The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Feature

Daschle Care

Where Hillary Clinton failed, the team of President Barack Obama and HHS Secretary Tom Daschle is determined to succeed—and the political momentum is all on their side.

(Page 4 of 4)

“Americans won’t be able to buy the health care plans that they want, because the government, in the same proposal, is going to say what constitutes insurance and what doesn’t,” he said, adding that the public option would also expose the plan’s objectives. “As soon as we create a government insurance plan that will be subsidized by the government, you won’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure out that all competitors will be on life support and will be gone after a period of time.”

He also predicted that Obama would have to reverse his campaign stance and come out in favor of an individual mandate, which is supported by Daschle and represents the only way to get insurers to cooperate. Aside from being unpopular, Shadegg said, mandates have been proven an “abject failure” in Massachusetts, where hundreds of thousands of people remain noncompliant, and also are ineffective in the 48 states that mandate automobile insurance.

Shadegg also observed that in his book, Daschle is “stunningly candid about denying care” as a way to save money. As an example, he quoted Daschle’s lament that “Many patients with insurance want any care that might do some good, and plenty of doctors will oblige them.”

In addition, Shadegg anticipated that Daschle will not be able to abandon his idea of a Federal Health Board, even as the Federal Reserve’s credibility has suffered from its handling of the financial crisis. He said that it “is absolutely essential for what they want to do with the health care system” and crucial to Daschle’s legislative strategy. But it also complicates things from a communications perspective.

“It will be difficult for Obama and Daschle to argue that we are not going to a government-run health care if they insist on a board that decides practices and procedures,” he said.

While acknowledging that many of the large interest groups won’t be on the side of Republicans this time around, Shadegg urged some skepticism. “If you speak to doctors, you will find that the AMA does not speak for many of them,” he said, and insisted that such groups do not represent the sentiments of the American people.

If large businesses support a government takeover of health care, Shadegg predicted that Americans would see that they are asking for a handout from taxpayers. And if Democrats end up, at the behest of the insurance industry, proposing a mandate that would fine Americans who do not purchase the industry’s product, it would show that “we’re not the ones carrying water for the insurance industry, the Democrats are carrying water for the insurance industry.”

Dick Armey warned that while Democrats recharged after their last defeat on health care and laid the groundwork for another push, Republicans became too complacent and will have a lot of catching up to do.

“The United States, after every military conflict historically, we disarmed,” he said, noting that, once Republicans defeated HillaryCare and took back Congress, they similarly stopped worrying and didn’t make the case for reforming a broken system by freeing up the health care market. “The question is, can Republicans reequip themselves to get back into the fray when [Democrats] are breathing down their necks again?”

Page: ‹ First   2 34

About the Author

Philip Klein is The American Spectator’s Washington correspondent. You can follow him on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/Philipaklein

Letter to the Editor View all comments (38) |

Michele San Pietro| 2.1.09 @ 1:32PM

If in a democratic country like America there is no universal healthcare coverage, it's because most Americans don't want it, it's that simple. You have no idea with how paranoia America haters mention alleged lack of free healthcare for everybody in the United States in order to justify that America is an absurd country that should not exist. Next time I go to America, I won't take out any traveling insurance policy about healthcare: I prefer to run the risk of having to pay a high sum for being treated medically rather than siding with the scoundrels from whom I have always been discriminated against and insulted.

Jim O'Brien| 3.10.09 @ 8:56PM

Obama's plan for socialized medicine will result in poor quality care, fewer doctors and hospitals, more fraud, fewer new drugs and innovative procedures which come from private competition, long waits for treatment, billions more in non-productive bureaucratic expenses, and most importantly, lack of individual choice - Freedom. It seems that Obama and many Congressmen have learned absolutely nothing from the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Socialism doesn't work.

Pingback| 4.30.09 @ 7:53AM

The Facts on Fascism links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…of freedom. It’s a question of free enterprise, free markets, and free minds. When an administration takes over banks and car companies, and makes moves to force through a takeover of the entire health care industry without the ordinary procedural safeguards, and (even under Bush) forces banks to buy other banks against their will, then this isn’t the America we know and love. This is instead a country…

Pingback| 4.30.09 @ 6:08PM

Capital Research Center: links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…of freedom. It’s a question of free enterprise, free markets, and free minds. When an administration takes over banks and car companies, and makes moves to force through a takeover of the entire health care industry without the ordinary procedural safeguards, and (even under Bush) forces banks to buy other banks against their will, then this isn’t the America we know and love. This is instead a country…

Pingback| 5.9.09 @ 12:05PM

The Facts on Fascism - Curiosity Blog links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…of freedom. It's a question of free enterprise, free markets, and free minds. When an administration takes over banks and car companies, and makes moves to force through a takeover of the entire health care industry without the ordinary procedural safeguards , and (even under Bush) forces banks to buy other banks against their will , then this isn't the America we know and love. This is instead a country…

yuy| 11.23.09 @ 8:16PM

TOD Converter Mac,
TOD File Converter Mac

fgdsg| 1.7.10 @ 9:26PM

SWF Converter Mac is excellent SWF conveting software for Mac users. This versatile Mac SWF converter can convert between SWF and all the popular video. In addition, the best swf file converter for Mac can also extract audio from video file and convert video to MP3, AC3, and AAC…as you want.
DVD Converter for Mac

fdg| 2.21.10 @ 10:18PM

CDG Converter

guo | 7.1.10 @ 5:07AM

www.wmvconverterformac.com

Sophie | 11.30.11 @ 2:57AM

How to convert flv to swf on mac? FLV to SWF Mac program is a real FlV to SWF converting program for Mac users. It provides the best and easiest way to convert between flash files, convert FLV to SWF on Mac and also MOV(QuickTime), M4V, 3GP, MP4, AVI, WMV, MPG, FLV, HD video, AVCHD, Flip video, Camcorder video, etc. Besides, Embedding SWF in HTML webpage is also supported.
FLV to SWF Mac

More Articles by Philip Klein

More Articles From Feature

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/01/daschle-care

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT