January 22, 2013 | 94 comments
January 14, 2013 | 66 comments
January 8, 2013 | 102 comments
July 25, 2011 | 225 comments
June 10, 2011 | 116 comments
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is trying to silence military leaders. Congress needs to demand that they be heard.
“Once the decision is made — and particularly once the
president signs off on the budget — then there needs to be
discipline about people not conducting guerrilla warfare against
decisions the president has made… We have a chain of command and
that’s what it’s all about.”
— Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Pentagon Press briefings, April 6 and 7
With those chilling words, Defense Secretary Robert Gates let it be known that he will brook no dissent within the military over his decision to gut the defense budget by canceling and “restructuring” key weapon systems. But the inconvenient truth for Gates is that his directive flies in the face of Congress and the Constitution.
Gates has proposed the most significant weapon systems cuts since the Carter administration more than 30 years ago. Gates’ cuts include the elimination of the Transformational Satellite program as well as the elimination of eight new Army combat vehicle types, all of which are integral to modernizing U.S. military capabilities for 21st-century irregular warfare.
Indeed, these cuts will have profound, deleterious and far-reaching effects on our fighting men and women. Shouldn’t Congress get to hear what U.S. military leaders think about these cuts? Doesn’t Congressional oversight responsibility demand a full and public vetting of the defense secretary’s proposals?
Gates grudgingly acknowledges that the military service chiefs “can give their professional military advice to the Congress and to the president if they disagree with [his] decisions”; but all other military leaders, he says, better shut up.
“For everybody else,” he told reporters on Apr. 7, “once I’ve made my decisions, and once the president has made his decisions, then that is the position of this department, and they are expected to execute those programs.”
Military officials, of course, have to follow the law. But the supreme law is the Constitution of the United States, which protects free speech, and which vests funding authority and oversight responsibility with Congress.
As Gates well knows, “the Pentagon,” so called, is not a monolith. It has 23,000 employees and hundreds of different chains of command. Consequently, there are a variety of different Pentagon viewpoints on myriad topics, including the defense budget.
In order for Congress to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities, it must subpoena and swear under oath all key participants involved in Defense Department budget deliberations, including but not limited to the military service chiefs and senior three- and four-star Generals and Admirals.
This means, pace Gates, that many more people than just the military service chiefs ought to publicly testify before Congress. More than 100 Pentagon officials, after all, were involved in this year’s secret Pentagon budget deliberations. The defense secretary has benefited from their analyses; so, too, should Congress and the American people.
That’s what democracy and representative government are all about: an open and vigorous exchange of ideas. All points of view should be heard, so that the American people and their elected representatives can make wise and informed decisions about our defense budget.
If Gates is confident that his cuts are wise public policy, then he should welcome, not fear, a thorough and open examination of his proposals. In actuality, however, Gates knows that his cuts are problematic at best and cannot withstand serious Congressional scrutiny. That’s why he’s trying to preemptively censor military leaders.
“Generals and Admirals are afraid to speak in the climate created by Gates,” Dr. Rebecca Grant, a senior fellow at the Lexington Institute, said to the Norfolk Examiner.
As Defense Secretary, Grant notes, “Gates has fired a service chief, [former Air Force General Michael Moseley]; two service secretaries, [former Army Secretary Francis Harvey and former Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne]; and a combatant commander.”
For internal Defense Department budget deliberations, Gates also forced uniformed military officers and civilian government employees to sign a secrecy oath. These are not actions that encourage free thought and open analysis by our nation’s top military leaders; quite the contrary.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?