The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Eminentoes
Print Email
Text Size

Eminentoes

Evangelical Left Rallies to Sebelius

These evangelicals could teach Doug Kmiec’s pro-Obama Catholics a thing or two.

Evangelical Left potentates are now rallying to Obama’s nomination of pro-abortion rights Governor Kathleen Sebelius as Health and Human Services Secretary.

Describing themselves as “top Christian leaders” in their news release, they affirmed Sebelius as part of their ongoing dedication to “finding common ground solutions to reduce the number of abortions in America.” Ostensibly, by expanding the welfare state, Sebelius will reduce overall abortion rates even while the Obama Administration opposes any legal restrictions on abortion, just as Sebelius supposedly did as Kansas’ governor.

The Evangelical Left pro-Sebelius effort was organized by Faith in Public Life, a forum mostly for liberal Protestants. Its website links directly to Catholics for Kathleen Sebelius, whose own manifesto was endorsed by Doug Kmiec and other pro-Obama Catholic luminaries.

Liberal pro-Obama evangelicals face the same conundrum as pro-Obama Catholics, having to argue that politicians who vigorously support abortion rights will still somehow facilitate a reduction in overall abortion rates. Still, the rhetorical enthusiasm for Sebelius from the Evangelical Left seems a little excessive.

“Under Governor Sebelius’ leadership, abortions have decreased in Kansas by 10 percent, adoption funding and incentives have increased, healthcare access for women and families has expanded, prenatal care has become more widely available, and legislation protecting the unborn from crime has become law,” the liberal evangelicals enthused. “Such a record demonstrates a commitment to results rather than rhetoric on life issues.” They further hailed her for having been elected in Kansas by “wide margins in a state where registered Republicans outnumber Democrats two to one” and for proving that “pro-choice and pro-life leaders can work together to advance a pro-family agenda.”

The evangelical enthusiasts for Sebelius include Florida megachurch pastor and Global Warming alarmist Joel Hunter, Christian ethicist and anti-torture activist David Gushee, Emerging Church leader Brian McLaren, Fuller Seminary functional pacifist and “just peace” advocate Glen Stassen, Evangelicals for Social Action chief Ron Sider, and Episcopal priest and gay rights proponent Randall Balmer, who tenuously clings to an evangelical identification based more on his past than his present.

Sebelius is a “person of deep faith,” the liberal evangelicals emphasized, and she should be defended against attempts to distract from her record of “reducing abortions and supporting women and families in Kansas — and the task that lies ahead of us all: working together to improve health care and reduce the number of abortions in America.”

Beyond just the Sebelius nomination, Rev. Hunter, who insists he is robustly pro-life, has seemingly also run interference for the Obama decision to fund destruction of human embryos for stem cell research. A member of Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, Hunter told the Politico that he regretted that the administration had not better educated its defenders before allowing opponents to interpret the stem cell issue. “That would relieve a great deal of the alarm and suspicion that is out there with pro-life groups,” Hunter said, if defenders such as himself had received advance notification. “Overall, there is still a desire to see him in the best light,” Hunter said of his fellow evangelicals. “I think the ones who are screaming bloody murder right now are the ones who may not have been reachable to begin with. But there are a whole lot of us on their e-mail lists — and we have people who want to think the best of the president — but they are getting all this mischaracterization and false information.”

Once a conservative religious activist who mobilized his church against same-sex unions, Hunter briefly acceded to taking over the nearly defunct Christian Coalition in 2006. But the Coalition’s board changed its mind when absorbing that Hunter would focus on Global Warming activism. Climate issues have become a rallying cry among liberal evangelicals. Under the Bush Administration, deriding U.S. interrogation policies as “torture” also became trendy.

David Gushee of Mercer University in Atlanta founded Evangelicals for Human Rights to target Bush’s supposed torture regime. Now Gushee’s group is supporting a “truth commission” to expose the purported crimes of the last administration, similar to the South African initiative to shed light on Apartheid’s atrocities. Glen Stassen of Fuller seminary in Pasadena, California worked with Gushee on his anti-torture [by the U.S.] manifesto, gaining endorsement from the increasingly left-leaning National Association of Evangelicals, in which Rev. Hunter is prominent.

Stassen, who is the son of perennial presidential candidate Harold Stassen, advocates a form of “just peace making” that, while not specifically pacifist, will not admit to the moral acceptability of military force. Somewhat famously, Stassen issued a report during the 2004 election, claiming abortion rates had declined during the Clinton presidency but had risen under Bush. Pro-life groups vigorously contested Stassen’s methodology, which rested on the premise that the largesse of Democratic compassion makes abortion less desired.

Ron Sider, founder of Evangelicals for Social Action, is a conventional Big Government liberal who still has steadfastly remained attached to orthodox theology, including the defense of marriage and sanctity of life. His defense of Sebelius is a little more surprising than for some others on the Evangelical Left. But the argument for Sebelius is perhaps no more compromising than support for other pro-abortion rights politicians whom Sider and the Evangelical Left have supported.

McLaren is the chief guru of the “emergent church” movement, which is largely comprised of self-professed “post-modern” evangelicals who incline left politically. Balmer is an academic who has produced PBS documentaries about evangelicals. Now an Episcopal priest in the liberal Diocese of Connecticut, Balmer is a harsh critic of conservative Evangelical hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy is a charge that some of those conservative Evangelicals might throw back at the Evangelical Left for compromising its supposedly pro-life convictions. How far that seeming compromise will carry the Evangelical Left during the Obama Administration may surprise liberal and conservative religionists alike.

About the Author

Mark Tooley is president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy in Washington, D.C. and author of Methodism and Politics in the Twentieth CenturyYou can follow him on Twitter @markdtooley.


Letter to the Editor View all comments (34) |

robroy| 3.17.09 @ 7:05AM

Did the number of abortions decline during Sebelius' tenure? Perhaps. Can Ms Sebelius take any credit? Absolutely not.

"Sebelius cut state funding for abortion alternatives, vetoed a bill imposing minimal sanitary standards, on abortion clinics, and vetoed a bill that would have strengthened Kansas’s parental notification law. More shocking, is Sebelius’ unyielding support for late-term abortions. She has vetoed a measure that would require explicit medical reasons for late-term abortions and vetoed another measure which would require abortion providers to report the diagnosis which necessitated a post-viability abortion."

Barry Stone| 3.17.09 @ 9:17AM

Its sad to see men that call themselves evangelicals are willing to blaspheme the name of God with their lives.

jack wheatley| 3.17.09 @ 10:26AM

Barry tone is so so right.How can these awful people even pretend to follow the teachings of our Lord Jesus?But wait they don't really do they?it is as a good friend of mine used to say when he was a young man he thought he was called to be an Anglican priest but after some thought he realized he only wanted the pretty nice lifestyle not the spiritual call.These people are even worse they only want power.

Bill| 3.17.09 @ 10:37AM

In their desire to be accepted by others or to be included in social groups.. peer pressure.. people have separated themselves from common sense. Abortion is murder of a child! There is no justification for it and no way to rationalize that act of violence against another life.
Sorry for the libs but that is one of those absolutes like gravity.

Robert| 3.17.09 @ 10:38AM

Very good article. New to the site and just beginning to get a sense of where the authors stand and what this website promotes. So far, so good. I'm saddened by the state of the church. It's scary to see the church split between political/social/religious left and right. The Word of God is clear on certain issues and principals, and there is no "left" option on the subjects being covered here. We can not call evil good, nor can we accomplish good by means of compromise. Not on this. Narrow is the way the leads to life. Choose life.

Robert| 3.17.09 @ 10:39AM

And by the way, thank you Mark Tooley for this article.

Gill O'Teen| 3.17.09 @ 1:53PM

As Jesus spoke and Matthew wrote in his Gospel Chapter 7, Verse 15: ”Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”

ruth| 3.17.09 @ 2:00PM

There's a special place in Hell for these people. Tiller the baby killer, who specializes in partial birth abortion, flourished under Sebelius' tenure as governor. Person of deep faith, indeed. Sickening.

Frank Natoli| 3.17.09 @ 3:36PM

"the same conundrum as pro-Obama Catholics"

Mr. Tooley: pro-Obama Catholics, which includes the vast majority of the clergy, would admit to no such conundrum. You might reply "well, they must". But the reality is, they don't. Their religious priorities require the welfare state über alles and abortion is simply not a significant consideration.

Ron| 3.17.09 @ 8:03PM

Even Dr. Suess's Horton gets it. He said, 'A person is a person, no matter how small".

I am an evangelical Christian. The folks who signed that press release are NEITHER.

ruth| 3.17.09 @ 9:12PM

Thanks for your lovely post, Ron. It touched my heart.

Aan Brooks| 3.17.09 @ 11:50PM

the next decade will be so ugly. you can feel it coming.

William Harold| 3.18.09 @ 12:02AM

Kathleen Gilligan: typical Irish Catholic.

Steve| 3.18.09 @ 1:32AM

Shouldn't the author have to support his criticism of moderate evangelicals with some kind of proof -- e.g. provide contrary evidence, detail faulty logic, etc. -- or can you just blast other people willy-nilly here and assume readers already agree, the facts be damned?

ruth| 3.18.09 @ 2:05AM

Alan, cut it out! Steve, truth hurts doesn't it? Who says 'willy nilly', anyway? Schmuck.

Scott| 3.18.09 @ 11:50AM

The Last Days, for those of us that still believe in that concept. (Paraphrase) Even the elect, will be
misled. I call it bemused Christianity. Continually debating issues already settled in Gods word, blinding our eyes toward Israel, always expecting government to solve for X instead of Prayer.

Angel| 3.18.09 @ 12:54PM

It's almost like a joke unfolding right before our eyes--almost.

Pingback| 3.19.09 @ 8:21PM

The Evangelical Left’s Abortion Conundrum | Caffeinated Thoughts links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…with praise, nor see it as proof that they pro-life and pro-choice legislators can work together on the abortion issue. Mark Tooney writing for the American Spectator on Tuesday noted the hurdle that the evangelical left faces. Liberal pro-Obama evangelicals face the same conundrum as pro-Obama Catholics, having to argue that politicians who vigorously support abortion rights will still somehow…

Pingback| 3.19.09 @ 9:01PM

RedBlueChristian » Blog Archive » The Evangelical Left’s Abortion Conundrum links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…with praise, nor see it as proof that pro-life and pro-choice legislators can work together on the abortion issue. Mark Tooney writing for the American Spectator on Tuesday noted the hurdle that the evangelical left faces. Liberal pro-Obama evangelicals face the same conundrum as pro-Obama Catholics, having to argue that politicians who vigorously support abortion rights will still somehow…

Pingback| 3.19.09 @ 9:03PM

The Evangelical Left’s Abortion Conundrum : CheckUp Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…with praise, nor see it as proof that pro-life and pro-choice legislators can work together on the abortion issue. Mark Tooney writing for the American Spectator on Tuesday noted the hurdle that the evangelical left faces. Liberal pro-Obama evangelicals face the same conundrum as pro-Obama Catholics, having to argue that politicians who vigorously support abortion rights will still somehow…

More Articles by Mark Tooley

More Articles From Eminentoes

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/03/17/evangelical-left-rallies-to-se

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Immigration Bill Clears Key Committee

Jordan Gonzalez | 11:56AM

Nixonian

Yogi Love | 11:54AM

Moore, OK by Steve Breen

Patrick Ryan | 11:50AM

He’s Just Not That Into You

Ross Kaminsky | 11:34AM

Issa’s Mistake

Ross Kaminsky | 11:11AM

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT