The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

This Bud's for You

Celebrating prohibition's end and being 21. Harpy-in-chief. All up in a Huff. Plus more.

(Page 3 of 3)

The U.S. was only able to sustain this level of effort because of a universal consensus that the Axis Powers constituted an immediate existential threat not only to the country but to Western Civilization (yes, I know the term sounds quaint today). It is difficult to conceive of any lesser scenario that would so focus our minds as to even consider allowing the government the degree of power it appropriated in World War II.

But every party must come to an end, and in the morning there is a hangover. Though it is little remembered today, there was a short but nasty recession after the War, as industries demobilized and factories had to convert back to consumer goods for which there had to be real customers and real demand. Fortunately, people were flush at the end of the war, and between the Depression and the War they had more than a decade of pent-up demand to satisfy. More to the point, as compared to the rest of the world, the U.S. was sitting on easy street, with an intact country, low casualties, and the only industrial base on the face of the planet not devastated by invasion or aerial bombardment. We soon became the suppliers of the world, a situation not likely to reoccur today.

To summarize, the situation in World War II was unique and not comparable to that of the United States today. Moreover, the world has changed significantly, and therefore using wartime methods to jump-start the economy simply would not work. This leaves aside the question of whether a "perpetual war economy" and the inducement of "wartime psychology" to address problems other than war are conducive to the existence of a free country. I leave that matter to Jonah Goldberg.
-- Stuart Koehl
Falls Church, Virginia

UPSIDE DOWN
Re: Steven Martinovich's Canadian Coup

America's attic is beginning to resemble America's cellar. Very odd goings-on.
-- David Govett
Davis, California

Page:   1 23

Letter to the Editor View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

David | 12.8.08 @ 8:22AM

"The Government needs to....."
"The Government should be more involved in..."
"The Government must regulate......"
The scarist words that we should be concerned with are "The Government has decided...."

frost| 12.8.08 @ 8:44AM

Ira nailed it, again. Karl Rove appears to be smarter now while doing Fox commentary than he was w/Dubya. Or, perhaps Bush is as inept and wrong-thinking as I guessed. My God, he's been an awful president!
Now, however, that said, I feel about as sad, but for different reasons: Now I feel simply "out-voted." The opportunists and "Something-for-Nothing" gang are succeeding the stupid... and, again, the total and absolute betrayal I feel from Bush's outgoing bunch (lowered a few taxes, appointed a few judges - - that's about it; sure can't attribute our not having been attacked to him, the TSA , CIA, FEMA, INS/ICE, the McClellans in the Pentagon or Condi's State Department) -- pitiful.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/12/08/this-buds-for-you
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT