What now for the Republican-Conservative conventicle?
(Page 6 of 8)
Philip Klein is a reporter forThe American Spectator.
Jeffrey Lord
In 1992, as the Bush-Clinton race careened to an end, a
newspaper story reported that Bush aides were seen “trudging” on
and off Air Force One. Physical exhaustion, it was clear, had
overtaken the Bush 41 team. Shortly thereafter, they lost.
Intellectual exhaustion has overtaken the Republican Party of
2008. But not, it should be said, the conservative movement. From
the world of talk radio to its magazines, think tanks, and
grassroots activists, the conservative universe is both
intellectually sharp and forward-looking. It cannot escape notice
(other than in the usual mainstream media quarters) that
President-elect Obama felt compelled to campaign as a would-be
tax-cutter who was tough as nails when it came to the idea of
deploying American military might in Afghanistan or, if need be, to
invade Pakistan.
This is nothing if not a testament to the continued power of
Reagan conservatism, even if Obama’s devotion to tax-cutting and
military strength is more political tactic than principle.
The real task ahead for conservatives is not to reinvigorate
conservatism but for conservatism to breathe new life into the GOP
itself as a party of ideas that deals imaginatively with the
real-life concerns of Americans.
As always, the Democrats, this time led by Obama, Speaker Nancy
Pelosi, and Senator Harry Reid, will provide plenty of ammunition.
Despite the echoes of Reaganesque campaign language, the Obama
White House and congressional Democrats will soon get themselves
entangled in the political consequences of bad economic and energy
policy at home while being dangerous appeasers abroad. More
ominously for Obama, it is no accident that two of the last three
Democratic presidents who openly governed from the left--LBJ and
Jimmy Carter--found themselves under assault from erstwhile allies
for not being left enough. (By pretending to centrism after the
1994 loss of Congress, Clinton avoided the fate.) Each time a split
opened the way for new chapters in the resurgence of the modern,
conservative GOP.
Personnel is policy when it comes to staffing administrations.
The same holds true when a party is out of power. Positions such as
chairman of the Republican National Committee demand the attention
of someone who has both a creative understanding of the power of
conservative ideas as well as the capability to implement a sharp,
strategically and tactically sound, crystal-clear opposition agenda
to the White House. The glaring weakness of the McCain campaign was
McCain's feckless insistence on “reaching across the aisle” as
opposed to being a Reagan-style leader of the conservative
movement. Reagan wanted to win, McCain wanted to get along.
Presumed to get mainstream media support and votes, the McCain
approach got none.
It was a tell tale sign of intellectual exhaustion. It is not a
mistake Republicans should make again.
Can you say “Chairman Newt”?
Jeffrey Lordis a former
Reagan White House political director and author. He writes
fromPennsylvania.
Grover G. Norquist
The Democrats have captured the White House, the House of
Representatives, and the Senate. Now what?
links of london sale| 9.10.09 @ 10:31PM
Thanks for your information, i have read it, very good!
links of london sale| 9.10.09 @ 10:40PM
Thanks for your information, i have read it, very good!
guo| 7.1.10 @ 5:05AM
www.wmvconverterformac.com