(Page 2 of 4)
WHILE THE DETAILS OF ANY plan would take months to hash out, Daschle’s writings, along with Obama’s campaign proposal, provide a good idea of the broad outlines. Both Obama and Daschle have touted the benefits of a single-payer health care model, which is a more academic way of describing a socialized system in which government is the sole purchaser of health care.
“I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care plan,” Obama declared in a 2003 speech to the AFL-CIO. “[W]e may not get there immediately. Because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, we have to take back the House."
During the presidential campaign, Obama refined the statement to mean that he would set up a single-payer system if he were “designing a system from scratch,” but said he supported working within the existing system because it was more politically feasible right now.
In order to stave off Republican charges that they want to bring European-style socialized medicine to America, Obama and Daschle have preemptively appropriated rhetoric from conservatives. They speak of “choice” and “competition” and emphasize that they don’t want a government-run system, but merely one that is made up of “public-private” partnerships.
However, once you look behind the veneer it becomes obvious that the aim is to craft a plan that maintains the current mixed public-private structure while making it function more like a government-run system. Over time, this can seamlessly evolve into the single-payer model that both Daschle and Obama clearly prefer.
“Supporters say single-payer is brilliantly simple, ensures equity by providing all people with the same benefits, and saves billions of dollars by creating economies of scale and streamlining administration,” Daschle writes in his book. “But a pure single-payer system is politically problematic in the United States, at least right now.”
Daschle goes on to ask, “If passage of a single-payer system isn’t realistic, what should we do?”
His answer, which has been echoed by Obama, would be a system in which individuals would be given subsidies to purchase insurance in a government-run exchange, choosing either a government plan modeled after Medicare, or among private plans that would have to meet certain government standards. Large employers would likely be required to either provide health insurance to their employees or pay into a government pool to purchase coverage for the uninsured. Such a plan would also require insurance companies to cover anybody who applies for insurance without taking into account pre-existing conditions, and insurers would have to charge rates that the government deemed affordable.
The new government-run option didn’t get much attention during the election, but it was a key element of Obama’s campaign proposal, and any piece of legislation that does not include it would be a non-starter for progressive activists and liberal members of Congress. Their hope is that they can design a public plan more generous than any of the private options offered by insurers in the exchange (a task made easier when government is setting the rules of the game and doesn’t have to worry about making a profit because it can always raise taxes or issue more debt). Thus, liberals can gradually shift more Americans toward government health care while arguing that it was an aggregation of individual choices.
THE CENTRAL PILLAR OF Daschle’s health care vision is a Federal Health Board. “Like the Federal Reserve, the Federal Health Board would be composed of highly independent experts insulated from politics,” Daschle explains in his book. “Congress and the White House would relinquish some of their health-policy decisions to it. For example, a shift to a more effective drug service would be accomplished without an act of Congress or the White House.”
Daschle has argued that the Federal Health Board will manage health care just as the Federal Reserve “skillfully managed monetary policy for decades…” (That is not a joke.)
Through the Board, government could control health care costs by rationing treatment based on what its experts consider effective or good value. While the Board wouldn’t technically be a regulatory body, Daschle writes that “its recommendations would have teeth because all federal health programs would have to abide by them, and those programs account for 32 percent of all health spending and insure roughly 100 million Americans."
Furthermore, any private insurer that wants a piece of all the money the federal government will be throwing around in the new insurance exchange would have to abide by their recommendations. And, Daschle writes that “Congress could opt to go further with the Board’s recommendations” by passing legislation that would coerce more insurers into abiding by them.
Conveniently enough, the entity would be composed of a Board of Governors that would be appointed to 10-year terms, subject to Senate confirmation. In other words, any Obama appointments would be allowed to serve until at least 2019.
It’s uncertain whether the Federal Health Board concept will be part of any final Obama proposal, but in a blurb on the back of Daschle’s book, Obama praises the idea. “[Daschle’s] Federal Reserve for Health concept holds great promise for bridging this intellectual chasm and, at long last, giving this nation the health care it deserves,” Obama writes. Furthermore, Daschle’s Board is not just part of his vision for the future of health care--it plays a central role in his strategy for getting any proposal passed in the first place. The idea, as he presents it, is that having “independent experts” make difficult technical decisions down the road--rather than members of Congress during a heated legislative battle--will reassure interest groups while allowing lawmakers to vote on a much simpler health care proposal than the Clinton-Magaziner leviathan.
Michele San Pietro| 2.1.09 @ 1:32PM
If in a democratic country like America there is no universal healthcare coverage, it's because most Americans don't want it, it's that simple. You have no idea with how paranoia America haters mention alleged lack of free healthcare for everybody in the United States in order to justify that America is an absurd country that should not exist. Next time I go to America, I won't take out any traveling insurance policy about healthcare: I prefer to run the risk of having to pay a high sum for being treated medically rather than siding with the scoundrels from whom I have always been discriminated against and insulted.
Jim O'Brien| 3.10.09 @ 8:56PM
Obama's plan for socialized medicine will result in poor quality care, fewer doctors and hospitals, more fraud, fewer new drugs and innovative procedures which come from private competition, long waits for treatment, billions more in non-productive bureaucratic expenses, and most importantly, lack of individual choice - Freedom. It seems that Obama and many Congressmen have learned absolutely nothing from the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Socialism doesn't work.
Pingback| 4.30.09 @ 7:53AM
The Facts on Fascism links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 4.30.09 @ 6:08PM
Capital Research Center: links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.9.09 @ 12:05PM
The Facts on Fascism - Curiosity Blog links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
tiffany jewellery| 8.14.09 @ 3:53AM
Very good to see the tiffany jewellery tiffany jewellery tiffany jewellery links of london hollister clothing ed hardy christian audigier abercrombie
feeling quite.
Tiffany Jewelry| 8.30.09 @ 11:26PM
abercrombie and fitch on Sale, Hoodies, Jeans, T-Shirts, Pants, Polos
abercrombie fitch and
fitch abercrombie fitch abercrombie cheap abercrombie fitch Abercrombie Men Tee abercrombie
womens polos Abercrombie & Fitch Men, women, and children's clothing and accessories
edhardylife a famous Ed Hardy store which sell directly
Ed Hardy Clothing shoes, boots, swim suit and other
cheap ed hardy Ed Hardy cheap Ed Hardy ed hardy clothing,Providing authentic Ed Hardy Clothing with competitive price and fast,secure delivery.The famous brand by Don Ed Hardy 's Vintage Ed Hardy
dropshippngwatch| 8.31.09 @ 12:01AM
Replica Watches Trade
Replica Watches
Replica Watch
Fake Watches
Replica Watches
Replica Watches
Replica A.Lange&Sohne; Watches
Replica Alain Silberstein Watches
Replica Audemars Piguet Watches
Replica B.R.M Watches
Replica Baume & Mercier Watches
Replica Bell&Ross; Watches
Replica BMW Watches
Replica Breguet Watches
Replica Breitling Watches
Replica Burberry Watches
Replica Bvlgari Watches
http://www.dropshippingwatch.com
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 3:15AM
Read this article, I see aWedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
Bridal Gowns
lot of things
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 8:25AM
Ah wellWedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 9:16AM
Ah wellWedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 10:00AM
Anybody knows the numbers of in CA,Wedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
I need to call them and get my bag repaired.
fsjdkjf| 10.16.09 @ 3:34AM
shanghai massage
turntable bearings
Good News | 11.11.09 @ 2:03AM
Welcome to coming and using our products:
Blu-ray Video Converter,
Blu-ray Burner
fdsj| 11.13.09 @ 8:58AM
beijing massage
AVCHD Video Converter| 11.16.09 @ 2:10AM
AVCHD Video Converter,
Sony XPERIA Video Converter