(Page 3 of 4)
Whenever the Russian government chooses to kick aside this, to them, jejune experiment with democracy and capitalism, and return to a good old soviet totalitarian economy in a good old Russian totalitarian government, they will return to being a good old communist world power. And, as anyone can see -- anyone but a hermit (and the intellectually hermitted media) -- that process has already begun.
The “victory over tiny Georgia” did not just “demonstrate that Moscow could defeat a small neighbor.” It demonstrated that Russia could defeat a small neighbor without interference from a completely impotent world.
Do Mr. Bandow or the “wishes really ARE horses” world of the media remember how World War II started in Europe? Or in Asia? Germany and Japan both started their power projection by attacking their smallest and weakest neighbors -- and none of the loud but impotent world powers stopped them.
I despair.
-- A. C. Santore
IMAGINE A WORLD WITH NO BAILOUTS
Re: Brian Wesbury's
Unemployment and Stimulus:
No need for more taxpayer bailouts and economic stimulus, if
politicians would do the following: First, repeal all sales taxes
and replace the lost revenue with an import tax/tariff on
imported labor and manufactured goods. Second, repeal all local
tax incentives that shift business costs to taxpayers and that
create poverty wage jobs; or change these incentives to pay a
living wage, minimum wage of $14/hour (parent with one child).
Third, re-regulate banks and financial corporations. Fourth,
enact a windfall profits tax on oil and gas companies; but,
rebate this money through tax incentives for drilling and
building refineries (including ethanol ones in other countries)
as well as eliminating the $.54/gallon import tax on sugar cane
ethanol. This strategy will slow these companies from using
excess profits to enrich executives and to buy company stock.
Fifth, increase taxes on fuel guzzling vehicles, wealthy
individuals and corporations (eliminating corporate welfare and
tax loopholes) to pay for the Wall Street bailout, the Iraq war
and to pump more oil in Iraq for export. These strategies will
lower the $11 trillion ($14 trillion forecasted) taxpayer debt
leading to a stronger dollar that will reduce inflation and
increase the number of good paying jobs with benefits for
American citizens.
-- Brent Pittman
Brownsburg, Indiana
DEPT. OF SIMPLE SOLUTIONS
Re: George H. Wittman's China's
Balance Sheet:
So high consumption in the USA is a problem for China?
If the poor trusting Chinese have been harmed by wicked America's appetite for cheap goods, the cure is certainly available:
Let us impose appropriate tariffs on cut-rate cloth, toxic toys,
melamine milk, poison pharmaceuticals, etc, etc etc. -- at
once.
-- Martin Owens
Sacramento, California
INTELLECTUALLY DWARFED
Re: Ralph R. Reiland's Isn't It Reich?
Reich is as short on intellect as he is in height. I worked
construction putting myself through law school and gained a great
repect for able construction workers, white and black, who don't
need the like of Reich dissing them
-- Gary Beauchamp
Reich misses one point?
There could be a burgeoning tourist opportunity I am missing.
frost| 2.9.09 @ 7:45AM
Mr. Santore nailed it, was absolutely correct in his assessment.
Mr. Pittman -- too logical.....
And, Mr. Beauchamp, agreed!
That said, on to the next source to see what folly Barack, Nancy and assorted other Marxist clowns have cooked up for us.....
Stuart Koehl| 2.9.09 @ 9:37AM
"I am a conservative Republican and I am fed up with my own party and fellow Christians denying the dangers facing our world from environmental change."
I am curious--does Mr. Fisher believe that the environment does NOT change? If so, where are all those dinosaurs? What happened to Gondwanaland? Environments change all the time, so the key issues are the nature of the change, its effect on human beings, and the extent to which human beings are affecting the change.
An objective look at the state of the global environment today, as opposed to half a century ago indicates tremendous improvements in almost every area--but only in the wealthier developed countries.
Why?
As environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg has demonstrated, environmentalism is a luxury of the rich. Only wealthy nations have the disposable income necessary to implement environmental remediation or invest in "sustainable" growth. Poor countries are stuck in a subsistence rut, and, contrary to popular belief, primitive people don't live in harmony with nature, but rather rape the landscape just to survive, until their ecosystems (and populations) collapse.
Lomborg rightly states that the most useful thing we can do to improve the environment is bring the bottom billion of the world's people out of abject poverty as quickly as possible, and that means rapid electrification using the most economical forms of power generation.
Of course, this is difficult to do except in the context of a free market economy under open and transparent governments. In other words, the conservative agenda is necessary for environmentalism to work.
ruth| 2.9.09 @ 2:53PM
Mr. Fisher, the wealthy paid MORE taxes during George W's tenure and border enforcement is necessary for our national security. You don't sound like a conservative or like someone who reads the Bible.
Alan Brooks| 2.9.09 @ 10:36PM
how i wish we were still in the Garden of Eden.
Alan Brooks| 2.9.09 @ 11:03PM
yes of course things have to change, but that doesn't mean we have to LIKE it.
dropshippngwatch| 8.31.09 @ 1:40AM
Replica Watches
Replica Watch
Fake Watches
Replica Watches
Replica Watches
Replica Watch
Fake Watches
Replica Watch
Replica Ebel Watches
Replica Emporio Armani Watches
Replica Fendi Watches
Replica Ferrari Watches
Replica Fortis Watches
Replica Franck Muller Watches
Replica Graham Watches
Replica Gucci Watches
Replica Guess Watches
Replica Harry Winston Watches
Replica Hermes Watches
Replica Hublot Watches
Replica Hugo Boss Watches
Replica IWC Watches
http://www.dropshippingwatch.com
slewing ring| 10.20.09 @ 4:33AM
shanghai massage
turntable bearings