By George Neumayr on 11.21.08 @ 6:09AM
Recruiting Clinton-era leftists isn't "governing from the
middle."
Like Barack Obama, Bill Clinton ran on the mantra of "change,"
but many of his plans for it ran aground not long into his
presidency. Now Obama seeks to enact the radical changes Clinton
couldn't.
His recruitment of Clinton-era leftists isn't "governing from the
middle," but an attempt to implement the thwarted radicalism of
Clinton's first two years in office. It suits the ideological
purposes of the media to push "the middle" gradually leftward and
cast the return of experienced Clinton-era hands as a measure of
Obama's caution and moderation.
But this is circumspection at the service of radicalism. Obama is
not choosing experience over radical change, but choosing
experience for the sake of it. What the Daschles and Holders
couldn't accomplish in the 1990s they will try again now. The
passage of time hasn't made their positions any less radical.
A sign of the ease with which Obama practices stealth radicalism
is that he can even take positions to the left of those early
Clinton-era positions and still retain the media's halo of
moderation.
Notice that at change.gov
legislation Clinton passed -- legislation that was considered
outrageous at the time -- is deemed insufficiently liberal in
Obama's eyes. Take Clinton's job-killing Family and Medical Leave
Act. It is just not good enough for Obama: "The FMLA covers only
certain people who work for employers with 50 or more employees.
Barack Obama and Joe Biden will expand the FMLA to cover
businesses with 25 or more employees, and to cover more purposes
including allowing: leave for workers who provide elder care; 24
hours of leave each year for parents to participate in their
children's academic activities at school; leave for workers who
care for individuals who reside in their home for 6 months or
more; and leave for employees to address domestic violence and
sexual assault."
Expansion of past liberal legislation, not modification of it, is
the theme of the web page for the most part, whether it's
Clinton's minimum-wage hikes (which Obama thinks should be turned
into a "living wage") or "hate crimes" legislation: "Obama and
Biden will strengthen federal hate crimes legislation, expand
hate crimes protection by passing the Matthew Shepard Act, and
reinvigorate enforcement at the Department of Justice's Criminal
Section."
That an incoming president has a special section devoted to the
"LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender] Community" isn't
exactly a sign of governing from the middle either. Obama hints
at his support for gay marriage on the page by including the word
"full" in front of same-sex civil unions: he favors not just
civil unions but "full civil unions." Or, as his wife put it
during the campaign, "robust" civil unions. Whenever Obama
arrives at that nebulous destination point to which he referred
in his victory speech, euphemisms like "full civil unions" will
apparently no longer be necessary.
The Clinton-era retreads Obama is selecting wanted these purer
liberal positions in the first place and will have another crack
at advancing them. They are eager to sweep away the very
compromises, such as the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in the
military and Defense of Marriage Act, that political resistance
forced them to craft reluctantly. This prior experience, and the
bogus media-decreed establishment respectability that comes with
it, will make their task all the easier. An Eric Holder or Tom
Daschle are far more effective conduits for radicalism than any
fresh face championed by Daily Kos.
Obama likes to present his positions in the form of triangulation
-- he is just offering a reasonable third way. But he invariably
places the third position to the left of the first liberal one,
or at best restates it (as in the case of tax hikes, in which he
used tax rates under Clinton to argue for the moderation of his
plan; he wasn't raising taxes, he said, but "restoring" previous
tax rates).
His decision to clear the bench of old Clinton hands in
Washington fits this game plan perfectly. Still ringing in their
ears is the Fleetwood Mac-performed inaugural them of
"yesterday's gone." While they couldn't accomplish that in two
years or two terms, they now have a chance to get "there" with
Obama.