By Quin Hillyer on 2.20.09 @ 6:09AM
What conservatives need right now is another Jack Kemp for a
younger generation.
What conservatives need right now is another Jack Kemp for a
younger generation.
Not that there really could be another Kemp either, of
course, because his particular brand of infectious enthusiasm and
passion for bold ideas are sui generis. But somebody new
could play a similar role to the one he played for the
conservative movement for the better part of two decades. And
somebody darn well better do so. Without the ability to cut
through the establishment media noise, capture the popular
imagination, and sell solid, intellectually coherent new policy
ideas, the movement will be in the wilderness a lot longer than
anybody in it seems now to expect.
Lest people forget, it's worth reviewing the manifold ways in
which Kemp pushed policies and, equally important, attitudes,
into an inhospitable political environment. Kemp always has
offered a generosity of spirit and a broadness of vision that
keeps conservatism from becoming hidebound. With Kemp long
retired from active politics (but not at all from actively
communicating ideas in
new columns and speeches), today's conservative organizers
and officeholders need to learn from Kemp's example.
It is the example of perhaps the single most influential House
Member, without official leadership position, since James
Madison. And it wasn't just Kemp's successful advocacy of
"supply-side" tax cuts that made him so important -- although
conservatives today are so steeped in the tax-cut dogmas that
they may not remember how revolutionary Kemp's ideas seemed at
the time and how hard they were to promote. It was that Kemp was
a constant, insistent, optimistic advocate for anything that he
thought could spur economic growth and raise people out of
poverty. Kemp shaped more successful policy from his post in the
House, and later as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development,
than just about any legislator in American history.
First, the tax cuts: It was Kemp who sold Ronald Reagan on
supply-side theory, way back in the late summer of 1976. It was
Kemp who sold most Republican House members on supply-side
economics between 1976 and 1980, overcoming the party's static,
green-eyeshade proclivities. It was Kemp who inspired Newt
Gingrich, Trent Lott, and Dan Lungren to form the "Conservative
Opportunity Society" that pushed not just tax cuts but a whole
host of economic growth and anti-poverty initiatives.
Significantly, Kemp worked across the aisle, forging unlikely
alliances without ever giving up his conservative bona
fides. Witness Kemp's work with District of Columbia
delegate Walter Fauntroy to pass legislation in 1987 establishing
tenant management and urban homesteading in public housing.
Witness his numerous ideas for "empowerment zones" and his
ceaseless push for welfare reform -- the latter of which did not
grow directly from his prescriptions, but certainly was inspired
by his long-stated goals.
And Kemp never failed to challenge conventional wisdom or narrow
preconceptions. It was a joy, for instance, to hear him have the
guts to stand up at a hyper-conservative Republican National
Convention and extol America's "liberal, democratic values." He
meant small "l" and small "d," of course, but listeners weaned
only on modern political rhetoric probably wondered what planet
sent Kemp to them. (Houston, we might have a problem.)
If Reagan was the Gipper for whom conservatives wanted to win,
Kemp has always been the quarterback who repeatedly moves the
ball down the field.
Conservatives today who want to recapture the popular imagination
(not to mention popular support) ought to emulate Kemp's loud and
tireless simultaneous engagement with policy details and public
relations in the best sense.
Fortunately, there are some conservatives today who seem to have
the right spirit. U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina is one,
as are U.S. Reps. Mike Pence of Indiana and Paul Ryan of
Wisconsin -- the latter of whom once worked for Kemp at Empower
America. Everybody in the conservative movement ought to move
heaven and earth to help these lawmakers get wider exposure
through speaking events, radio and TV appearances, and other
public forums.
But the Kempian model is more than about mere men. It is a model
about bedrock values, beliefs, and attitudes. It is a model about
openness to new approaches without losing core principles. Kemp's
own core was expressed in his 1987 speech announcing his
candidacy for the presidency, in words describing the polar
opposite of what is now the approach of the Obama administration:
"No government in history has been able to do for people what
they have been able to do for themselves, when they were free to
follow their hopes and dreams. The American Dream is not to make
everyone level with everyone else, but to create the opportunity
for all people to reach as high as their God-given potential
allows."
Today's policymakers also seem not to appreciate Kemp's advocacy
(from that same speech) of sound currency, of missile defenses,
of protection for the sanctity of human life, and of unfettered
school choice.
In Kemp's conception, government can be active, but only as a
catalyst for private action, not a replacement for it. Kemp
surely would not sit by and let the nationalization of health
care occur unchallenged -- but he also would be out front (as
Rep. John Shadegg has been) with ideas about what government can
do to spur reform.
Pence and Ryan and Shadegg and company would do well to emulate
Kemp's boldness. Facing a leftist American administration is
nothing in comparison, for instance, to facing the Soviet Empire.
But David Caprara, a top Kemp aide at HUD and now a Brookings
Institution scholar, recalls Kemp sponsoring him on a trip to
Moscow, where he bore a copy of a Kemp speech at the Heritage
Foundation called "The Democratic Capitalist Manifesto" --
translated in Russian. Caprara presented the speech to council
member Elena Kotova -- and, Caprara said, she later said to him:
"I laughed aloud with pleasure when I read Jack Kemp's Democratic
Capitalist Manifesto. This is what we reformers have been
standing for!"
Conservatives, in that spirit, let's stand tall. And, like Kemp,
be bold.
topics:
Conservatism