Goodbye to a beloved TAS contributor. Obama's Lincoln impersonation falls flat. Old ideas, new tricks. Plus more.
(Page 4 of 4)
IT'S THE SLAVE ECONOMY, STUPID
Re: Matthew Kenefick's Shades of Gray:
In the Gettysburg Address, Lincoln set forth what the war was about for him. It was a test to determine whether government of the people, by the people, and for the people would survive. If our nation is divided, then our attempt at preserving such a government has failed. A major goal of the internationalists is to weaken the power of national governments.
My family settled in Middle Georgia around 1800. My great-grandfather lost an eye to a Yankee bullet, and was a founding member of the KKK. But I agree with Peter Marshall's reading of the Civil War. For the South, it was about slavery. Their whole way of life depended on it. For Lincoln it was about preserving the Union. Lincoln said, "If I could abolish slavery and save the Union, I would do it; if I could legalize slavery and save the Union, I would do it; if I could abolish slavery in some states and legalize it in others, and thereby save the Union, I would do that."
Lincoln was very careful not to violate the Constitution, because
that would give the South a justification. He said, "I could not
abolish slavery, even if I wanted to;" and "Unless the South
attacks me, I am powerless to act against them." The South did
not cite the Declaration of Independence as justification for
secession, because they knew Lincoln would claim the same rights
for Blacks. Neither did they cite States Rights. That argument
appeared after the War. Before the War, Southerners announced
that if a "Black Republican" (a Republican who opposed slavery)
was elected President, they would secede. Lincoln's duly executed
democratic election was the proximate cause of the war.
-- DuPree Moore
WE'LL ALL BE RICH WHEN THE STIMULUS HITS
Re: Joseph Lawler's The
Bigger Dig:
So one dollar spent by the government magically becomes $2.50 because of the "multiplier effect"?
Reminds me of the story of two drunks, walking down the road. One
has a big jug of wine, the other a dollar bill. And when one gets
thirsty, he hands the dollar to the other and gets the jug in
return. And on they go, swapping the jug and the dollar back and
forth, telling each other "won't we be rich when we wake
up!"
-- Martin Owens
Sacramento, California
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
Alan Brooks| 2.16.09 @ 7:55PM
the real Communion isn't in church, it is in Heaven.