By Rachel Alexander on 12.31.08 @ 6:06AM
Janet Napolitano is the wrong woman to head the Department of
Homeland Security.
Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano has done little to protect the
state from illegal immigration, and under her leadership
Arizona is now tied for
last place in the nation for emergency disaster preparedness.
So why has incoming president Barack Obama picked Napolitano for
secretary of homeland security? It clearly has nothing to do with
her record. She is leaving Arizona with the highest budget
deficit ever, and the highest budget deficit per capita in the
nation after California, at more than $2 billion.
Obama probably selected Napolitano because she is one of a small
handful of Democrats who fit the necessary stereotype of "tough,"
and she satisfies a female diversity quota. Napolitano looks and
sounds tough, but her policies suggest otherwise. Democrats find
this kind of person appropriate for a law enforcement leadership
position, much the way Janet Reno was tapped by former president
Bill Clinton to fill the attorney general position. In fact, many
initially thought Napolitano would be selected by Obama for that
same office.
What is Napolitano’s actual experience and legacy in Arizona?
Napolitano was elected governor in 2002 due to an unprecedented
relentless campaign on her behalf by the local liberal
newspapers. She disingenuously ran as a conservative, the only
way to get elected to statewide office in Arizona, emphasizing
her former law enforcement role as the state's attorney general.
Napolitano's most visible legacy is turning Arizona into the
biggest police state in the nation with "Janet Cams," authorizing
more speed cameras than any other state. State Treasurer Dean
Martin has argued that
they are unconstitutional, because the legislature did not
approve them as an additional taxing source. The Arizona
Department of Public Safety has admitted their purpose is not
public safety, but revenue generation. Ballot initiatives are
already circulating to repeal the cameras, since the last thing
the state needs right now is another license to spend more money.
Fines from the speeding tickets go to fund Clean Elections, a
failed government experiment that funds the campaigns of
candidates running for state offices.
In terms of her administrative abilities, Napolitano was the
first governor in Arizona to use debt to balance general fund
budgets -- finding a way around the state constitution’s prohibition
against the state accumulating more than $350,000 in debt.
Business Week recently
ranked Arizona's budget problems the worst in the country.
Although Arizona has the highest rate of illegal immigration in
the country, and the highest number of illegal immigrants
proportionate to the general population of any state, Napolitano
vetoed seven bills as governor that would have cracked down
on illegal immigration. She supported drivers' licenses for
illegal immigrants, and took away funding from Maricopa County
Sheriff Joe Arpaio that he was using to enforce illegal
immigration laws. She opposes a border fence, laughingly
dismissing it, "you show me a 50 foot fence, I'll show you a 51
foot ladder."
Napolitano has made only two symbolic efforts to combat illegal
immigration, repeatedly touted by her proponents as evidence she
is tough on illegal immigration. The first was sending the
National Guard to the border, which she was forced into doing
after first vetoing a bill ordering her to. She initially tried
to get out of it by claiming it was the federal government's
responsibility to fund the National Guard at the border.
Ultimately she sabotaged the effort by limiting the role of the
National Guard to administrative functions, not illegal
immigration law enforcement.
Napolitano's second symbolic measure against illegal immigration
involved Arizona's employer sanctions law. When it was first
passed by the legislature in 2006, Napolitano vetoed it, claiming
it wasn't tough enough. At the time, everyone knew it was
unlikely because she had vetoed every other law against illegal
immigration. So the legislature called her bluff. The next year,
it passed a tougher version of the bill, and anti-illegal
immigration activists circulated an even tougher ballot measure
in case she vetoed it. Considering Arizona voters passed four
anti-illegal immigration measures with over 70% approval in 2006,
Napolitano was trapped and forced to sign it, giving Arizona the
toughest employer sanctions law in the nation.
Napolitano's accomplishments prior to becoming governor of
Arizona were unimpressive. She was tapped by former President
Bill Clinton for U.S. attorney after she came to public
prominence representing Anita Hill against Clarence Thomas at his
judicial confirmation hearings. In his book, The Real Anita
Hill, David Brock documented how Napolitano put a witness on
the stand who wasn't corroborating Hill's version of the facts,
so Napolitano took her off the stand and had her return and claim
amnesia. After leaving the U.S. attorney's office, Napolitano
became state attorney general, where her only memorable
accomplishment was banning Christmas decorations from the public
areas of the office, which received national attention and
protest.
In her six years as Arizona's governor, Napolitano has
proactively failed to protect Arizona's borders from the highest
rate of illegal immigration in the country. Based on this record,
it is unlikely she will do much better protecting America's
homeland from terrorists. Arizonans are delighted to see her go
so we can fix our budget and illegal immigration problem, but at
what cost to the nation as a whole?
topics:
Immigration, Janet Napolitano