Sadly, Help in Suffering has only enough resources to look after
the animals in Jaipur and in limited ways given the world's
street dogs are an orphaned cause that suffers from a paucity of
funding, particularly now with the global financial crisis.
Notwithstanding, the dog population has declined by about 50% in
the Pink City, based upon Reece's surveys. "Visitors tell us that
our street dogs look better than those in other north Indian
cities, and we attribute this to our efforts to stabilize the
population at lower levels, reduce the stress of reproduction and
the numbers of puppies which are born, suffer and die on the
streets," he says.
But for every street dog in Jaipur there are thousands more. Dogs
who are not bouncing around the White House lawn being offered
furry microphones by obsequiously adulating reporters. Not being
carried in $1,000 luxury pouches from Saks Fifth Avenue to save
their paws from pounding the privileged pavement of Park Avenue.
And they're certainly not perfumed, pawdicured, and physically
pampered like the genetically tampered dogs of the Westminster
Kennel Show. No, they're dogs who would treat the Prozac pills
their first-world canine counterparts take to cure "depression,"
as food.
So here's my modest proposal to turn the tide of public opinion
for the Portuguese waterdog. Just as POTUS aims to fight for the
underprivileged, so too should DOTUS. Instead of parading his
activities before the doting media, or penning mindless books as
previous White House occupants have done, Bo could start with a
website: www.dotus.com would make dog-doting humans aware of the
dire needs of developing world dogs. Bo's television and
photo-ops could be used to remind viewers, especially if he were
to don a symbolic collar or jumper with, perhaps, a request for
donations to HIS-Vets that would also help them to create more of
these animal treatment centers in the many other parts of the
world where none exist. And to throw him a bone, they could even
be named after Bo.
Imagine how DOTUS may have enlightened Leona Helmsley to divert
even a fraction of the millions she left behind for her lapdog of
luxury. And how he could have pulled the Brazilian heart-strings
of Gisele Bundchen into wrapping a simple ribbon around her dogs
and sending the untold sum she paid for their Dolce and Gabbana
lace collars directly to Jack Reece instead. And just think of
what could be done with the $5 million that Gerrit Dou's dog
painting fetched at auction in 2006.
The mind boggles.
In these countries, a little goes a long way: Eight dollars would
spay and vaccinate a dog, or employ an animal care technician for
three days, or treat 2.5 camels at Pushkar.
President Obama and his best friend would be in good spiritual
company. As President Woodrow Wilson said, "If a dog will not
come to you after having looked you in the face, you should go
home and examine your conscience."
The burden must now rest on this adorable beast named Bo. Dogs
know nothing of noblesse oblige, but given their dogged caring
for their canine brethren, I know Bo would bark two woofs in
agreement with Will Rogers who always said that "a dog does
nothing for political reasons."
As the human companion of 2 non-specific breed dogs I hope BO
(the pseudo-male occupying the Oval Office) will work to tear
down the walls specieism that pervade our country and keep my
well behaved and intelligent quadrupeds from enjoying the full
benefits of living in an enlightened country.
When will they be able to marry other species, drink freely from
toilets no longer chemically treated with blue water and lick
their genitals in public without scorn? For that matter when will
they like the dead be used by ACORN to steal elections for
Democrats?
One can only hope that BO's Muslim heritage with its hatred of
dogs hasn't so tainted him that he fails to change our antiquated
laws and mores to insure Zulu and Peanut share fully in the
benefits of the Obamanation.
L. Ross| 4.27.09 @ 1:53PM
Marilia,
You have a big heart, but you're an idiot. On a list of things
that need fixing in the world, dog suffering is way, way down at
the bottom. Next time you see a suffering dog, I suggest you just
shoot it, and get on with your life. Don't worry, we're not going
to run out of dogs.
MeowMix| 4.27.09 @ 2:00PM
Michael Tomlinson| 4.27.09 @ 12:04PM
Further evidence of the complete decline of the GOP and it's RANK
and file. When you've got absolutely nothing in your own party of
substance, by all means go after the dog.
What a bunch of FN losers.
JL / HCN| 4.27.09 @ 2:21PM
The rescue-only crowd insists that every dog purchased from a
breeder is a death sentence for a stray. They make no distinction
between responsible breeders who nurture sound-tempered dogs and
puppy-mill operators who crowd breeding bitches so tightly into
cages that they chew off each other's legs.
Rescuing a dog is indeed a noble gesture, even if there will
never be enough humans to save every abandoned dog. But for the
health of their daughter, the Obamas wanted a purebred dog. And
last time I checked, Portuguese water dogs weren't turning up at
the pound with any regularity.
Most of the purebred dogs that end up in shelters come by way of
reckless backyard breeders or puppy mills, where dogs are
routinely inbred, bred so narrowly for looks that they can't
breathe properly, or bred with no thought for their health at
all. Responsible breeders track their puppies assiduously and
take them back if they don't work out. They don't put their dogs
up for rescue, they "re-home" them.
For the record, I rescue dogs. I rescue, in fact, the kinds of
dogs that end up in shelters in droves: Yippie, wild-eyed
terriers and the much-maligned American Staffordshire (pit) bull
terriers. I take them in, train them and keep them with me for
longer than a decade; I work through their tendencies to bolt or
their fears of men in baseball caps until they accept the
compromises of life with humans. I am well set up for the task:
My tolerant, dog-loving husband and I have no children; I love
dogs that would drive sane women mad; and I have the tenacity to
work with them.
But I also love purebred dogs and the whole notion that we humans
have bred dogs for certain tasks. I love Newfoundlands that save
drowning children, border collies that live to herd, brave
terriers driven to hunt rats. And I despair that we may be
heading into a world in which breeding dogs to do what dogs do --
work with, and beside, and indeed even for, human beings -- is
considered, by some crooked measure, cruelty to animals.
There is something far worse than a family acquiring a dog from a
conscientious breeder, and that's a family rescuing a dog that
turns out to be fundamentally unstable or just plain unsuited to
life with a family.
Childhood dogs shape attitudes toward animals for life; they can
make kids lifelong advocates for animal welfare or create in them
an ineluctable fear. A family that adopts a dog that incorrigibly
nips children's hands, eats expensive furniture or lunges at
other animals might at best end up investing in an expensive
trainer. At worst, the dog ends up back in the shelter or on the
street, leaving a family forever wary of canines.
In January, one month after the death of a beloved pit bull I
rescued from the pound 13 years ago, I took in a 5-month old
American Staffordshire named Tabitha. She is, from what we can
tell, sane and hearty, a natural retriever, psychologically
stable enough that neither ear-pulling nor toe-fondling nor the
taunts of her Cairn terrier housemate, Thomas, faze her.
But Tabitha is still a puppy, and having lived with dogs -- seven
in total -- nearly all my life, I know that puppies harbor
secrets in their DNA. What we know about Tabitha is all good, but
we could scribble it on a sheet of notebook paper. What we don't
know could fill volumes.
We don't, for instance, know what her parents were like. We don't
know if she harbors the gene for a debilitating neurological
condition called ataxia that is common in her breed. Will she
continue to put up with our ambushing cats? With the squeals of
our friends' children? We think so, and we will work with her no
matter what. If we had children to worry about, however, it might
be different.
Symbolically, it would have been nice if the Obamas rescued a
dog. But to insist that the only good dog is a rescued dog is to
relegate our future with the canine species to random
relationships in which humans are forced to settle for whatever
renegade breeders produce and fail to care for.
And let it be said that the reason there exists such a thing as a
Portuguese water dog at all, or any dog with a hypoallergenic
coat and a game temperament, is not a happy accident but a
triumph of the selective breeding humans have been practicing
with canines for millenniums -- the very practice so many people
who claim to care about dogs would prefer to see turned into a
crime.
thankyou for publishing this marvellously enlightening and gut
wrenchingly compassionate piece. it shows that you ain't been
neutered. let's hope, that we as a dog worshipping nation, will
run with it!
Michael Tomlinson| 4.27.09 @ 12:04PM
As the human companion of 2 non-specific breed dogs I hope BO (the pseudo-male occupying the Oval Office) will work to tear down the walls specieism that pervade our country and keep my well behaved and intelligent quadrupeds from enjoying the full benefits of living in an enlightened country.
When will they be able to marry other species, drink freely from toilets no longer chemically treated with blue water and lick their genitals in public without scorn? For that matter when will they like the dead be used by ACORN to steal elections for Democrats?
One can only hope that BO's Muslim heritage with its hatred of dogs hasn't so tainted him that he fails to change our antiquated laws and mores to insure Zulu and Peanut share fully in the benefits of the Obamanation.
L. Ross| 4.27.09 @ 1:53PM
Marilia,
You have a big heart, but you're an idiot. On a list of things that need fixing in the world, dog suffering is way, way down at the bottom. Next time you see a suffering dog, I suggest you just shoot it, and get on with your life. Don't worry, we're not going to run out of dogs.
MeowMix| 4.27.09 @ 2:00PM
Michael Tomlinson| 4.27.09 @ 12:04PM
Further evidence of the complete decline of the GOP and it's RANK and file. When you've got absolutely nothing in your own party of substance, by all means go after the dog.
What a bunch of FN losers.
JL / HCN| 4.27.09 @ 2:21PM
The rescue-only crowd insists that every dog purchased from a breeder is a death sentence for a stray. They make no distinction between responsible breeders who nurture sound-tempered dogs and puppy-mill operators who crowd breeding bitches so tightly into cages that they chew off each other's legs.
Rescuing a dog is indeed a noble gesture, even if there will never be enough humans to save every abandoned dog. But for the health of their daughter, the Obamas wanted a purebred dog. And last time I checked, Portuguese water dogs weren't turning up at the pound with any regularity.
Most of the purebred dogs that end up in shelters come by way of reckless backyard breeders or puppy mills, where dogs are routinely inbred, bred so narrowly for looks that they can't breathe properly, or bred with no thought for their health at all. Responsible breeders track their puppies assiduously and take them back if they don't work out. They don't put their dogs up for rescue, they "re-home" them.
For the record, I rescue dogs. I rescue, in fact, the kinds of dogs that end up in shelters in droves: Yippie, wild-eyed terriers and the much-maligned American Staffordshire (pit) bull terriers. I take them in, train them and keep them with me for longer than a decade; I work through their tendencies to bolt or their fears of men in baseball caps until they accept the compromises of life with humans. I am well set up for the task: My tolerant, dog-loving husband and I have no children; I love dogs that would drive sane women mad; and I have the tenacity to work with them.
But I also love purebred dogs and the whole notion that we humans have bred dogs for certain tasks. I love Newfoundlands that save drowning children, border collies that live to herd, brave terriers driven to hunt rats. And I despair that we may be heading into a world in which breeding dogs to do what dogs do -- work with, and beside, and indeed even for, human beings -- is considered, by some crooked measure, cruelty to animals.
There is something far worse than a family acquiring a dog from a conscientious breeder, and that's a family rescuing a dog that turns out to be fundamentally unstable or just plain unsuited to life with a family.
Childhood dogs shape attitudes toward animals for life; they can make kids lifelong advocates for animal welfare or create in them an ineluctable fear. A family that adopts a dog that incorrigibly nips children's hands, eats expensive furniture or lunges at other animals might at best end up investing in an expensive trainer. At worst, the dog ends up back in the shelter or on the street, leaving a family forever wary of canines.
In January, one month after the death of a beloved pit bull I rescued from the pound 13 years ago, I took in a 5-month old American Staffordshire named Tabitha. She is, from what we can tell, sane and hearty, a natural retriever, psychologically stable enough that neither ear-pulling nor toe-fondling nor the taunts of her Cairn terrier housemate, Thomas, faze her.
But Tabitha is still a puppy, and having lived with dogs -- seven in total -- nearly all my life, I know that puppies harbor secrets in their DNA. What we know about Tabitha is all good, but we could scribble it on a sheet of notebook paper. What we don't know could fill volumes.
We don't, for instance, know what her parents were like. We don't know if she harbors the gene for a debilitating neurological condition called ataxia that is common in her breed. Will she continue to put up with our ambushing cats? With the squeals of our friends' children? We think so, and we will work with her no matter what. If we had children to worry about, however, it might be different.
Symbolically, it would have been nice if the Obamas rescued a dog. But to insist that the only good dog is a rescued dog is to relegate our future with the canine species to random relationships in which humans are forced to settle for whatever renegade breeders produce and fail to care for.
And let it be said that the reason there exists such a thing as a Portuguese water dog at all, or any dog with a hypoallergenic coat and a game temperament, is not a happy accident but a triumph of the selective breeding humans have been practicing with canines for millenniums -- the very practice so many people who claim to care about dogs would prefer to see turned into a crime.
Judith Lewis
Tom Paine| 4.27.09 @ 2:52PM
Michael --
You're a jackass, aren't you?
MAS1916| 4.27.09 @ 4:42PM
At least Obama remembered to include Bo in his Apology tours.
http://firstconservative.com/blog/uncategorized/obamas-next-task-apologize-to-the-dog
glenda bayless| 4.28.09 @ 1:09PM
thankyou for publishing this marvellously enlightening and gut wrenchingly compassionate piece. it shows that you ain't been neutered. let's hope, that we as a dog worshipping nation, will run with it!