More important than football. Health care coming, your money going. Religous struggles. Plus more.
ALL-STARS
Re: R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.'s
Good Sports, Great Sports:
Forty four years ago I was privileged to briefly serve in the
Special Forces. I can only say "Hear, Hear." I
guarantee you Americans ought to sleep better knowing these
incredible warriors are on duty. God Bless them each and
every one.
-- Jay Molyneaux
North Carolina
A simply wonderful piece, Mr. Tyrrell. I am reminded of the recent Nike commercial featuring Earl Woods describing Tiger as the "most mentally tough person he'll ever meet."
With all due respect to Tiger and the late Earl, both of whom I admire and appreciate greatly, I can only conclude that Tiger will never meet the folks in your article.
Thanks, keep up the good work.
-- George Pazin
There is an amazing contrast between men like these that the 300 Spartans would welcome into their ranks as brothers and the standard bearer of Democrat heroism and patriotism John Fake Kerry and his ink...
I lost all respect for those in professional sports as role models decades ago when millionaires started going on strike for more money…
I doubt the kinds of people that make up units like the 3336
would find anything heroic about professional sports today or
people who get three scratches and out…
-- Thom Bateman
Newport News, Virginia
OH THEY'LL SPEND YOUR
MONEY, ALRIGHT...BUT LATER
Re: Philip Klein's Health
Care Reform May Have to Wait Until 2010:
Just goes to show how Democrats view the American public -- if we don't play ball, then they'll "force us" to play ball. How arrogant that Rep. Stark would force me, a healthy individual, to enter the market in order to water down the premiums that unhealthy folks would pay. Maybe my personal decision is to pay my health care bills out-of-pocket. Who the hell is Stark to say otherwise? He was elected to represent the people, not coerce them.
Just where in the U.S. Constitution does it authorize Congress to
become involved in the health care issue anyway?
-- Owen H. Carneal, Jr.
Yorktown, Virginia
Spend thinking not of tomorrow. / Spend every cent you can
borrow. / Beggar thy neighbor; impoverish thy friend. / There’s
more where that came from. / So spend, fool, spend.
-- David Govett
Davis, California
DOUBLE STANDARD
Re: Bret Joshpe's Protecting
Free Speech:
It is one thing for the U.N. to be its true self and promote “tolerance” by attacking freedom of speech. What else have we come to expect? What is disturbing is so many non-Muslims in the universities and even in the churches advocated much the same thing is the name of “civility.” Thus, the very places where religion is discussed, criticized, dissected, re-interpreted, rejected and defended have become zones in which critical discussions on Islam are proscribed. Of course, they are quick to assert that they are not singling out Islam for protection. Instead, it is claimed that critical writing and speech about Islam must be “respectful.” What that means is practice is left vague and flexible.
The odd thing about all this is that very few have a mind to have proponents of Islam to wear the same hat. The Koran, various Islamic books, and Muslim websites regularly attack Christianity, refer to the Gospels as fake and concocted, present Gnostic heresies as what the Church teaches, and by any standard "blasphemes” the person of Christ Jesus. The portrait of Christianity painted by Islam and Islam’s advocates is nothing short of libel and slander.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
frost| 12.19.08 @ 7:52AM
What an awful dismal way to start the day, reading the name of uber-leftist congressman Pete Stark... bad!
Mr. Shoup reminded me of a method to retire the National Debt heard/ventured many years ago: if the federal government, the biggest land-owner anywhere, were to sell "our" land to private enterprise/people, we'd be a whole bunch better off.... that is, if we public people have anything left to purchase with - - -
frost| 12.19.08 @ 8:48AM
- - so, okay... "with which to purchase..."
Betsy Red| 12.19.08 @ 8:51AM
Health care is not a right, but a privilege. Most of the nation's wealth is held by people age 65 and upward. They are also consuming the vast majority of healthcare services. Most of these consumers of healthcare have far exceeded any contribution to the FICA tax. Means testing must be put in place. For those elderly poor, by all means, let's take care of them, for surely we'd want the same charity. If you own land, have extensive financial resources and are 'well off', then your grandchildren and great-grandchildren should not be burdened with your healthcare costs. You folks are of the generation that 'saved so you won't someday be a burden to society'. Your time has come. Crack open the savings and pay your own way. Living to be a ripe old age costs, just like every other luxury.
Appleby| 12.19.08 @ 9:48AM
As of this morning I have been hit up by SIXTEEN DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS begging from me for TheNeedy either from inside my office or from the subway station on the way into my office.
If I hear the word "Needy" once more before Christmas I will start screaming and Lord knows when I will be able to stop.