The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email

Reader Mail

I Begala Your Pardon

RET TO THE RESCUE
Re: R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.'s Rush to Rush:

Reading R.E. Tyrrell's comments on Paul Begala's appearance, I recalled that Rush once described James Carville as looking like "something sired from the love scene in Deliverance."
-- Will Pickering

Let us not overlook that the left always relies on personal attacks and slanderous attacks on their rivals. They rarely offer any logical or substantive arguments. This was developed during the Clinton administration as a parallel strategy to demonizing Republicans as an "attack machine." These were the glory days of the serpent faced Satan, James Carville, ( see how easy it is?), who to this day can be sure to use the words "liar, stupid, racist and evil" in any sentence when asked about a Republican.

Today Republicans "hate children" because they halted Democratic attempts to make taxpayer pay for medical care for illegal immigrants -- all of them -- and children up to age 30. Republicans are "anti-American" because they are opposed to President Obama's unprecedented grab for government take over of most of the economy. There are no longer substantive discussions of any issue. The Democrats take to the airwaves and media pages which they control and spew venom and hatred. That is the new bipartisanship.
-- Jay Molyneaux
North Carolina

I'm surprised it took so long for Begala and Carville to crawl out from whatever bridge they were living under. Is it conceivable that Mr. Obama would keep them under wraps intentionally so that he could spread his message of change without the taint of the goon squads of the Clinton era? Is Mr. Obama really that devious? I think so, he's a product of the Chicago Political Machine. He came to Washington with his pet Pit Bull in tow.

With a resume so thin as to be transparent, he blew in on an ill wind and has left a stink of Chicago politics in his wake, with the MSM fanning so as to disperse and misdirect. Witness the Rush Limbaugh misdirection with the ease of a master magician as he slips this country into the greatest peril it has ever faced, done it within a mere month or two and now attempt to drag the rest of the world down with us. While he wines and dines, I can imagine Mrs. Obama with a "Let Them Eat Cake" grin on her lips, and the rest of the world watches as we self-destruct.

Given enough time, the once great USA will become just another third world country. And all because our elected officials on both sides of the aisle can only spend money; they have NO other ideas. What happened to the Contract with America? What happened to integrity? What happened to honesty? Where did America go?
-- Greg Mercurio
Vacaville, California

The campaign against Rush Limbaugh is a cleverly organized, well executed, and largely successful effort to distract the American people from the disaster that the Obama presidency has been in its first couple months. Who cares whether Rush wants Obama to succeed? The vital question is whether Obama's policies are or can be successful. The markets have answered that resoundingly. President Obama appears to be perfectly capable of converting a serious recession into an economic disaster that will last at least four years. The combination of hubris and naivety that the Obama administration exhibits has not been seen at least since John F. Kennedy brought "the best and the brightest" to Washington in the 1960's. May God have mercy on us all.
-- John W. Hockert

THE MIDDLE...OF NOWHERE
Re: George Neumayr's The Big Tent in the Wilderness:

Many thanks. Mr. Neumayr's argument is persuasive. That Republicans must re-discover a clear mission may be reinforced by consideration of the nature of the electoral "middle."

"Moderates" and "undecideds" and "centrists" and "independents" -- however they may choose to identify themselves -- have been denied a necessary Manichaean choice by Republican polytheism.

The one major party with a core is now the Democrats, and it's straight Left. Denied the choice of a major-party straight Right alternative, a statistical Leftward electoral drift was inevitable. The game is no longer Right v. Left, it has morphed into Left v. Muddle.

The electoral result becomes a stronger statistical Leftward advantage when that phenomenon is compounded with the fact that conservatives and libertarians have been denied clear champions. Why be involved in an electoral process that refuses to represent one's needs?

The New Mediocrity "compassionate conservative" axis-of-anything movement represents no Majority! It can represent at best only a minority of middle-grounders, those of principled confusion. Almost by definition, muddlers reject (or perhaps, fear) the responsibilities of a principled ideological stand. My guts tell me that the majority of muddlers would rather switch votes back-and-forth, that most of them want clear menu choices.

No Right-principled party can hold permanent sway over the majority of middle-grounders every election. Yet just as the country can drift Left, it can drift Rightwards once more, if and only if Republicans (grow a set and) confidently embrace principled conservative-libertarian values.

Page: 1 2  

Letter to the Editor

Comments

Alice Moore| 3.6.09 @ 9:13AM

Re: Jindal

This is a Governor that has more substantive experience and accomplishment in his fingernail than the present CIC who hasn't even run a hot dog stand. Gov. Jindal is too busy governing to be practicing with a Telepropmter.

Four years from now I'm guessing that a Willie Loman style will have worn thin. I'm hoping enough people will look at substance.

Havoc| 3.6.09 @ 9:25AM

Just an aside: I, for one, am tired of viewing Sarah Palin's gaping maw - as presented in ads on this site.

Sarah Palin is not really Britney Spears, is she? Do the Republicans want to field a Britney Spears wannabee in the next election? What gives, here? Would Winston Churchill have posed for a publicity shot flashing his tonsils?

Republicans need to get serious. Seriously.

Appleby| 3.6.09 @ 11:07AM

If there are any adults who have not yet Gone Galt and departed for the Gulch, you might want to re-read "Lord of the Flies" and "Brave New World" -- particularly in the latter the lecture Mustapha Mond gives to John Savage near the end of the book, in which he discloses the innards of the Machine.

If you went to "school" after they stopped teaching reading, you can probably download these two books into your Binkie. They are not very thick so should leave plenty of room for your Tunes.

Angel| 3.6.09 @ 1:18PM

Well, I'm sick of looking at the ads of the two gay guys groping each other, Havoc. But of course the liberal complains about the pictures of a beautiful woman. Go figure.

CH| 3.6.09 @ 1:22PM

Does Carville call his Republican strategist wife, Mary, 'liar, stupid, evil, racist' ? Inquiring minds want to know.

Alan Brooks| 3.6.09 @ 3:38PM

what's wrong with Palin? if she'd run for president, I'd have voted for her.

ruth| 3.6.09 @ 3:48PM

But she's not up there with Margaret Thatcher, Alan. Since when did you become a Palin fan?

Alan Brooks| 3.6.09 @ 9:00PM

I said-- if you'll remember-- she is not ready to be VOTED into office. like if Jesus himself came to earth they would say "you're only 33, you can't run for president". as I said before, Palin will have to wait a very long time.

wish I didnt have to explain everything.

ruth| 3.6.09 @ 9:55PM

Conservatives have to be consistent, Alan. Just checking. LOL

Alan Brooks| 3.7.09 @ 12:19AM

okay, just remember first Palin has to be primaried, then nominated, then voted for.

a loo-ong way off.

Alan Brooks| 3.7.09 @ 12:32AM

alrighty? got it? Obama will be re-elected, then you have to wait till 2016...

ruth| 3.7.09 @ 3:04AM

Obummer is a one-term wonder. Watch and see.

ruth| 3.7.09 @ 3:30AM

But I still want his black ass.

Ruth| 3.7.09 @ 7:58PM

Who is the loser posting under my name @ 3:30 AM? Whoever you are, you are a coward. I did not write that post. I am most definitely not attracted to Obummer. Too skinny, way too liberal and he's married. Liberal girls are into married men--not this Conservative girl--I have a conscience.

Ruth| 3.8.09 @ 3:26AM

ruthy,ruthy its me,er,you,Imean me. We were sleepblogging again and unbeknownst to us our alterego is eeeegads liberal. gobacktosleep preshissss it will all be back to normal in the morning.it was just our science conning us again ZZzzzzzzz!

Liberals Lie| 3.8.09 @ 3:29AM

Only losers post under others' names. You must be a liberal. EGAD!

Andy| 3.8.09 @ 10:03PM

I am just hunting around for a good right-wing comment thread. As usual, nothing happening here!

Matt| 3.8.09 @ 11:19PM

Don't recall sending you an invitation, clown. Bye, bye.

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you in a mob?

The Democrats say Obamacare opponents are a mob. Are they right?

         

Participating in this survey will subscribe you to the American Spectator email newsletter. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Defending Cao

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

The Elite Search for Non-Meaning at Fort Hood

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Members to Watch

Philip Klein

* * * *

The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pelosi's Pyrrhic Victory?

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pro-Life Amendment Passes Easily

Philip Klein

* * * *

One Step Forward, Two Races Back

George Neumayr

* * * *

Divisive Unanimity

Daniel J. Flynn

* * * *

Joe Wilson, Call Your Office

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

ACORN's Big Spender

Matthew Vadum

* * * *

The Spirit of 1989

Doug Bandow

* * * *

The Somali-Kenya Connection

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Tex Mess

William Murchison

* * * *

Feeding the Beast

Philip Klein

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT