All about management styles. Constitutionally opposed. Arguing with Stoners. Plus more.
(Page 4 of 4)
Let us get this straight. We cannot know if Bush prevented any attacks at all; but (although we have nothing concrete to point to) “[Bush’s] actions have very likely increased the likelihood of future attacks from a still active al-Qaeda and perhaps others who have become enemies of America because of his decisions (if they were his decisions).”
To support this conjecture, Stoner goes into the same tedious series of speculations we’ve heard over and over again since the first Marine put his boots on the ground to put Osama in harms way. I suppose they think that if they say it enough it just has to be true.
So to reiterate our lesson: in the absence of evidence, we
can’t say Bush prevented any terrorist attacks on American soil
-- in the absence of evidence, we must conclude the likelihood of
future attacks on American soil have worsened.
-- Mike Dooley
P.S. We appreciate Mr. Stoner’s insistence on qualifying Bush’s actions with such phases as “if they were his decisions,” “if they were his actions” and “if it was his.” It is nice Mr. Stoner keeps an open mind as to the possibility “it” really wasn’t Bush’s fault. Christian charity is a wonderful thing.
HOPEFUL SIGNS
Re: George Neumayr's The Day
After:
Now more than ever liberalism is defined as the pursuit of
interest group power. Take heart, like the greedy protons drawn
to a nuclear core, their inherent opposition to each other will
cause the explosion apart. The coalition is fraught with
contradictions: hedonism vs. state control, ethnic assertion vs.
hedonism, global trade vs. protectionism, unions vs
enviromentalism, etc. After the detonation and
disconsolation, the conservative verities will endure as before.
Our best days are still ahead.
-- Timothy O'Neill
Pompano Beach, Florida
HALF-HEARTED MACHIAVELLIANS
Re: Jeremy Lott's Machiavelli's
Revenge:
So Bush and Rice started a war and invaded a country and then
worried that they would be too Machiavellian! How did people
so stupid get so far? No wonder events turned out the way they
did.
-- Christopher Holland
Canberra, Australia
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
frost| 1.22.09 @ 10:04AM
I’m certainly no Republican, and I sure don’t trust the GOP; most politicians are pandering whores. BUT, the Republican Party contains fewer certifiable maniacs. The demented Democrats are just a tad more dangerous than the inept GOP. I read somewhere that "We have a two party system. The evil party and the stupid party."
That pretty much says it all, except for the fact that, 'til now, Barack Obama's foreign policy experience was confined only to having had breakfast at the International House of Pancakes. Think I’m going to be ill, especially with the huge socialistic spending plans and the eventual tax-rate INCREASES. Appreciate the above comments from Mr. Bonn. Jones and Govett as well.
ruth| 1.22.09 @ 3:11PM
Mr. Schaper, let us know how 'affordable health care' is working out for you when you wait several months for treatment after your cancer diagnosis. There's no such thing as a free lunch. Government involvement will only make matters worse.
Kat| 1.22.09 @ 3:14PM
Unfortunately, there are many Mr. 'Stoners' on the left. Too many fried brain cells.
Alan Brooks| 1.22.09 @ 8:43PM
why Israel and Hamas have now signed a tweety.
such sweet vibes to fill the mideast air
hggffgf| 11.18.09 @ 8:10PM
Mac TOD Converter,
TOD Converter for Windows
fdsf| 1.11.10 @ 2:25AM
FLV to WMV Converter,
Free FLV to WMV converter