The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Political Hay
Print Email
Text Size

Political Hay

Steadying the Ranks

GOP must focus on the Big Issues.

With a Republican victory in the Georgia Senate run-off, the GOP ranks appear to be steadying after a traumatic election season that obliterated the party of Lincoln among independent and younger voters, and completely wiped it out in New England with respect to House seats at least.

A truly providential victory was that of Senator Mitch McConnell in Kentucky, who, as David Frum correctly noted, leads the Senate Republican caucus, the most important institution of government from the standpoint of conservative and Republican interests — not that they are always identical. McConnell is a master parliamentarian and, when the need arises, an effective obstructionist to any legislative initiative not to his liking. And I say that with the greatest respect, from the perspective of a Madisonian.

While its success may be a fleeting thing, congressional Republican resistance to an unfettered, expansive bailout of the Big Three auto companies, backed up by the White House, was a momentary glimpse of an effective effort at principled opposition to the current Zeitgeist. Such opportunities will be few and far between in the next Congress.

So what is the GOP minority to do for the next two years until the mid-term elections present an opportunity to increase its traction? Certainly, playing solid defense is as important in politics as it is in college basketball; and Senator McConnell is superb at that aspect of the game. It is likely that defending the right to life of the unborn is one area where the GOP will have to put these skills to work given the new administration’s announced support for the Freedom of Choice Act, which would nullify laws limiting abortion, including bans on partial birth abortion; mandate funding of abortion, eliminate even minimalist regulation; and threaten the rights of conscience of health care workers.

But ultimately, you have to get on the scoreboard to win the game. Republican strategists need to think offensively. They need to get back to serious ideas and truly Big Issues.

Republican legislators need to pick two or three really Big Issues and energetically pursue them in the new Congress and with the Obama administration and the broader public. They should promote solutions to serious problems for the benefit of the nation. This sounds hopelessly idealistic, but it is also a pragmatic requirement for restoring the Republican Party’s credibility, especially with independent and younger voters who seem, for now, lost to the cause of right-of-center governance.

Setting aside social and environmental issues, policy areas where Barack Obama has not yet shown his cards, the president-elect’s choices for economic and national security positions are downright centrist and extremely competent. This may be a hopeful sign that the GOP might be able to find some common ground without rolling over on fundamental issues of principle.

It seems that the GOP will likely go along with a major stimulus package, which even free market libertarians such as Bruce Bartlett concede is needed in the circumstances. Let’s face it, the Hill Republicans should have balanced the budgets during the good times, but they did not even come close. But the resulting bulge in deficits and debt will make even more urgent serious thinking about the long-term restructuring of the federal budget, most notably, the crushing liabilities accruing for entitlement obligations, and a shift in our system of taxation away from penalizing wealth creation, income and productivity. As enlightened GOP leaders such as Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) understand, these issues must be dealt with in tandem. There’re two new Big Issues just in one paragraph.

A number of conservative reformers have called for greater attention to middle-class and working-class fears and insecurities in the area of health care and adaptation to uncertain economic times. This writer can certainly understand the concern with health care. His two daughters just moved into the job market without health insurance coverage during months of transitioning to new jobs. It keeps you up at night. That’s another pair of Big Issues Health care may be an issue on which the Republicans will have to play offense and defense simultaneously, resisting bad policies but keeping the faith of sound policy in the future.

Protecting the nation from non-state actors and terrorists is still a pressing task in the post-9/11 world. Hence, a renewed focus on doing whatever it takes to control nuclear weapons rattling around the old Soviet Union, as well as other biological and radioactive materials around the world, is one of the greatest priorities for America, Republicans and Democrats alike. Indeed, the paramount nature of this challenge, including that of a nuclear-armed Iran, will necessitate a renewed and sustained effort to engage Putin’s Russia whether or not we detest his regime. The truth of the matter is that we need Russia on board for achieving greater security gains on this front. There’s a fifth one.

Whatever they are, and I would certainly hope that at least some of the preceding suggestions would make the cut, the GOP needs a short list of policy priorities. Then it can molt its old skin of self-serving corruption and reclaim its brand as a serious force for sound policy and conservative principles of governance even if it does not yield immediate legislative victories, an unlikely prospect for the immediate future.

A sharp and unrelenting focus on a few, high-priority Big Issues is everything. Forget about that weird Chicago pastor and that horrible person from the '60s. Speak to the real-world concerns of middle-class Americans with integrity, verve, and imagination.

topics:
Foreign Policy, Health Care, Mitch McConnell, Congress

About the Author

G. Tracy Mehan, III served at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the administrations of both Presidents Bush. He is a consultant in Arlington, Virginia, and an adjunct professor at George Mason University School of Law.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (11) |

Rocco| 12.9.08 @ 6:50AM

Perhaps the 1996 Contract with America, Gingrich's brainchild, is the appropriate model to use. If the Republicans are going to get anywhere, they need to regain the courage of their convictions, take the responsible (and conservative) position, and get out there, talk it up and don't let the Obama media (mainstream they're not, they might as well formally announce they're his press office) define them. Republicans have been too quiet or tongue-tied for too long.

Rocco| 12.9.08 @ 6:52AM

Plus, the Republicans need to stick with their positions. If anyone (RINO's anyone?) wanders off, then they need to be ostracized, even if it is McCain himself. The "Maverick" has proven that his approach is a losing one.

Bob| 12.9.08 @ 9:28AM

I agree with almost everything you said with the exception that I'm pro-choice and more libertarian. We need to do a few things -- become the party of ideas rather than the party of "no" and we need to reduce the influence of so-cons who are intolerant and driving people away from the party. The tent needs to be bigger or nothing that is done will improve the election results.

steve purtell| 12.9.08 @ 12:40PM

The GOP needs to find away to get everybody health care coverage or the Dem's will fully socialize medicine and get the political credit. The elderly and poor, who contribute the least to the economy, receive all the help. It would be fairer or good politics to help the "Sam's Club" Republicans and Reagan Democrats.

Louis Jenkins| 12.9.08 @ 1:15PM

The GOP must return to basic policies-smaller government, a balanced budget ( reduced spending), strong national defense, and common sense in that BIG GOVCO cannot be all things to all people. An enlarged tent will lead to a diverse muddy watered down message. With McCain, who bragged that he often crossed the aisle, it was often hard to differentiate between him and the competition. Where was the contrast when casting a ballot, particularly with a moderate from the Big Tent pulling the lever?

If the GOP goes along with the "Freedom of Choice Act, which would nullify laws limiting abortion, including bans on partial birth abortion" does that make for a stronger more focused party? The discussion rages on abortion's and its moral ground, but partial birth abortion is absolute barbarity. Read up on it! Its nothing more than human butchery. And the GOP, to be a Big Tent party, is supposed to abide by its practice in the name of re-gaining political power? To be successful, to drive home a message, any political movement must keep the story line simple. It must adhere to strong convictions and principles, not a mish-mash of contradictory policies found under an overcrowded peice of canvas.

Gazinya| 12.9.08 @ 4:38PM

What Errors

Gazinya| 12.9.08 @ 4:48PM

I was wondering why the amnesty program was supported by so many polititans when so many others hated it. I have a theory. Maybe because we have aborted more that 50 million Americans since 1973, that is that many that are not contributing to SocSec. And when one takes away the children they would be having it seems that the gov was looking to fill the gap with illegals. They don't abort. Maybe we could link limiting abortions with producing Americans that will do the job 'they' say we won't do. If there is a demand we should be able to supply it from within. Wadayutink?

Tim| 12.9.08 @ 8:50PM

Oppossing the auto loans is the stupidest thing the GOP has done in my lifetime. This is not a case of pricipled free market conservatism. The same people talking about free markets now, were the biggest supporters of tax breaks for foreign automakers to build in their (mostly Southern) states. Now maybe I forget something from Economics class, but how is a special tax break for one company a free market solution? The GOP must stand for the common sense it usually has against Democratic excess. The Big 3 loan package is not one of them. Republicans do not want to see an America without any manufacturing! Keeping the Big 3 and their huge supply base and dependent sectors in business trumps the fear of government intervention. Look at what they are asking for! They are asking for a bridge loan to be paid back starting in 3-4 years not an unlimited, free handout as Wall Street has received. We'll see how well free markets work when your precious Toyota Corolla costs $60,000 because it has no competition left! Selling out to Japan and Korea and China is not conservative!
If another major war ever occurs (God forbid), China will be a likely adversary. Are we going to ask them not to call in our debt and then ask them to kindly build us some bombs, because we can't do it ourselves anymore? Mortgaging America's future over a little anger at an election lost (with UAW helping the Dems coincidentally) and the desire to keep a supposedly "pure" free market is certainly not the Conservative answer.

Alan Brooks| 12.9.08 @ 11:00PM

don't "protect" us from non-state actors and terrorists-- find them; kill them. search and destroy.
thats what Patton said: don't hold onto any territory, hold on to the enemy.

Related Articles

More Articles by G. Tracy Mehan, III

More Articles From Political Hay

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/12/09/steadying-the-ranks

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT