By Joseph Lawler on 5.7.09 @ 6:07AM
Putting teachers' unions, not D.C. school children, first.
Tears welled up in Zed Yim's eyes when she was asked where her
son will go to school next year. "I have no idea," she confided,
before her emotions prevented her from saying any more.
Ms. Yim, along with 1400 D.C. schoolchildren, teachers, and
parents rallied, yesterday in Freedom Park, just across from the
White House, to protest the cancellation of the Opportunity
Scholarship Program (OSP) that provides school vouchers for 1700
disadvantaged D.C. youth. The Democratic Congress voted in a
spending bill to defund the OSP earlier this year, thereby
revoking the scholarships of kids like Zed's son, Kassa, who
currently attends Sacred Heart School in Northwest D.C.
The rally, which featured speeches by former mayors Marion Barry
and Anthony A. Williams as well as student and parent
testimonials, drew students from OSP-participating schools all
over D.C.. Neither Infinite Fields and Demarro Shavazz,
scholarship recipients in the seventh grade at Bridges Academy,
knew exactly who was responsible for ending their scholarship
program, but their disappointment showed. Infinite called Bridges
"fantastic," and said that studying there had improved his
academic career. Demarro added that he did not think it was fair
to axe the program, because "not all the parents can pay."
Donna Mebane, a teacher of literature and language arts at
Bridges, explained that the OSP gives the kids an advantage.
Bridges Academy's advanced curriculum allows the kids to enter
high school ahead of the curve. In her seventh grade literature
class of nine children, all but one or two are OSP participants.
The death of the OSP program "will hurt a lot of people," she
predicted. "It will definitely affect students."
Another mother in attendance, Anquanette Williamson, has two
sons, Dayonte and Donae, attending private schools through
vouchers. "I don't think it's fair to the parents or the kids,"
she said of the program's demise. She explained that it was
particularly disheartening for the program to end just as it
began to benefit those who needed it the most. "I don't want to
be racist," she said, "but that's when they stopped [funding the
program] -- when us minorities found out about it."
Although the rally's attendees knew that they had been dealt a
bad hand, none who spoke to TAS knew exactly where to
assign the blame. Most blamed D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty and the
City Council for ending the OSP.
In fact, Fenty supports vouchers. OSP lost its funding at the
federal level. Sen. Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, added
language to the $410 billion omnibus spending bill enacted on
March 11 that cut off the $14 million for the OSP. Senate
Republicans submitted an amendment to remove the funding
restrictions, but it was voted down. As a result, the families
that participated in the OSP, with an average household income of
approximately $24,300, face the prospect of tearing their kids
away from the schools they have become acclimated to and
re-enrolling them in D.C.'s dysfunctional public schools.
According to the rally's organizers, over 85% of the scholarship
students belong to public schools identified as "low performing"
according to the No Child Left Behind standards.
In fact, a recent study
(pdf) proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the program
provides a better education than the terrible public schools, at
about a third of the cost. Why would the Democrats on Capitol
Hill want to end the voucher program? Why would President Obama
and Treasury Secretary Arne Duncan, who repeatedly promise to do
"what works" for the schools regardless of ideology, allow
Congress to get away with it (and sweep the incriminating study
under the rug)?
The Democratic Party's priorities, apparently, are with their
consituents in the teachers' unions. The unions know that school
reforms like vouchers threaten their jobs running mediocre public
schools, and went so far as to remind the Democrats,
"we paid good money for you." The Democrats are willing to
consign these 1700 kids to mediocrity to appease the unions.
Although Obama officials said yesterday that the administration will
try to restore funding for the current recipients until they
finish at their schools, it is a poor compromise considering that
thousands more D.C. families would love to enter the program and
that Obama's intentions are useless unless he threatens to veto
further efforts to cut the current recipients' funds. In fact
Obama's weak efforts are hypocritical, considering that Obama
himself would not be where he is today had he not received a
scholarship to attend a private school in Hawaii. Furthermore,
neither he nor Arne Duncan entrusted their own children to the
D.C. public school system, sending them to prestigious private
schools instead. And yet they will not stand up to defend the
same right for 1700 poor kids who do not have parents in the
upper echelons of government to speak for them.
The families that gathered at Freedom Plaza yesterday are mostly
unaware of the distant politics that conspired to deprive them of
the opportunities afforded by the OSP, but they know that they
want the same privilege to choose their children's education that
Barack Obama and Arne Duncan have. There is no justifiable reason
to deprive them of this choice, and so the Democrats'
politically-motivated decision to do so, abetted by the
administration, can best be described as unconscionable. Even
that description, however, falls short when you see a mother
crying because she does not know where her son will get an
education.
topics:
Education, Democratic Party, Washington, D.C.