The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Feature

Providing Relief from the Crisis

How to spare the economy further crippling government intervention by suspending mark-to-market accounting

(Page 2 of 5)

It makes no sense to allow the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board to continue destroying capital in our banks while the Treasury is using taxpayer money to recapitalize the banks. Our new president should call upon the SEC to get on the same page as the rest of the government and end the destruction of bank capital under SFAS 157. 

William M. Isaac is chairman of the Secura Group of LECG and former chairman of the FDIC.

Edward L. Yingling

Mark-to-market accounting is contributing to uncertainty in the markets, and it is leading to misdirected public perceptions. Certainly mark-to-market did not cause the financial crisis. Toxic sub-prime loans and excess leverage in Wall Street firms were the principal causes. But many people, including American Bankers Association members, believe that overly strict application of mark-to-market made the crisis much worse by creating a downward spiral of valuations based on prices in dysfunctional markets. Furthermore, current mark-to-market accounting is very pro-cyclical, exaggerating ups and downs. For years, during the good times, ABA argued against strict mark-to-market. During these bad times, we have pointed out the need to adjust mark-to-market to reflect the dysfunctional markets.

The misapplication of mark-to-market accounting in today’s situation, when there is no functioning market, has unnecessarily destroyed billions of dollars in capital. On a related matter, the recent action by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Financial Accounting Standards Board to address the concept of “Other Than Temporary Impairment” (OTTI) was very inadequate. The SEC attempted to resolve this issue, but FASB’s interpretation (FASB Staff Position 157-3) muddled it again. As a result, banks may be required to write down securities—even though there may be no threat to principal or to cash flow—because the markets are dysfunctional.

Congress and others have recognized the need to replace mark-to-market accounting. During the development of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, there was unprecedented debate among legislators, investors, regulators, financial institutions, and others about the problems with mark-to-market accounting. As a result, the act required the Securities and Exchange Commission, in consultation with the Federal Reserve and Treasury, to conduct a study on mark-to-market accounting standards applicable to financial institutions.

ABA believes that if an entity’s business model is based on fair value or if an instrument is held for trading purposes, market value (as a proxy for sales price) may represent the most relevant measure of how the instruments will be settled. On the other hand, the lending and investment model of banks is based on cash flows rather than market value, meaning that mark-to-market is not the most relevant measurement. If mark-to-market is overstating gains in good times and overstating losses in bad times, are we providing good information to the public about the performance of financial institutions? We think not.

Mark-to-market accounting needs to be addressed in the short term by improving both the definition of fair value and OTTI. In the longer term, the efforts to move to fair value for all financial instruments should be abandoned, and existing rules requiring fair value should be examined to determine whether mark-to-market is appropriate. Some tough lessons have been learned in this environment regarding the lack of reliability and relevance of mark-to-market accounting, which should not be ignored.

It is important that any new standards improve financial reporting for users of financial statements. Our recommendations will achieve that and will help reduce some of the unwarranted uncertainty that exists in the markets. Accounting standards have played a significant role in the financial meltdown, and the time to repair them is now. 

Edward L. Yingling is president and CEO of the American Bankers Association.

Brian Wesbury

The government has pulled out all the stops, and is injecting trillions of dollars into the economy through just about every avenue that anyone can dream up. What’s so frustrating is that no one in control will seriously consider a change to the inflexible rules of mark-to-market accounting.

Mark-to-market (or fair value) accounting forces financial institutions to use market prices (gathered by soliciting bids from buyers) to value assets in their portfolios. Then those values are used to mark an institution to market.

Any loss gets pushed though the income statement, which in turn subtracts from capital. If capital-asset ratio falls below legal levels imposed by regulators, the institution can fall into insolvency. While this is typically an end-of-quarter calculation, the government can step into an institution at any time and apply mark-to-market accounting.

As a real-life example, imagine that a forest fire is one mile from your $1 million home, the winds are blowing it your way and you have a $600,000 mortgage. Then, imagine that your banker knocks on your door and demands that you mark the value of your home to the price that you could sell it for, right now. Then the bank forces you to come up with more money or be foreclosed on. If the wind shifts and your home is saved, it’s too late. You’ve already been “marked-to-market.”

Page:   12 3 4   Last ›

Letter to the Editor View all comments (18) |

Alan Brooks| 3.4.09 @ 9:05PM

Even if you suspend mark-to-mark accounting and do whatever else you can to turn the economy around, you'll just end up with a situation similar to the one we were in during the late '90s when the public-- the public whose judgment we overrate-- got overconfident and made so many mistakes that we ended up with another financial 'crisis' (an overused word). Foolish people have to learn the hard way, and since the overwhelming majority are fools it now appears genuine progress is a mirage. We all walk in a maze of self deception.

Life is basically making mistakes until we die.

Pingback| 9.16.09 @ 6:08PM

Recommended Mark to Market Article links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Recommended Mark to Market Article Home September 16, 2009 Recommended Mark to Market Article Providing Relief from the Crisis excerpt: Devotees of market value accounting cringe at the thought of suspending the rules. They argue it would result in a loss of transparency and an overstatement of values. To the…

hgjhg| 11.23.09 @ 8:11PM

TOD Converter Mac,
TOD File Converter Mac

asdf| 1.5.10 @ 4:49AM

This powerful Streaming Video Capture supports comprehensive video sharing websites, online TV channels, Internet radio station, online movie, live sport, live news report and other streaming video websites. It enables you to easily capture all these videos and save on your local hard disk. It is the best tool to capture streaming video from Internet.Capture Streaming Video,iPhone To Computer Transfer

trytry| 3.1.10 @ 10:06PM

iPod to PC Transfer,
iPod to PC Transfer

ikaynak | 5.4.10 @ 11:03AM

thanks.

guo | 7.1.10 @ 5:08AM

www.wmvconverterformac.com

More Articles From Feature

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/01/providing-relief-from-the-cris

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

He’s Just Not That Into You

Ross Kaminsky | 11:34AM

Issa’s Mistake

Ross Kaminsky | 11:11AM

Anthony Weiner Running for NY Mayor

Kyle Peterson | 10:38AM

Morning Round-Up 5-22

Patrick Ryan | 10:01AM

Carney Goes Birther on Major Garrett

Aaron Goldstein | 12:10AM

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT