NOWHERE WAS THE PREVARICATION about American virtue in
confronting evil more evident than in Obama’s brief foray overseas
last summer to try to fortify his portfolio of foreign policy
expertise. In front of one of the largest crowds ever assembled in
Berlin for a political event—at least since the fall of the Third
Reich—Obama spoke about the city as a place where “a wall came
down, a continent came together, and history proved that there is
no challenge too great for a world that stands as one.”
This “narrative” of the end of the Berlin Wall is a bit like
describing Shakespeare’s Macbeth and forgetting the murder
of Banquo. The wall didn’t come down because “a continent came
together,” but because an American president roundly described the
empire that had erected it as “evil” and confronted it forcefully
with a buildup of military power until it collapsed.
In this he was aided by a Soviet leader who though he believed
devoutly in the validity of Communism lacked the ruthless backbone
of a Stalin or a Khrushchev that might have enabled him to preserve
it for a few more years. There was never a kumbaya moment of “a
world that stands as one” in the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was
American will— “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall”—and American
power that caused it to collapse.
But the Berlin speech revealed perhaps one of the most
disturbing facets of Obama’s narrative: his slight but unmistakable
disconnection from identifying wholly with America. Very early on
in the speech he said that he didn’t “look like the Americans
who’ve previously spoken in this great city.”
He’d come to Germany, he said, not “as a candidate for
president, but as a citizen—a proud citizen of the United States,
and a fellow-citizen of the world.” Well, we are all “citizens of
the world,” but when we went to the polls last November, we went as
citizens of the U.S. in order to elect a president of the U.S.
During the presidential campaign, some observers criticized Obama’s
patriotism because he almost never wore a flag pin, sometimes
didn’t put his hand on his heart for the playing of the national
anthem, and showed a distinct elitism (his infamous “clinging to
guns and religion” remark). Senator McCain may well have been
accurate—and was surely being generous— when he affirmed in public
that Obama was indeed patriotic. But what is the “narrative” of
that patriotism? Is there anything basically and fundamentally
American with which Obama wants to identify, and of which he is
really proud?
I think many Americans would like to know. Then they might feel
a lot more comfortable with his “narrative.”
guo | 7.1.10 @ 5:09AM
www.wmvconverterformac.com