The American Spectator : Jimmy Carter's Spirit of Notre Dame

The Obama Watch

Jimmy Carter's Spirit of Notre Dame

By Jeffrey Lord on 3.31.09 @ 6:09AM

(Page 2 of 3)

And Obama, before a joint session of Congress, saying the same of America today and blaming Bush:

To overcome extremism, we must also be vigilant in upholding the values our troops defend -- because there is no force in the world more powerful than the example of America. That is why I have ordered the closing of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, and will seek swift and certain justice for captured terrorists -- because living our values doesn't make us weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger.

Carter sought to appease the rise of anti-Americanism abroad that surfaced as a result of a U.S. challenge to an enemy. In the case of Carter, the idea was to soothe ruffled European allies and others over U.S. Vietnam policy and opposition to Communism. For Obama, the point is to soothe European allies and their opposition to the Bush War on Terror against Islamic fascism.

Carter at Notre Dame:

The Vietnamese war produced a profound moral crisis, sapping worldwide faith in our own policy and our system of life, a crisis of confidence made even more grave by the covert pessimism of some of our leaders.

Obama at Camp Lejeune:

And we have learned the importance of working closely with friends and allies, which is why we are launching a new era of engagement in the world.

Or, again, it can be the idea of offering an olive branch to an enemy, telling the world Americans have nothing to fear from that potential enemy, and that potential enemy has nothing to fear from America.

Carter at Notre Dame:

We are now free of that inordinate fear of Communism which once led us to embrace any dictator who joined us in our fear.

Obama in Inaugural Address:

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect.

Obama has even gone out of his way to make this point to today's most prominent American enemy, signaling his intentions to Islamic radicals sworn to destroy not only America but Western civilization. Instead of a speech, Obama exercised a technical option not available to Carter in 1977: taping a video message for the Iranian mullahs proclaiming America's peaceful intentions for distribution on You Tube. Speaking in the Carteresque language of moral equivalence Carter had used to appeal to the Soviet Communists, President Obama looked into the camera lens to assert "the United States wants the Islamic Republic of Iran to take its rightful place in the community of nations." This is the Obama version of Carter's assurance to the Soviets as expressed at Notre Dame: "Our goal is to be fair to both sides, to produce reciprocal stability, parity, and security." In other words, there's really no big deal about the differences between the United States and the Soviet Union (Carter's view) or between the United States and Iran (Obama's view). Carter, unlike Reagan, saw no "evil empire." His objective was not to win the Cold War but to get along. Obama never blinks at the reality of Iran, whether it is its lust for nuclear weapons or internal policies where women are stoned for adultery and gays executed simply for the "crime" of being gay.

Obama specifically made it clear in his video that his administration was not threatening the Iranians nor would he seek a change in their government over their efforts to build a nuclear weapon that presumably would be used to destroy Israel. Said former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Martin S. Indyk (author of Innocent Abroad: An Intimate Account of American Diplomacy in the Middle East) of this approach: "That wording is designed to demonstrate acceptance of the government of Iran….The message is dripping with sincerity and directly addresses one of the things they [the Iranian government] are most concerned about." Which is to say, the Iranians want the ability to be left alone to build their bomb when they aren't stoning women or executing gays, all of which the President of the United States telegraphs he is willing to ignore in the name of bringing Iran into "its rightful place in the community of nations." As Carter wanted to get along with the Soviet Union, Obama seeks to get along with the Islamic extremists. Victory is never the goal.

In the last few days, Obama has revealed his new strategy for the U.S. to the world. In a bow to political correctness and in a nod to Carter's philosophy as expressed at Notre Dame, the Obama administration announced it will no longer use the term "terrorism." Instead, according to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, the government will be changing it instead to "man-caused disasters." Nor will the term "enemy combatants" be used, because, according to Attorney General Eric Holder, the term is not compatible with American "values." Next the Obama team had the Pentagon issue an internal memorandum saying "this administration prefers to avoid using the term 'Long War' or 'Global War on Terror' [GWOT]. Please use 'Overseas Contingency Operation.'"

Page: < 12 3 >

Letter to the Editor

Obama Drools| 3.31.09 @ 8:32AM

I'm sure Jimmy Earl is cheering Odumbo on to take the mantle of "Worst President" away from him. He's doing a heckuva job already.

Go Barry Sotero, go!

Indiana Alex| 3.31.09 @ 9:03AM

I think what's most interesting is not only the similarity in foreign policy, but the desire to print money as a way to acheieve economic success.

Oh, and the energy crisis will be back with a vengance as well.

mark| 3.31.09 @ 9:11AM

One has to hand it to Jimmy. He's managed to make many forget about how bad a president he was by becoming the worst ex-president in U.S history, but as noted above, Berry seems determined to give Jimmy a run for his money.

Rocin| 3.31.09 @ 10:13AM

What is it about the Great American Liberal that makes him obsessed with governing from a position of weakness?
Don't get it.

Obama Drools| 3.31.09 @ 10:23AM

It's where they want all society to be, at the bottom. Liberalism is about punishing achievement and spreading miserabilism. If liberals truly wanted to "lift" people out of poverty, blacks would be the most successful and productive people in the world.

They give them their "fish" for the day, instead of teaching them to "fish". This way they have a lock on a voting bloc that goes 90+% each election. God forbid they become self-reliant and realize they don't need that "fish" anymore.

Liberalism, like Marxism, is bringing people down to a sub-par level all cloaked in the guise of fairness and looking out for the little guy. All they want is control of the little and guy and more like him.

Rocin| 3.31.09 @ 10:32AM

Thanks, "O".
However, sounds hopelessly self defeating, and short term.
Still don't get it.

KMB| 3.31.09 @ 10:43AM

Obama drools,
You are coming close to what I think is a major premise to the authors article, which is how fitting it is to have Obama pick up where Jimmy left off.
I think one has to remember where the so called “Liberation Theology” was hatchedand embraced…yep at Notre Dame. The "father" of this nonsensical movement is none other than Fr. Gutierrez…yep you guessed correctly again- professor of theology at Notre Dame.
None of this should surprise anyone!
This “Christian Marxism” has been around a while, but really took root in the 70’s in South America. Both popes condemned many aspects of it, but it never went away in spite of the Bishops down South America way!

Rocin| 3.31.09 @ 12:29PM

Well, that explains my confusion; didn't know liberalism was just another false religion. Mea culpa.

sfpete| 3.31.09 @ 1:07PM

This redefinition of "terrorism" and refiling it into the same folder as the liberal anthropogenic model of global-warming ("man-caused disasters") effectively eliminates terrorism from the modern world in one swell foop. Now that's "change" we can believe in.

Rocin| 3.31.09 @ 1:46PM

"Swell foop" indeed.
Sums it all up, somehow

Mattmon1| 3.31.09 @ 2:25PM

This is a great article. I recently stumbled across "welcome back Carter" shirts online that have the saying and Obama's face...I want to get one! This article really captures how the sneaky Obama avoided tough questions to get into office. Many people that voted for Barry had no idea how far left he was which is sad. But, this will teach Americans to be more responsible next time and do the research. Even Europe's more socialist members are warning that Obama is spending way too much. And, the world knows this guy will be a push-over. Also, Obama is crazy to have his face out there speaking every day while the market drops on every word. Let's face it, the far left is like 10% of the people that voted for him. The others especially Republicans that crossed over and middle roaders that expected a centrist are reeling from sticker-shock. Obama's approval rating has nowhere to go but down. One term for sure. I hope he doesn't destroy the country in meantime.

Tom Masles| 3.31.09 @ 2:45PM

It helps me some to remember we survived Carter but I have to lament the untold numbers of Americans who will die because of Obama's naivete.

Anthony| 3.31.09 @ 3:20PM

The quisling Catholic administrators at Notre Dame are already giving "Touchdown Jesus" a new look, with a face similar to Obama's. And above the new T.D. Jesus will be the words, "Yes we can" !!! Who needs Jesus when we have Obama?

Ammo Guy| 3.31.09 @ 3:24PM

sfpete, very apropos indeed - I bet you wrote your comment in a rit of fealous jage.

Marc Jeric| 3.31.09 @ 4:01PM

Tenured radicals, teacher unions, illiterate voters, slobbering media - and we got Abu Hussein from Kenya as our Community Organizer-in-Chief. Communization is proceding apace - nationalizations of banks and Detroit, billions for teacher unions and ACORN brownshirts - the left is rising to secure perpetual and total power - just like in Russia (1917), Germany (1931), Italy (1921). Yet to come are Fairness Doctrine and Card Check and ...

stmichrick| 3.31.09 @ 4:57PM

wow;

Isn't it amazing how leftist Democrats can still come to power spewing the myth that they have a more enlightened approach to dealing with our enemies?

Carter's foolish policies are outlined above. Clinton's was that we treat Islamic jihadists as a police problem (using an poorly targeted ccasional cruise missile). The result of that being an accumulated boldness in the form of their 4 well-targeted hijacked airliners.

And the electorate continues to buy it...

lynnrockets| 3.31.09 @ 5:24PM

Publik Skool Educasion at work. Any thinking individual would never vote for a charlatan like Obummer.

Dean| 3.31.09 @ 5:55PM

The reason why the liberals Carter, Clinton and Obama and those like them disarm is largely their anthropology--that is, their view of basic human nature.

They believe that people are basically good, and all that is needed for people to do right is to change their circumstances. Get them a job, provide some regular income and the like at the local level, all the way up to avoid scaring tyrants and talk nicely and fairly to them at the international level.

If on the other hand, you follow a Biblical world view, which clearly states that each human being has a possibility of, indeed a pull toward, radical evil, then you'll think differently about many things. People down on their luck here at home may well need a hand up, and we should put out our hands to do so. But they also need to shoulder their own responsibility, so that the evils of covetousness, sloth and selfishness don't get a foot in the door.

The Founding Fathers largely held the second of these two incompatible views, which is why our Constitution has a great deal to say about checks and balances. They worried a great deal about moral evil, and how to restrain it. In contrast, neglecting this point of anthropology put Communism on the ash heap of history, because they thought they could mold human nature. We succeeded and they failed.

Nations abroad need to see two traits in our national character. They need to know we are no better friend, but no worse enemy, as the U.S. Marine Corps informal motto puts it.

As my mentors used to say, the best indication of future performance is past performance. Actions, not words. So, when we hear promises from the Iranian mullahs, assurances from the ex-KGB Russians, or objections from the Communist Chinese, keep your eyes peeled and feel for your hatchet.

eugene hauber| 3.31.09 @ 7:57PM

as an old alumnus od Notre Dame, I can only say to you; SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON YOU.
Father Sorin would be especially agahast at the liberal policies of the university today.
Again...shame on you rev. jenkins.

P.S. God does not permit abortion in any sense of the word.

eugene hauber
class of '25

Alan Brooks| 3.31.09 @ 8:26PM

I came to say goodbye, as too many trolls have been spamming here in my (and others') names.

track down the troll and neuter him.

lynnrockets| 3.31.09 @ 8:29PM

I have a less sanguine view of liberals: I think they take our tax-payer money for 'the poor' and keep most of it themselves. They are just thieves. I think it's all about money and power with them; their concern for others is a ruse.

ruth| 3.31.09 @ 8:32PM

Alan, you're not alone: At times, my name has been hijacked, too. I'm not going to let some creep run me off. Don't go--you make me laugh.

Alan Brooks| 3.31.09 @ 8:59PM

Ruth,
alrighty, for you and Mr. Tyrrell (like Buckley, he founded a magazine)-- I'll stay.
But if you read a strange post with my name heading it, find the goddamned troll and throw him into a swimming pool-- with a shark in it.

as for Carter:
NOW always wanted a woman for President.
so you want a laugh, a mini ha ha?
well on 20 January 1977 a woman was sworn in.

but no offense to women; THEY could have done alot better!

Alan Brooks| 3.31.09 @ 9:23PM

women COULD have done alot better!

Aaron| 3.31.09 @ 9:51PM

Even Janet Reno?

ruth| 3.31.09 @ 11:17PM

I'm ticked off at Will Ferrell for his Bush Broadway Play, but do you remember the SNL skits that showed him playing Janet Reno? OMG! In one, he (Reno) was dancing to My Sharona at a party. I laughed so hard I felt sick, almost fell off the couch. Whenever Reno's name is mentioned--I think of that skit. Ferrell is one sick guy.

Alan Brooks| 4.1.09 @ 12:01AM

i'll take Janet Reno over Jimmuh-- though not in the biblical sense of taking. You'd need one heck of a dose of viagra and spanish fly to want either of them.

However, Carter did help people; like Idi Amin, Jeffrey Dahmer...

Alan Brooks| 4.1.09 @ 12:04AM

if that wasn't too gross, what about if Jocelyn Elders were Education Secretary?

ruth| 4.1.09 @ 12:14AM

Yeah, well those two wouldn't be in my top thousand, either. Even with a massive mickey finn. Shudder.

ruth| 4.1.09 @ 12:15AM

Two freaks were enough. No more, please.

ruth| 4.1.09 @ 12:29AM

Alan, I just got your joke--two cannibals, LOL!! I'm kinda slow. See, you can't go; I'd miss your jokes.

srpaquette| 4.1.09 @ 12:45AM

Catholicism is nothing more than men dictating it's will upon a society. Most catholics do not even read the bible but dutifily do their Hail Marry's, Our Father prayers as robotically as sheep to the slaughter. They think they are Christians but are more lost than ones who never went to church. Notre Dame is a prime example of a lost church with no moral compass. I used to be of that faith but woke up long ago when my family was in decline and I was sent to stay temporarily at an orphanage---catholic-run, and was introduced to bitter human closeted nuns. They beat the feeble and shy ones first, then took delight in breaking down those who remained. I bit, I mean literally bit any sister who dared lay their hand on me. Needless to say I was concidered an agitator---thank God, it saved me many beatings. I am very bitter about this so called religion, when seeing fellow children be paddled while trying to take a shower for simply peeing in the stall which as a child is hard to control, makes my blood boil to this day; I can, in my mind, still hear the wailing of those poor souls put through such anguish, not to mention the fact that they were parentless. Shame on them, and for that matter take away their tax free racket.

MT| 4.1.09 @ 1:14AM

srpaquette, sorry your life was so rough. Hope you can find joy now. Life is short--I hope you feel loved some day.

srpaquette| 4.1.09 @ 1:49AM

To: MT, Thank you for your comment. I have some joy now, and am loved by many, including myself. It did take some time however. My mother developed a sense of entitledment and assumed my hard-working dad was a dimwit, and her liberal drug addicted freinds reenforced the ideas. My mother now has only her 76 year old lesbian lover to call family, no one else cares to speak to it. No one. Anyway, my family is the House of the Lord and the angels who reside there in. I am confident that as a mere human, I'll make the grade, God willing. And GOD BLESS YOU AND YOURS, MT., Steven.

MT| 4.1.09 @ 4:15AM

Yes, God willing. May God bless you, too, Steven.

Al| 4.1.09 @ 7:57AM

I hope Notre Dame does the right thing and uninvites this ding dong. This is most certainly sending a message of acceptance of Obama's hideous abortion and stem cell stands. The invite can be rescinded with respect and regrest, and if Obama has any sense of decency (which is questionable since he should have declined to begin with knowing the differences in philosophies) he would accept it gracefully and with understanding. Instead, we have these university hacks perfectly willing to water down and distill the Church's beliefs and doctrine for the sake of publicity. Take a stand and make a pro-Catholic statement, for God's sake and stop selling out our faith!!

Mia| 4.5.09 @ 5:50PM

SRPAQUETTE:
Sadly, your horrendous experiences have left you very bitter. I'd have hoped that such suffering would teach you compassion and tolerance, but no. You've become that which you apparently hate. You judge all Catholics to "sheep" and "lost," which certainly isn't the case, and you begrudge your mother for finding her soul mate and belittle her lesbian partner, referring to her as "it." What faith do you now practice? If it's some form of "conservative Christianity," it certainly hasn't brought you peace.

Regarding Notre Dame...
This "controversy" is much ado about nothing and 100% POLITICALLY MOTIVATED. American Catholic bishops (AKA cover-up artists) have NO business casting stones. Further, the same bishops who criticize "O" would roll out the carpet for "W" (despite his waging unjust war and being pro-death penalty).

The American Catholic Church is obsessed with abortion, and for that reason, they seek to bring down any/all powerful liberals while throwing themselves at the feet of Republicans (who only claim to care when pandering for votes).

Obama should speak and accept the degree. Every other recent President has done so, and none of them accepted all the Church's teachings. The invitation was extended and accepted. ND should be gracious and welcome "O" warmly. For those who wish to challenge his views, they can ask him back for a debate. I'm sure he will accept and not call them evil or Anti-American if they disagree with him.

scythe| 4.7.09 @ 7:54PM

Obongo won't be happy until America is on her knees, on a prayer rug facing east towards Mecca.

Cookie| 4.8.09 @ 12:12AM

51 million dead babies, Mia. Just think about it for a moment. Shame on you for your lack of concern for these innocent children.

Pingback| 4.10.09 @ 11:20AM

It’s Officially Jimmy Carter’s Second Term « Infidels Paradise links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…decline. A few more such overseas tours, and Obama will have a lot more decline to celebrate. Please read Krauthammer in full here. So, where does Jimmy Carter fit in here? Jeffrey Lord at The American Spectator points out: Notre Dame. May, 1977 [ ... ] In the midst of the controversy over the decision by Notre Dame to invite President Obama to deliver the school’s commencement address,…

Pingback| 4.10.09 @ 12:59PM

Dinocrat » Blog Archive » Been there, done that links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Dinocrat » Blog Archive » Been there, done that « Empty rhetoric, and giggles Been there, done that Jeffrey Lord takes us back to the early days of the Carter administration, where America’s newfound weakness was broadcast to the world: In May of 1977, Carter was just over four months into his presidency.…

Jimmy| 4.15.09 @ 12:58PM

To "Obama Drools":

I suggest you do some Habitat for Humanities work or something similar in the poorest areas of this country and get to know those who live in those areas. I agree that there are those that take advantage of the system. We are a product of our environment. However, there are some situations that make it seemingly impossible for the poor to get ahead. Thinking that working harder can fix poverty is not an end-all solution.

On another note, if you think about it, liberal and conservative view points should balance each other out the same as the widely used socialist and capitalist terminology. In the end, pure socialism and pure capitalism results in the same kind of conclusion. Defining yourself with only one term is polarizing and narrow-minded in my opinion. People are people and should not always decide on one end of the spectrum. If they do, then they are drones. That's why I find it damaging in this thread that only democratic leaders are criticized. I am afraid this us vs. them coming from both sides of the isle is degrading our economy.

nike basketball shoes| 8.5.09 @ 11:56PM

thank you very much .;.

The American Spectator

Comments