The after-effects of drunkenness aren't what they used to be.
The first thing to realize about Todd Phillips's The
Hangover is that it contains no actual hangover -- not in
the sense that the term is usually understood. Or at least as it
was understood in the days of my youth when hangovers were not so
unfamiliar to me as they are now. That sort of hangover, in case
the word has changed its meaning without my realizing it, was the
kind that comes in the morning, on waking, from having drunk too
many alcoholic beverages the night before. Mostly it involved
headaches, sensitivity to light, a dry mouth and, in really bad
instances, sickness to one's stomach. The hangover in this movie
is not of that kind, nor is it recognizable as belonging to the
same genus as literature's most famous example, that of Kingsley
Amis's Jim Dixon:
He lay sprawled, too wicked to move, spewed up like a broken
spider crab on the tarry shingle of the morning. The light did
him harm, but not as much as looking at things did; he
resolved, having done it once, never to move his eyeballs
again. A dusty thudding in his head made the scene before him
beat like a pulse. His mouth had been used as a latrine by some
small creature of the night, and then as its mausoleum. During
the night, too, he'd somehow been on a cross-country run and
then been expertly beaten up by secret police. He felt bad.
I keep meaning to write a piece attempting to explain why the
world had to wait until 1954 and Lucky Jim for an
elegantly comic literary treatment of the after-effects of
drunkenness, but I haven't yet got around to it. Hint: it has to
do with honor. And, of course, shame.
Shame, as it happens, is also what's missing from the movie of
The Hangover. The physical grossness of the hangover's
symptoms stand for, or used to stand for, the moral lapse of
overindulgence. Needless to say, those days are long past. Now,
so far from being a badge of shame, being drunk out of one's mind
is a badge of honor. As Mike Tyson, who makes a cameo appearance
in the movie so elegantly puts it, "we all do dumb s*** when
we're f***** up." And dumb s***, as everyone knows, is funny. But
if the purpose of imbibing is to be funny for the benefit of
others and ourselves, little or no actual alcohol need be
involved. The point of drinking nowadays is simply to get smashed
as quickly and efficiently as possible, and for that drugs are a
much better way to go.
That, at least, is the discovery of Phil (Bradley Cooper), Stu
(Ed Helms) and Alan (Zach Galifianakis), who are helping Doug
(Justin Bartha) celebrate his bachelor party in Las Vegas when
Alan -- the odd man out of the quartet in several, faintly
disturbing ways -- laces their Jaegermeisters with Rohypnol,
familiarly known as "roofies" or "the date-rape drug," under the
impression that he is only adding "ecstasy" to the fun. Slow
dissolve. The next thing they -- and we -- know is that there is
a tiger in the bathroom and a baby in the closet; Stu is married
to a stripper and minus a lateral incisor while Phil has a
hospital bracelet on his wrist; they find themselves in charge of
a police cruiser that they have apparently valet-parked the night
before and, when they finally find their car, there is a naked
Chinaman in the trunk. Oh, and Doug is missing. In short, the
only real symptom of this hangover that is of any interest is
amnesia, and amnesia looks a lot funnier than people being sick.
The fact that no one has any memory of how any of these things
could have happened is just about the whole of the comic scenario
-- and, besides being funny, it dispenses with the need for any
joined-up cinematic story-telling of the type that I tend to
prefer in movies but so seldom see anymore. But this movie gets
more comic mileage out of keeping us in the same state of
ignorance as the boys themselves. Like them, too, we only get
reminded of the highlights of the night, not how they got from a
to b, which wouldn't have been so funny. For the highlights are
quite funny. The confusing and equally hilarious events of the
following day eventually reveal, though in no particular order,
how some but not all of the surprises of the morning came to be,
and add some new ones.
For instance, the naked man (Ken Jeong) appears to be under the
impression that our heroes owe him $80,000, and he is involved
with some very scary people who seem determined that they shall
pay it. Also, the rightful operators of the police cruiser are
sore about having mislaid it and arrange to have the hungover
trio (Doug is still missing) tasered by a group of
school-children on a field trip. "You can't just tase people
because you think it's funny," says one of the gang indignantly.
"That's police brutality." It's also movie comedy as we know it
today -- because, I guess, it is like extreme drunkenness in
allowing for the presentation of people suffering painful and
undignified lapses from rational human behavior without any
rational context to make sense of them, or the need for any
slow-moving narrative exposition. Craziness is its own
justification.
As a sort of po-mo joke at the very end of the film, one of the
guys discovers a camera on which snapshots of their wild night
have been taken, and we see these over the close credits. But the
photos don't fill in the gaps at all, as advertised; instead,
they merely add new highlights and -- occasionally obscene --
comic non sequiturs to the phantasmagoria of the night's
adventures. Oddly, there are what seem to be intended to be
serious moments in the midst of this laff-riot. Stu may not be
married to the stripper (Heather Graham) after all, but he seems
to like her a lot better than he does his shrew of a girlfriend,
Melissa (Rachael Harris). The masculine bonding is, in the first
place, an escape from feminine constraints -- to the point where
there are coy but nervous little references to homosexuality --
but the happy ending implies that, except for Alan, they have all
returned to civilization with their masculine confidence and
assertiveness restored. I wonder if that's a po-mo joke as well?
About the Author
James Bowman, our movie and culture critic, is a resident scholar at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He is the author of Honor: A History and Media Madness: The Corruption of Our Political Culture, both published by Encounter Books.
I had no interest in seeing this movie until a friend saw it and
said she could not stop laughing. I need a bit of escapism from
the wretched Obamination, and I still have a few bucks. I'm going
to the movies :)
PolishKnight| 6.15.09 @ 3:34PM
James, TIVO a copy of "Dude, where's my car" which this film is
basically a remake of. It's the same concept: Stoner guys wake up
and then piece together their night before by searching for a
car. Replace car with groom and you have Hangover.
The best film I know of with stoner/drunk humor is The Big
Lebowski where I watched the film the first time, laughed, and
then watched it a second time and laughed harder because of the
things I didn't get the first time.
Finally, the ultimate dumb humor that you probably couldn't watch
is Beavis and Butthead. Designed to drive most women out of the
room, men laugh at the juvenile idiocy of the two that so
accurately described slacker teenage culture of the 80's
including that the slackers laughed at a program that so
accurately described themselves.
hehehe huhuhuhuh.
Danger Ranger| 6.16.09 @ 1:05PM
It's great to see someone conducting this kind of analysis about
the actual 'hangover' promised by the title. Most people seem to
focus on the gags or the stars. Not that I don't love hearing
praise about Zach Galifianakis. Wonder if Visioneers and G-Force
are going to attract more attention due to his rising popularity.
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the
information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of
post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
Kitty| 6.15.09 @ 6:43AM
I had no interest in seeing this movie until a friend saw it and said she could not stop laughing. I need a bit of escapism from the wretched Obamination, and I still have a few bucks. I'm going to the movies :)
PolishKnight| 6.15.09 @ 3:34PM
James, TIVO a copy of "Dude, where's my car" which this film is basically a remake of. It's the same concept: Stoner guys wake up and then piece together their night before by searching for a car. Replace car with groom and you have Hangover.
The best film I know of with stoner/drunk humor is The Big Lebowski where I watched the film the first time, laughed, and then watched it a second time and laughed harder because of the things I didn't get the first time.
Finally, the ultimate dumb humor that you probably couldn't watch is Beavis and Butthead. Designed to drive most women out of the room, men laugh at the juvenile idiocy of the two that so accurately described slacker teenage culture of the 80's including that the slackers laughed at a program that so accurately described themselves.
hehehe huhuhuhuh.
Danger Ranger| 6.16.09 @ 1:05PM
It's great to see someone conducting this kind of analysis about the actual 'hangover' promised by the title. Most people seem to focus on the gags or the stars. Not that I don't love hearing praise about Zach Galifianakis. Wonder if Visioneers and G-Force are going to attract more attention due to his rising popularity.
مركز تحميل| 6.27.09 @ 3:18AM
مركز تحميل
nikecitycn| 7.1.09 @ 4:24AM
It is a wonderful article,i like it,thank you very much!
Lingerie| 9.17.09 @ 9:46PM
sexy lingerie wholesale lingerie
links london Necklaces| 10.21.09 @ 3:10AM
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
sdf| 12.4.09 @ 1:54AM
MKV Converter,
MKV to AVI
nyten| 2.21.10 @ 9:22PM
Tod Converter
vouchercodes| 1.6.11 @ 8:57AM
I really wonder it
دردشة يمنية| 6.10.11 @ 2:40AM
vere nice !
بنت مصر| 6.13.11 @ 4:55AM
goooooooooood