The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

High Spirits

National Prayer Bazaar

America's National Prayer Breakfast has a problem. It is in danger of becoming an empty social ritual rather than a meaningful spiritual event. As a reasonably regular attendee at the NPB for several years, your High Spirits columnist is sad about the decline in its standards and sorry to be firing these warning shots of criticism across its bows. But before this historic gathering drifts further toward being just another secular convention with a dash of prayer added, its mission needs to be reexamined and its course re-chartered.

The origins of the NPB go back to the Great Depression, when 19 leading businessmen in Seattle met to pray over breakfast for the poor and unemployed of their community. The idea, inspired by the meal cooked by Jesus on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias as described in John 21, spread to other cities.

In 1942 breakfast prayer groups were founded in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Eleven years later President Eisenhower asked the senators if he could join them. That was the birth of what is now called the National Prayer Breakfast. The great generation of the Eisenhower era were God-fearing people, rooted in faith, raised in hard times, and tested in war. Those traditions died slowly, but even so no president since 1953 has dared to miss the NPB, although some must have longed to strike it from their calendars. Bill Clinton looked a most bedraggled lion thrown to the Christians when he had to attend at the height of the lurid allegations about his most un-Churchillian use of cigars with Monica Lewinsky. Another unrepentant White House sinner was Richard Nixon during Watergate. He declared that he would prefer to spend a couple of hours in the dentist's chair without an anaesthetic rather than to go and pray in public at this event—but in the end he went. February 5, 2009, saw the 57th NPB, and President Obama was dutifully on parade. But he too looked and sounded as though he would rather have been somewhere else.

The NPB's modern weakness lies in its success. It has become the worldliest of events, a see-and-beseen extravaganza with a Cecil B. DeMille–sized cast of 4,000 extras featuring major donors and minor diplomats. The latter now far outnumber members of Congress. This seemed to be a matter of pride for the organizers, who kept referring to this great international breakfast.

Too much internationalization can bring its problems, for there were moments when the proceedings seemed to have turned into a diplomatic networking exercise for B-list embassies. The NPB co-chairman, Rep. Vernon Ehlers of Michigan, had such difficulty making himself heard above the hubbub that he needed the apocryphal advice once given by a cathedral verger to a preacher: "You'll have to speak up, sir, in this church the agnostics are something dreadful." When Rep. Ehlers eventually became audible he complained, "Obviously some people here are not aware of our spiritual traditions." By this he meant that about a quarter of the breakfasters at this feeding of the four thousand began tucking into their croissants without waiting for a blessing. Other little breaches of protocol included an African ambassador who took multiple calls on his cell phone during the Scripture readings, a politician from Laos who fell asleep while the opening hymn was being sung, and a table full of Central Asian businessmen who noisily swapped visiting cards with Washington lobbyists as their neighbors attempted to pray.

President Obama clearly missed these equivalents of the moneychangers in the temple because in the opening lines of his remarks he solemnly intoned: "And today, as I see presidents and dignitaries here from every corner of the globe, it strikes me that this is one of the rare occasions that still brings much of the world together in a moment of peace and goodwill." Since the highest ranking of these great global statesmen attending the NPB turned out to be the prime minister of Albania, the president of Haiti, and the secretary of state of Kazakhstan, one began to wonder if the expectations were running too far ahead of the realities.

President Obama had his expectation problems too. Some of them were perhaps due to the event coming so soon after his election. He can't always reproduce the soaring oratory of his acceptance night speech in Chicago, particularly to an audience where foreigners and Republicans were in the majority. But at least he brought attention back to where the original prayer breakfasts were focused— "on the afflicted and those who have fallen on hard times," even if his announced solution to these problems, "a new White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships" seemed rather underwhelming.

Obama's unexpected difficulty was that he had to speak immediately after Tony Blair. The contrast between them was reminiscent of Tacitus's comparison between the two greatest orators of the ancient world: "When Cicero sat down his hearers said, 'How well he spoke!' But when Demosthenes finished they rose up, crying, 'Let us march!'"

As the keynote speaker, Tony Blair was the day's Demosthenes, on fire with passion. As this column has previously noted (June 2008), the former British prime minister has become a powerful advocate opposing the growth of aggressive secularism. "I say that there are limits to humanism and beyond those limits God and only God can work," he told the NPB, urging his listeners to return to the fear of God because the phrase "really means obedience to God, humility before God, acceptance through God that there is something bigger, better, and more important than you. It is that humbling of man's vanity, that stirring of conscience through God's prompting, that recognition of our limitations that faith alone can bestow."

This was a fine speech by Blair, combining self-deprecating humor, personal testimony, and sound theology. More importantly, he touched a deeper wavelength of spirituality than seemed to be present in most of the outer atmospherics of the 2009 NPB. The Fellowship, a group inspired by Doug Coe that runs the event today, needs to get back to the 1953 basics of prayers for the nation, for victims of the recession, and for the God-fearing leaders of Congress. Irrelevant diplomats, multi-faith political correctness, international glitz, and networking businessmen are not the right components for America's National Prayer Breakfast in the 21st century.

Letter to the Editor

Jonathan Aitken, The American Spectator’s High Spirits columnist, is most recently author of John Newton: From Disgrace to Amazing Grace (Crossway Books). His biographies include Charles W. Colson: A Life Redeemed (Doubleday) and Nixon: A Life, now available in a new paperback edition (Regnery).

Comments

Will| 4.10.09 @ 8:57AM

At these national prayer meetings, to which god is prayer directed? Which god will respond to the prayers?
The principle of inclusion stands in stark contrast to the particularity that shapes the historic Christian confession, i.e., its insistence that there is but one God and one way that a fallen humanity may be restored to God through Jesus Christ alone.
Only the most utterly naive Christian can invoke god in the public square while assuming that everyone else means by that term precisely what we mean.
David L. Adams, The Anomymous God

Aaron| 4.10.09 @ 9:37AM

The last National Prayer Breakfast that I attended was in Boise, ID. I sat near Medal of Honor recipients Capt ED 'Too Tall" Freeman and Col. Bernie Fisher. Its a good thing to be in the presence of God and heroes.

Ellis Wyatt| 4.10.09 @ 9:37AM

To answer Will, I believe they are referring to the one and only God. The God that came to earth as a man, was crucified for our sins, and then was raised back to life. In a Christian nation, and at an event founded by Christians based on an event that involved Christ himself, I would have to believe those who attend the breakfast understand to whom the prayers are directed.

Gustav| 4.10.09 @ 10:26AM

It always has been a social/political occasion. More than a few politicians, who in their hearts are atheists, gain cover by attending.

Tim| 4.10.09 @ 11:16AM

The fact that Obama has yet to attend Sunday worship since his swearing in speaks volumes.

But, I actually respect him for his dedication to his leftist, atheist and anti "christian American" upbringing. He is who he is!

I guess I am somewhat surprised that such a political animal such as himself won't even go to church just to make it look good to the masses.

I think what is the real scary situation here is.....Obama doesn't even feel he has to look the part of a so called God Fearing Human Being or American Leader.

Cow Rie| 4.10.09 @ 10:32PM

C'mon people.
Obama is God.

Alan Brooks| 4.10.09 @ 10:36PM

you say Obama is God?
well then he'd better answer my prayers that Jesus will come back. If Obama is God that means in addition to his two daughters he has a son--
so let him send his son to us!

Tim| 4.11.09 @ 10:49AM

Can you believe this crock of dog dung.

Obama is searching for the right church.
He is sending advisors to these churches, listening to the sermons. They are doing back ground checks on the churches, pastors, interviewing the flock, etc.

I liked Obama better when he was being his true self and laughing it up and knee slapping and high fiving his fellow brothers and sisters in Rev Wright's Chicago Church.

At least Obama was being genuine during those first 20 years and not this oh so transparent facade we see today.

I didn't vote for Obama and I sure don't like his brand of all power to the State socialism, but I at least respected him two years ago or so for being true to his beliefs and being open about his socialism/anti west/anti American rhetoric.

In politics, the cover up is always worse than the crime. And of all people, the "Left" should know that for corn sake.

Jimmy T| 4.12.09 @ 10:15PM

I say let Tony Blair run for President on an Independent ticket. No worry, he doesn't have to prove he was born an American citizen.

Tony not Blair in Central PA | 4.13.09 @ 1:33PM

Tony Blair and his wife recently converted to Catholicism. I read that he reportedly waited until he left office to convert because Britain still has a law on the books prohibiting Catholics from the office of Prime Minister ( the way things are going, they might just want to leave that law in place ).
Many of the public statements by the Blair's since their conversion sound very much at odds with the teaching of the Church when it comes to things like abortion and contraception. This begs the question " Why convert to something you don't believe ? ".
I'd hold Blair at arm's length for now in his new role. He was a solid ally for the US and our friend in time of need but I don't know what to make of his latest enterprise. I'm uncertain about his motivations. It might be that he sees the curtain descending on secular Europe and thinks that popularizing some watered - down form of Christianity will turn back the clock a few decades.

Wholesale Lingerie| 9.5.09 @ 10:26PM

sexy lingerie lingerie

Nike SB sale| 10.1.09 @ 12:50PM

Your idea is novel,I like it,Thank you for sharing.Waiting for your new ideas!

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

In Sum, IPCC Discredited

Paul Chesser

* * * *

That Dangerous Radical . . . Marvin Olasky?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Forget the Committees

Greg Scandlen

* * * *

Reid Disses David Broder

Philip Klein

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT