By Eve Tushnet on 1.5.09 @ 6:06AM
There's a lot more to the marriage movement than the debate over
same-sex matrimony.
If you judged by the headlines and the ballot boxes, you'd think
the only interesting thing about marriage is whether Ellen
DeGeneres can marry Portia de Rossi. But the central issue in the
gay marriage controversy -- how we should connect sex, babies,
and marriage, and when we can or should separate them -- plays
out in almost every American life, including the lives of the
heterosexual majority.
Barack Obama's campaign for the presidency highlighted concerns
over fatherhood. A man whose first autobiography dealt
extensively with his troubled relationship with his divorced
father was elected president, and t-shirts bearing photos of the
President-elect with his wife and children sold out at sidewalk
stands in neighborhoods where husbands are hard to find.
Nisa Muhammad, the founder of Black Marriage Day and creator of a
marriage education curriculum for black couples, noted that many
people she worked with didn't see the need to get married: "Our
first session is called 'Why marriage?' So that when they get the
skills they'll value having the skills."
She blamed "an absence of cultural cues that guide most young
people, but especially black young people, toward marriage.
There's the Beyonce song 'Put a Ring on It' but [songs like that
are] very few and far apart." The cultural shifts go beyond the
music charts: "Some people grow up never going to a wedding,"
Muhammad pointed out. "There used to be weddings all the time in
the summertime -- we used to be junior bridesmaids, grow up being
flower girls."
Muhammad often finds herself working with low-income families,
whose concerns could not seem further away from the lives of
couples and singles who pay startling sums for surrogate mothers
or egg donors. The often chaotic lives of poor families seem
remote from the intensely planned, often lawyer-vetted
arrangements of families who use sperm donors or other forms of
third-party reproduction.
But many of the issues of father-longing and changeable family
constellations are similar -- though not the same -- from the
penthouses to the projects. As the first wave of donor-conceived
children come of age, and begin to speak plainly about their
experiences, they often inadvertently articulate concerns at the
heart of the marriage movement: a child's need for her father,
and for a unified family.
Elizabeth Marquardt first became interested in donor conception
after her first book was published, Between Two Worlds: The
Inner Lives of Children of Divorce. Herself a child of
divorce, she studied the emotional, ethical, and spiritual
difficulties faced by children growing up in a divided family.
And she began to notice similarities to the lives of children of
divorce in the "very poignant stories" told by many
donor-conceived children: "Father loss is father loss whatever
guise it comes in," she says. Some of the subjects in her
forthcoming study, My Daddy's Name Is Donor, said that
"to have been conceived by an anonymous sperm donor with pretty
much no hope of being able to find out who it is feels like the
death of their father."
Donor-conceived children can have many unknown half-siblings;
they lack information about their biological parents' medical
histories; and they lack a defined relationship to the donor
parent. Marquardt says that even laws allowing children to learn
their donor parent's identity at age 18 don't address major
issues: "How do you start a relationship [with the donor parent]?
Who are you to each other? If you ask him for $20, is it all
over? If he has hundreds of children, will he get kind of tired
of this? If he gets sick, do you have an obligation to care for
him?" And, overarching these day-to-day questions: "How many
people are we going to bless as parent figures in children's
lives?"
Donor conception is primarily used by heterosexuals, and yet it
is also directly tied in to gay marriage. As Marquardt notes,
"With the right to marry comes the right to form a family," and
for a gay couple, donor conception is the only way to form a
family in which at least one partner has a biological tie to the
child. Therefore, she fears that "we stand on the brink of not
being able to have that debate [about problems with donor
conception] because to oppose donor conception is to be
anti-gay."
Gay couples are much more likely than straight couples to use
"known donors," and to make the donor a part of the child's life.
But these children must negotiate at least two different
families. "There's no obligation for their own parents to make
one family the way marriage requires," Marquardt notes.
And the couples who enlist donors face their own identity issues.
Marquardt describes distancing ways of framing the relationship,
calling a sperm donor "the Y guy" or the "uncle," as "cutesy ways
of minimizing the fact that he might have real importance to the
child. The moms tend to want to keep the known donor at arm's
length."
She points out, "The reason why people…want donor offspring is
that they want a biological connection to their child." By the
same token, that child will likely feel a connection to the
biological parent.
Marquardt says that the donor offspring in her study "as a group,
broadly embraced the right of adults to access these
technologies, and at the same time broadly embrace the
right of children to know absolutely everything. They're not
saying, 'ban this.'" For her own part, Marquardt would ban
anonymous donation, "and if a friend [asked me for advice on
donor conception] I'd encourage her not to do it."
Our new family forms derive from our belief that we can separate
sex, marriage, procreation, and childrearing, not only out of
tragic necessity but as positive, equally-valid alternatives.
Donor-conceived children show the blessings that can come from
this separation -- but also its limits. It is simply not true
that children only want two people to love and care for them.
They also often long for their biological parents, the man and
woman whose physical union brought them into the world.
That longing, and the need it reflects, is one of the core
reasons for renewing our marriage culture.
topics:
Marriage Laws