Daniel Johnson's fascinating account of the Soviet Union's
attempt to turn an ancient game into a Cold War weapon.
White King and Red Queen: How the Cold War Was Fought
on the Chessboard
By Daniel Johnson
(Houghton Mifflin, 384 pages, $26)
With its virtually limitless possible moves and combinations,
chess has meant many things to players since it appeared in India
about the 6th century: casual pastime or embarrassing school of
humility, challenging mental workout or, in the case of a number of
grandmasters, sanity-threatening maniacal fixation. The Austrian
writer Stefan Zweig, author of the great chess story The Royal
Game, whose chess-obsessed protagonist goes crazy, puckishly
defined it as "thought that leads nowhere, mathematics that adds up
to nothing, art without an end product, architecture without
substance."
For Daniel Johnson, chess is nothing less than a mega-metaphor
for the late Cold War. Indeed, in White King and Red Queen
he argues persuasively that, with its "abstract purism, incipient
paranoia, and sublimated homicide" it became a proxy war between
superpowers prevented by the nuclear bal- ance of terror from
engaging in direct hostilities. A British journalist, chess
aficionado, and contributor to The American Spectator, he
once played Garry Kasparov to a draw in a simultaneous exhibition.
In this original take on an unexplored aspect of the late Cold War,
Johnson is well placed to depict in detail that peculiar period in
mid-20th century when chess matches were front-page news and
grandmasters were household names.
Long a favorite of Russian intellectuals and rulers—Peter the
Great took along special campaign boards of soft leather while
battling Turks or subduing obstreperous serfs—chess was turned into
a tool of the revolution by Marx and Lenin, who were avid players.
(They were also very bad losers: Marx would rage when put in a
difficult position; Lenin got depressed if he lost and finally gave
the game up because it distracted him from the revolution.) They
and Stalin made it an instrument of the all-embracing communist
state. It was, they considered, both a demonstration of dialectical
materialism and good mental training for war both hot and cold.
By the mid-1920s Moscow launched a nationwide program with the
declared objective of dominating the chess world. What better
propaganda for the New Soviet Man? "We must organize shock brigades
of chess players and begin immediately a 5-year plan for chess,"
declared Nikolai Krylenko, Stalin's commissar of war and founder of
the Red Army, who himself headed the new All-Union Chess Section.
With a multi-million ruble budget, Krylenko created a vast,
tentacular infrastructure of 500,000 players by the 1930s. That
number would eventually peak at some 5 million. A systematic
training program spotted promising players early in Communist youth
chess clubs and rewarded them as they matured with rare treats like
foreign currency earnings and travel abroad. At one point the
Ukrainian province of Chernigov alone had over 10,000 players, more
than the entire U.S.
THE FIRST GREAT HERO of soviet chess was Mikhail Botvinnik. A
meticulous, methodical product of the Russian chess machine, he
developed a rigorous pre-match procedure that became standard for
Soviet masters preparing for international competition: three
weeks' confinement in a country dacha with intensive training
games, plenty of exercise and fresh air, stringent analysis of all
the opponent's past games, four openings devised for both White and
Black, concluding with five days of rest without chess just before
the match.
After Botvinnik won a big international tournament in 1936, the
ministry of heavy industry rewarded him with an automobile. Stalin
himself signed an order providing him 250 liters of gasoline. As
Johnson notes, "Apart from the vehicles assigned to the
nomenklatura, Botvinnik's may well have been the only private car
in the Soviet Union." When he entered a theater, the audience gave
him a standing ovation; his studious, bespectacled face glowered
from propaganda posters; Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov, he of
the eponymous cocktail, personally intervened to ensure that
Botvinnik had plenty of time off from work as an electrical
engineer to study chess.
If being a chess star was a passport to the good life, Soviet
style, the machine had no pity on losers even after Stalin was long
gone. Mark Taimanov, champion of the USSR, grandmaster, inventor of
the clever Taimanov Variation of the Sicilian Defense, and a gifted
concert pianist to boot, had to run a humiliating gauntlet of
punishment after losing an important international match in the
early 1970s. Rather than being waved through customs as usual on
his return to Sheremetyevo airport, he was subjected to a thorough
search and found to be carrying a copy of Solzhenitsyn's banned
novel, TheFirst Circle. As the customs
official explained candidly, if he had won, "I would have been
prepared to carry the complete works of Solzhenitsyn to the taxi
for you." In Moscow, Taimanov was summoned before the Sports
Committee for a harsh dressing down and Soviet-style "civic
execution": kicked off the national team, he was stripped of his
title of Merited Master of Sports, banned from publishing,
forbidden foreign travel, and ordered to do no more piano
performances.
America had been the world's strongest chess nation in the
1930s. The Russians ended that after World War II by crushing an
American team in a radio match in September 1945. For the next
three decades their only serious competition came from their East
European satellite states, especially Yugoslavia. The idea that
Communist chess supremacy did actually demonstrate Western
decadence took hold in certain quarters.
Enter an arrogant, paranoid Brooklyn brat named Bobby Fischer,
whom Johnson considers "perhaps the most extraordinary genius in
the history of the game." After winning the U.S. championship in
1957 at 14, Fischer showed up in Moscow the next year boldly
demanding to play Botvinnik. But when the chief Soviet chess
bureaucrat informed him that he would not be paid for the games, he
abruptly declared "I'm fed up with these Russian pigs" and went
home. When he did play top Russians later that year in Yugoslavia,
he finished fifth, good enough to earn Fischer the grandmaster's
title at 15.
At first he was respectful toward the Russians and was on
relatively friendly terms with Boris Spassky. But as he observed
the Soviet players in action he became convinced that they had
rigged world chess against him by agreeing among themselves to
throw games to each other during tournaments. He was largely
right—even paranoids have enemies—but that didn't keep him from
beating several Soviet grandmasters during the 1960s.
By 1970 the Soviet chess machine began to feel what Johnson
calls "Fischer fear," with Botvinnik warning his comrades that the
volatile American prodigy had become a threat to Soviet chess.
Little did they know. Despite his mother Regina being a
card-carrying member of the Communist Party U.S.A., Fischer had
gradually become an ardent anti- Communist ready to fight the Cold
War. "It's really the free world against the lying, cheating,
hypocritical Russians," he declared. The scene was set for the most
famous chess match in history, Fischer vs. Spassky in Reykjavik in
the summer of 1972. Johnson calls it "the Cold War's supreme work
of art."
In the tense run-up to the contest, both President Richard Nixon
and his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, contacted
Fischer with messages of support, saying in effect, Go over there
and beat the Russians. As the two-month match got under way, world
newspapers played it on their front pages, London pubs replaced
dartboards with chessboards, and New York bars tuned their
television sets not to the Mets games but to live broadcasts from
Reykjavik. (Even I, certified chess duffer, clipped the daily
accounts of the games and duplicated them on my board.) Fischer
himself called it hand-to-hand combat. Their superb, gripping 13th
game, which Fischer won after eight hours of play, doomed Spassky
and ended the supremacy of the Soviet chess machine. As Johnson
puts it, "In Spassky's submission to his fate and Fischer's fierce,
exultant triumph, the Cold War's denouement was already
foreshadowed."
THIS WELL-RESEARCHED account of the Soviet attempt to turn an
ancient game into a Cold War weapon makes fascinating reading for
both history and chess buffs. In his acknowledgements, Johnson
thanks a circle of American friends, including Michael Novak and
Bob Tyrrell, for their help in giving the book its unflinching
moral clarity. In his tale of those murky years of looking glass
conflict, two final ironies stand out. First there was the strength
that chess gave the unyielding Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky, a
first-rate player, to resist his interrogators and tormentors. "The
chessboard had improved my defense against false threats and
concealed tricks," he later wrote. "I gave them no openings."
Then there were the contrasting post-Cold War destinies of Bobby
Fischer and Garry Kasparov. Fischer, his neurons overloaded, became
increasingly delusional and bitterly anti-American in his exile in
Iceland. Meanwhile, Garry Kasparov, the last Soviet champion,
became fervently anti-Communist and the most prominent leader of
today's domestic opposition to Vladimir Putin's resurgent police
state. Fortunately not all grandmasters are driven crazy by
chess.
I gotta get hold of this book. But was Fischer more than an
interlude? It has to have been a big deal when he won, but within
a couple years after that he forfeited his title to be replaced
by a Russian who was then defeated by another Russian.
Matt| 3.12.09 @ 7:21PM
Fischer was a anti-semetic crazy nut. He later played 10 second
chess against second rates and went in seclusion I thought. He
traveled around and became a nobody. I was a chess player myself
as a teenager and watched Fischer destroy players with an his
arrogant, brilliant style. You cant teach what he did. His
brilliance for the game was unmatched - but he had serious issues
and was not someone you would want to meet. A real shame.
This book does look good.
S.L. Toddard| 3.13.09 @ 12:02PM
JEREMIAH AND BOB: FYI - I haven't been posting here in over a
month, since maybe Feb 2nd. There is a troll here who adopts
other people's names and posts as them. I never called Bob
"blow-bob" or whatever. I saw you also got into some scraps with
him, Jeremiah. None of it was me. I don't use terms like "lib" or
whatever else this clown said.
Imagine doing that - being that pathetic? Logging on and
pretending to be someone else you only know through the internet?
It's sad and the sort of thing one would expect of a
stalker.
Anyway, none of the posts under my name - S.L. Toddard - have
actually been me since the first couple days of February. It's
been that same, sad, lonely troll.
Troy Riser| 3.13.09 @ 3:11PM
I have a book of Fischer's games, and play them out on my old
tournament board when I'm stressed. I love the game, although
only a coffeehouse patzer, and find the personalities of the
chess world--men such as Morphy and Alekhine, Fischer and
Kasparov--endlessly fascinating. 'Chess as art without end
product'? Not true. The artist Marcel Duchamp, himself an expert,
loved the artistic aspects of chess, thought of it as art in
motion--and chess(unfortunately) possibly/probably contributed to
his later efforts at inspiring the evolution of the art form
referred to as performance art.
About Bobby Fischer: He was clearly, obviously, blatantly
mentally unbalanced in the last several decades of his life. I
personally believe his mind was broken by the monumental task of
single-handedly taking on the Russian machine . Thus, he should
be remembered for his chess, which remains beautiful and fine,
uniquely individual and always startlingly unexpected. Fischer's
rabid paranoia, coupled with virulent antisemitism and
anti-Americanism? Let it go. Call his madness a wound, call him a
casuality of the Cold War. Fischer served his country, giving the
free world a much needed psychological boost when the outcome of
that struggle was by no means a sure thing. Few Americans have
done more, or better.
Alan Brooks| 3.16.09 @ 8:35PM
Now Fischer, as you know, is in Sweden eating pastries instead of
halvah.
he said he was glad of 9/11.
so maybe he wasn't as patriotic as you thought he was. But now he
is patriotic-- of his adopted country.
Roy| 3.12.09 @ 2:38PM
I gotta get hold of this book. But was Fischer more than an interlude? It has to have been a big deal when he won, but within a couple years after that he forfeited his title to be replaced by a Russian who was then defeated by another Russian.
Matt| 3.12.09 @ 7:21PM
Fischer was a anti-semetic crazy nut. He later played 10 second chess against second rates and went in seclusion I thought. He traveled around and became a nobody. I was a chess player myself as a teenager and watched Fischer destroy players with an his arrogant, brilliant style. You cant teach what he did. His brilliance for the game was unmatched - but he had serious issues and was not someone you would want to meet. A real shame.
This book does look good.
S.L. Toddard| 3.13.09 @ 12:02PM
JEREMIAH AND BOB: FYI - I haven't been posting here in over a month, since maybe Feb 2nd. There is a troll here who adopts other people's names and posts as them. I never called Bob "blow-bob" or whatever. I saw you also got into some scraps with him, Jeremiah. None of it was me. I don't use terms like "lib" or whatever else this clown said.
Imagine doing that - being that pathetic? Logging on and pretending to be someone else you only know through the internet? It's sad and the sort of thing one would expect of a stalker.
Anyway, none of the posts under my name - S.L. Toddard - have actually been me since the first couple days of February. It's been that same, sad, lonely troll.
Troy Riser| 3.13.09 @ 3:11PM
I have a book of Fischer's games, and play them out on my old tournament board when I'm stressed. I love the game, although only a coffeehouse patzer, and find the personalities of the chess world--men such as Morphy and Alekhine, Fischer and Kasparov--endlessly fascinating. 'Chess as art without end product'? Not true. The artist Marcel Duchamp, himself an expert, loved the artistic aspects of chess, thought of it as art in motion--and chess(unfortunately) possibly/probably contributed to his later efforts at inspiring the evolution of the art form referred to as performance art.
About Bobby Fischer: He was clearly, obviously, blatantly mentally unbalanced in the last several decades of his life. I personally believe his mind was broken by the monumental task of single-handedly taking on the Russian machine . Thus, he should be remembered for his chess, which remains beautiful and fine, uniquely individual and always startlingly unexpected. Fischer's rabid paranoia, coupled with virulent antisemitism and anti-Americanism? Let it go. Call his madness a wound, call him a casuality of the Cold War. Fischer served his country, giving the free world a much needed psychological boost when the outcome of that struggle was by no means a sure thing. Few Americans have done more, or better.
Alan Brooks| 3.16.09 @ 8:35PM
Now Fischer, as you know, is in Sweden eating pastries instead of halvah.
he said he was glad of 9/11.
so maybe he wasn't as patriotic as you thought he was. But now he is patriotic-- of his adopted country.
hellen| 9.3.09 @ 11:30PM
the Aion Account heartsofyou.
Players often have Knight Noah
ghgfh| 11.26.09 @ 9:46PM
Mac TOD Converter,
TOD Converter for Windows