Following in the tradition of the great Don Budge and Gottried von Cramm.
(Page 2 of 2)
Cramm thanked Budge for making it possible for him to play such a splendid match.
There are matches and matches, and there are shots you make and shots you miss and then there are those that, make or miss, you remember all your life. Budge-Cramm at the ‘37 interzonal, Nadal-Federer at the ‘08 Wimbledon final, this is where we see that in life you reach and reach and sometimes your grasp is just as long and sometimes it falls short.
I owe the information on that famous Budge-Cramm match to Marshall Jon Fisher, whose recent book A Terrible Splendor recounts the intersections of the lives of the two champions as well as their intersections with Tilden’s. For the sake of full disclosure, whatever that is, I should probably add that I wrote a review of that book for another publication, but as of this writing they are sitting on it and I forgot what I said, except that I rather liked the book so I must have said nice things about it.
The Nazis arrested Cramm and sent him to prison for a year on a morals charge. Budge organized an international protest. Cramm was released just before the war started and though the King of Sweden offered him asylum, he put on his uniform and went to the eastern front. He survived, as he did the July 20 plot in which he participated. He resumed his tennis career and became a grand and revered figure in German sports, but he was barred from entry in the U.S. due to his conviction in a Nazi court.
Thus it goes, I guess. He never complained. Budge had a good war too, and returned to the pro circuit, which he had joined just before the war started.
Budge was not the type of man who would speculate in public, or even, I suspect, in private, after a successful match as to whether he was the greatest of all time. But let’s face it, we live in a different culture, and Federer’s manner does not disqualify him as a good sport and a gentleman. He is always generous to his opponents, gracious with the fans. The Roger Federer Foundation supports sports education among poor kids in Africa and elsewhere. It partakes of the mission of UNICEF.
Jack Kramer, than whom few men have done more to promote tennis as a mass sport, wrote that “Budge was the best of all. He owned the most perfect set of mechanics and he was the most consistent.” This describes Roger Federer, and though he is behind Nadal on points in the rankings at the moment, you may be sure that if he wins at Wimbledon on July 5, as President Obama gets ready to fly to Accra, there will be a consensus that he is indeed number one again, if ever he really was not.
(Mr. Kaplan’s explanation of why his tennis activities contributed to John McCain’s loss last November can be found in our archives.)
*CORRECTION: In our article on the Wimbledon Championships, with reference to the fifth set tiebreaker rule, alert reader Frank Stieber of Arlington, Virginia, notes that “The fifth set tiebreaker is exclusive only to the U.S. Open and the Masters Cup final. The Aussie, Roland Garros,Wimbledon, and all Davis Cup ties have the ad-fifth set rule.” Thanks, and we stand corrected.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
elskeptico| 6.19.09 @ 7:37AM
the modern rackets have altered the game and allow baseline players to hit winners from the backcourt they never could with the old gear. I'd like to see Federer with the same racket Budge used.
J.A. Davis| 6.19.09 @ 10:22AM
Advantage Mr. Kaplan! Great article. I have to say I think Federer is one of the players that would excel with a Budge racquet, but I do think the game should have done more to minimize the impact of racquet technology in the game. I think they've changed the balls now, and it seems to be making the game much better.
Paul S. | 6.19.09 @ 11:17AM
Very interesting article. It was a pleasant surprise to find an article on tennis history in the Spectator.
Paul Revere| 6.19.09 @ 12:32PM
Great stuff, but I am still a Pete Sampras man myself.
Pingback| 6.19.09 @ 9:54PM
The American Spectator : Footwork and Roger Federer | Germany today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 6.19.09 @ 10:22PM
The Most Ambidextrous Tennis Player “The Lave” | Betting Tennis Club links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 6.19.09 @ 11:11PM
The American Spectator : Footwork and Roger Federer | Israel Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Richard Baker| 6.21.09 @ 9:21AM
elskeptico:
Played tennis in high school in the late '60s. You know the racket I used. First time I saw one of these huge modern rackets, my first thought was where's the skill in using this monster? Sort of like my sentiment with the Big Bertha drivers in golf. Great article , though. Go, Rod Laver!
Poptropica| 4.9.10 @ 8:43PM
thanks you very much for your information
Poptropica
Poptropica
bri | 10.1.10 @ 1:56PM
i reckon the nadal federer wimbledon final is best tennis match ive ever seen
free download driver | 6.1.11 @ 1:19PM
thanks you very much for your information
love site
Lelani J | 6.5.11 @ 9:22AM
Thanks for the interesting post!UTI Treatment