By Lisa Fabrizio on 6.3.09 @ 6:07AM
The state of Connecticut exacts its revenge on religious
believers.
Having returned to these fair shores after an overseas trip, the
end of which culminated in a total of 13 hours of flight time, it
was with a general sense of relief and peace that I betook myself
a seat in my favorite pew in my local parish for Mass last
Sunday. But, as has too often happened in the past few months,
examples of our Lord’s predictions of persecution and calumny
against those who believe in him came true once again as our
learned pastor took to the pulpit to address us.
It seems that our Diocese of Bridgeport -- which in March was
forced to marshal
the faithful to defend itself from unconstitutional
government interference -- was notified by the Connecticut Office
of State Ethics that it is under investigation for possible
violations of the state’s lobbying laws. This of course is
nothing less than the vindictive retribution by an entity whose
leadership has become as anti-religious a nest of vipers as our
Lord ever encountered. But our courageous bishop, William E.
Lori, is not taking this lying down and has filed an injunction
in Federal Court to end this harassment. In a letter to the
faithful, he laid
out the facts:
Following the surprise introduction of Bill 1098, a proposal
that singled out Catholic parishes and would have forced them
to reorganize contrary to Church law and the First Amendment,
our Diocese responded in the most natural, spontaneous, and
frankly, American, of ways: we alerted our membership -- in
person and through our website; we encouraged them to exercise
their free speech by contacting their elected representatives;
and, we organized a rally at the State Capitol. How can this
possibly be called lobbying?
He then delivered the kind of rebuke that should warm the hearts
of freedom-lovers everywhere:
This cannot possibly be what our Legislature had in mind when
it sought to bring more transparency and oversight to a
legislative process that has been corrupted by special
interests and back-room deals. If it is, then it should shock
the conscience of all citizens of the Constitution State.
The State of Connecticut, like so many other American
governmental bodies that deliberately obscure their statutes with
lawyerly twaddle, basically defines
lobbying as those who spend over $2,000 in any year to:
"communicate directly or solicit others to communicate with any
official or his staff in the legislative or executive branch of
government or in a quasi-public agency, for the purpose of
influencing any legislative or administrative action…" There are
of course exceptions; one of which is unsurprisingly granted to
members of the media.
So in other words, if you, dear taxpayer, were to have the
audacity to be offended at the next usurpation of your
constitutionally guaranteed liberties by your betters in
government, and decided to organize your fellow ungrateful
citizens into a letter-writing campaign, and if the cost of this
exceeded two grand, you too might be the subject of government
retribution. Welcome to the Constitution State!
The point of all this is that in the continuing war between
church and state, governments -- which in the words of our
Declaration of Independence are sending "swarms of Officers to
harass our people, and eat out their substance" --are counting on
the servile acquiescence of the governed to severely curb our
religious freedom. And sadly, it is working.
Colleges and universities, once the bastions of independent
thinking and free speech, are now the home to the most stifling
rules and regulations punishing the exercise of same.
Private citizens too have been muzzled both socially; bowing to
politically correct admonitions never to discuss religion or
politics in public, and governmentally; by the soon to be enacted
"hate crime" legislation.
Of course, those who hate religion in general and the Catholic
Church in particular will attempt to howl her into submission by
endlessly reviving the so-called "pedophile priest" issue; as if
the sins of a few should render the whole body illegitimate. Were
this rule similarly applied to the rest of our society, the halls
of Congress themselves would also fall silent. Not a bad thought,
actually.
Yet, in view of the continuing assaults on our religious freedom,
one has to doubt if this country could have been founded at all
in light of today's standards. Many were the fiery speeches
delivered from pulpits in support of American Independence, based
on the natural law. One also wonders if clergyman like the Rev.
Martin Luther King and others who organized marches in favor of
civil rights would today be considered lobbyists. Or what, if
any, action should be taken against the many black churches that
actively welcome politics and politicians to their lecterns; the
Rev. Jeremiah Wright and friends here come to mind.
To take this to the next level, how long will it be before we
will see rabbis and pastors across the land become fearful of
exercising not only their religious freedom, but their sacred
right of free speech as Americans to express their opposition or
support for pending legislation. This is already underway in
Canada and will probably, like government healthcare, soon speed
southward.
We who love the disappearing U.S. Constitution do so in part
because--unlike the Declaration which uses lofty language
addressed to the whole world--its meanings are clearly spelled
out in words that did and still should speak to American hearts
and minds. Words like these that should continue to inspire all
future American "lobbyists":
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right
of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances.
topics:
Religious Freedom, Catholic Church