The glory days of anti-Americanism may have been in the 1970s,
when marchers filled the streets of every European capital to
protest against “neo-colonial imperialism,” but that pernicious
virus is still very much with us. And not necessarily where you
might expect. In Britain, the cousins pore over works with titles
like Why Do People Hate America? and American Dream,
Global Nightmare. Opinion leaders like Margaret Drabble, the
prominent British novelist who spews leftist venom on everything
middle-class and American, confesses, “My anti-Americanism has
become almost uncontrollable. It has possessed me, like a disease.
It rises up in my throat like acid reflux, that fashionable
American sickness.”
Britain is also the home of the BBC World Service radio
broadcaster. Funded largely with public monies by the government’s
Foreign and Commonwealth Office, it boasts a worldwide audience and
proportionate influence. (I refer here to the Beeb’s foreign radio
broadcasting, not its commercial BBC America program, specially
edited for the American television audience.) In my days as a
roving international correspondent, I have known BBC reporters in
various climes and shared tips, sources, and drinks with them.
Generally they are a well-informed and thoroughly professional lot.
But they can do little about the way their editors back in London
treat their reporting and choose the facts that fit their editorial
line, which has long been consistently critical of America. No news
item is too trivial to report if it makes the U.S. look ridiculous,
no disgruntled soldier back from Iraq too isolated to find and
interview at length. The result is often a spiteful bias that has
prompted me several times to protest in writing a particularly
vicious warping of news concerning the U.S. In Britain itself the
BBC as a whole has been widely criticized for its notorious leftist
bias, including by some of its own management and journalists.
A typical recent example: When American troops staged a
lightning raid into Syria to take out an al Qaeda staging area used
to smuggle foreign jihadists into Iraq, the BBC World Service
announcer spat out with audible relish that it was “a fit of pique
by the Bush White House.” Much airtime was given to Syrian
officials to voice righteous indignation over this “outrageous
crime… an unprovoked attack on a sovereign country.” No official
U.S. source was quoted to give the American side of the story, but
the resourceful BBC did find someone, identified as an academic in
Oklahoma, who supported its line that the raid had no other motive
than President Bush’s petulant desire to punish Syria before he
left office. At no time during the long report were the words "al
Qaeda" pronounced. Minutes after listening to that, I tuned to a
French station that aired a report from its Washington
correspondent giving the American version of events and pointing
out that al Qaeda used Syria for staging. When the French are
fairer toward America than the BBC, you know you’re in the presence
of big-time bias.
THUS IT WAS WITH SOME trepidation that I opened a new
British-published book about the U.S. provocatively entitled
Have a Nice Day (Short Books, London) by the BBC’s
Washington-based North America editor, Justin Webb. Uh-oh, I
thought, more snide observations about the overweight, gun-toting,
fanatically religious ignoramuses who populate the American
hinterland.
But it turns out that Webb not only loves the place and its
people, he is downright offended by the deep European prejudice
against America, which he likens to racism. Having lived six years
in the U.S., he himself is sometimes the target of such prejudice,
as when his English friends ask solicitously how he will rid his
children of the dreadful American accent they have picked up. He
professes to be puzzled. “America is attractive in a way no other
nation has ever matched,” he writes. “Why, then, do so many
foreigners persist in disliking America, misunderstanding it,
trashing it?”
Webb traces the origins of anti-Americanism to long before the
U.S. even became a nation, and finds--surprise!--that the French
invented it in the early 18th century. It was then that salon
academics like the naturalist Georges-Louis Leclerc de Buffon
declared America a primitive place fit only for degenerate life
forms. Then, too, that Antoine de La Mothe Cadillac, whom Louis XIV
named governor of Louisiana in 1710, reported back that “The people
are a heap of the dregs of Canada.” Webb neatly rebuts this:
“Europeans, with their feudal system and the cultural baggage that
surrounded it, with their tightly monitored villages and their
strict hierarchies, had taken 20 times as long to civilize their
continent. Some Europeans still don’t get it.”
Webb undeniably gets it. In what resembles a love letter to
America, he starts with a brief but revealing contrast of basic
European and American attitudes. Europeans, he says regretfully,
seem to drift drearily through life, full of doubt and empty of
values. Americans, on the other hand, “have a zest for life….
America is what happens when humans take their chances, seize the
moment, go for it.” Well now. This guy makes us feel like
cheering.
A good reporter who gives us the facts as he finds them in
lively journalistic prose, Webb scrutinizes the whole, crazy-quilt
American scene. From geography, which he insists explains much
about the national character, to religion, guns, race, and
politics, he takes on all the big topics. And he has done his
legwork from one end of the country to the other.
In Arkansas he visits a prison to observe the Interfaith program
run by Christian evangelicals who work to give inmates meaning and
purpose in their lives, concluding that American evangelism does
not conform to the bigoted stereotype of the British press. In
Vermont he meets a grieving mother whose son was killed in Iraq,
and yet is proud that he died so that Iraqis could have the kind of
life he had enjoyed. In Minneapolis he interviews Omar, a recent
immigrant from Somalia, who suffers from the cold in his new
country, whose Arabic is still better than his English, and who
likes to watch Al Jazeera television--but who is profoundly
thankful that his daughter was able to go to college in America. In
Iowa, Webb attends a caucus in Polk County and comes away with the
impression that the caucus system, so incomprehensible to
foreigners, is in its grassroots, bottom-up approach “American in
its sheer imperviousness to the logic of the European way.”
In the Washington suburb of Georgetown he meets an elegant young
woman in pearls and a power suit who shows him the Mossberg
Maverick 12-gauge shotgun she keeps under her bed--and skillfully
demonstrates just how she would use it should an attacker come
through her door. Webb cottons on to the chasm between American and
European attitudes toward guns, the one seeing a legitimate means
of self-defense, the other only a killing machine. As for those who
see America as a place of random violence, he retorts, “Oh, come
off it. This goes to the heart of the jaundiced European view of
the United States, the great myth of American nastiness. Yes, there
is violence.… But there is also a tranquility and civility that
most British people can only dream
of.”
WHAT DOESN'T HE LIKE? Well, one pet peeve is our penchant for
euphemism, or what he calls American “linguistic timidity,” the
overdone political correctness that has us saying things like “Oh
my gosh” instead of something perhaps more cathartic. He also finds
it silly to substitute “the holidays” for a forthright and robust
“Christmas” out of misplaced fear of possibly offending someone.
Then too, he perceives a continuing squeamishness about sex, which
he finds, despite changes in mores, still puritanically linked to
smut and sin. And, black president or not, he worries that America
may not have completely worked through the racism that has plagued
it for so long.
But in general, Webb is convinced that few of the world’s
huddled masses will be knocking on the doors of Russia, China, or
even Europe anytime soon. America is still where they want to go,
the dream still the United States. (And not only the masses. A
recent poll in Reader’s Digest shows that fully 52 percent
of today’s relatively prosperous French citizens would move to the
U.S. if they could, along with 30 percent of the British and 20
percent of Germans.) A world without American power for good would
be incalculably worse off, he concludes. Not only for millions of
Taiwanese, Israelis, and Afghans, but also “for all of us Europeans
who know that if push comes to shove, the Yanks will bail us out,
as they did our parents and theirs before them.”
Here’s hoping Justin Webb’s compatriots in general, and his BBC
editors in particular--whom he has on occasion criticized publicly
for treating the U.S. with “scorn and derision”--get it. For that
matter (American publishers take note), many in the U.S. itself
could do with this tonic reminder of what’s right about their
country.
About the Author
Joseph A. Harriss is The American Spectator's Paris correspondent. His latest book is About France.
The first thing no on had ever heaard of Al Queda, till the CIA
invented it. The concept of dialectical thinking to cause chaos
between nations.
After the second world war, the Europeans decided on something
Napoleon had tried but did not succeed on a one block European
States, Napoleon died never accomplishing his dream.
Hitler was trained and placed to try to create a unify not only
Germany but the whole of Europe, and one Government of the
European Union, and one King of Europe under Under Edward, who
would be King of Europe who found an American Walis Sympson a
divorced American, who went off to live in France because his
plan with Hitler did not work, nor did Hitlers plan to become
head of the European Union.
After the second world world war all European leaders decided
along with the Pope that the long term goal was to unify Europe
creating a super state. The Jesuits, and the various groups
decided that a European State in not enough they want a One World
Order with the Pope being the head of the world churches and one
government on a revolving State basis, and they must create a one
world Banking system. This situation has been in the making form
before Hitler, and goes back as far as Napoleon of France.
But what is most frightening of all America and Britain wants to
create a FASCIST state much like the model they created by design
in Germany. America under the Jesuits and the Knights of Malta
which is at the higest part of the Freemason, has had this plan
since before the second world war.
The same model is being carried out in the Middle east with the
Israeli acting as the NAZI SS officers and the Palestinians in
GAZA and the West Bank as the Prisoners in the Concentration
Camps. These two models are the prototypes of the future under
the one world order model being excercised in the Middle
East.
Israel operates inder the one world order in the Middle East, the
excercise shows there will be great resaistance. Ther have
stepped up the plan two gears, what if the people don't have
money or food and are being attacked, what is the level of
risistance. And the reality is a massacre of a people, it can
only work if people can't fight back.
The test is being carried out as an experiment on the rest of the
world to create a one world order ther need a world reaction.
That is to take away the means of Borrowing, Working, Having
Homes, and watch the results, watching the Banking system
collapse is a part of the exercise. Many people think this is a
coincidence, there is no coincidence in things failing it is by
design.
The control of the BBC, or the News Media in America is to keep
information getting into the system so the population has no
information or control over their lives.
The Ultimate plan is to create a Socialised System , which is
distributing Wealth to the poorest people in the world, one place
that springs to mind is Brazil, large populations ot Catholics,
who do not follow family planning, and produce people they can
neither house or feed adequately, give the wealth to these people
open borders where there is no immigration control, and what is
yours you worked for is now for the porest who acted in an
irrisponsible way, in governing their lives. All this is already
signed into law under the TREATY OF ROME, Europe has signed up to
this so has America. So voting for Republican or Democrats there
is only a difference of colour on a rosette. They are obligated
to carry out the new laws and find ways of implementing them, the
TRILATERAL COMMISSION has laws that has also to be implemented,
and the UN is obsolete in areas of effictiveness, because the
ultimate goal is to reduce the population by 95%, these bits of
information in not in the public domain for obvious reason
because it would cause cause unress in developed countries, so
the government needs time to impliment these things stage by
stage. All Governments around the world has to adear to these
laws or their countries is destroyed as they did to Zimbabwe, and
starve it out of existance. They then bring down the government
and put in place some one who dont care about the population of
that country. Britain did his part in ensuring that the
Zimbabwean Government is destroyed, because under the TRILATERAL
COMMISSION and the TREATY OF ROME that was the role given at the
BILDERBERG GROUP to carry out that role.
Obama cannot do what he thinks but what he has been instructed if
he is elected, the same as McCain was instructed. The unfortunate
thing for the masses they think they are being governed by who
they elect, the elect is only carrying out ORDERS.
Quiberon Bay| 2.1.09 @ 1:56PM
The above should be made into an advertisement for comment
moderation.
Mario Sanchez| 2.9.09 @ 11:08PM
I could care less what europeans think of my country, whether
they like it or not. They are totally inconsequential in my life.
st louie mo| 2.28.09 @ 12:04PM
I suspect Mr. Webb's next assignment will be the Yorkshire farm
reports.
It's pretty obvious that when you are the most powerful and
properous country in the world, those that aren't, express a
typical jealously. In cases like England, this is a bitterness at
their lack of power and relevance that their political attitudes
have brought them to.
England could reclaim it's national vitality by shedding its
suffocating leftism and standing again for its principles,
regardless of those, especially the masses of unassimilated
'citizens', that stand would 'offend'.
vb| 3.1.09 @ 7:52AM
I do care what Europeans think and say about us, not because of a
childish desire to be liked. I care because what they say often
harms us in the world. They can feed the paranoia of young
jihadis.
No other country is as open as the US. We don't censor the news,
so our faults and problems are as accessible to the world as out
virtues and accomplishments. Rather than using this information
for serious analysis, European journalists and politicians all
too often make cheap shots and distort the facts for their own
advantage. When that puts us in danger, I am angry. It is nice to
know that Justin Webb has gone beyond the cliches.
Randall| 3.8.09 @ 10:16PM
Mr. Webb seems to have risen above the snarkiness of British
journalists and commentators and has reported, in a professional
manner, about America as he has seen it by virtue of having been
there, unlike most of his peers. One should want to read his
book.
5 to MIDNIGHT| 2.1.09 @ 1:15PM
The first thing no on had ever heaard of Al Queda, till the CIA invented it. The concept of dialectical thinking to cause chaos between nations.
After the second world war, the Europeans decided on something Napoleon had tried but did not succeed on a one block European States, Napoleon died never accomplishing his dream.
Hitler was trained and placed to try to create a unify not only Germany but the whole of Europe, and one Government of the European Union, and one King of Europe under Under Edward, who would be King of Europe who found an American Walis Sympson a divorced American, who went off to live in France because his plan with Hitler did not work, nor did Hitlers plan to become head of the European Union.
After the second world world war all European leaders decided along with the Pope that the long term goal was to unify Europe creating a super state. The Jesuits, and the various groups decided that a European State in not enough they want a One World Order with the Pope being the head of the world churches and one government on a revolving State basis, and they must create a one world Banking system. This situation has been in the making form before Hitler, and goes back as far as Napoleon of France.
But what is most frightening of all America and Britain wants to create a FASCIST state much like the model they created by design in Germany. America under the Jesuits and the Knights of Malta which is at the higest part of the Freemason, has had this plan since before the second world war.
The same model is being carried out in the Middle east with the Israeli acting as the NAZI SS officers and the Palestinians in GAZA and the West Bank as the Prisoners in the Concentration Camps. These two models are the prototypes of the future under the one world order model being excercised in the Middle East.
Israel operates inder the one world order in the Middle East, the excercise shows there will be great resaistance. Ther have stepped up the plan two gears, what if the people don't have money or food and are being attacked, what is the level of risistance. And the reality is a massacre of a people, it can only work if people can't fight back.
The test is being carried out as an experiment on the rest of the world to create a one world order ther need a world reaction. That is to take away the means of Borrowing, Working, Having Homes, and watch the results, watching the Banking system collapse is a part of the exercise. Many people think this is a coincidence, there is no coincidence in things failing it is by design.
The control of the BBC, or the News Media in America is to keep information getting into the system so the population has no information or control over their lives.
The Ultimate plan is to create a Socialised System , which is distributing Wealth to the poorest people in the world, one place that springs to mind is Brazil, large populations ot Catholics, who do not follow family planning, and produce people they can neither house or feed adequately, give the wealth to these people open borders where there is no immigration control, and what is yours you worked for is now for the porest who acted in an irrisponsible way, in governing their lives. All this is already signed into law under the TREATY OF ROME, Europe has signed up to this so has America. So voting for Republican or Democrats there is only a difference of colour on a rosette. They are obligated to carry out the new laws and find ways of implementing them, the TRILATERAL COMMISSION has laws that has also to be implemented, and the UN is obsolete in areas of effictiveness, because the ultimate goal is to reduce the population by 95%, these bits of information in not in the public domain for obvious reason because it would cause cause unress in developed countries, so the government needs time to impliment these things stage by stage. All Governments around the world has to adear to these laws or their countries is destroyed as they did to Zimbabwe, and starve it out of existance. They then bring down the government and put in place some one who dont care about the population of that country. Britain did his part in ensuring that the Zimbabwean Government is destroyed, because under the TRILATERAL COMMISSION and the TREATY OF ROME that was the role given at the BILDERBERG GROUP to carry out that role.
Obama cannot do what he thinks but what he has been instructed if he is elected, the same as McCain was instructed. The unfortunate thing for the masses they think they are being governed by who they elect, the elect is only carrying out ORDERS.
Quiberon Bay| 2.1.09 @ 1:56PM
The above should be made into an advertisement for comment moderation.
Mario Sanchez| 2.9.09 @ 11:08PM
I could care less what europeans think of my country, whether they like it or not. They are totally inconsequential in my life.
st louie mo| 2.28.09 @ 12:04PM
I suspect Mr. Webb's next assignment will be the Yorkshire farm reports.
Philosopher| 2.28.09 @ 12:39PM
I've constantly wondered why so many Americans seem to have this high-schoolish desire to be 'liked' in the world:
http://pracphilosblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/foreign-countries-again-hope-us-will-abandon-its-principles/
It's pretty obvious that when you are the most powerful and properous country in the world, those that aren't, express a typical jealously. In cases like England, this is a bitterness at their lack of power and relevance that their political attitudes have brought them to.
England could reclaim it's national vitality by shedding its suffocating leftism and standing again for its principles, regardless of those, especially the masses of unassimilated 'citizens', that stand would 'offend'.
vb| 3.1.09 @ 7:52AM
I do care what Europeans think and say about us, not because of a childish desire to be liked. I care because what they say often harms us in the world. They can feed the paranoia of young jihadis.
No other country is as open as the US. We don't censor the news, so our faults and problems are as accessible to the world as out virtues and accomplishments. Rather than using this information for serious analysis, European journalists and politicians all too often make cheap shots and distort the facts for their own advantage. When that puts us in danger, I am angry. It is nice to know that Justin Webb has gone beyond the cliches.
Randall| 3.8.09 @ 10:16PM
Mr. Webb seems to have risen above the snarkiness of British journalists and commentators and has reported, in a professional manner, about America as he has seen it by virtue of having been there, unlike most of his peers. One should want to read his book.
jkjhjh| 11.23.09 @ 8:15PM
TOD Converter Mac,
TOD File Converter Mac
fhg| 3.1.10 @ 10:11PM
iPod to PC Transfer,
iPod to PC Transferg