been human history, those types, by whatever nomenclature is used, are understood to be cowards. This will not end well.
stephanie| 6.24.09 @ 8:27AM
Siegfried, why is it "you far lefties" can't get over the fact that "you won". You all, including that harpe that is unfortunately speaker of the house,
sound like a bunch of kids on the playground.
Get over yourselves and grow up. It's all temporary.
Chuck| 6.24.09 @ 8:29AM
Obama is a gutless fool. His "up to the Iranian people " comment completely ignores the fact that the government was forced upon the people, and that it has all the guns and the willingness to use them to stay in power. Obama is completely out of his league, an incompetent fool.
Big J| 6.24.09 @ 8:36AM
Being president is just a little different than "community organizing" or "teaching" at a university, eh Barack?
Amateur night at the white house, with a limp wristed empty suit at the helm. I expected nothing more, and was not disappointed.
I wonder how his lofty rhetoric is going to get us through the North Korea ordeal. Maybe if he just glares at 'ole Kim like he did at Major Garret for asking a real question, they won't shoot off that long range fire cracker in celebration of our Independence Day.
Doubt it.
keith| 6.24.09 @ 9:02AM
Too bad Obama didn't make the connection between the free and fair elections in Iraq, and the yearning for such in Iran. The desire for self determination is strong especially when your neighbor has that GIFT. Thanks of course to GEORGE BUSH.
Michael Tomlinson| 6.24.09 @ 9:03AM
The appeasers of tyranny and defenders of oppression have nothing to worry about -- Obama (beloved of the Obamacons and paleo-cons) with his vaginal foreign policy and vacuous dribble will insure your anti-democratic Muslim fellow-travelers and oppressors of liberty are safely ensconced in power. You're skin as always is safe while better men and women fight, defend and die for freedom -- freedom you enjoy at no cost to yourself aside from paying taxes (since less of that is now going to the military that should make you even happier).
Big J| 6.24.09 @ 9:09AM
Michael Tomlinson:
You owe me a keyboard. Vaginal foreign policy? I love it. I am stealing it!
Siegfried X| 6.24.09 @ 9:11AM
I am not a "leftie". I am a conservative, a REAL conservative, not a neo-con.
Big J| 6.24.09 @ 9:20AM
Siegfried, go sell crazy somewhere else. We ain't buyin' here.
I think you protest too much.
stu.b.con| 6.24.09 @ 9:25AM
Seigfried X said:
I am not a "leftie". I am a conservative, a REAL conservative, not a neo-con.
Yes, I imagine Ronaldus Magnimus would er...er...find you a tool and a fool. Read some recent history or visit Poland. I NEVER heard Reagan make such vacuous, pussified, pathetic responses to Lech Walensa and the Poles in their fight for a free society as your fearless leader has.
We are not fooled by you or him.
Galen| 6.24.09 @ 9:26AM
Why not have Nancy Pelosi fly to Terhan and Pongyang to make personal diplomacy?
Pingback| 6.24.09 @ 9:46AM
The American Spectator : Obama Professes Toughness links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Louis Jenkins| 6.24.09 @ 9:50AM
We should not be surprised by Obama’s responses, or lack of it, to the Iran situation. If we waiting for a “Ronald like address’, then we’re backing up. Charles Krauthammer summed up Obama last week with these words:
“Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the USA, more as a ruler over the world. He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate & coordinate various countries & their agendas. He sees moral equivilency in all cultures. His apology tour in Germany & England was a prime example of how he sees America, as an imperialist nation
that has been arrogant, rather than a great noble nation that has at times made errors. This is the 1st President ever who has chastised our
allies & appeased our enemies!”
Obama will wake up one day in a taxed out, militarily impotent, recessionized nation. He may or may not realize that the world has catagorized him as an ineffectual egghead. They will reject his weak kneed bid to rule the world, and will leave him and this country behind.
David Gonzalez| 6.24.09 @ 10:15AM
"vaginal foreign policy . . . "?
Padre, you sure know how to turn a phrase!
Alan Brooks| 6.24.09 @ 10:22AM
as long as the crypto anti-Israel crowd remembers
how many Germans were killed 1939- '45.
because, see, as many or more slipper-wearers can be sent off to that great falafel shop in the sky.
Big J| 6.24.09 @ 10:39AM
Alan, don't count on it with our current Poser-In-Chief in charge.
After all, those are his brethren.
Alan Brooks| 6.24.09 @ 10:59AM
I hope the German birthrate plummets completely, and Israel can occupy Germany someday. A long shot, but if only.
Alan Brooks| 6.24.09 @ 11:18AM
Big J
this is ludicrously hypothetical, but if Israelis were to vacate Israel to live in Germany, the A-rabs could bump each other off like they during the Iran-Iraq War.
Alan Brooks| 6.24.09 @ 11:20AM
I'm all in favor of A-rabs whacking each other.
thins out the herd, you know.
Old Texican| 6.24.09 @ 11:48AM
Gosh
I am very proud to be a neoconservative, Siefried!
I genuinely appreciate you reminding me from time to time.
I will bet you a spelling bee that you cannot define "neocon" in your own words though.
I sure would like you to try. You might discover you are too, once you understand what it means.
jeffW| 6.24.09 @ 12:30PM
Siegfried, Siegried. I do not recall anyone stating we should go to war in Iran over the elections. People simple wanted our president to offer his support for people desiring freedom. Even verbal support would have been fine. And apparently Obama finally got the message because he is starting to do that now. Of course he wants us to believe that is the stance he has always taken. But you knew that already didn't you?
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 1:07PM
"Obama (beloved of the Obamacons and paleo-cons) with his vaginal foreign policy..."
What sort of "man", I wonder, views the female sexual organ with such horror and distaste that he considers it the worst insult in his arsenal?
More of a "Man's Man" are you, Mike?
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 1:11PM
"Charles Krauthammer summed up Obama last week with these words:
“Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the USA, more as a ruler over the world."
And we are all agreed that Obama is wrong to think this, correct? Obama is the leader of the *United States only* - and not the leader of the free world - right?
Amor de cosmos| 6.24.09 @ 1:16PM
Lightworker thinks that he is a university president. That is why he has "summits" with "break out sessions" just like academic conferences.
And like most of the professorate, he is a hard leftist who has drunk the dregs of the relativist kool-aid.
"Worse than Carter" is a standard pretty damn well hard to reach. Lightworker is already there.
L. Ross| 6.24.09 @ 1:20PM
S.L. Vegetard:
How interesting that you would latch on to this absolutely hilarious phrase to launch a misguided insult at Mike Tomlinson.
Vaginal foreign policy, effeminate foreign policy, accomodating, let's not offend anyone, not even our enemies foreign policy, hell, we don't even have any enemies, just friends we don't know very well foreign policy. They are all the same thing. Something that any man, or any woman for that matter would instantly understand. Since you don't seem to understand what was meant, just exactly where on the GLBT spectrum do you tastes lie, exactly?
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 1:25PM
"Siegfried, Siegried. I do not recall anyone stating we should go to war in Iran over the elections. People simple wanted our president to offer his support for people desiring freedom."
So what you are looking for is empty talk and grandstanding from the president, correct? You want him to blather about "freedom" without backing it up - right? How would empty talk and grandstanding benefit U.S. international relations, and how (on earth) *could* it benefit the protesters?
Isn't it really about nothing more than your desire for a dramatic, empty gesture to wave your flag over? Isn't it really about *you* and not the protesters?
What is it with neoconservatives and their pathological insecurity about America? If they don't see some "patriotic" prancing around from the President on a daily basis they go into withdrawals. They constantly need to be told that America is "the greatest nation on earth" and the "greatest in the history of the world". They need - really, really NEED - the President to get on stage and say he's "for" Freedom and "against" oppression. Then what - you get to wave your little flags and yell "Yeah we are THE BEST!!!"
It's really sad, in a way, that your love of your country is so shaky it needs to be reinforced constantly by public figures making flamboyant gestures.
Floyd R. Turbo| 6.24.09 @ 1:28PM
Kid Karisma's patois isn't "Professorish" --- it's MANDARIN GIBBERISH that is then translated by the pundit class.
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 1:28PM
"Vaginal foreign policy, effeminate foreign policy"
Ewww - vaginas!!! So gross, right? Does the mention of the word make you want to run out of your house and straight to the locker room at the Y where there are no gross girls and their disgusting private parts?
"hell, we don't even have any enemies, just friends we don't know very well foreign policy
Um.. you believe that a President who is maintaining one war and escalating another is conducting an enemy-free foreign policy? 2 wars at once - that's too wish-washy for you?
txn4ever| 6.24.09 @ 1:56PM
That vaginal foreign policy thing is priceless.
The President doesn't have to back up harsh rhetoric with threats of war. As Reagan did with the Soviets when they arrested Lech Walesa, the current President can threaten all kinds of sanctions. As history as proven that worked out pretty well.
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 2:05PM
Does anyone even consider it possible that an American President condemning the Ayatollah and proclaiming solidarity with the protesters would give the Ayatollah the opportunity to color the protesters as aligned with the Great Satan? As bought-and-paid-for pro-Western agitators? Or that his encouraging them (without backing them up militarily) could lead to more of them rioting, and an even greater and more violent crackdown and subsequent oppression?
Do these ideas even occur to you? How can you be so sure that these won't be the only results of the President weighing in emphatically? And how can you be so absolutely positive that emphatically speaking out is 100% right, and that anything less is an abomination?
Old Texican| 6.24.09 @ 2:07PM
Hey txn4ever! Welcome!
Many of these folks here have a hard time understanding my "Texanese".
Perhaps you can be my translator? (grin)
To the best of my understanding, "vaginal" means an innie as opposed to an outie.
Hmmm...that seems to accurately describe the current admenestruation! (heh)
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 2:08PM
"As Reagan did with the Soviets when they arrested Lech Walesa, the current President can threaten all kinds of sanctions. As history as proven that worked out pretty well."
*sigh*
We have been imposing sanctions on Iran for three decades. Thirty years.
ONTIME| 6.24.09 @ 2:15PM
Profess and act,
Word and deed.
A sharp tongue does not necessarily indicate a keen mind.....Praaag-Maaaa-Tis-Uhmmmm?
Old Texican| 6.24.09 @ 2:15PM
Toddard...enough!
...Everything else is an an abamanation!
However, Obama plans on doing the same kinds of stuff...TO YOU!
...AND ME AS WELL. How in the world can you ignore the nose on your face, sir?
We got a President who is destroying 230 years of freedom...in his wildest fantasies...
I was talking about "innies" earlier. What I was referring to is Obama's priorities of trying to kill America's freedom first.
txn4ever| 6.24.09 @ 2:41PM
Toddard:
Did it ever occur to you that we have Iran surrounded with the greatest fighting force in the world has ever seen?
Did it ever occur to you that when the EUnuchs are talking tougher than the President of the U. S.
that our President just might be WRONG?
People like you thought we shouldn't do anything in Iraq unnless and until we got the the full blessing of the EUnuchs. The shoe is on the other foot now. We're tippy-toein around like a tender foot in a briar patch. How sad is that?
txn4ever| 6.24.09 @ 2:46PM
Yes Toddard, we've had sanctions in place. But we can go further.
txn4ever| 6.24.09 @ 2:47PM
Old Texican, thanks.
I'll be happy to provide backup.
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 3:13PM
What do the pretend pro-Iranian-protesters have to say about Chamberlain-like appeaser Ronald Reagan, his vaginal foreign policy and his coddling of Hitler-like genocidal tyrant Saddam Hussein?
During Reagan’s presidency Saddam brutally oppressed his people. Iraqi citizens were denied the freedom of assembly or protest. He jailed, tortured and slaughtered his own people in staggering numbers with cold detachment. He ordered the genocide of the Kurds, murdering over 50,000 of them.
Can anyone quote Ronald Reagan forcefully speaking out against Saddam, and voicing his support for the tens of thousands he brutally murdered and the millions he oppressed? Did he ever speak out against Saddam’s brutal reign, and profess solidarity with Saddam’s opposition? Or did he *support* Saddam Hussein with massive amounts of foreign aid and military assistance?
Was Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy “vaginal”? Or was it right for him to actively support brutal tyrants and genocidal dictators if he deemed it in the best interests of the United States? Was he a good President of the U.S. or a failure as the Leader of the Free World?
What do you say, Tomlinson? Was Reagan’s foreign policy to “spread democracy and freedom” or not? If he “understood democracy and freedom are the only way to have true peace between nation states”, why did he oppose democracy and freedom in Iraq by arming and propping up a genocidal maniac? Could it be – possibly – that Reagan believed that it is sometimes in the interest of the U.S. to treat with – and perhaps even support – anti-democratic tyrants, and that the President’s responsibility is to the *United States* and not to airy-fairy, abstract notions of “freedom” and “democracy”?
Or was Reagan a Chamberlain-like appeaser whose vaginal foreign policy coddled Hitlerian genocidal maniacs?
janet| 6.24.09 @ 3:15PM
"Vaginal foreign policy" is just a clever way of describing how America and its foreign policy will be F-CKED once Obeyme is done screwing with it. Wish I came up with that moniker!!
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 3:16PM
"Did it ever occur to you that we have Iran surrounded with the greatest fighting force in the world has ever seen?"
Um... aren't they busy? And what - you're proposing another war?
"Did it ever occur to you that when the EUnuchs are talking tougher than the President of the U. S. that our President just might be WRONG?"
No. "Talking tough" is something one looks for in an action hero, not in a president. "Tough talk" is meaningless.
"People like you thought we shouldn't do anything in Iraq"
And history has proved us correct, and proved you wrong. Do you want to make the same mistake again?
janet| 6.24.09 @ 3:24PM
SL Toddard,
History DID prove us correct. Look at the democracy and free elections in Iraq
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 3:38PM
"History DID prove us correct. Look at the democracy and free elections in Iraq"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oh man. Hahaha that was a good one. Thanks.
Everly Waverly| 6.24.09 @ 4:25PM
Just an observation--
Did "Sphincter-X" morph into S.L."Slippery Liberal" Toddard.
James| 6.24.09 @ 5:10PM
Jay seems to understand US politics, and he savvy in trashing the intellectuals.... he however, doesn't seem to have a clue of Iranian politics. I am glad President Obama does.
Richard Baker | 6.24.09 @ 6:20PM
Obama is similar to LBJ and Clinton in that he's a physical coward who treats his office as if he won the High School government election and he knows it all, even when it's manifestly clear that he doesn't have a clue. The theocracy in Iran knows that Obama will do nothing, as he has proven. For those who say his Cairo speech caused the insurrection, remember that the speech was completely blacked out in Iran. This anger of the Iranians has been building for 30 years against these 7th century fools.
Pingback| 6.24.09 @ 6:42PM
Obama Professes Toughness « Northern Virginia, Richmond, VA and DC Metro Chapter links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
S.L. Toddard| 6.24.09 @ 7:08PM
"Obama is similar to LBJ"
LBJ initiated monstrous and expensive federal social programs, launched and then escalated a massive failure of a war that cost thousands of American lives and hundreds of thousands of civilian lives, he maintained an open border policy with Mexico, irresponsibly spent massive amounts of taxpayer money, vastly expanded the size and scope of the federal government and left the office as a disgraced, discredited joke, justly reviled at home and abroad as a bumbling clown and a war criminal.
In other words, the most comparable president to LBJ is George W Bush.
Liberal Reader| 6.24.09 @ 7:46PM
Reactionaries don't get it.
Iran is not "the Muslim world" and it is not Poland or East Germany or Iraq.
Iran is Iran. It has its own history, including a history of having its internal politics manipulated by Britain and the United States that unites the Iranian people in outrage and nationalistic solidarity.
Nothing, nothing, nothing could be more foolish than for Obama to go shooting his mouth off about these protests.
Obama is playing this perfectly. In fact, I'd say his response to the Iranian protests is probably his most successful action as president so far.
The protests must be seen by the world AND by Iranians -- most importantly, by Iranians -- to be home grown, and not some underhanded plot cooked up by analysts at the CIA.
Believe it: the Iranian people -- front, center, and right -- are extremely nationalistic. They cannot tolerate the idea of being manipulated by the west.
Needless to say, no sane people in Washington or anywhere else are listening to the reactionaries bloggers and radio disc jockeys for advice on how to respond to the unrest in Iran. They may pay heed to Graham and McCain, but for the time being at least, the sensible and rational response to the protests is carrying the day.
J Beumler| 6.24.09 @ 7:50PM
Just a thought here. Want to see what is going on in Tehran this week? Look here: http://threatswatch.org/rapidrecon/2009/06/unimaginable-horror-in-tehran/
Christopher Holland| 6.24.09 @ 11:44PM
Nobody brings as much sincerity and conviction to be morally equivalent as Barack Obama. You have to give the guy credit - he is the best snake oil salesman ever. He has nothing to say, but he does say it very well.
Big J| 6.25.09 @ 12:29AM
I still can't get over the "vaginal foreign policy" thing, neither can toddard or siegfried and roid.
Sorry, can't help myself!
BwaaaaaaaHaaaaaaaHaaaaaa!
Richard Baker| 6.25.09 @ 2:19AM
Stoddard:
Just because Bush spent too much doesn't give Obama a pass for quadrupling that spending. LBJ and the '60s democrat Congress created the disastrous programs that are killing the country. No matter who spends it, they're wrong. Sorry, using Bush to excuse Obama is pretty lame, even for you. Remember, Bush loves this country which is not something that can neccessarily be said of the Kenyan.
Pingback| 6.25.09 @ 4:58AM
The American Spectator : Obama Professes Toughness | Barack Obama News links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
S.L. Toddard| 6.25.09 @ 7:00AM
Just because Bush spent too much doesn't give Obama a pass for quadrupling that spending. LBJ and the '60s democrat Congress created the disastrous programs that are killing the country. "No matter who spends it, they're wrong."
I agree - Bush was wrong and a socialist.
"Sorry, using Bush to excuse Obama is pretty lame"
I wouldn't excuse either of those big government left wingers.
"Remember, Bush loves this country"
Bush who? *George W* Bush? Is that a joke? He carelessly sent thousands of our soldiers to their deaths. He killed more Americans than Osama bin Laden. He spent our children's and our grandchildren's money like it was his own and left the American economy a smoking ruin.
George W Bush has nothing but contempt for this country, its laws, its traditions, its citizens and its soldiers.
ds80| 6.25.09 @ 12:29PM
James: re - Obama and "clues"
The only clue Obama has is that magical words appear when he turns on the teleprompter. He defines inexeperience. Arrogance. Hubris. Narcissism. Jug ears.
Okay, the last one was lame. So I apologize to all jugs, cab doors, elephants, and basset hounds.
cheap handbags| 7.26.09 @ 7:29PM
We only sell the top grade replica cheap handbags, some of them are genuine leather handbags, yet the price is far lower than the authentic designers want you to pay. We lead you to a genuine pool of bags : collections in wide range: handbags, shoulder bags, clutches, tote bags, purses and wallets, the hottest brands you can find like replica Louis Vuitton handbags, Replica marc jacobs handags, Replica Prada handbags, Coach,Replica Chloe handbags,Burberry, Dior,replica Chanel handbags, Chloe,Replica gucci handbags, Dolce & Gabbana,Replica Balenciaga handbags . Crafted to the highest standard, from the finest materials in the industry, we guarantee the toppest Replica Hermes handbags at low price you'll find anywhere.
george| 7.29.09 @ 3:29AM
Louis Vuitton Epi Leather handbags , commonly referred to as
Louis Vuitton Epi Leather, or sometimes shortened to
Louis Vuitton LV Shoes bags has become one of the most
LV Shoes handbag luxury brands.
louis vuitton online storelove
louis vuitton online shopnice
vuitton onlinegood
luis vuitton onlinei like
s| 8.20.09 @ 3:01AM
Cheap Jordan,Cheap Jordan shoes,Retro Jordan,Air Yeezy Shoes,Supra shoes,Kanye West ShoesJordan shoes,New Jordans,Air Yeezy,Air Force Ones,Nike Dunks,Retro Jordan, Cheap Jordan Shoes,Nike Dunk High,True Religion Jeans,New Air Force OnesAir Yeezy Shoe,Supra Shoes,Retro Jordan,Creative Recreation,Nike DunksNike Air YeezyTrue Religion,Air Jordan Shoes,Air Shox,Air Max,Dunk Shoes.Air Jordan,Cheap Jordans,Jordan Shoes,Cheap Air Jordans,Air Jordan Shoes
dropshippngwatch| 9.1.09 @ 10:57PM
Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
Sales Replica Watches
Fake Watches
Fake Watch
Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
replica Rolex watches
Replica BMW Watches
Replica Breguet Watches
Replica Breitling Watches
Replica Burberry Watches
Replica Bvlgari Watches
Replica Cartier Watches
Replica Chanel Watches
Replica Chopard Watches
Replica Christian Dior Watches
Replica Concord Watches
Replica Corum Watches
http://www.dropshippingwatch.com
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 10:40PM
I just bought this bag from whichWedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
located in New York city, it’s wonderful.
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 10:43PM
I never buy from outlet, the priceWedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
is expensive and I always bought online.
Pingback| 10.17.09 @ 6:47PM
Popular People » Blog Archive » The American Spectator : Obama Professes Toughness links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
fdsf| 10.22.09 @ 1:53AM
shanghai massage
beijing massage