By Lisa Fabrizio on 3.25.09 @ 6:07AM
It's not cool to have a leader one can only look down at.
In America, those who exude a certain type of attraction or
charisma are often christened with the sobriquet of "rock star."
For those of us who've outgrown the allures of the
brain-shattering, soul-stealing muck that has masqueraded as
music for the last few decades, this term is not exactly a
desirable one for those engaged in anything but narcissistic and
immature pursuits.
Yet for many in this country, comparison to a rock star is the
ultimate compliment and a cherished goal. Into this sad state of
our country comes President Barack Obama, whom many have labeled
our first post-Baby Boomer president and naturally, a rock star
who can dance too!
Bill Clinton was the first Baby Boomer president and he was
followed by another, George W. Bush. Yet Clinton, who was also
accorded presidential rock star status, was, by the time he
reached the White House, an accomplished politician, having spent
15 years as Attorney General and Governor of Arkansas. Similarly,
Bush was the twice-elected Governor of Texas.
But despite their differences in posture and policy, both were
products of basically the same electorate; one still largely made
up of those who recalled the tumult of the 20th century and made
the handling of serious issues a priority in choosing their
leader. Obama, on the other hand is the product of another
constituency; one who has no memory of the sacrifices and
hardships endured by the Greatest Generation; one for whom a rock
star in office is worthy of the supreme adjective: cool.
Baby Boomers were the first generation to be reared on
television, but not to the extent of their children and
grandchildren. The advent of cable and satellite technology
brought 24/7 news, MTV and other so-called entertainment in a
such way that television and those who make it became the
omnipresent arbiters of social mores. If TV was the babysitter of
the Boomers, it became mother, father, teacher and preacher to
all who came after.
So it's not surprising that two-thirds of the biggest turnout of
the vaunted "youth vote" in years turned out to elect a man of
scanty credentials and no executive experience at all. Since the
1960s, maturity is not considered cool, and most kids since that
awful decade have grown up thinking that their goal in life is to
clean up the messes made by their parents; the reasons behind
them be damned. And Mr. Obama is the essence of that modern
mantra: coolness counts most, and consequences be damned.
This is not to say that voters in this country have never favored
style over substance before, but in the confluence of Obama's
packaged persona and the adoration heaped on him by a fawning
press, we have reached a truly frightening stage in our history.
We have heard
zombie-like children singing psalms to him and witnessed eerie
loyalty oaths sworn to him; the testimonies of those who have
promised to be better people simply because of his election.
However talented the man might be, Barack Obama as silver-tongued
savior, is in reality a creation of the mainstream media. When
George W. Bush was inarticulate at times, he was the butt of
jokes and worse; a buffoon who got through life on the coattails
of his father. Yet, when Obama stutters through rehearsed
speeches or maniacally laughs while discussing our ailing economy
on 60 Minutes, these gaffes are either ignored or oddly
offered as
further proof of his oratorical genius.
But why? Because those who control most major newspapers and TV
are immature dreamers still stuck on their vision of a socialist
utopia; the stuff of teenaged vows to "change the world." And
their hero epitomizes all they hold dear; a hip, youthful knight
who champions activism -- whatever that means -- and looks good
doing it.
And so we have managed to elect a man whose brief time in office
has reeked of political immaturity. It's as if like a child, he
is constantly trying on his father's shoes by purporting to
accept responsibility, while seconds later claiming, "It wasn't
me...I didn't do it!" Try this
from a recent town hall meeting in California:
Listen, I'll take responsibility. I'm the president. We've got
a big mess that we're cleaning up. Nobody here drafted those
contracts. Nobody here was responsible for supervising AIG and
allowing themselves to put the economy at risk by some of the
outrageous behavior that they were engaged in. We've got a lot
on our plate -- but it is appropriate when you're in charge to
make sure that stuff doesn't happen like this.
Can you conceive of your own father, much less the President of
the United States, alibiing his way out of responsibility in this
manner? Can you imagine a real statesman using the word "stuff"
when speaking of issues of vital, national importance? Such is
not the stuff of a great, oratorical leader. The fact that he
feels it necessary to demean the office of the presidency by
going on late-night talk shows and making childish jokes about
the Special Olympics only adds to the immaturity factor.
This country used to favor electing presidents that it could look
up to, that possessed the kind of maturity needed in tough times.
Like George W. Bush or hate him, there were very few accusations
of frivolity surrounding his presidency. And despite what went on
behind closed doors, Bill Clinton at least made an outward show
of gravity; he made sure to tell us that he felt our pain, he
didn't laugh at it.
So here we are. Either we have three or more years of being
regaled by the cool and the hip -- watching our president dance
and laugh while America burns -- or we can encourage Americans to
hold Obama's feet to the fire. Because style will only go so far;
even among kids, who will hopefully one day grow up into
responsible citizens who'll have to pay the piper for this
economic farce. And when that time comes, they'll only have
themselves to blame.