The Rod Blagojevich scandal raises a number of important questions about our next president.
Does what happens in Chicago stay in Chicago?
Tuesday’s arrest of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich on charges that included trying to sell President-elect Barack Obama’s U.S. Senate seat has brought renewed national attention to the state’s corrupt political culture while creating a headache for the incoming administration.
Blagojevich’s declaration, recorded by wiretap, that a Senate seat “is a fu—ing valuable thing, you don’t just give it away for nothing,” is sure to enter the political scandal lexicon along with Larry Craig’s “I have a wide stance” and Marion Barry’s “the bitch set me up.”
In a press conference, prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald emphasized that the 76-page complaint against Gov. Blagojevich contained “no allegations” against Obama. In fact, the document quotes Blagojevich using an Oedipus-themed slur in reference to Obama, and the governor lamented that the President-elect wasn’t willing to dole out bribes to secure the Senate seat for his preferred candidate.
Nonetheless, the wide-ranging scandal, which also included charges that Blagojevich tried to shake down a children’s hospital and have an editor removed from the Chicago Tribune, raises a number of important questions about our next president. The most immediate is whether Obama or any of his representatives had any interaction with Blagojevich over the past month regarding the Senate vacancy.
On this point, there is already some uncertainty.
“I had no contact with the governor or his office and so I was not aware of what was happening,” Obama told reporters in the wake of Tuesday’s indictment.
But soon after his statement, ABC’s Jake Tapper posted video of a November 23 interview in which senior adviser David Axelrod said of Obama’s involvement that “I know he’s talked to the governor.”
Later in the day, Axelrod claimed he was “mistaken” in the interview.
The scandal has also drawn attention to Obama’s relationship with Blagojevich, which Obama’s defenders say is tangential, while other evidence suggests otherwise.
In a July New Yorker article, reporter Ryan Lizza quotes Obama’s chief of staff designate, Rahm Emanuel, as saying that he and Obama served as key advisers to Blagojevich in his run for governor, along with two other campaign staffers. “We basically laid out the general election, Barack and I and these two,” Emanuel said, according to the magazine.
Lizza goes on to write that “a spokesman for Blagojevich confirmed Emanuel’s account, although David Wilhelm, who now works for Obama, said that Emanuel had overstated Obama’s role. ‘There was an advisory council that was inclusive of Rahm and Barack but not limited to them,’ Wilhelm said, and he disputed the notion that Obama was ‘an architect or one of the principal strategists.’”
What is clear is that Obama endorsed and campaigned for Blagojevich in 2002. In June of that year, he told Jeff Berkowitz, a local television interviewer, that his “main focus is to make sure that we elect Rod Blagojevich as governor,” and when asked whether he was working hard for him, Obama responded, “you betcha.”
Some of Obama’s signature moves could be seen in Blagojevich’s 2002 campaign: promising change and reform, tying his Republican opponent (Jim Ryan) to the unpopular Republican incumbent (George Ryan), and turning his unusual name into an asset and source of humor.
“How can you replace one Ryan with another Ryan and call that change?” Blagojevich asked at a rally that summer at the Illinois State Fair, according to an Associated Press account at the time. “You want change? Elect a guy named Blagojevich! Now that’s change.”
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?