The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Fumbling Around

Republican leadership: unlikely. Painting an Obama picture. An invidious comparison. Plus more.

(Page 4 of 4)

Ask yourself any one of the following questions:

1. Which party supports sanctuary cities?

2. Which party has dominated school boards (especially in urban areas) for decades?

3. Which party believes a fully-funded school program has never existed since the beginning of mankind?

4. Which party claims they don’t tax. Instead, they “invest” in our future?

5. Which party is constantly on the lookout for new “victims” requiring some form of state aid?

6. Which party pushes multiculturalism over American values?

So, Jay, answer any one of the above questions — it doesn’t matter which one — and you will have your answer.
Garry Greenwood
Gearhart, Oregon

Page: ‹ First   2 34

Letter to the Editor View all comments (12) |

OCPatriot | 12.4.08 @ 12:36PM

Fear is the key
In the L.A. Times, Neal Gabler has an article that analyzes exactly what "conservative" Republicans have been doing, tracing their strategy back to Senator McCarthy, not to Senator Goldwater, who in 1964 lost in one of the biggest landslides in American electoral history and wrested the party from its Eastern establishment wing.
According to Gabler, the myth tells how Nixon co-opted conservatism, talking like a conservative while governing like a moderate, disenchanting true believers. Ronald Reagan, next, embraced it wholeheartedly, becoming the patron saint of conservatism and making it the dominant ideology in the country, even though he didn't practice it in terms of fiscal responsibility or size of government. George W. Bush picked up Reagan's fallen standard and "conservatized" government even more thoroughly than Reagan had, cheering conservatives until his presidency came crashing down around him. That's how Gabler believes the mythology tells it.
Gabler's thesis is that the real connection is from Sen. Joe McCarthy, to Nixon to Bush and possibly now to Sarah Palin. McCarthy attacked alleged communists and the Democrats whom he accused of shielding them, as well as the centrist American establishment, Eastern intellectuals and the power class, many of whom were Republicans, including moderate ones. McCarthyism became a means to play on the anxieties of Americans, convincing them of danger and conspiracy even when they didn't exist, which he used to build power and support. George H.W. Bush used it to get himself elected, terrifying voters with Willie Horton (and denigrating Dukakis as a commander-in-chief). His son used fear of 9/11 and convincing voters that John Kerry was a coward and a liar and would hand the nation over to terrorists, tried and true McCarthy tactics used very aggressively, and W. then used fear and stealth in pushing through totalitarian unconstitutional measures. The thread continued through McCain and then Palin, probably through Rove (who also coached W.), and I quote from Gabler, "That's why John McCain kept describing Barack Obama as some sort of alien and why Palin, taking a page right out of the McCarthy playbook, kept pushing Obama's relationship with onetime radical William Ayers."
What Gabler believes is that, because of this tradition, the Republican Party will continue to move rightward. Fear and blame; rabble-rousing; the Rush Limbaughs and Sean Hannitys and Bill O'Reillys; and now Palin. This is the direction the Party will take. Probably because it cannot be believed as the party of small government or fiscal responsibility or moral integrity; all credibility lost in the harsh reality of events; at least not until people forget and these actualities become memories and fade. It is a dangerous approach because it incites people to do violent things, especially as times become more stringent.
It is, I believe a shame, because some of the original precepts of fiscal responsibility and keeping government out of peoples' lives and moral integrity are well worth preserving. The Republican Party which stood for those princples was a Grand Old Party. But, I hate to say it, those are all too easily trumped by fear-mongering and, I might add, difficult to achieve. I would nominate the Republican Party today as the Party of Fear, as opposed to the Party of Solutions. And, if that's the direction it's going in, yes, it's a shame.
The consistent thing about guys like Jeb Bush, in line with the old Republican philosophy, is to be against something, not for it; to be in a position to scare people, not to advocate good positive things. Putting people and ideas down is the tack they have taken; witness McCain's whole campaign; witness Sarah's natural proclivities. So Jeb Bush starts off by surfacing and proposing that the Republicans start a "shadow government" to watch, and criticize, and follow what Obama's Administration does closely. What bothers me about this, deeply, I might add, is the fact that it is not being supportive in any way. No one is saying, if we want to survive, we have to work together, guys. No, the implication is that "they" (Democrats) are the enemy. And in this terrible time, when the country is literally falling apart, and everybody is unsettled, these isolated Republicans are settling in to be critical. As if they aren't losing their savings, too; as if they are exempt; as if, should the country really fail, they wouldn't be affected. Quite a blind spot. isn't it. They aren't even pretending to help, to support, to work with their counterparts to make things better for everybody, themselves included. How antedeluvian, how "old school", how traditional, how like McCarthy and all of the Republican demogogues, to stand back and continue criticizing the Democrats who are working very hard, very earnestly, to fix what went wrong with this country. So Jeb Bush is nothing more than another toxic Republican, joining in the long line of negative right-wing naysayers and destroyers, no better than Limbaugh and Hannity and O'Reilly. Pretty disgusting, I'd say. Stand on the sidelines and criticize while the Titanic goes down; criticize everything the crew and captain does. Disgusting, guys, absolutely disgusting.
For more, see: www.ocpatriot-runningcomments.blogspot.com.

Paul| 12.4.08 @ 1:17PM

Chaplain Tomlinson: I appreciate your hearty defense of our President Bush, but your comparing him favorably vs. President Reagan is getting a bit too facile.

1. When Reagan raised the cap gains tax rate it was as a bargaining chip to get the marginal income tax rate down to 28%. I mentioned this to you you several months ago, you may recall.
2. No, Reagan did not disband the Dept of Education, but if you were in Mass. during the 1996 Kennedy - Romney senate race you'd have been amazed at the viciousness of the attacks Romney endured when he made the same proposal. And with a House under Democrat control Reagan would not have been successful in doing so. In any case Bush 43 saw the quixotic nature of this and abandoned it as well.
3. Reagan accelerated the emasculation of the Interstate Commerce Commission during his time in office; it was disbanded in 1994.
4. Reagan also put the Civil Aeronautics Board out of business in 1984.
5. Reagan dereugulated domestic oil prices in 1981.
6. Reagan put the FAA controllers union in its place - big time - in 1981.

Best Regards

frost| 12.4.08 @ 3:45PM

Going thru some notes in my computer from 4 1/2 years ago, back before General Portaeus' surge, when a series of McClellans were still goofing up a winable war -- shortly before I came to the reluctant conclusion that Dubya's gotta be tied with Jimmy Carter as the AllTimeWorst president ever; hell, his spending even exceeded LBJ, and that's saying a bunch. Anyway, from that file in May, '04, these observations (since compounded by other multiple goof-ups too numerous to mention, Mr. Tomlinson): Dubya's become a whore, no better than the worst of congress -- backed Kennedy's huge spending plan on education, the gigantic "farm bill" with Tom Daschle's amendments, signed the campaign finance law -- the 15+ Billion-dollar AIDS in Africa fiasco… among other things. Then, there were steel price supports. He also "folded" after opposition to ANWR was stated by the Greens, Democrats and stupid Republicans; didn't have the courage to push for more US oil. Worse? Bush inherited a horrible CIA and miserable intelligence; he finally replaced George Tenet, a horrible CIA boss, and presented him with the Medal of Freedom? This delusional president was heard to "express confidence" in the CIA -- then, was blocking an investigation of the intelligence failures? That's bad.
Further, he's agreed to those tax-rebate measures which include $$$s to "low income" people who haven't paid taxes. And he pushed again for an extension of unemployment benefits (Urban League speech 7/28/03); having an "audience" with Jesse Jackson when conservative blacks can't get a hearing or any backing. He failed to speak up on the U-of-Michigan affirmative action policy and other rulings by the Supremes, which included the states' rights position on sodomy.
The prescription drug pandering by Republicans has turned out to be another sad joke, and Dubya's been very quiet about that addition to creeping Socialized Medicine.
He was "in bed" with Mexico's Vicente Fox, and the border continues to be a sieve, and until he gets the INS working, if he ever does, and has the courage to shut down all illegal immigration, he's simply not doing his job! He never even spoke up on the subject of Drivers Licenses for Illegal aliens which, in so doing, is tantamount to giving it his blessing. Immigration "reform" it's called? And, oh, speaking of the "border" - pardon the departure - Dubya didn't back Miguel Estrada's judicial nomination sufficiently well - left him "hung-out-to-dry" - the Republican Senators didn't care enough to force an end to the Democrats' filibuster, which could have been done easily by simply working 'round-the-clock.. And, as if that weren't enough, finally (again), how 'bout that double standard with Israel? Sure, we can defend ourselves, but we ask the Israelis to reserve more patience than we would? But, wait-a-minute! "Defending ourselves" with a dopey color-threat system, searching Norwegian grandmothers (with a fear off offending Arabs through the legitimate profiling of potential terrorists) and the goofy incompetent, Norman Manetta as Transportation Secretary? His "covering" for the Saudi Arabians (spies supporting terrorists?) and calling 'em friends?.
And other things, like a major increase in the National Endowment for the Arts? Give me a break. Sorry George -- you ain't got my vote.
And, more recently (5/26/04) these additional points which add up to being a Disaster --
Cozying up to the UN and not pushing the Oil-For-Food corruption fiasco - a total; fraud with kickbacks, payoffs and "percentages." Then, the government's suit against the State of Oregon on the Assisted Suicide law (which had been approved by voters), which AttnyGen. John Ashcroft had railed against in earlier speeches. This suit was one of the very few ruled upon by the Ninth Circuit Court with which I agree; our government has no business trying to dictate what its individual states' citizens decide.
Okay, that was a partial critique from a number of years ago. He finally got things turned around in Iraq, 'way too late, and we're still fronting those abysmal costs -- he appointed a few judges, cut a few taxes, but, again, he's been totally inept, still tied with Carter for the dubious aforementioned distinction. God, he's been an awful president. And now, Obama?!? We'll be in Costa Rica in two weeks.

Alan Brooks| 12.4.08 @ 6:31PM

FDR, considered one of our greatest presidents, was a CONGENITAL LIAR. Even Truman thought so but Harry was too "nice" (whatever nice means) to say so very often. Truman was lucky FDR died so soon, if Truman had had to serve under him in peacetime it would have been unbearable for the honest Truman.

So being very dishonest doesn't always hurt an image in the history books. Nixon was rehabilitated. Carter, who was/is smarmy to the point of being very dishonest is loved like, um, Mandela...

frost| 12.4.08 @ 7:02PM

A gullible fool, Jimmy Carter's only meaningful achievement was helping Ronald Reagan get elected. For this and only this may we be grateful to him. Undoubtedly, the most dishonest politician I’ve ever read of is Jimmy Carter, period... said Bob Novak (one of the very few columnists I trust)
And, I can't help but wonder why do we even worry about Obama? If a guy like Jimmy Carter didn't ruin this country, no one can.
Remembering that it was H. L. Mencken who observed that ex-presidents should be hung in the interests of public sanitation, this additional quotation, if you can take one more: "Sometimes, when I look at all my children, I say to myself, 'Lillian, you should have stayed a virgin.'" - Lillian Carter (mother of -)....

C Marshall| 12.4.08 @ 9:10PM

Gee, OCPatriot, who knew Neal Gabler was such a deep thinker. I always thought he was a hack movie critic. It's mythology alright, liberal mythology.

ruth| 12.5.08 @ 1:43AM

OCPatriot, what a knee slapper!!! Your Obamassiah hasn't even been inaugurated and already you are haranguing us about our negativity. This after 8 years of your side screeching BUSHITLER!! Shut Up!

ruth| 12.5.08 @ 1:59AM

Mr. Tomlinson, I understand your defense of President Bush, but I do believe that it is a leader's primary duty to communicate with the people. I don't know why the president withdrew from us, but what good did it do him or the country to allow the hostile left/mainstream media define him and his policies? I think he bears a good deal of responsibility for our party's turmoil, and I think the saddest part is that it was so unnecessary. He is a good man who, I believe, is being unfairly maligned. We all are the poorer for his unwise decision to not use the bully pulpit more.

Pingback| 7.1.09 @ 1:37PM

Obama's honeymoon is over - now it's his recession - US Message Board - Political Di links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…entirely on Booooosh. But CON$ pretend to be rational blaming the 1982 Reagan Recession, the worst recession since the Great Depression, on Carter two full years into Reagan's first term. The American Spectator : Fumbling Around The American Spectator SIDE BY SIDE WITH THE GIPPER
Philip Klein: Reagan's first two years in office were an expansion of the Carter depression __________________ Accuse your opponents…

Pingback| 7.9.09 @ 10:38PM

Great Yard Sign Explaining President Obama's Change - Page 3 - US Message Board - Po links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…him? The last campaign was 22 months long! But CON$ were blaming the 1982 Reagan Recession, the worst recession since the Great Depression, on Carter two full years into Reagan's first term. The American Spectator : Fumbling Around The American Spectator SIDE BY SIDE WITH THE GIPPER
Philip Klein: Reagan's first two years in office were an expansion of the Carter depression __________________ Accuse your opponents…

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/12/04/fumbling-around

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT