The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
The Nation's Pulse
Print Email
Text Size

The Nation's Pulse

Baseball for Grownups

If so, it’s Vin Scully doing the play-by-play.

It dawned on me a few days ago that we’re already in January. OK, I knew that as soon as I heard the fireworks early on the first. But what I grasped at last is that if this is January, Major League baseball players report to spring training camps NEXT MONTH. The thought cheered me.

This is the time of year when I weary of all sports that aren’t baseball. By January I’ve usually developed minor nervous tics that true fans will recognize as symptoms of Baseball Withdrawal Syndrome (BWS in the medical literature).

Sure I can get winter sports fixes with the NFL, which amuses me for short periods. (The Super Bowl this year will be in Tampa, where I live. But this will only mean more traffic and noise and general botheration, not the least of which will be the local Babbitts and boosters prattling on endlessly on how important this event is to the Tampa Bay area and how it proves how comprehensively wonderful the local life is. It is indeed pretty good around here. But not because of a football game. I’ll be glad when it’s over and gone.)

Watching Florida beat Oklahoma in the BCS (Big College Show) championship game was fun. Young Tebow is a force of nature. And I have enough sports channels in my cable package to pick up the occasional good boxing match. (There was a dandy the other night when a hard-hitting Polish guy named Adamek took the cruiserweight championship away from a tall American who is so long-armed he looks a bit like a praying mantis.) But it’s the return of the Grand Old Game that I crave.

So imagine my delight when I discovered this weekend that by going to MLB.com and then to Best Games, I can watch classic baseball games and a selection of games from ‘08 on my computer screen for free. Saturday’s offering was the 7th game of the 1965 World Series when Sandy Koufax three-hit the Twins to take the title.

Not only did I get to see a dominating performance by one of the game’s greatest pitchers, but got to see again household names of the baseball world of a half century ago: Harmon Killebrew, Tony Oliva, Maury Wills, Jim Gilliam, John Roseboro, et al. To top off this embarrassment of baseball riches, the game was called by the best baseball announcer to draw breath, Vin Scully.

The gentlemanly Scully, 81 and ready to call the 2009 Dodgers season, has been the Dodgers’ main announcer since before the team left Brooklyn for L.A. With his intelligence, humility, dexterity with the language, and cliché-free delivery he can turn a baseball game into poetry. His broadcast booth is a hype-free and hyperbole-free zone.

Who’da thunk a guy with a Bronx accent could be so pleasing to listen to? For millions, the sound of Vin Scully and a baseball crowd is the sound of the American summer night. In fact, for decades the only cultural advantage to living in Los Angeles has been Vin Scully on the air. He’s probably the only baseball announcer who could have his own highlight reel.

I have some nominations for that reel. The night in September of 1965 when Sandy Koufax took his fourth no-hitter and only perfect game into the ninth in Dodger Stadium, Scully started the call of that historic inning by saying, “29,000 souls in Dodger Stadium tonight, and a million butterflies.”

When the Phillies had a classy double-play combination of Bobby Wine at shortstop and Cookie Rojas at second, Scully spoke of “the plays of Wine and Rojas.” Fans whose baseball memory stretches back to the sixties recall that Bob Gibson was not only a dominating pitcher but one of the fastest workers around. When he got the ball back from the catcher he was ready to throw again. No screwing around. Scully said, “Gibson pitches like he’s double-parked.” When Andre Dawson had a minor injury, Scully said, using that peculiar baseball expression, Dawson was “day to day.” Scully took a beat and added, “Aren’t we all?” Just so.

But back to the action on the field. Watching that 43 year-old game I was struck, as almost any baseball savvy person over 50 would be, by some dramatic differences between that time and the modern game. First, the umpires were in those old, black undertakers’ suits with white shirts and ties that they used to wear. The home plate umpire’s huge outside chest protector looked like a section of couch. It appears substantial enough to stop a shoulder-fired missile (or a Sandy Koufax fastball, whichever hits harder).

The players were all wearing high stirrup socks at a uniform height (take notice, Manny). Sartorial standards were very different too. No excess hair, facial or otherwise, and no jewelry. This is in sharp-contrast to the postmodern player, who is often hairier than a bearded collie and wearing more jewelry than Mr. T.

Lou Johnson of the Dodgers was the only player to go yard that day. He didn’t stand and admire his drive when he hit it or point to the sky. He just got around the bases quickly, as was the practice then.

Another pleasant aspect of the old games is that between innings they just had organ music rather than the blasting rock that accompanies games in contemporary ball yards. No exploding scoreboards or constant, loud commercial promotions. No “Day-O” or choruses of “YMCA” in between innings. The entire entertainment package was the baseball game, which was clearly enough for the 50,000 fans on hand.

Speaking of whom, the contrast was almost as big in the stands. The fans, an orderly bunch in 1965 Minneapolis, were not dressed, as is the current fan, as though he were heading straight from the game to a knife fight or to muck out a stable. There was even a scattering of men in coats and ties (it was a chilly mid-October afternoon).

Page: 1 2  

About the Author

Larry Thornberry is a writer in Tampa.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (35) |

Craig| 1.13.09 @ 6:33AM

Great article! You had me thinking about smuggling that transistor radio to school to listen to World Series games......

grampa guy| 1.13.09 @ 8:29AM

I used to call him "Numb" Scully because he was a little too pro-Rams back when he called the football playoffs. You remember those endless years when The Purple Gang would always send The Goats home without their supper from a frosty Met Stadium. But , for baseball, Mr. Scully is right up there with Harwell, Carneal and the best of the best. The nuns at my grade school even let us listen on the radio that fateful AFTERNOON in 1965. Thanks for the memories.

Ammo Guy| 1.13.09 @ 9:33AM

Finally...a topic I can sink my teeth into. I grew up a Brooklyn Dodgers fan and was heartbroken (to this day even) to see them leave Ebbets Field behind for the lovely LA Memorial Coliseum, but I continued to follow them thru the 60s until all Brooklyn players were gone. Having watched and played baseball for more than a half century, it is my humble opinion that Koufax was the best pitcher that I've ever seen. His accuracy, velocity, curve ball, gentlemanly behavior, even his adherence to his faith were awesome (sorry Larry, just had to use that word because here it is truly le mot juste). One of the best days of my life was attending a double header at Forbes Field in which Koufax pitched one game and Drysdale the other...just a great memory and I still have the ticket stub to pass on to my grandkids one day. Like Ted Williams before him who lost 5 seasons to military service, I always wondered what sort of numbers Sandy would've put up if he could have pitched for another 5 or 6 seasons. Of course, at 300+ innings a year and throwing mostly complete games, his arm was being severely stressed so we have to treasure those moments we had with him. So, just in case he happens upon this thread...Sandy, thanks for the memories (and I've got a 1964 baseball card of you that I would love for you to sign - call me :o)

Trotter| 1.13.09 @ 9:38AM

Having grown up listening to Vin broadcast my beloved Dodgers as a kid, there simply is no alternative to listening to a baseball game on the radio than Vin Scully. In fact, every time I hear Vin broadcast a game I feel like I'm back at Chavez Ravine watching the Dodgers take on the hated Reds, munching on peanuts, booing lustily each time Pete Rose came to the plate, and letting the gentle breeze cool me off from the weekend sun. Oh man, that was baseball the way it's supposed to be.

Now, there really is no point bringing a radio to a game. The announcers where I live now are horrible, and I can't hear the radio over the racket going on over the PA system.

Alan Brooks| 1.13.09 @ 11:22AM

i miss the Mets twi nite double headers in '69.

and the hot dogs were still affordable. progress?

phooey!

Alan Brooks| 1.13.09 @ 11:24AM

give me a time machine so i can shake Ty Cobb's hand.

Philip Pettus| 1.13.09 @ 1:49PM

I, too, saw the game, and wondered where the tradition of solo sportscasters has gone. When a virtuoso like Vin calls a game, a sidekick would be an intrusion and an insult. I am guessing he is the last of the breed still doing it a capella.

Marc Jeric| 1.13.09 @ 4:59PM

A very nice article; reminded me of my coming to this country some 47 years ago. What a place! Baseball - it was a very strange game to me, but over the years I learned a lot. At McDonalds, the hamburger was 10 cents and the coffee 5 cents - so when you left a quarter it was considered a decent tip. I opened a bank account, got a driving licence, bought a car , foynd a job - and nobody asked me for my ID!

Stuart| 1.13.09 @ 10:03PM

A great piece! I've been away from the year for years now- too many teams, too many relief pitchers stopping the action, too little bunting etc.. But I remember the era you're talking about- and, of course, Scully's word painting.
You're spot on about the low class and just plain adolescent behavior of the players, and the slovenly fans. And the music is appalling.
You have a great line that in the not so distant past the entertainment was the game itself.

Sarah | 1.17.09 @ 5:51AM

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Sarah

http://www.thinkpadonline.info

rtytry| 1.11.10 @ 2:06AM

FLV to WMV Converter,
Free FLV to WMV converter

fghyfd| 2.25.10 @ 3:29AM

DVD PAL to NTSC,
PAL DVD to NTSC

reter| 3.1.10 @ 2:24AM

DVD to iTouch Converter Mac,
Convert DVD to iPod Touch

adfads| 4.26.10 @ 2:55AM

HD Video Converter for Mac is professional HD converter, provides you the functions of decording and encording HD videos.
Video Splitter for Mac is a powerful Mac video splitter software, that can split video on Mac OS X. This video splitter Mac also functions as a video cutter, movie trimmer for Mac users to split videos of any format.

More Articles by Larry Thornberry

More Articles From The Nation's Pulse

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/01/13/baseball-for-grownups

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT