Readers pile on Sonia some more. Whither SSM? Left Coast blues. Plus more.
(Page 3 of 4)
Since Governor Schwarzenegger has been calling for new thinking and "blowing up the boxes," allow me to suggest an untried approach: outsourcing. Outsource California, together with all of its problems.
That's right, EXPEL California from the Union. The advantages are obvious.
Leaving California outside the USA would improve America's social health. It would mean immediate and substantial reductions in the national rates of drug abuse, drug smuggling, illegal immigration and violent crime, to name just a few. The state of national public education will immediately improve, as average test scores would soar once divorced from California's edu-politics racket. Wonder how important gay marriage will be to California, once there's no chance of forcing it on America at large?
Forced separation will mean fewer demands on the U.S. economy. California is forever gassing about being the world's sixth or seventh largest economic entity -- OK, take them at their word. Let them make it on their own. It will be interesting to see how golden the Golden State remains without one lifeline to the Federal Treasury and another to Wall Street. Federal welfare payments to California -- personal, governmental, agricultural and corporate -- are well into the hundreds of billions every year, and over half the toxic mortgages were written here. Eliminating California would halve the cost of the national bailout, right off the bat.
And let's not forget the environment. Kicking California loose will save Uncle Sam the tremendous bill that must come due the day this state splits in half along the San Andreas fault. If L.A. is geologically fated to become part of Tahiti, who are we, in this earth-friendly age, to oppose it? And why should ratepayers in Peoria bear the burden for millionaires who build trophy homes amid dry brush piles in Santa Barbara and Topanga Canyon? Once California is free to chart its own course, Those That Know Best can save the whales, save the wolves, taboo every tree -- but it'll be on their own dime for once.
Finally, expulsion would finally make honest women (so to speak) out of our ruling class. Anti-Americanism is such a conditioned reflex among the activists, academics and actors who decide our fate here, it is clear that the poor dears would be much happier under a system like Cuba's or Nicaragua's. They say so themselves, after all. They speak for everyone -- just ask 'em.
I've even got a catchy slogan for showing California the door:
"Forty-nine? Mighty fine!"
-- Martin Owens
Sacramento, California
Gosh, it looks like the golden goose has no more eggs to lay. And the state seems to be facing problems similar to the car companies who gave the unions everything they wanted in years past. Well, it looks like payback time has finally arrived, but what are all those getting their entitlement checks to do?
What are the politicians who haven't a brain cell in their heads to do? I really can't believe the voters voted to cut themselves off from the entitlements spigot.
I guess it was that or watch the state go bankrupt, then who would buy the state's bonds? Answer no one. The fact is there is no money; not in California nor in many states such as Washington state that is over its eyeballs in red ink. There is no money from the feds either because they are teetering on near bankruptcy as well, except they can print more paper; something the states can not do.
This is really a turning point in U.S. history: we are no longer
the great wealthy country of years past and our standard of
living is eroding right before our eyes.
-- Karl E. Wahl
Bellevue, Washington
PEOPLE ARE ANIMALS TOO
Re: Ken
Blackwell's The Blood Libel of
the New York Times:
I had a epiphany reading this article. Suppose a veterinarian
were to open a clinic to provide abortions on dogs and cats?
Video streamed live on the Internet as puppies and kittens were
pulled from the womb squirming and killed, then put in a plastic
bag and disposed of? While
humans don't seem to have a problem with killing 48 million
Americans, they would scream like crazy about aborting pets. The
idea would eventually sink in that killing unborn children is
just as horrible and even worse.
-- Davis Johnn
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Dear Sir: You and the people that are reporters are responsible
for the murder of Dr. Tiller whether you admit it or not. It's
all going to come out when the guy who murdered the doctor is
questioned by the police.
-- Barbara Neely
IMKessel| 6.5.09 @ 8:28AM
Ms. Neely,
One can be held legal, morally and ethically responsible for inciting violence, but the First Amendment (a big deal to the readers of TAS, Libertarians and Conservative) allows for the free exchange of ideas. (The Democrats don’t seem to be as impressed, after all, they are the ones who proposed and continue to support The Fairness Doctrine.) People like Scott Roeder abase and abuse freedom, and a just society imprisons them for their transgression. No one but Roeder and his accomplices are responsible for his violence.
What your letter suggests is that the free exchange of ideas is dangerous. And you are right. Like a weapon held by an improperly trained person, ideas can cause damage, but life itself is dangerous. Maybe, sadly, the minds of the people can be controlled, but the loss of free thought would outweigh the benefits to the nth degree. Ironically, the very people who wish to control the thoughts of others are often the most thoughtless of all.
J.C.Eaton| 6.5.09 @ 12:23PM
Ms. Neely: If your brain-dead observation about universal guilt with respect to Tiller is valid, then you, madam, are responsible for all the liberal pestilence that has swarmed this once great nation. Carry the burden painfully.
wrinkle cream| 6.6.09 @ 6:15AM
This is really wonderful article.i enjoy to be here
weight| 11.12.09 @ 2:06PM
hi