Michigan’s state GOP chairman is first to announce for RNC chairman — an iffy proposition for someone with a losing record.
ON THE PHONE, Saul Anuzis doesn’t stutter. That’s fitting for the former telecom executive and current Michigan state GOP chairman who’s running for Republican National Committee Chairman. After all, he’s been the first to actually announce his intention to run.
Anuzis is also the first to announce his candidacy using web platforms — speaking to Republicans via YouTube, changing his status message on the social networking site Facebook, and sending a message via Twitter. [UPDATE: I neglected to mention his website, here.] The significance of such a move cannot be underestimated: At a time when Republicans are regrouping and looking for a path forward, there is a great deal of consensus that whatever the national party does, it has to make better use of the web. That doesn’t mean putting up a nice website. It means creating a vast online social network of activists, who can then use web tools to organize meetings, raise money, or even announce their own candidacies.
When asked how he’s used the Internet to get candidates elected, he cites the use of Facebook to organize rallies, that he has blogged almost daily during his time as chairman, and he has an email address list of over 100,000 emails. When pushed, he doesn’t offer any names of candidates who benefitted from the effort. On the other hand, most other party chairs don’t come near even this kind of engagement with the Internet.
Anuzis knows that the technology gap isn’t the only area where the RNC needs reform. “I think we need to be more inclusive of the chairmen from each state party. Those members serve on the national committee but most of the time it works like a politburo. It’s not a working meeting.” That’s what happens when the party has a president in office. Decisions are made top down, rather than from the ground up. Anuzis wants to change that.
He also wants to implement a “40 under 40” plan. Recruiting and grooming candidates for office helps renew the image of the party, he says, so it’s a priority to “get them the exposure that allows them to compete.”
One area in which Republicans are likely to face Democratic challenges are on issues of transparency. As Democratic special interests begin to cash in on favors earned during campaign ‘08, Anuzis sees the best strategy in ‘10 and ‘12 as running against the typical Washington tendency toward hypocrisy. “We can’t be duplicitous or hypocritical. That sort of thing has hurt us.”
IT’S A HARD SELL. Just what can a state GOP chairman do in increasingly blue Michigan? This year alone saw two Republican districts go blue, one of which (the 7th) had been red for over ten years. Republican gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos lost by 14 points to incumbent governor Jennifer Granholm. The Michigan state Senate has the lowest number of Republicans in years. Yet Granholm and Democratic incumbent Senator Stabenow were both vulnerable at a time when Michigan was in a single-state depression. In other words, in the time that Anuzis has been state party chair, there have been no actual major electoral accomplishments, and perhaps even blown opportunities.
Two thousand eight can be explained by two words: “Barack Obama.” And despite being a firmly Democratic year, Michigan did in fact retain most of its Republican House members in Congress. And Democratic billionaire Jon Stryker gave enough money to help the Democrats outspend Republicans. But maintaining the status quo is hardly a recommendation for Anuzis, and explains why there are five candidates running to replace him who have campaign statements pinning the blame solidly on Saul.
Dan Tollis is running for Michigan state chair and announced his candidacy with a direct attack on Anuzis, his executive director, and the Michigan GOP’s preferred vendor:
“With Anuzis, Timmer, and Sterling at the helm, we’ve been creamed at the top of the ticket, as well as losing the majority in the Michigan House of Representatives, two Congressmen, The Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, Republican majorities on several County Board of Commissioners, and several seats on the statewide education boards.… Corruption and infighting has withered the Michigan Republican Party into an ineffective organization, and because of this, I am announcing my candidacy for Michigan Republican Party Chairman.”
Jerry Zandstra, who had previously attempted to run for Senate but couldn’t get on the ballot, is also running for chairman:
“I am not sure what RNC Members would find attractive about the results of the Michigan Republican Party over the last 4 years.… It is easy for us to make comments about Gov. Granholm being in Washington elbowing for a seat in Barrack Obama’s cabinet while her state is in an economic meltdown. But isn’t our Chairman doing something similar?”
Zandstra’s grievances aren’t purely in terms of electoral success. While he’s upset that the county map has gotten progressively bluer since 2002, he sees Anuzis as being more interested in “getting involved in party fights rather than trying to win elections.” One such party fight was Zandstra’s own Senate race, where every signature on his petition to run was challenged not by a Democrat, but by an attorney who was affiliated with the Republican Party. Zandstra suspected state party interference, and felt that Anuzis favored Mike Bouchard, one of the two other competitors for the Republican nomination. Anuzis has denied the allegation about favoring Bouchard, and has stated he knows nothing about the signature challenges. Bouchard got the nomination, but lost in the general.
Anuzis cites this and other controversies as pure mud drummed up to prevent his success. “There is a very small group of people that has not been on my side. I consistently get unanimous support from 12 out of 15 congressional districts. On the other three I have the leadership that may have a problem with me because they’re part of a different crowd.”
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?