The American Spectator : Builders' Bawling

Print Email

Text Size

Builders' Bawling

2.9.09 @ 6:01AM

Crisis causes. Hunting down Orlet. Only in Reich's world do certain folks need help. Plus more.

(Page 4 of 4)

Where can one travel to see "white, male construction" workers?

I can find none in the Southwest.

For that matter I can routinely only find one English speaker on the job, the person who interfaces with people funding the job.

This "reverse prejudice" is a joke that perpetuates very real problems.
-- Malcolm Burton
South Montgomery County, Texas

DELAYED REACTIONS
Re: Paul Chesser's 2006 article Bible Bending Propaganda:

Are you seriously expecting any intelligent person to read this and find a well constructed argument?

I am a conservative Republican and I am fed up with my own party and fellow Christians denying the dangers facing our world from environmental change.

Please, reread the Bible and tell me where in there that the Lord states anything about lower taxes on the wealthy, gun rights, drilling for oil, declassifying mercury as a pollutant, allowing species to become extinct, building walls to stop immigration or any of the other mean spirited issues that dominate the Republican agenda.

Jesus is not Republican, Democrat or even American.
-- David Fisher

PELOSI LOVES HER 4.7 KIDS
Re: David N. Bass's Pelosi's Children:

I'm still waiting for someone to mention that Pelosi has far more than 1.7 children... She owes an apology to her last three children.
-- D. Carroll

Page: ‹ First < 2 34

Letter to the Editor View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

frost| 2.9.09 @ 7:45AM

Mr. Santore nailed it, was absolutely correct in his assessment.
Mr. Pittman -- too logical.....
And, Mr. Beauchamp, agreed!
That said, on to the next source to see what folly Barack, Nancy and assorted other Marxist clowns have cooked up for us.....

Stuart Koehl| 2.9.09 @ 9:37AM

"I am a conservative Republican and I am fed up with my own party and fellow Christians denying the dangers facing our world from environmental change."

I am curious--does Mr. Fisher believe that the environment does NOT change? If so, where are all those dinosaurs? What happened to Gondwanaland? Environments change all the time, so the key issues are the nature of the change, its effect on human beings, and the extent to which human beings are affecting the change.

An objective look at the state of the global environment today, as opposed to half a century ago indicates tremendous improvements in almost every area--but only in the wealthier developed countries.

Why?

As environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg has demonstrated, environmentalism is a luxury of the rich. Only wealthy nations have the disposable income necessary to implement environmental remediation or invest in "sustainable" growth. Poor countries are stuck in a subsistence rut, and, contrary to popular belief, primitive people don't live in harmony with nature, but rather rape the landscape just to survive, until their ecosystems (and populations) collapse.

Lomborg rightly states that the most useful thing we can do to improve the environment is bring the bottom billion of the world's people out of abject poverty as quickly as possible, and that means rapid electrification using the most economical forms of power generation.

Of course, this is difficult to do except in the context of a free market economy under open and transparent governments. In other words, the conservative agenda is necessary for environmentalism to work.

ruth| 2.9.09 @ 2:53PM

Mr. Fisher, the wealthy paid MORE taxes during George W's tenure and border enforcement is necessary for our national security. You don't sound like a conservative or like someone who reads the Bible.