Evangelical Left potentates are now rallying to Obama’s
nomination of pro-abortion rights Governor Kathleen Sebelius as
Health and Human Services Secretary.
Describing themselves as “top Christian leaders” in
their news
release, they affirmed Sebelius as part of their ongoing
dedication to “finding common ground solutions to reduce the
number of abortions in America.” Ostensibly, by expanding the
welfare state, Sebelius will reduce overall abortion rates even
while the Obama Administration opposes any legal restrictions on
abortion, just as Sebelius supposedly did as Kansas’ governor.
The Evangelical Left pro-Sebelius effort was organized by Faith
in Public Life, a forum mostly for liberal Protestants. Its
website links
directly to Catholics for Kathleen Sebelius, whose own manifesto
was endorsed by Doug Kmiec and other pro-Obama Catholic
luminaries.
Liberal pro-Obama evangelicals face the same conundrum as
pro-Obama Catholics, having to argue that politicians who
vigorously support abortion rights will still somehow facilitate
a reduction in overall abortion rates. Still, the rhetorical
enthusiasm for Sebelius from the Evangelical Left seems a little
excessive.
“Under Governor Sebelius’ leadership, abortions have decreased in
Kansas by 10 percent, adoption funding and incentives have
increased, healthcare access for women and families has expanded,
prenatal care has become more widely available, and legislation
protecting the unborn from crime has become law,” the liberal
evangelicals enthused. “Such a record demonstrates a commitment
to results rather than rhetoric on life issues.” They further
hailed her for having been elected in Kansas by “wide margins in
a state where registered Republicans outnumber Democrats two to
one” and for proving that “pro-choice and pro-life leaders can
work together to advance a pro-family agenda.”
The evangelical enthusiasts for Sebelius include Florida
megachurch pastor and Global Warming alarmist Joel Hunter,
Christian ethicist and anti-torture activist David Gushee,
Emerging Church leader Brian McLaren, Fuller Seminary functional
pacifist and “just peace” advocate Glen Stassen, Evangelicals for
Social Action chief Ron Sider, and Episcopal priest and gay
rights proponent Randall Balmer, who tenuously clings to an
evangelical identification based more on his past than his
present.
Sebelius is a “person of deep faith,” the liberal evangelicals
emphasized, and she should be defended against attempts to
distract from her record of “reducing abortions and supporting
women and families in Kansas — and the task that lies ahead of
us all: working together to improve health care and reduce the
number of abortions in America.”
Beyond just the Sebelius nomination, Rev. Hunter, who insists he
is robustly pro-life, has seemingly also run interference for the
Obama decision to fund destruction of human embryos for stem cell
research. A member of Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and
Neighborhood Partnerships, Hunter told the Politico
that he regretted that the administration had not better educated
its defenders before allowing opponents to interpret the stem
cell issue. “That would relieve a great deal of the alarm and
suspicion that is out there with pro-life groups,” Hunter said,
if defenders such as himself had received advance notification.
“Overall, there is still a desire to see him in the best light,”
Hunter said of his fellow evangelicals. “I think the ones who are
screaming bloody murder right now are the ones who may not have
been reachable to begin with. But there are a whole lot of us on
their e-mail lists — and we have people who want to think the
best of the president — but they are getting all this
mischaracterization and false information.”
Once a conservative religious activist who mobilized his church
against same-sex unions, Hunter briefly acceded to taking over
the nearly defunct Christian Coalition in 2006. But the
Coalition’s board changed its mind when absorbing that Hunter
would focus on Global Warming activism. Climate issues have
become a rallying cry among liberal evangelicals. Under the Bush
Administration, deriding U.S. interrogation policies as “torture”
also became trendy.
David Gushee of Mercer University in Atlanta founded Evangelicals
for Human Rights to target Bush’s supposed torture regime. Now
Gushee’s group is supporting a “truth commission” to expose the
purported crimes of the last administration, similar to the South
African initiative to shed light on Apartheid’s atrocities. Glen
Stassen of Fuller seminary in Pasadena, California worked with
Gushee on his anti-torture [by the U.S.] manifesto, gaining
endorsement from the increasingly left-leaning National
Association of Evangelicals, in which Rev. Hunter is prominent.
Stassen, who is the son of perennial presidential candidate
Harold Stassen, advocates a form of “just peace making” that,
while not specifically pacifist, will not admit to the moral
acceptability of military force. Somewhat famously, Stassen
issued a report during the 2004 election, claiming abortion rates
had declined during the Clinton presidency but had risen under
Bush. Pro-life groups vigorously contested Stassen’s methodology,
which rested on the premise that the largesse of Democratic
compassion makes abortion less desired.
Ron Sider, founder of Evangelicals for Social Action, is a
conventional Big Government liberal who still has steadfastly
remained attached to orthodox theology, including the defense of
marriage and sanctity of life. His defense of Sebelius is a
little more surprising than for some others on the Evangelical
Left. But the argument for Sebelius is perhaps no more
compromising than support for other pro-abortion rights
politicians whom Sider and the Evangelical Left have supported.
McLaren is the chief guru of the “emergent church” movement,
which is largely comprised of self-professed “post-modern”
evangelicals who incline left politically. Balmer is an academic
who has produced PBS documentaries about evangelicals. Now an
Episcopal priest in the liberal Diocese of Connecticut, Balmer is
a harsh critic of conservative Evangelical hypocrisy.
Hypocrisy is a charge that some of those conservative
Evangelicals might throw back at the Evangelical Left for
compromising its supposedly pro-life convictions. How far that
seeming compromise will carry the Evangelical Left during the
Obama Administration may surprise liberal and conservative
religionists alike.
robroy| 3.17.09 @ 7:05AM
Did the number of abortions decline during Sebelius' tenure? Perhaps. Can Ms Sebelius take any credit? Absolutely not.
"Sebelius cut state funding for abortion alternatives, vetoed a bill imposing minimal sanitary standards, on abortion clinics, and vetoed a bill that would have strengthened Kansas’s parental notification law. More shocking, is Sebelius’ unyielding support for late-term abortions. She has vetoed a measure that would require explicit medical reasons for late-term abortions and vetoed another measure which would require abortion providers to report the diagnosis which necessitated a post-viability abortion."
Barry Stone| 3.17.09 @ 9:17AM
Its sad to see men that call themselves evangelicals are willing to blaspheme the name of God with their lives.
jack wheatley| 3.17.09 @ 10:26AM
Barry tone is so so right.How can these awful people even pretend to follow the teachings of our Lord Jesus?But wait they don't really do they?it is as a good friend of mine used to say when he was a young man he thought he was called to be an Anglican priest but after some thought he realized he only wanted the pretty nice lifestyle not the spiritual call.These people are even worse they only want power.
Bill| 3.17.09 @ 10:37AM
In their desire to be accepted by others or to be included in social groups.. peer pressure.. people have separated themselves from common sense. Abortion is murder of a child! There is no justification for it and no way to rationalize that act of violence against another life.
Sorry for the libs but that is one of those absolutes like gravity.
Robert| 3.17.09 @ 10:38AM
Very good article. New to the site and just beginning to get a sense of where the authors stand and what this website promotes. So far, so good. I'm saddened by the state of the church. It's scary to see the church split between political/social/religious left and right. The Word of God is clear on certain issues and principals, and there is no "left" option on the subjects being covered here. We can not call evil good, nor can we accomplish good by means of compromise. Not on this. Narrow is the way the leads to life. Choose life.
Robert| 3.17.09 @ 10:39AM
And by the way, thank you Mark Tooley for this article.
Gill O'Teen| 3.17.09 @ 1:53PM
As Jesus spoke and Matthew wrote in his Gospel Chapter 7, Verse 15: ”Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”
ruth| 3.17.09 @ 2:00PM
There's a special place in Hell for these people. Tiller the baby killer, who specializes in partial birth abortion, flourished under Sebelius' tenure as governor. Person of deep faith, indeed. Sickening.
Frank Natoli| 3.17.09 @ 3:36PM
"the same conundrum as pro-Obama Catholics"
Mr. Tooley: pro-Obama Catholics, which includes the vast majority of the clergy, would admit to no such conundrum. You might reply "well, they must". But the reality is, they don't. Their religious priorities require the welfare state über alles and abortion is simply not a significant consideration.
Ron| 3.17.09 @ 8:03PM
Even Dr. Suess's Horton gets it. He said, 'A person is a person, no matter how small".
I am an evangelical Christian. The folks who signed that press release are NEITHER.
ruth| 3.17.09 @ 9:12PM
Thanks for your lovely post, Ron. It touched my heart.
Aan Brooks| 3.17.09 @ 11:50PM
the next decade will be so ugly. you can feel it coming.
William Harold| 3.18.09 @ 12:02AM
Kathleen Gilligan: typical Irish Catholic.
Steve| 3.18.09 @ 1:32AM
Shouldn't the author have to support his criticism of moderate evangelicals with some kind of proof -- e.g. provide contrary evidence, detail faulty logic, etc. -- or can you just blast other people willy-nilly here and assume readers already agree, the facts be damned?
ruth| 3.18.09 @ 2:05AM
Alan, cut it out! Steve, truth hurts doesn't it? Who says 'willy nilly', anyway? Schmuck.
Scott| 3.18.09 @ 11:50AM
The Last Days, for those of us that still believe in that concept. (Paraphrase) Even the elect, will be
misled. I call it bemused Christianity. Continually debating issues already settled in Gods word, blinding our eyes toward Israel, always expecting government to solve for X instead of Prayer.
Angel| 3.18.09 @ 12:54PM
It's almost like a joke unfolding right before our eyes--almost.
Pingback| 3.19.09 @ 8:21PM
The Evangelical Left’s Abortion Conundrum | Caffeinated Thoughts links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.19.09 @ 9:01PM
RedBlueChristian » Blog Archive » The Evangelical Left’s Abortion Conundrum links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.19.09 @ 9:03PM
The Evangelical Left’s Abortion Conundrum : CheckUp Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: