By Lisa Fabrizio on 12.17.08 @ 6:05AM
What does the Blago flap have to do with Thomas Perrelli's
presence on the Obama team?
As the year 2008 winds down and President Bush's days in office
draw to a close, liberals all over the world are celebrating the
Iraq shoe-throwing incident. But this only illustrates that the
Bush's efforts in Iraq have proved a tremendous success, given
that a member of the Iraqi press has managed to outdo even
Western media types who, despite their best efforts, have never
laid a glove on W.
However, just in time for the holidays, the liberal media have
received a Fitzmas present, though not of the sort for which they
wished. No, after years of beating the Bushes for a chance to
take down the 43rd president of the United States, they find
themselves in the position of having to defend one of their own,
via the Blagojevich pay-for-play scandal and the incoming Obama
administration's alleged involvement therein.
And in a seemingly unrelated matter, we have learned that the
"office" of President-elect has swelled its crimson
tide by tapping Harvard chum Thomas Perrelli for its Justice
Department transition team. Now, what does the Blago flap have to
do with Perrelli's presence on the Obama team?
For those who remember the Terri Schiavo case, Mr. Perrelli was
one of a team of lawyers representing Michael Schiavo's efforts
to end the life of that defenseless woman. Mr. Perrelli's firm,
Jenner & Block, honored him for his work which allowed the
state of Florida to take the life of an innocent woman whose
official cause of death was tragicomically listed as
"undetermined."
Also lauded
by his firm were those lawyers who made "exceptional pro bono
contributions on behalf of Death Row prisoners." Yes, such is the
state of the legal profession in this country that supporters of
innocent life have reason to fear it, while convicted killers can
depend on it for a rigorous defense.
We know what Shakespeare said about lawyers; it only seems more
appropriate when applied to recent presidents. Is it any
coincidence that neither Ronald Reagan nor the Bushes had law
degrees and managed for the most part to elude liberal
prosecution? Or that the last elected Republican president who
was a lawyer was also "a crook"?
Yet Richard Nixon's sins seem penny-ante in comparison to the
goings on of our most recent lawyerly president; but not to hear
the media tell it. A two-bit burglary by the Watergate bunglers
was treated as a capital crime, while the reprehensible offenses
-- both illegal and immoral -- committed by Bill Clinton were
pooh-poohed as mere randy behavior by the Teflon one.
The sad part of all of this is that we have a right to expect
that a United States president -- the chief executor of the law
of the land as laid out in our Constitution -- should have at
least a working grasp of those laws and the moral strictures
behind them. And this should be even more true of those who are
lawyers; which brings us back to Obama and his advisors. In a
presidential debate in February, he was asked about his part in
the congressional intervention to save the life of Terri Schiavo;
a life Perrelli fought so hard to snuff. The Big O's answer was most
illuminating:
It wasn't something I was comfortable with, but it was not
something that I stood on the floor and stopped. And I think that
was a mistake, and I think the American people understood that
that was a mistake. And as a constitutional law professor, I knew
better.
It's hard to say what's more disturbing here: knowing that the
next leader of the free world is so wedded to popular opinion
that he will ignore what he perceives to be the law, or that he
was allowed to pass his ignorance of the U.S. Constitution on to
others in the guise of teaching.
Either way, it appears that the makeup of his administration and
the way in which it seeks to suppress information before it is
even installed recalls that of his fellow law professor from
Arkansas. And both of these legal scholars would be better served
had they sought to know better the wording of U.S. Code Title 18,
Section 4, which reads:
Misprision of a Felony: Whoever, having knowledge of the
actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United
States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the
same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority
under the United States, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Now maybe Mr. Perrelli, a former counsel to Janet Reno -- whose
rein of terror included the Waco Massacre and the midnight raid
on Elian Gonzalez -- together with Greg Craig, Clinton's
Impeachment trial mouthpiece and brave defender of John Hinckley,
Jr. and Fidel Castro's interests in the Gonzalez case, can help
Obama out with the legal and ethical implications of all of this.
After all, these are the legal eagles who gave us the most
ethical administration in history, right?
topics:
Barack Obama, Terri Schiavo