By David N. Bass on 5.13.09 @ 6:07AM
Republican support for traditional marriage is hardly the reason
for the GOP's problems.
Perhaps goaded by the liberal theta waves now pulsating from
Washington, same-sex marriage advocates have won an unprecedented
number of victories in recent weeks.
The avalanche began in April when the Iowa Supreme Court
struck down a state law protecting the historical definition
of marriage. Since then,
Vermont,
Connecticut, and
Maine have approved same-sex marriage through legislative
act. The New Hampshire House
approved similar legislation last week, although it's unclear
whether Gov. John Lynch, a Democrat, will sign it.
The flurry of triumphs for homosexual marriage supporters has,
predictably, led to renewed calls from liberal Republicans to
scuttle the party's stance on the issue.
Former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, for instance,
recently
urged the GOP to scrub traditional marriage from its platform
or face the political consequences. Steve Schmidt, a political
advisor for John McCain's presidential bid last year, gave a
similar
prognosis. He said the issue is alienating Republicans'
chances of capturing young voters and northeastern states.
Ignored in both Whitman and Schmidt's analysis are the 30 states
that have already amended their constitutions to protect the
traditional understanding of marriage. Although much ado has been
made about the democratic approval of same-sex marriage in recent
weeks, states with marriage amendments have put the issue to a
direct vote of the people, with an average victory margin around
75 percent.
The wins haven't all been in conservative Sun Belt states,
either. Voters in California, Oregon, Nevada, Colorado, Florida,
Ohio, Wisconsin, and Michigan — all states that broke for Obama
in 2008 — have approved traditional marriage amendments.
In fact, aside from the anomaly of Iowa and California (both made
possible by judicial fiat), the northeast is the only region of
the country to see a successful push for same-sex marriage. The
issue often fares better on the ballot in blue states than do GOP
candidates. So why the push to wipe it from the party's agenda?
Liberal Republicans point to shifting polling data. During the
last decade, they say, national surveys have shown a gradual
erosion of support for traditional marriage, and that bodes ill
for the party's future.
In some ways, that's an accurate assessment. In 2008, Gallup
reported that 40 percent of Americans said homosexual
marriage should be recognized as equal to traditional marriage,
compared with one in four Americans in 1996. But the poll also
showed that public support for same-sex marriage was higher in
2004 than it is today, and that support has fluctuated between 37
percent and 46 percent during the last four years.
Clearly, the nation isn't seeing a tsunami-level shift on the
marriage issue, although polling shows a gradual shift toward the
left. That's true for many positions advocated by the GOP,
however. If the Republican Party forfeits its position on
homosexual marriage in response to negative survey data, then it
should toss most of its agenda, because current polling puts the
GOP, across the board, in the toilet.
A better option is to remain true to the foundational principles
of conservatism, of which traditional marriage and family are a
critical plank. Conservatives can do a better job of nuancing the
issue, but they should never forfeit the principle itself.
In addition, strict political pragmatists should consider that
traditional marriage remains a strong winner at the state level,
even in reliably blue states. California has twice approved
protections for traditional marriage, the second time after the
state Supreme Court ruled that defining marriage as traditionally
understood is unconstitutional. The amendment garnered far more
support than John McCain's paltry showing in the Big Enchilada.
The GOP needs to do some soul searching, no doubt. Part of that
should be the acknowledgment that social conservatism in general,
and marriage protection in particular, is not responsible for the
party's fading fortunes.
topics:
Republican Party, Marriage Laws