By George Neumayr on 12.3.08 @ 6:09AM
Contrary to the bipartisan hype, she will get into plenty of
mischief at State.
The bipartisan cooing over Barack Obama's selection of Hillary
Clinton as his Secretary of State is a little hard to take. She
hasn't become more conservative; Republicans have become more
complacent -- and PC.
There was Condoleezza Rice on Monday extolling Hillary Clinton's
"deep love" for America's "values." Which ones?
Hillary Clinton has long made it clear that she considers those
values passé, preferring the Brave New World ideology of the
internationalist elite to the philosophy of America's founding.
If anything, the State Department gives her a powerful perch to
advance UN-style propaganda at the expense of American values.
The striped-pants Strobe Talbotts she will select to work there
find those values tiresome.
Yes, desperately needing to contrast herself with Obama, she
faked up some populist concerns during the campaign, but the
Hillary Clinton of the not-so-distant past oozed contempt for
Americans who worried about the erosion of American traditions
and the country's sovereignty under corrupting internationalist
influence.
The Clinton administration's State Department might as well have
been an annex of the UN. For example, Hillary's friend Timothy
Wirth -- with what Newsweek described as his "silver
bowl of condoms" in the foyer of his State Department office --
endeavored to reassure the international community that America
would one day join the enlightened nations of the world and
endorse all of the UN's population control plans. The Clinton
State Department was constantly signaling to "the world" its
embarrassment at America's values.
Hillary Clinton's State Department is more likely to let the
world change America than America change the world. Her tendency
has always been to support internationalizing practices that she
feels the American people are too retrograde to accept on their
own.
In the 1990s, she campaigned for an international right to
abortion, endorsed collectivist "global" solutions to this or
that "crisis" (now it is "climate change"), and offered more than
a few nods to creeping models of quasi-world government proposed
by UN ideologues.
America, among her other statements, had a great deal to learn
from France's child-care programs. It takes a global village in
her mind to change not just the family but America itself.
NOW and NARAL should just open up offices at the State Department
once she arrives. Bill Clinton's boon companions across the globe
are probably the least of America's worries; it is Hillary's
ideological ones at the UN, working in tandem with domestic
liberals, who will do the most damage on the American taxpayers'
dime.
Five years after the UN's infamous Cairo Conference, Hillary
popped up at the Hague to praise the great advances made since
it: "Now as you in this great auditorium know better than I,
developing that historic consensus was not an easy task. Yet
every nation and every NGO agreed to work to implement the common
goals laid in the Cairo Program of Action: that by the year 2015
all governments will make access to reproductive health care and
planning, family planning services, a basic right…"
As Secretary of State, she will have plenty of time to work on
the 2015 goal. Neglected in all the hoopla is that Obama has just
carefully paid off an enormous political debt, giving the
abortion lobby that worked hard to elect him an ideal conduit for
its ambitions.
That Hillary Clinton is now seen as "non-ideological" represents
the triumph of the dominant media's left-wing brainwashing over
American political culture. She is "non-ideological" and Bush is
"radical"? It is the other way around.
If the start of Barack Obama's administration looks dismayingly
to the media like Bush's third term, that's because Bush was
never as conservative as the media claimed. No matter how PC the
Bush administration strove to appear -- Condoleezza Rice
presiding over domestic partnership ceremonies at the State
Department, etc. -- the media was determined to hammer it as
"radical," thereby pushing the whole political culture so far
leftward that a Hillary Clinton could wake up one day a
"centrist" and venerable custodian of American values.
topics:
Hillary Clinton, State Department