By Mark Tooley on 2.13.09 @ 6:07AM
A member of President Obama's religious left explains.
Do you remember how President George W. Bush was sustained in
power by mindless Religious Right evangelicals, who zealously
supported Bush's wars because they knew he shared their not so
secret theocratic dreams? Supposedly Bush would signal his
solidarity and ignite these purported bumpkins by lacing his
speeches with code words from Scripture or hymns.
President Obama's own Religious Left constituency is now flaking
for their man. Of course, advocating their religious agenda
(Global Warming, larger welfare state, disarmament and
subordination to the United Nations, multiculturalism) is not
theocratic, but timeless and universal pleas for justice and
global harmony.
"Emerging" church maestro Brian McLaren, who is a columnist for
Jim Wallis's Sojourners, has been a leading cheerleader
for Obama among liberal evangelicals. ("Emergent" evangelicals
emphasize post-modernity and stress community over doctrine.)
McLaren and other Evangelical Left organizers celebrate that
strong majority evangelical support for John McCain last year
fell somewhat from the historic tide for Bush, back down to more
traditional Bob Dole levels. Supposedly evangelicals will
increasingly abandon their concerns about marriage and sanctity
of life in favor of climate activism and harnessing CIA
interrogators. The Evangelical Left perspective is not populist,
like the Religious Right. It primarily represents the elite voice
of disenchanted evangelical academics and their student
followers, plus some religious urban hipsters and their suburban
wannabes, all desperately anxious to shed "Inherit the Wind"
stereotypes.
McLaren's own brand of post-modern emergent Christianity is
therapeutic and post-theological, hoping to end the culture wars
though a series of dialogues in coffee houses and meditation
rooms. In his latest
column, McLaren excoriates hopes for a traditional economic
recovery, based on materialistic expectations. Specifically, he
was irked by an MSNBC Pat Buchanan comment about Obama's recent
Indiana town hall, with Buchanan sardonically noting that
Elkhart, Indiana produces RV's, and Obama didn't explain how to
revive the RV market.
Naturally McLaren was horrified at the prospect of a resurgent
America gunning gas gulping RV's across the nation's interstates,
accelerating glacier melt, panicking the polar bears, and
doubtless drowning many South Pacific islanders. That's not the
kind of recovery we want! "For many people, economic recovery
means 'getting back to where we were a few months or years ago,'"
McLaren sermonized. "That means recovering our consumptive,
greedy, unrestrained, undisciplined, irresponsible, and
ecologically and socially unsustainable way of life."
McLaren may hope for a new world, or really just a re-creation of
the old, pre-industrial world, where humanity abandons modernity
and returns to the forest hut and the tundra igloo, subsisting on
berries and ferns, living shorter life spans less destructive to
The Planet. He suggested a different kind of "recovery" that
would not include RV's roaring out of Elkhart, but a "wiser way
of life" that recalls the "experience of addiction." Capitalism's
beneficiaries, like drug addicts, first must address the root
cause of their avaricious consumerism: "unresolved pain or anger,
the need to anesthetize painful emotions, lack of creativity in
finding ways to feel happy and alive, unaddressed relational and
spiritual deficits, [and] lack of self-awareness."
A true "recovery" would rescue and not restore consumerist
addicts to their destructive habits, McLaren insisted. Firstly,
of course, that means kicking our "addiction to carbon," whose
fossil fuels, like a "cultural amphetamine," give us "speed" and
"quick energy" while they "toxify" the environment and unbalance
the ecosystem. But carbon is not modernity's only addiction.
There is "addiction to weapons," which are among the "most
addictive substances possible." Like barbiturates, weapons
generate a false sense of "well-being and security, removing our
feeling of fear and anxiety," while also making us "lazy and slow
in the much more important work of relationship-building,
justice, and peace-making, lazy in seeking the common good." And
barbiturate-like weapons fuel an "addictive cycle' around the
world, as increasing numbers seek the same drug induced
reassurance.
Another addiction, according to McLaren's pharmaceutical
analysis, is the "hallucinogenic stimulant of fear," which
[conservative] religious and political leaders foment for dollars
and votes. The targets are predictable: "By making straights
afraid of gays, conservatives afraid of progressives, Christians
and Jews afraid of Muslims, citizens afraid of immigrants, and
vice versa, these leaders get a quick organizational high --
crack for their unity and morale." McLaren lamented that
fear-crazed conservatives often slip from stimulation, to
paranoia, to paralysis. Evidently the Religious Left, during the
Bush years, never resorted to fear or paranoia, so far as McLaren
recalled.
McLaren is also concerned about addictions to "stuff." After all,
"an economy that measures growth by the number of durable goods
(resources) extracted from the environment and turned into
non-durable goods that are bought, used, and then thrown away
into a landfill," is constantly "turning goods into trash" and
pretending this destructive cycle is "success." McLaren wants to
move beyond "an extractive, consumptive economy" to a
"sustainable" and "regenerative" economy, not dependent on
"destroying the planet and exploiting people addictively."
It is true that Christians traditionally warn against inordinate
attachment to "stuff," since their ultimate loyalty is to Heaven.
But in their pursuit of Heaven, Christians are also called to
provide "stuff" to the needy. Several billion people will never
escape chronic poverty, illness, and early death until they too
can "extract" durable goods from the planet, much of whose refuse
will end in a landfill. According to the teaching of Christians,
the earth is not itself an object of veneration, but was created
to serve the needs of humanity. Living "sustainably" for
McLaren's suburban followers may in their minds just mean
recycling and driving a Prius. But for much of the impoverished
world, it threatens a permanent absence of hope for them and all
future generations.
McLaren is hoping to "sabotage" these addictions to "stuff" by
redefining "recovery" to mean waking up from a drug-induced
"comfortable, dreamy, half-awareness" into a new world of solar
panels and Fair Trade coffee. But this post-industrial fantasy is
itself hallucinatory, portraying the Religious Left as even
loopier and more archaic than the worst stereotypes about the
Religious Right.