Arlen and co. take center stage. Steinbeck on stimulus. Dooley noted. Plus more.
(Page 2 of 2)
A heads-up to the people of Oklahoma: As the Pelosi Recession
deepens, expect caravans of cars packed with indigent
Californians — you will call them Calies, no doubt — looking
for jobs in your better-managed, lower-cost state. Until then,
man your border and prepare a Joad-like reception.
— David Govett
Davis, California
It is too bad the one thing that could be done to instill confidence in the economy is not even mentioned as it has gone away for a while. It is so blatant that a fifth grader could see it and that was the rise in gasoline prices to 4 dollars a gallon. That is when the people stopped buying cars and trucks because when you have that kind of price increase people quit buying the hog that uses the gas.
A very simple thing would be to open drilling up any where the
oil can be found and allow the oil companies to come in at very
reduced lease rates and start drilling. The billions set aside
for ACORN could be used for refineries, soon the confidence in
the economy would rise to the point the workers would be recalled
and working again. No doubt the Wall Street mess has a share in
this but the cost of gas hits home to the every day working man
and woman. It is something they see that takes real money out of
their hands and they do without to buy gas. Also, Obama needs to
stop his fear mongering and be positive about things.
— Ken Roberts
Lebanon,Ohio
THE PITTS
Re: Brent Pittman’s letter (under “Imagine a World With No
Bailouts”) in Reader Mail’s
Builders’ Bawling:
Wow. Mr. Pittman you really nailed it on how to fix the economy without taxpayer bailouts or economic stimulus plans. I wonder, however, if I could get some clarifications on a couple of your points:
1. You say we should repeal tax incentives for companies unless they pay a living wage of $14/hour. Not sure where that figure came from. Wouldn’t things be a lot better if we forced companies to pay $34/hour or maybe $44/hour instead? If not, why not?
2. You say we should enact a windfall profits tax on oil companies, but give them a rebate through tax incentives for drilling. I thought congress and the current administration have pretty much blocked drilling anywhere offshore, in ANWR and in most of the western states. Where would you recommend the oil companies drill to get these tax incentives?
3. You say we should increase taxes on fuel guzzling vehicles. Since every gallon of fuel already has federal and state taxes on it, aren’t owners of fuel guzzling vehicles already paying more taxes compared to people who are driving more fuel efficient vehicles?
4. Finally, you say wealthy individuals should pay more to fund
the Wall Street bailout and the Iraq war. The current
administration keeps lowering the amount you can make to be
considered wealthy. What is your definition of wealthy and how
much do you think they should pay?
— Garry Greenwood
Gearhart, Oregon
A RELIGIOUS RIGHT HOOK
Re: David Fisher’s letter (under “Delayed Reactions”) in Reader
Mail’s
Builders’ Bawling:
I assure David Fisher that there is a long list of things I am “fed up with” our fellow Christians. Among them is the “baptizing” of the liberal left agenda as God’s own demand for justice and righteousness. This version of holy agenda that all Christians rigidly were supposed to be obligated to was on the scene long before the Supreme Court’s radical “liberalizion” of abortion — a profound provocation which led to conservative Christianity’s break with its historic “quietism”.
I am old enough to remember that as long as religion was in support and in active advocacy of liberal causes, the mixture of Church and State was just fine. Beforehand, Liberals used to feel all superior that they were engaged in the big societal issues and their conservative counterparts were not. It was only with the emergence of the Christian Right that all of a sudden our self-righteous and self-serving “deep thinkers” began to have “grave” objections to the appearance of the bible-thumpers on the political forum. Not the least of liberal churchmen’s anger at their conservative brothers and sisters was that liberal influence on Capital Hill was greatly diluted. No longer could they claim to speak for the entire Christian Church as they once had.
Most Christians — both liberal and conservative — are acutely aware that God has HIS own purposes beyond our political disagreements. While we all are influenced by our faith, the church is one kingdom and the “prince” is quite another. In the realm of politics and care for God’s creation, we are left to be guided by prudential judgment in governing a very imperfect world. The faith tells us what justice is. Prudential judgment tells us just how much justice we can afford and withstand.
Don’t like the influence of the religious crazies?” Too damn bad.
What can you do about it? Engage in the fight. Welcome to
America.
— Mike Dooley
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Rocco| 2.10.09 @ 7:10AM
"Can you dig it?"
Well written, Mr. Martell. I am a third party supporter and thoroughly agree with what you say. Time for a Hercules to come down and clean out our Augean stables once and for all.
Appleby| 2.10.09 @ 7:20AM
Stand back and let it crash. That is the way and th only way that any of these people will come to their senses.
Meanwhile i continue to pray for the conversion of King O and that he will realize sooner rather than later that no matter what Satan told him on the mountain top (See Luke 4), the Evil One does not take partners.
Tom| 2.10.09 @ 10:47AM
Said 40 yrs. ago that we need a third party. Not the ones that run someone for president but one that starts at the grass roots. It will take time to go from local to national level but that is what is needed.
frost| 2.10.09 @ 12:03PM
I am NOT a Republican, yet I cringe at those three terminal nutcases seduced by Barack Obama. They're beneath contempt; and I say that based on principle only -- and common sense.
Want jobs? Open ANWR and there will be 100K plus, and all the oil imports from SaudiArabia will have been replaced. Add offshore drilling and multiply both.
Then, a follow-up on the clown named Pittman if I may. I read somewhre that if Barack Obama is not a socialist, he does the best imitation of one I've ever seen. Under his tax plan, the top 5 percent of wage-earners have their income tax rates raised from 35 percent to 40 percent, while the bottom 40 percent of all wage-earners, who pay no income tax, are sent federal checks.
If this is not the socialist redistribution of wealth, what is it? As a number of prominent columnists have properly observed, a steeply graduated income tax has always been the preferred weapon of the left for bringing about socialist equality. Indeed, in the "Communist Manifesto" of 1848, Karl Marx was himself among the first to call for "a heavy progressive or graduated income tax." The Obama tax plan is pure class warfare: Use the tax power of the state to rob the successful and reward those who seek Something For Nothing…
Sorry to say, we've lost -- we producers have been outvoted, and that's not likely to change, 'cept to worsen - - and, following last night's stupid press conference, look at how the stock market has dropped - again!
Bruce| 2.10.09 @ 3:01PM
Just read that Snowe, Collins and Specter were the only 3 Senate Republicans to vote for that monstrosity of a "stimulus" bill.
There has got to be a way to get these 3 clowns defeated or at least permanently out of the Republican caucus in the Senate! They are not doing us any favors ....
IMKessel| 2.10.09 @ 4:45PM
The GOP has only three defectors because they were not up for election in the last cycle; if they were, they would probably been defeated by true Dems. Yes, the answer for the GOP is to put up TRUE believers. The answer for the nation is a party that is philosophically and action oriented for true Federalist ideas.
We can hope. We can pray. But we must act!
Greg | 2.10.09 @ 8:03PM
I'm ashamed that Specter is my senator and I aim to fix that situation in 2010. Starting with a grassroots effort to get people fired up to help at defeatspecter.org.
I've written, tried to call etc etc and still he votes against the wishes of his constituents. I'd rather have another Dem than this idiot.
Nick| 2.11.09 @ 1:35AM
Greg,
I'm glad to see some Pennsylvanians are ashamed of Mr. "Scottish Law" Specter. Santorum lost his seat because he campaigned for that RINO, in my opinion.
I'm with you, I'd rather see a democrat have the seat, than have him be reelected. But I'd rather see someone successfully beat Specter in the primary even more.
hgjh| 11.24.09 @ 9:12PM
DVD Copier For Mac,
DVD To DVD Copier Mac