By The Prowler on 3.23.09 @ 6:10AM
Why are Geithner and Summers taking the rap while Emanuel is not?
Over the past ten days, as the furor over AIG retention plan
bonuses has focused on Sen. Chris Dodd and
Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, the
White House has undertaken a PR offensive to protect the highest
ranking Obama Administration official who was involved in the
House and Senate negotiations over the stimulus bill, in which
the AIG waiver language was inserted.
"Right now, you get the feeling this is all about protecting
[White House Chief of Staff] Rahm Emanuel,” says
a former Treasury Department lawyer, who worked in that
department's counsel's office on the Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP) before joining a D.C.-based law firm in February.
"At the time, we were led to believe there were basically three
or four people from the Administration at the table when the
final deals were cut and one of them was Emanuel."
Informal advisers to Geithner are growing increasingly
frustrated, they say, that Geithner is being held up as the straw
man for the public anger over the bonuses. "Just over the weekend
you saw a new guy added to the target list, [White House
economics adviser Larry]
Summers,” says a longtime Geithner colleague at
the New York Fed. "You have Dodd, Geithner, Summers, but there
were other, more senior political people involved in this mess,
and their names aren't being mentioned. Why isn't anyone asking
Rahm Emanuel, 'What meetings were you in?' 'What did you and the
President know and when did you know it?' Tim has some
culpability, but he's not the guy who signed off on the Dodd
language. He wasn't that empowered to do something like that."
Yesterday, Obama supporter and New York Times columnist
Frank Rich fingered
Summers as a key player in the AIG bonus mess. "Summers is so
tone-deaf that he makes Geithner seem like Bobby Kennedy," Rich
wrote.
Summers currently serves as head of the National Economic Council
in the White House, and has been mentioned as someone who might
be forced to return to the Secretary of the Treasury post he once
held in the Clinton Administration should Geithner not survive
the political storm he finds himself in.
It isn't just Rich, though, who has placed Summers in the center
of the controversy. Last week, Sen. Ron Wyden,
who was led to believe that language he was inserting into the
stimulus bill, which would have heavily taxed such payouts as the
retention bonuses, told reporters that it was the "Obama economic
team" that stripped his and Sen. Olympia Snowe's
provision from the bill. When he was asked about who he dealt
with during the February negotiations over his language, he said,
"Secretary Geithner, Larry Summers, and I'll leave it at that."
He declined to name other names, though he indicated to reporters
present that he was aware of others in the negotiations.
Senior Democrat leadership aides in both the House and Senate,
however, insist that both Emanuel and Office of Management and
Budget Director Peter Orszag were present at the
meetings where the decision was made to strip out the bonus
taxation language and insert the Dodd waiver.
Further complicating the situation is that at the time of the
negotiations, Geithner had in his possession Treasury Department
memorandums outlining November negotiations between the
department's counsel's office and AIG officials over the very
retention bonuses that were preserved in the final bill.
As early as November 5, 2008, AIG lawyers and senior executives
and Treasury officials were in negotiations over just which
bonuses and retention-plan payouts could and could not take
place. "We indicated that UST wants to put in place a limitation
on annual bonuses that assure that AIG executives/employees will
not be enriched out of TARP funds," wrote a Treasury official to
colleagues involved in the negotiations.
In preparing Geithner for the stimulus negotiations, Treasury
staff provided him, as well as Obama Administration officials,
detailed memorandums outlining the extensive negotiations the
agency had had with AIG, among other financial institutions,
about bonus payouts, and recommending steps that could be taken
legislatively to at least limit taxpayer exposure.
"[Geithner] had the information," says the former Treasury
lawyer. "What he did with it we don't know. But our input didn't
seem to make much of a difference in the room when it mattered."
Neither did Republican input; no Republicans were present in the
negotiations in the Speaker's office. Both Nancy
Pelosi and Harry Reid, who served as a
conference manager on the bill, barred Republicans from the
negotiation table.
And, surprisingly, neither was Chris Dodd, who was not one of the
three Senate managers for the conference negotiations.
So the mystery remains: who had final sign-off on the Dodd
language insertion on AIG's retention bonuses? One thing seems
certain, Rahm Emanuel isn't talking, and neither are Pelosi or
Reid, who were also in the room with Emanuel, Orszag, and Summers
when the final language was worked out.